I'm creating an extbase extension to handle very simple product orders.
The model is:
Order --1:n--> OrderItem --1:1--> Product
To order a selection of products, the customer goes to checkout page and uses a Fluid based Order form. All selected products are available in the fluid template as {products}.
The OrderController->createAction processes new Orders by creating OrderItems from the given Products.
Writing the code I'd like to have would look like this:
class OrderController
{
public function create(Order $order, array $products)
{
foreach ($products as $product) {
$orderItem = new OrderItem()
->setProduct($product)
->setPrice($product->getPrice());
$order->addOrderItem($orderItem);
}
$this->orderRepository->add($order);
}
}
How to assign products to a Fluid form fields, in order to receive them as ControllerAction array argument?
How to trigger extbase to automagically provide an array of product objects to the ControllerAction?
I wonder if it is even possible to simplify the Controller createAction like shown below and assemble objects elsewhere:
public function create(Order $order) {
$this->orderRepository->add($order);
}
My suggestion for the fluid template would be:
// basic form with the order as main object
<f:form action="create" object="{order}">
// each order item with a product, using index to have no array with an empty index (Extbase does not like that)
<f:for each="{products}" key="index" as="product">
// Here you can set the product
<f:form.hidden prpoerty="orderItems.{index}.product" value="{product} />
</f:for>
</f:form>
This should be enough to use your single-line create action.
You can change the field type from select to whatever you want, but the __identity is mandatory to say Extbase which record it has to link.
When you want the orderItems to be new created, you need to remove the __identity field.
Related
I am using the Megamenu third-party module in Magento 2 and I have customized this module due to some custom requirements.
I need to count product same as display in the admin category section for the anchored category and using the below code
$category->getProductCollection()->count()
this code is returning 0 products while this category is anchored and its subcategory has some product so it should count it subcategories product same as display in the admin section.
Please advise what will the code to get the products.
Thanks,
Please make sure you have successfully reindexed after setting the anchor via php bin/magento indexer/reindex.
Then try following code:
Include product collection factory to your construct
public function __construct(
// ...
\Magento\Catalog\Model\ResourceModel\Product\Collection $productCollection,
// ...
) {
// ...
$this->productCollection = $productCollection;
// ...
}
And count the product collection filtered by your category.
$products = $this->productCollection->create();
$products->addCategoryFilter($category);
$products->count();
I have a postgres table in which I have some "defaulted" fields like date_created which automatically receives a current_timestamp as default.
or the ID field which gets it's value from a sequence defined in the database.
What would be (if possible) the syntax to tell the ORM module to not include these two fields when generating an INSERT statement ?
You can use a function as 2nd parameter to remove the fields:
$this->copyfrom('POST',function($val) {
unset($val['ID']);
unset($val['date_created']);
return $val
});
or to only copy allowed fields from the POST array:
$this->copyfrom('POST',function($val) {
return array_intersect_key($val, array_flip(array('name','age')));
});
Assuming you are using an HTML form to add new records into the tables, follow the steps below;
In the form, omit these 'defaulted' fields, i.e. add only the fields that you want to submit
Create a model with a function similar to below
public function add() {
$this->copyFrom ( 'POST' );
$this->save ();
}
Create a route that links the form to this function
I need to retrieve only part of a document and call it via a helper so that I can render a subtemplate multiple times as the part I require to pull from the db is an array of object itself. I have the following as the fields. What I need to do with my helper is only retrieve the ordersDispatch array of one particular document which would be uniquely called by the tripNumber field.
I have tried several things but nothing has come close to only having an array of the objects in the orderDisptach field be returned in a fashion that it can be used by the helper to render my subtemplate for each object in the array.
{
tripNumber: companyRecord.lastTripNum + 1,
custID: $('input:hidden[name=orderCustomerId]').val(),
custContact: $('input:text[name=customerContact]').val(),
custEmail: $('input:text[name=customerEmail]').val(),
trailerSealNum: $('input:text[name=trailerSealNum]').val(),
orderBroker: $('input:text[name=orderBroker]').val(),
orderEquipment: $('input:text[name=orderEquipment]').val(),
orderLoadNum: $('input:text[name=orderLoadNum]').val(),
orderPlacedDate: $('input:text[name=orderPlacedDate]').val(),
orderPrivateNotes: $('textarea[name=orderPrivateNotes]').val(),
orderPublicNotes: $('textarea[name=orderPublicNotes]').val(),
orderCurrency: $("input[name=orderCurrency]:checked").val(),
orderCharges: $('input:text[name=orderCharges]').val(),
orderFUELCheck: $('input:checkbox[name=orderFUELCheck]').is(':checked'),
orderFUELPerc: $('input:text[name=orderFUELPerc]').val(),
orderFUELTotal: $('input:text[name=orderFUELTotal]').val(),
orderGSTCheck: $('input:checkbox[name=orderGSTCheck]').is(':checked'),
orderGSTPerc: $('input:text[name=orderGSTPerc]').val(),
orderGSTTotal: $('input:text[name=orderGSTTotal]').val(),
orderPSTCheck: $('input:checkbox[name=orderPSTCheck]').is(':checked'),
orderPSTPerc: $('input:text[name=orderPSTPerc]').val(),
orderPSTTotal: $('input:text[name=orderPSTTotal]').val(),
orderTAXCheck: $('input:checkbox[name=orderTAXCheck]').is(':checked'),
orderTAXPerc: $('input:text[name=orderTAXPerc]').val(),
orderTAXTotal: $('input:text[name=orderTAXTotal]').val(),
orderTotalCharges: $('input:text[name=orderTotalCharges]').val(),
ordeBlockInvoicing: $('input:checkbox[name=ordeBlockInvoicing]').is(':checked'),
orderExtraCharges: orderExtraCharges,
orderPickups: puLocations,
orderDeliveries: delLocations,
orderDispatch: dispatchLocations,
createdDate: new Date(),
createdUser: currentUser.username
Any help in building a helper that will accomplish this would be greatly appreciated as I am new to meteor and mongo.
