I'm trying to retrieve an XML stream from a URL. For most URLs my code below works fine. But, I have a couple URLs that timeout. The URLs in question do work from Internet Explorer.
$webclient=New-Object "System.Net.WebClient"
[xml]$data=$webclient.DownloadString($url)
So, I went searching for a way to increase the timeout period. From what I've read, I believe I cannot do this using System.Net.WebClient. I think I need to use System.Net.WebRequest instead, but I cannot get it to work. The code I've been working on is below:
$myHttpWebRequest = [system.net.WebRequest]::Create($url)
$myHttpWebRequest.Timeout = 600000
$myHttpWebResponse = $myHttpWebRequest.GetResponse()
$sr = New-Object System.IO.StreamReader($response.GetResponseStream())
[xml]$xml = [xml]$sr.ReadToEnd()
The URLs I'm trying to access are internal to my company, so I can't post them. But, they do work in IE and the actual URL should be irrelevant.
Ideas?
EDIT: Preliminary testing shows that adding $myHttpWebRequest.AuthenticationLevel = "None" works. Thanks Scott Saad.
By default the WebRequest.AuthenticationLevel is set to MutualAuthRequested, therefore it will wait for some type of authentication response. Therefore, a timeout is probably being exceeded while waiting for the authentication to occur. It didn't look like you were messing with the Credentials so unless you require authentication, you probably won't need this. Try something like the following after you create your WebRequest:
$myHttpWebRequest.AuthenticationLevel = "None"
I hope this helps solve the problem.
Related
I'm trying to just retrieve all my receipts amount from my Uber account and dump into excel.
I installed uber_riders and trying to do that. I have no intention of creating a website or any other business purpose. My mere purpose is just fetch trips bills and dump to excel sheet.
So in my code.
from uber_rides.auth import AuthorizationCodeGrant
auth_flow = AuthorizationCodeGrant(
"xxx",
"partner.trips",
"xxx",
"http://localhost/redirect_uri"
)
print auth_flow
auth_url = auth_flow.get_authorization_url()
session = auth_flow.get_session("http://localhost/redirect_uri")
So what should i fill in the redirect_uri ? I believe i don't need it. Can someone help me on what to do with this. I currently get uber_rides.errors.UberIllegalState: Bad Request. Missing state parameter.
I was also facing the same problem, after spending some time thinking, I found this solution:
Execute till this statement as it is:
auth_url = auth_flow.get_authorization_url()
After executing this instruction copy the auth_url and paste it into a browser.
If everything is fine, you would get to your redirected link with two parameters, 'code' and 'state', now copy this complete url along with the parameters, and use it for the get_session()
session = auth_flow.get_session(<new_url_here>)
I'm struggling to figure out how I can do role-based authorization depending on what HTTP method a request is using. I use HTTP basic auth and depending on the users role and the HTTP method used a request should succeed or fail.
Example:
a GET request to http://localhost/rest/ should always be allowed, even to non-authenticated users (anon access)
a PUT request to http://localhost/rest/ (same resource!) should only be allowed if user is authenticated
a DELETE request to http://localhost/rest/ (same resource!) should only be allowed if user is authenticated and has the role ADMINISTRATOR
My current (non-working) attempt of configuring shiro.ini looks like this:
/rest = authcBasic[PUT], roles[SERVICE_PROVIDER]
/rest = authcBasic[POST], roles[EXPERIMENTER]
/rest = authcBasic[DELETE], roles[ADMINISTRATOR]
/rest = authcBasic
Update
I've just found https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHIRO-107 and updated my shiro.ini to be
/rest/**:put = authcBasic, roles[SERVICE_PROVIDER]
/rest/**:post = authcBasic, roles[EXPERIMENTER]
/rest/**:delete = authcBasic, roles[ADMINISTRATOR]
/rest/** = authcBasic
but it still doesn't work. It seems that only the last rule matches. Also, the commit comment also seems to indicate that this only works with permission-based authorization. Is there no equivalent implementation for role-based authz?
I think HttpMethodPermissionFilter is the one you need to configure: http://shiro.apache.org/static/1.2.2/apidocs/org/apache/shiro/web/filter/authz/HttpMethodPermissionFilter.html This should enable you to map the HTTP method to Shiro's "create,read,update,delete" permissions as outlined in the javadoc for the class.
I had a similar situation with Shiro and my REST application. While there may be a better way (I hadn't seen SHIRO-107), my solution was to create a custom filter extending the Authc filter (org.apache.shiro.web.filter.authc.FormAuthenticationFilter). You could do something similar extending the authcBasic filter or the Roles filter (although I think authcBasic would be better as it is probably more complicated).
The method you want to override is "protected boolean isAccessAllowed(ServletRequest request, ServletResponse response, Object mappedValue)". Your argument (e.g. "ADMINISTRATOR") will come in on the mappedValue as String[] where the arguments were split by commas.
