I've got a page where messages and associated elements (responses, forwards, etc) all share a class based on the database id of the parent.
For example
<pre>
<div id="recentMessages">
<div id="a3" class="message a3">this is a message</div>
<div id="a5" class="message a5">this is another message</div>
</div>
<div id="recentComments">
<div id="a3" class="comment a3">this is a comment</div>
<div id="a5" class="comment a5">this is another comment</div>
</div>
<div id="recentActions">
<div id="a3" class="action a3">tim posted a new message</div>
<div id="a4" class="action a4">sara forwarded a message to john</div>
</div>
</pre>
at times I need to remove all elements with the same id, so I originally had
jQuery('div#'+id).remove();
but that would sometimes not remove all the ids because ids are supposed to be unique.
So I added the id as a class. now I use
jQuery('div.'+id).remove();
but this seems to be about 80% effective, and sometimes the divs aren't being removed.
I'm not sure if the issue is because the div has more than one class, but I need the classes because that is how I refer to the elements when somebody clicks.
For instance,
jQuery('div.message').click(function(){
get the id, send it to the server and get the message
});
is there something wrong I'm doing here? or is there a better way to do this?
Looks like this was an issue where a function was being called using a variable which had already been defined. I didn't realize this would cause a problem.
For instance:
jQuery('div','div#recentActions').click(function(){
var removeId=jQuery(this).attr('id').replace('','a');
removeDiv(removeId);
});
function removeDiv(removeId){
jQuery('div#a'+removeId).remove();
}
I can't say for sure this was the issue, but changing the function to:
function removeDiv(cancelId){
jQuery('div#a'+canceld).remove();
}
seems to be working.
Related
I have a widget components with simple markup inheritance like so
AbstractWidget
<wicket:panel>
<wicket:child />
<div wicket:enclosure="editButton" class="widget-edit-wrapper">
<button wicket:id="editButton" type="button" class="widget-edit">
<span class="glyphicon glyphicon-cog"></span>
</button>
<div style="display:none;">
<div wicket:id="editPanel" class="widget-settings"></div>
</div>
</div>
</wicket:panel>
LabelWidget
<wicket:extend>
<div wicket:id="container" class="label-widget flex-container">
<div wicket:id="label"></div>
</div>
</wicket:extend>
Now imagine the label content is taken from a loadable detachable model and loading the model throws an Exception.
I need to show some feedback to the user on this 'broken' widget component. Is there a way to replace the whole child's content when loading its model throws an Exception?
Note that LabelWidget is just one from many AbstractWidget childs so I need to solve this in the AbstractWidget and I also need to preserve all elements from the AbstractWidget component.
You can accomplish this by using a smarter model - a model that delegates to the original one and try/catches if it throws an exception. In case of an exception you will need to return an "empty" model object, where "empty" would mean different things for your different use cases.
Your smart model could implement IComponentAssignedModel so that it knows the Component it is used in. This way in the catch clause you can do component.error("..."). In AbstractWidget you should add a FeedbackPanel that will render the error message. The specialization widget, like LabelWidget, will render as "empty" (whatever this means for it) by using the fallback model.
I don't know if the title is all apt...... but here is my situation....i have a class called dropper and another class drop_list...these two are sub-classes of the class drop_head, the drop_list has to drop down whenever the dropper is clicked...
<div class="drop_head">
<div class="dropper"> Content-1</divr>
<div class="drop_list"> List-1</div>
</div>
<div class="drop_head">
<div class="dropper"> Content-2</divr>
<div class="drop_list"> List-2</div>
</div>
when content-1 is clicked list-1 has to toggle and when content-2 is clicked list-2 has to drop down... how do i achieve this using single jquery..?? thanks in advance......
If i understand you correctly this should be pretty simple:
$('.drop_head').each(function(i,e){
$('.dropper', e).click(function(){
$('.drop_list', e).slideToggle();
});
});
by using the .drop_head as the context for the list and clickable element you dont need to use id's. additionally if you omit a list or dropper by accident it will only screw up that one "widget" and wont effect the others, which wouldnt be the case with closest.
you have two way (that I see =))
-just give two different ID names to your couples drop-list/dopper
<div class="dropper" id="id_1"> Content-1</divr>
<div class="drop_list" id="id_1"> List-1</div>
<div class="dropper" id="id_2"> Content-2</divr>
<div class="drop_list" id="id_2"> List-2</div>
and then say something like:
$(".dropper #id_1").click(function(){$("#id_1").slideToggle("slow")})
or shorter:
$(".dropper").click(function(){$(this).closest('drop_list').slideToggle()})
Hope it helps
Luca
Using jQuery, I've got a selector -- call it $('#someDiv1') -- that I'd like to get the inner HTML for, but also the header of the tag as well. So given this HTML structure..
