Was hoping for some ideas as to a service to which I can set up an inbound-only email system. In other words, I will have multiple users on the system, each can receive their own email... but at the moment... at this time, I am not focused on the ability to send or reply to messages, only receive them and send to the appropriate user. I looked into Postmark... They seem to have some great functionality.
CloudMailin Is another alternative. However there are effectively three options for setting up something like this.
Use an existing, traditional, email server and poll for the emails
Setup your own email server and create a script to run when you receive an email
Use a third party solution, as you've already mentioned.
I went through for of these for Rails a little while back here, but all the information is still relevant.
First, let me get this out of the way and say this isn't a spam application. I'm writing an app that allows users to share files with multiple friends easily via email.
Right now, I'm using SKPSMTPMessage to send out emails to a list of recipients at the user's request. It works, but I wonder if there isn't a better solution here. For example, if it might be better to send the smtp info and attachments to my server, and conduct the sending from there in order to avoid repetitive attachment uploads on the device.
I am also considering how to handle cases where there is no connection available (determining connection error vs other kinds of errors and persisting the failed message for a later retry).
Any advice on the best way to structure this service would be greatly appreciated.
In order to customize the user experience for sending e-mail you need access to their email details, IMAP, POP, etc. if you want that user to be the one sending the e-mail.
The solution I use is to have the from address be an e-mail I control and use a 3rd party email provider, ex: SendGrid, PostMark, Mandrill and plug in to their api's to send e-mails.
I am working on a research project that has to do with responding to spam. I want to implement the following functionality:
1. A mail server that saves all incoming email messages in an easily accessable form - hard drive, database, etc. For example, if someone sends a message to peter#domain.com or akjfhasfkjf#domain.com, this message should be accepted and saved.
2. I should be able to reply to these messages from the same server/account. E.g. a message gets delivered to peter#domain.com, so the spammer receives a response from the same address.
Any suggestions on any software / packages that can help me with that? If I can interface with them with Java or Python, it would be even better.
Thanks.
you could run a postfix mailserver with fuglu,a python framework for mail filters. it would be very simple to write a plugin that does what you want.
but remember: responding to spam is in most cases a bad idea. the sender address is almost always forged, so the reply goes some innocent victim instead of the spammers inbox and your server could be blacklisted for backscattering.
I have an application that sends emails when a user creates/modifies a record. I would like my users to be able to reply to the email that was sent to them and have the web application receive the email, parse it and update the record automatically. I have seen this done in web apps like Basecamp. The email usually says "Reply above this line", and if you simply reply to the email, you don't have to log in to the web application in order to update your ticket/conversation.
How can I go about implementing this sort of functionaly? (I'm not looking for a particular language implementation, but rather a language agnostic solution).
There are 2 ways you can do this:
You could use a Procmail filter to pipe the incoming email to your script. This would need some 'nix knowhow to setup - but it's certainly possible to do what you described via this method.
Use a service like MailGun - they do all the hard work of setting up and configuring the mail server stuff and expose it to you via a nice programmable web API. I've been evaluating it this week to solve a similar problem like the one you are having and I can tell you: it is really cool and I highly recommend you check it out yourself.
You'll need to implement a service/daemon that polls an email inbox for new messages. To relate an incoming email to the corresponding data, you can include an id in the outgoing email's subject.
I agree you should created a system to receive the incoming email but I don't necessarily agree that polling for it is the correct solution. Take a look at a blog post I wrote on the subject here. It relates to Rails but the concepts should work in any language. That's why we wrote the CloudMailin system to provide a better way of receiving the email.
Also you can use a unique from address for each email that would prevent the user from altering the subject line being a problem. The disposable part of an email address is useful for that. reply+user123#example.com for example.
A number of applications have the handy feature of allowing users to respond to notification emails from the application. The responses are slurped back into the application.
For example, if you were building a customer support system the email would likely contain some token to link the response back to the correct service ticket.
What are some guidelines, hints and tips for implementing this type of system? What are some potential pitfalls to be aware of? Hopefully those who have implemented systems like this can share their wisdom.
Some guidelines and considerations:
The address question: The best thing to do is to use the "+" extension part of an email (myaddr**+custom**#gmail.com) address. This makes it easier to route, but most of all, easier to keep track of the address routing to your system. Other techniques might use a token in the subject
Spam: Do spam processing outside the app, and have the app filter based on a header.
Queuing failed messages: Don't, for the most part. The standard email behavior is to try for up to 3 days to deliver a message. For an application email server, all this does is create giant spool files of mail you'll most likely never process. Only queue messages if the failure reasons are out of your control (e.g., server is down).
Invalid message handling: There are a multiple of ways a message can be invalid. Some are limitations of the library (it can't parse the address, even though its an RFC valid one). Others are because of broken clients (e.g., omitting quotes around certain headers). Other's might be too large, or use an unknown encoding, be missing critical headers, have multiple values where there should only be one, violate some semantic specific to your application, etc, etc, etc. Basically, where ever the Java mail API could throw an exception is an error handling case you must determine how to appropriately handle.
Error responses: Not every error deserves a response. Some are generated because of spam, and you should avoid sending messages back to those addresses. Others are from automated systems (yourself, a vacation responder, another application mail system, etc), and if you reply, it'll send you another message, repeating the cycle.
Client-specific hacks: like above, each client has little differences that'll complicate your code. Keep this in mind anytime you traverse the structure of a message.