Since I needed the possibility of both a method and a role, I ended up have my arguements looks like "-". For example:
/rest/** = customFilter[DELETE-ADMINISTRATOR]
That let me split out the role required to perform a delete from the role required for a POST by doing something like:
/rest/** = customFilter[DELETE-ADMINISTRATOR,POST-EXPERIMENTER]
I think if you play with this, you'll be able to get the functionality you need.
BTW, I hadn't seen SHIRO-107, so I've not tried that technique and probably won't since I've already invented my own custom filter. However that may provide a cleaner solution than what I did.
Hope that helps!
I'm testing out the new API, but having no luck downloading a test image file. The file exists, is accessible through the web UI, and is retrievable using the v1.0 API.
I'm able to access the metadata ("https://api.box.com/2.0/files/{fileid}") using both commandline curl and pycurl. However, calls to "https://api.box.com/2.0/files/{fileid}/data" bring back nothing. An earlier post (5/1) received the answer that the download feature had a bug and that "https://www.box.com" should be used as the base URL in the interim. That, however, just provokes a 404.
Please advise.
You should be able to download via http://api.box.com/2.0/files/<fildID>/content ... Looks like we have a bug somewhere in the backend. Hope to have it fixed soon.
Update 11/13/2012 -- This got fixed at least a month ago. Just updated the URL to our newer format
For me it works when its /content instead of /data... python code below
import requests
fileid = str(get_file_id(filenumber))
url = https://api.box.com/2.0/files/1790744170/content
r = requests.get(url=url, headers=<HEADERS>, proxies=<PROXIES>)
infoprint("Downloading...")
filerecieved = r.content
filename = uni_get_id(fileid, "name", "file")
f = open(filename, 'w+')
infoprint("Writing...")
f.write(filerecieved)
f.close()
I am trying to use HTTP to POST a file to an outside API from within a grails service. I've installed the rest plugin and I'm using code like the following:
def theFile = new File("/tmp/blah.txt")
def postBody = [myFile: theFile, foo:'bar']
withHttp(uri: "http://picard:8080/breeze/project/acceptFile") {
def html = post(body: postBody, requestContentType: URLENC)
}
The post works, however, the 'myFile' param appears to be a string rather than an actual file. I have not had any success trying to google for things like "how to post a file in grails" since most of the results end up dealing with handling an uploaded file from a form.
I think I'm using the right requestContentType, but I might have missed something in the documentation.
POSTing a file is not as simple as what you have included in your question (sadly). Also, it depends on what the API you are calling is expecting, e.g. some API expect files as base64 encoded text, while others accept them as mime-multipart.
Since you are using the rest plugin, as far as I can recall it uses the Apache HttpClient, I think this link should provide enough info to get you started (assuming you are dealing with mime-multipart). It shouldn't be too hard to change it around to work with your API and perhaps make it a bit 'groovy-ier'
Please help! I have been grappling with this error for days and I cannot for the life of me figure it out. I am using facebook connect and fetching a "contact_email" attribute using their api method users_getInfo.
The issue is that when I execute this PHP file, i get this error: "Cannot use string offset as an array in...". This error specifically refers to this line of code: $firstName=$user_details[0]['contact_email'];
I'm thinking this is because the user_getInfo method is not returning any results... However, the most ridiculous part about all this is that, I can execute the code below several dozens of times in a row SUCCESSFULLY without the above error, BUT THEN randomly without changing ANY code at all, I will suddenly encounter this error, in which case it will begin to give me an error several dozens of times, and then AGAIN without any code change, start executing successfully again.
This odd behavior occurs regardless of the attribute i am fetching.. (contact_email, first_name, last_name, etc.). I am running php 5.2.11. Is there something I'm missing??
Please Help!
include_once 'site/fbconnect/config.php'; //has $api_key and $secret defined.
include_once 'site/facebook-platform/client/facebook.php';
global $api_key,$secret;
$fb=new Facebook($api_key,$secret);
$fb->require_login();
$fb_user=$fb->get_loggedin_user();
$user_details=$fb->api_client->users_getInfo($fb_user,array('last_name','first_name','contact_email'));
$email=$user_details[0]['contact_email'];
$firstName=$user_details[0]['first_name'];
$lastName=$user_details[0]['last_name'];
Using the facebook php client API I was also receiving that error but my error was related to checking if the users are friends using the friends_areFriends php method.
//$results_array = $facebook->api_client->friends_areFriends($fb_user, $selected_friend_uid);
//$answer = $results_array[0]['are_friends'];
I would get this error when I assigned the $result, "Cannot use string offset as an array" and aparently the friends_areFriends method above was failing alot. My solution was to create a for loop that ran that code and then check $answer to see if it was an array using php method is_array() and executing the method call again if it wasn't. My loop was for 10 tries before just letting it fail. In the end, this check was severely degrating the performance of my facebook application. Instead, I removed the friends_areFriends api call alltogather and my facebook app performance was nice and fast again.
You could probably implement a similar feature allowing the method to retry itself if the result is not an array. The problem I think is on facebook's side, sometimes they are flooded and the requests do not complete successfully. I caution you not to retry more than 5 tries though because if you do a forever loop, rest assured they will ban you from the using the Facebook API for flooding it, so be careful.