The following helper should give you what you need:
Template.oneTrip.helpers({
orderDispatch: function(tn){
return Trips.findOne({ tripNumber: tn }).orderDispatch;
}
});
Trips.findOne({ tripNumber: tn }) gets you an individual document and .orderDispatch returns the value of the orderDispatch key which in your case will be an array.
html:
<template name="oneTrip">
{{#each orderDispatch this._id}} <!-- assuming you've already set the data context to an individual order -->
{{this}} <!-- now the data context is an element of the orderDispatch array -->
{{/each}}
</template>
I'm trying to create a laravel form that have an input select generating from array of strings coming from controller.
How can I set values of options manually?
In controller :
public function create()
{
$eventTypes = EventType::all()->lists('title');
return View::make('events.create')->with(compact('eventTypes'));
}
In view (blade) :
{{ Form::label('eventType', 'Type') }}
{{ Form::select('eventType', $eventTypes, null, array('class'=> 'form-control')) }}
And select created as :
<select class="form-control" id="eventType" name="eventType">
<option value="0">Sport Competition</option>
<option value="1">Movie</option>
<option value="2">Concert</option>
</select>
I just want to set values manually.
The value in the options is just the key of the array. The second parameter to the lists() method will let you choose a field to use as the key:
// use the 'id' field values for the array keys
$eventTypes = EventType::lists('title', 'id');
If you want to do something more custom than that, you'll need to manually build your array with the key/value pairs you want.
Edit
As mentioned by #lukasgeiter in the comments, there is no need to call all() first.
EventType::all()->lists() will first generate a Collection of all the EventType objects. It will then call lists() on the Collection object, meaning it will loop through that Collection to build an array with your requested fields.
EventType::lists() will call lists() on the query builder object, which will just select the two requested fields and return those as the array. It will not build any EventType objects (unless you select a field built by a Model accessor).
First of I am new to ORMLite. I would like my model class to have a field which is a list of strings, that would eventually hold a list of tags for my model object.
Which ORMLite annotations should I use?
Firstly I don't want to have a table of all tags, and then use the #ForeignCollectionField.
Also I thought of using the #DatabaseField(dataType=DataType.SERIALIZABLE) annotation, but it turns out that List<String> doesn't implement the Serializable interface.
What are your suggestions?
First of all, List doesn't implement Serializable but ArrayList certainly does as well as most of the common collection implementations. But storing a huge list is probably not the best of doing this from a pure object model standpoint.
So why don't you want to have a table of all tags? That's the best way from a pure model standpoint. It will require a 2nd query if you need them every time. That's the way hibernate would store a list or array of tags.
After reading your comment #creen, I still think you do want a table of tags. Your model class would then have:
#ForeignCollectionField
Collection<Tag> tags;
The tags table would not have a single tag named "red" with multiple model classes referring to it but multiple "red" entries. It would look like:
model_id name
1 "red"
1 "blue"
2 "red"
3 "blue"
3 "black"
Whenever you are removing the model object, you would first do a tags.clear(); which would remove all of the tags associated with that model from the tags table. You would not have to do any extra cleanup or anything.
No need to go for #ForeignCollectionField for simple String Array
Change your code
#DatabaseField(dataType=DataType.SERIALIZABLE)
List<String> users;
to
#DatabaseField(dataType = DataType.SERIALIZABLE)
String[] users;
Database doesn't want to store dynamically grow able arrays. That is the reason it allows only static array like string[] and not List.
I added two properties... one that gets written to the database as a csv string and the other that translates this:
[Ignore]
public List<string> Roles
{
get
{
return new List<string>(RolesCsv.Split(new char[] { ',' }));
}
set
{
RolesCsv = string.Join(",", value);
}
}
public string RolesCsv { get; set; }