Senders, replies, and loops: Depending on your situation, you might receive mail from some of the following sources:
Real people, maybe from external sources
Mailing lists
Yourself, or one of your own recipient addresses
Other mail servers (bounces, failures, etc)
Entity in another system (my-ldap-group#company.com, system-monitor#localhost)
An automated system
An alias to one of the above
An alias to an alias
Now, your first instinct is probably "Only accept mail from correct sources!", but that'll cause you lots of headaches down the line because people will send the damnedest things to an application mail server. I find its better to accept everything and explicitly deny the exceptions.
Debugging: Save a copy of the headers of any message you receive. This will help out tremendously anytime you have a problem.
--Edit--
I bought the book, Building Scalable Web Sites, mentioned by rossfabricant. It -does- have a good email section. A couple of important points it has are about handling email from wireless carriers and authentication of emails.
You can set the address that the email is sent from, what will be put into the To: address if someone just presses 'Reply-to'. Make that unique, and you'll be able to tell where it came from, and to where it must be directed back to.
When it comes to putting a name beside it though '"something here" ' - put something inviting to have them just reply to the mail. I've seen one major web-app, with Email capturing that has 'do not reply', which turns people off from actually sending anything to it though.
Building Scalable Web sites has a nice section on handling email. It's written by a Flickr developer.
(source: lsl.com.au)
EDIT: I misunderstood your question.
You could configure your email server to catch-all, and generate a unique reply-to address. E.g. CST-2343434#example.com.
A polling process on the server could read the inbox and parse out the relevant part from the received email, CS-2343434 could mean Customer Support ticket ID no. 2343434.
I implemented something like this using JavaMail API.
Just a thought.
The best way to achieve this will be to write a window service that acts like a mail client [pop3 or imap]. This windows service should execute a timed action triggered by a timer, which connects to the mail server and polls the server for any unread message(s) available in the email inbox. The email ID to check for is the email ID on which the users will give their input on/to. If the windows service client finds that there exists any new mail(s) then it should download and filter the email body and push further for processing based on the user input in the email. You can host the input processing in the same windows service but it is not advisable to do so. The windows service can put the inputs in a special application directory or database from where your main appication can read the user inputs received in email and process them as needed.
You will be required to develop a high performance TCP/IP client for doing so. I advise you not to use the default .Net library due to performance issues, instead use one of the best availabel open source TCP/IP implementations for .Net like XF.Server from kodart. we have used this in our applications and achieved remarkably grear results.
Hope this helps..
Bose has a pretty great system where they embed a Queue and Ticket ID into the email itself.
My company has the traditional Case # on the subject line, but when CREATING a case, require a specific character string "New Case" "Tech Support Issue" on the subject line to get through the spam filters.
If the email doesn't match the create or update semantics, the autoresponder sends an email back to the recipient demonstrating how to properly send an email, or directs them to our forums or web support site.
It helps eliminate the spam issue, and yet is still accessible to a wide technical audience that is still heavily email dependent.
Spam is going to be a bit of a concern. However since you are initiating the conversation you can use the presence of your unique identifier (I prefer to use the subject line - "Trouble ticket: Unable to log into web...[artf123456]") to filter out spam. Be sure to check the filter on occasion since some folks mangle the subject when replying.
Email is a cesspool of bad standards and broken clients. You need to be prepared to accept almost anything as input. You will need to be very forgiving about what kinds of input are tolerated. Anything easy for you to program will likely be difficult for your users to use correctly. Consider the old mailing list programs that require you to issue commands in the subject line. Only hardcore nerds can use those effectively. And some of those trouble-ticket CRM things you mentioned have bizarre requirements, such as forcing the user to reply between two specific text markers in the text. That sort of thing is confusing to people.
You'll need to deal with email clients that send you formatted text instead of plain text. Some email clients still don't handle HTML properly (cough GMail) so your replies will also need to be designed appropriately. There are various ways in which photos might be "uploaded" via email as well, especially when mobile phones are involved. You will need to implement various hacks and heuristics to deal with these situations.
It's also entirely possible that you will get email that is valid but unusable by the email parsing library you are using. Whether or not this is important enough to roll your own will be a judgement call.
Finally, others have mentioned using specific email addresses to uniquely identify a "conversation". This is probably the easiest way to do this, as the content of the mail will often not survive a round trip to a client. Be prepared, however, to get mail to old IDs from old customers who, instead of opening a new ticket somehow, reply to an old ticket. Your application will probably need some way to push emails with an old ID into a new case, either manually or automatically. For a CRM system it's very likely that a user would reply to an old email even if you already sent him a new email with a new ID in it. As for whether you should use some.email.address+some.id#yourdomain.com or just some.id#yourdomain.com, I'd go with the latter because the plus-sign confuses some email clients. Make your IDs guids or something and have some way to validate them (such as a CRC or something) and you'll get less junk. Humans should never have to type in the GUIDs, just reply to them. The downside is spam filtering: a user's computer might view such email addresses as spam, and there wouldn't be an easy way to whitelist the addresses.
Which reminds me: sending email these days is full of pitfalls. There are many anti-spam technologies which make it extremely hard for you to send email to your customers. You will need to research all of these and you need to be careful, and do some testing, to ensure that you can reach the major email providers. A website like Campaign Monitor
can help you if you are sending email.