I'm trying to figure out what logic should go into the different UIViewController methods like viewDidLoad, viewDidAppear, viewWillAppear, ...
The structure of my app is that I have a root view controller that doesn't really have a view of its own, rather it has a tab view controller and loads other view controllers into it. But in the future, it may have to load other view controllers instead of the tab bar controller depending on app logic.
My main question is, what do people usually put into the viewDidLoad, .... methods.
Currently I:
viewDidLoad - setup the tab bar controller and set its view to the view controller's own view
viewDidAppear - check if user has stored login info
if not - present with login
if so, login and get app data for first tab
I'm trying to figure out now if my logic for setting up my tab bar controller should go into loadView rather than viewDidLoad.
Any help would be great. Small examples found on the web are great, but they don't go into detail on how larger apps should be structured.
You should not implement both -viewDidLoad and -loadView; they are for different purposes. If you load a NIB, you should implement -viewDidLoad to perform any functions that need to be done after loading the NIB. Wiring up the tabbar is appropriate there if you haven't already done it in the NIB.
-loadView should be implemented if you do not use a NIB, and should construct the view.
-viewWillAppear is called immediately before you come onscreen. This is a good place to set up notification observations, update your data based on model classes that have changed since you were last on screen, and otherwise get your act together before the user sees you. You should not perform any animations here. You're not on the screen; you can't animate. I see a lot of animation glitches due to this mistake. It kind of works, but it looks weird.
-viewDidAppear is called after you come onscreen. This is where you do any entry animations (sliding up a modal, for instance; not that you should do that very often, but I was just looking at some code that did).
-viewWillDisappear is called right before you go offscreen. This is where you can do any leaving animations (including unselecting tableview cells and the like).
-viewDidDisappar is called after you're offscreen (and the animations have finished). Tear down any observations here, free up memory if possible, go to sleep as best you can.
I touch on setting up and tearing down observations here. I go into that in more depth in View controllers and notifications.
viewDidLoad will be called once per lifetime of each UIViewController's view. You put stuff in there that needs to be set up and working before the user starts interacting with the view.
viewDidAppear is called whenever the view has appeared to the user. It could potentially be called more than once. An example would be the root screen of an app using a UINavigationController to push and pop a hierarchy of views. Put stuff in there that you'd want done every time. For example, you might want to hide the UINavigationBar of the root screen, but show it for all subscreens, so you'd do the hiding of the bar here.
Therefore, you'd put your logic for setting up your UITabBarController in viewDidLoad, since it only should be done once.
Regarding your app, is there a reason why you don't just make the UITabViewController be the controller loaded by your app delegate? It seems that you have a level of indirection in your app that you may or may not need. It's probably better to simplify it now, and refactor later if you need something more complex.
Related
My apps "short" description:
Basically an interactive storybook, I have a class that sets up a audio session and audio player which every other class(ViewControllers) in my app imports and calls a function or two to set the right sound to be played each time something happens(for instance.. user reads the story). Each ViewController has it's own .m and .h classes and uses them for animations and action handling. My app is only about 60 mb's in size (audio/images/code).
Now these ViewControllers are set up in a storyboard (they are 13 now) and are modal segued from one to the next one and then programmatically dismissed to go back.
When I run my app on my iPad now, I'm starting to get memory warnings and yes Instruments is showing me that my app is adding roughly about 40 Mb's for every ViewController that I segue to.
My questions are:
Do they reside in real memory no matter what I do? (I thought I wasn't holding any strong pointers to these view controllers).
Is there an easy way for me to dismiss one controller and still use a modal segue to get to the next one?(ran into troubles trying this)
Modal Segues are probably not the way I should be doing things in my App are they?!. They looked so nice and easy for my "storybook", but now they are giving me a very rough time.
Any other tips you can give me from what I described are appreciated.
Thank you.
Yes, as long as you present it modally. The presenter view controller keeps a strong pointer to the presented view controller. What you could do here is in the viewWillDisappear: release all the images and other views that might use memory !
You could instantiate your view controller using the method instantiateViewControllerWithIdentifier: and then presentViewController:animated:completion: like you would do with any view controller
It's up to you to decide. But you could easily mimic the animation if you wanted to.