<div id="parentDiv">
<div id="someDiv1">
<div id="innerDiv1_1"></div>
<div id="innerDiv1_2"></div>
</div>
<div id="someDiv2">
<div id="innerDiv2_1"></div>
<div id="innerDiv2_2"></div>
</div>
</div>
If I've got the selector $('#someDiv1') in a variable -- call it $someDiv1 -- I'd like to be able to use that variable to get a string that is:
"<div id='someDiv1'>
<div id='innerDiv1_1'></div>
<div id='innerDiv1_2'></div>
</div>"
I thought about just saying $someDiv1.parent().html(), but that would give me the div's sibling(s) as well (someDiv2, etc..). Any ideas? Thanks.
You also try
$('#parentDiv').clone().find("> :not(#someDiv1)").remove().end().html();
You can try something like this:
$('<div></div>').append($('#someDiv1').clone()).html()
I've got a list of objects in an MVC view, each with a set of submit buttons - Move up, Move down and Remove.
Using the answer from this question, I can get the button clicked - but I need to know which item it would be operating on.
The problem comes from the fact the input's value attribute is passed back, I need more information than that - i.e. an id.
Below is a snippet of the contents of a for loop, rendering each item.
<ul>
<li><input type="submit" name="SubmitButton" value="Move-Up" class="linked-content-position-modifier" /></li>
<li><input type="submit" name="SubmitButton" value="Move-Down" class="linked-content-position-modifier" /></li>
<li><input type="submit" name="SubmitButton" value="Remove" class="linked-content-modifier" /></li>
<li><%= Model.Contents[i] %></li>
</ul>
When the form is posted back, I can see that the SubmitButton has a value of either Move-Up, Move-Down or Remove - but no idea which item in the array it's referring too.
Without changing the value to something really ugly, how would I tell which item it's referring to?
Just a quick idea, but maybe you could try adding hiddenfield to each row and see which one gets submitted?
Why are you using a button?
Could a link work instead?
Move Up
I use similar code to update items in a table, but I do it with javascript and update the table accordingly...
<script type="text/javascript">
$('img.action').click(function(){
var itemId = this.attr('id'); // Do some parsing of the id here, i use a format of bi-##
$.ajax({ uri: 'controller/MoveUp/' + itemId });
});
</script>
I have this html:
<div id="top">
<div id="potato"></div>
</div>
<div id="bottom">
<div id="potato"></div>
</div>
I am trying to use JQuery to access the bottom potato div, and none of the following work.
$('#top #potato').html('Russet');
$('#bottom #potato').html('Red');
$('#top > #potato').html('Russet');
$('#bottom > #potato').html('Red');
$('#potato').html('Idaho');
All of these just modify the top div and not the bottom one. How do I modify the bottom div?
All elements must have unique IDs, in this case you may use the class attribute, so that you have
<div class="potato" />
Which you may access like this:
$('#bottom > .potato').html('Idaho');
I just ran into this problem. Although it's true you shouldn't have two items with the same ID, it happens.
To get the div you want, this is what works for me:
$('#bottom').find('#potato');
For one thing you can not have an element that has the same id as another. Id is unique, but class names can be used as many times as you want
<div id="top">
<div id="potato1"></div>
</div>
<div id="bottom">
<div id="potato2"></div>
</div>
jquery as so:
$(function{
$("#potato2").html('Idaho'); //if you're going to name it with an id,
// that's all the selector you need
});
What you posted and said doesn't work seems to work to me.
$('#top #potato').addClass('Russet');
$('#bottom #potato').addClass('Red');
https://jsfiddle.net/wzezr706/
no need to put classes on everything, but you should have unique id's for everything. That aside, try this:
$("#bottom + div").html('Idaho');
Try this:
$("#bottom #potato").html('Idaho');
Or
$("#bottom #potato:last").html('Idaho');
your HTML is not valid, since you have non-unique ids