If I understood everything correctly I would go with a singleton class kinda like 'AudioEngine' which is accessible from anywhere in any class. Then I would design all my viewcontrollers in my storyboard like you did. When I need to present modally another view controller, I'll do it using the answer of your 2nd question. If I still had a memory issue, I would try to cheat and keeps always 3 view controllers (like we do with the UIScrollView's infinite scroll) that I would reuse and I'll mimic the modal presentation using UIView's animation blocks.
I'm kind of new to iPhone development so bear with me.
I have an application wherein I display a lot of data in a tableviews, edit it in a detailview etc. However, I also have a login-system.
The problem I have is that I can't figure out how to reload the subviews of the NavigationController when I've logged out, or how to dealloc it completely and reinitialize it upon a succesful login.
This means that data from the last user who logged out is still present in my tableview when I log in as another user, as the data is set to reload only when the view loads for the first time.
Thankful for any and all contributions.
There are probably several ways you could go about this; it's up to you (and without more information about your app, I can't suggest a particular solution). You might consider:
-viewWillAppear: — this method is called on any UIViewController subclass when it's about to (re)appear as part of a UINavigationController stack (or tab bar controller, etc.). You can clear out fields, etc. This is mostly useful when a view controller reappears (being uncovered or switched to), because you usually create a new view controller instance each time you display one.
Notifications and delegates — your view controllers (and other objects) can communicate with each other about when a logout occurs, and reconfigure themselves as necessary.
Suppose I have 2 views. In the first view, I allocate memory to displaying many UI components such as an UILabel, UIImages, etc.
Suppose the user navigates to the next view (via UINavigationController)
Is it OK to deallocate memory assigned to displaying UI components in the first view and then initialize them again once the user goes back to the first view (in viewFirstLoad or the appropriate function)?
It seems to me if you don't do this, then memory will keep on increasing the longer the user uses your app in that particular session.
Is this not allowed? frowned upon? impossible?
It is perfectly normal and in fact, that functionality is built in standard UIViewController - when controller is not displayed its view may be released from memory and you can release all its subviews (e.g. retained through IBOutlet references) in controller's -viewDidUnload method.
When controller needs to display again it reloads its view again.
It depends. Generally, the rule of thumb is that you should free objects that you don't need. If your view is just a view, then yes, I'd release it and all of its subviews. If your view has data that was obtained through a lengthy retrieval process (e.g. a web service call), I'd probably hold onto the data somewhere so that I don't have to go back out and retrieve it when the user goes back to the first view.
To clarify a little: Apple recommends you display data specific to a view in it's -viewDidLoad method, such as setting text on labels. Then, in -viewDidUnload you should release (or nil outlets of) the view objects you setup in -viewDidLoad. It's critical you implement -viewDidLoad, as the base UIViewController code checks that it's subclass actually implements -viewDidLoad before it assumes it can unload the view (and therefore call -viewDidUnload). Failing to implement -viewDidLoad results in the controller thinking it can't recreate your view at a later time, and so it doesn't unload the view from memory. A developer I know experienced this same problem, took forever to track down.
I'm tinkering with an iPad app that (like many iPad apps) doesn't use the UINavigation root view control system, so I don't have natural ownership for each app "view". I essentially have two basic views: a document list view, and a document edit view.
I'm playing with UIView animation for getting from a selected document to the edit view.
I also have a toolbar on top that exists (with different buttons) in both "views".
Because I don't have UINavigation running the show for me, I have a tendency to just throw more and more stuff into one NIB and one view controller that owns the whole container. But now I'm trying to figure out how to segue from the document list view to the edit view if the edit view lives inside a different NIB, preserving the toolbar too.
Anyone have thoughts or experience on app structures like this? I find the docs lacking on best practices around code/UI structure for anything except trivial one-screen apps or full-on navigation apps.
You're not "supposed" to have parent/child view controllers owning subcomponents of the same "screen" according to the docs, but this implies one massive honking view controller that basically contains the whole app, and that can't be right.
Not sure if there's a "right answer" to this; I'm looking for some intelligent examples or suggestions. Nobody's touched this question in months, so I'm adding a bounty to generate good chatter. :)
Thanks!
UPDATE: I'm not talking about a split view, which is clearly well handled by a split view controller. Instead, take a look at Apple's iWork apps (e.g. Pages) which have a document list view and an independent edit view, but these are related by animation.
Maybe the real question here is: how would you (or could you even?) build a "container" view controller like the split view or navigation controller, yourself? Are you required to build the whole damn thing from scratch? I sense that you are, because seems to be hidden wiring in the interaction between view controllers. If so, thoughts on this?
I think the only hidden wiring in view controllers is setting parentViewController, which is required to support the categories declared for split and navigation.
View controllers are designed to be nested, with each controller owning a part of the view hierarchy. The only design goal is that no view controller reach into the view hierarchy of another controller. A parent view controller will usually have some call for adding child controllers so that it can set the frame of the view within the view hierarchy it owns. A child view controller should not do anything to the superview of the view it controls, as that is owned by another controller. Not should it set the center or frame of the view it controls.
For example, a navigation controller has a push method, in which it removes the previous controller view, adds the new controller view, and sets the frame of the newly added view. In general, a parent view controller is free to set the frame of the view of a child controller, but not the bounds.
If you want to change the animation of a navigation controller, I think you would start by implementing every method with an animated: argument. Set up your animation then call super with the animated flag off before committing the animation.
I haven't tried the multiple-view-controllers thing outside of the UIKit-provided ones (navigation/tab-bar/modal/etc) but I don't see why it shouldn't work. Under the hood, everything is a view, though I'll note that UIKit has special views for view controllers which no doubt have some kind of special handling by the system (UIViewController has a wrapper view, UINavigationController has a UINavigationTransitionView or something, ...).
I'd advise not worrying too much about "best practice" — just code something which does what you want. A couple of options:
Stick logic into view classes (ewwww!). One of our apps does this so it can handle rotation in a custom way (views slide in/out instead of rotating). We should've probably implemented our own view controller logic instead.
Break the model into components which correspond to views. Make each view know how to load its component and recursively load subcomponents. Then the view controller only needs to worry about "big picture" stuff.
Also note that you can load multiple nibs into the same view controller by e.g. connecting it to an outlet called editView.The big difference is that it's not done automatically by -[UIViewController loadView] so you need to do something like
-(EditView*)editView {
if (!editView) {
// Loads EditView into the outlet editView
[NSBundle loadNibNamed:#"EditView" owner:self];
}
return editView;
}
You'll also need to worry about adding it to your view hierarchy, unloading it on -(void)viewDidUnload (iPhone OS 3.0+), setting it up in -(void)viewDidLoad in case there was a memory warning during editing mode, etc...
It's not easy, but UI never is.
You need a master-detail view implemented with a split-view/popover-view and controlled with a UISplitViewController.
The master view is the document list and the detail view is the edit view. Each has its own controller. The two controllers themselves are managed by the UISplitViewController.
If you don't use the splitview controller you will just end up hand coding something that works very much like it. This is really the only way to do what you want easily in the API and it is the layout that iPad users will expect.
See Creating a Split View Interface in the iPad programming guide for details.
I'm starting to go a little crazy with this one.
I have an iphone application with a somewhat complex view structure it is a tabbed application with either a view controller or a navigation controller on each tab.
The main controller for one tab uses the viewDidAppear callback to reload any data that has been modified since the last time it was displayed and this behaves fine in most cases. The issue I have run into is that when I navigate in subviews(within the same tab) using the standard navigation controller push/pop mechanism the viewWillAppear and viewDidAppear on the main view always fire when I navigate back to it.
However if I load a modal view controller and then dismiss it, the viewWillAppear continues to fire but the viewDidAppear stops firing.
I am almost certain that this is tied to the need to manually call these callbacks on the modal controller but I cannot find the reference info on how to do this correctly. (I only see this viewDidAppear bug on the hardware, in the simulator it works as I'd expect)
If you need further clarification let me know and thanks for any input.
Yes, this is how it works. You are better off switching to using viewWillAppear.
This has the added advantage of updating the data before the screen is redrawn.
viewDidLoad should be used for one-time setup operations:
Setting titles
Instantiating subviews, content arrays
Anything else related to the infrastructure of the view in question
After that, use viewWillAppear: to do anything related to refreshing data. You shouldn't have to call any of the viewDid/viewWill methods manually – that's handled by the innards of UIView. viewDidLoad won't fire after you dismiss a modal view controller because, more than likely, the view never unloaded. viewDidLoad fires fine when you're navigating the a view controller stack since the new views need memory, requiring other views to unload, then be reloaded when they reappear.