I'm reading about the new development of Google quick action buttons in the mail inbox.
I'm a little bit lost in this topic and not understand how I can include this function in my emails.
I have read about DKIM/SPF but I don't know if this functionality could need to do an google app.
I have my mail server with marketing segmentation and I want this button is visible when email come to client (destiny) gmail inbox (guess only works in gmail....). If i have included the markup code in html in my emails, why i can't see this button?
would it need create a specific mail application to implement this feature and send emails from this app? Someone tried this?
I know maybe this has been reply before but i think must start more down... so.. sorry.
Thanks and regards!
When you are ready to launch your marked up emails to your users, you will need to register with Google. Please follow this process:
1.Send a real-life email coming from your production servers (or a server with similar DKIM/SPF/From:/Return-Path: headers) including the markup / schema to schema.whitelisting+sample#gmail.com.
2.If you send a test/blank email, an email that does not contain schema or if you don't send an email for review your application will be silently discarded.
3.Make sure that the markup is correct prior to sending the email. For more details see Testing your Schema. Especially make sure the email passes the Email markup Tester and that there are no errors, also make sure to include as much data as possible.
4.Gmail removes all markup when forwarding an email. Do not forward the email but send it directly.
Fill out the registration form available here.
Here is the link for the documentation.
Hope this helps!!
Are you sending a promotional email (offers, etc.)?
If yes, then you are likely to be delivered to the Promotions tab, where quick actions do not work (according to Litmus - https://litmus.com/ebooks/gmail-ebook/gmail-ebook/).
Quick Actions work best in the Inbox for transactional emails.
("Here is your booking confirmation" [Check-in now] quick action)
These typically arrive directly in the Inbox.
Was hoping for some ideas as to a service to which I can set up an inbound-only email system. In other words, I will have multiple users on the system, each can receive their own email... but at the moment... at this time, I am not focused on the ability to send or reply to messages, only receive them and send to the appropriate user. I looked into Postmark... They seem to have some great functionality.
CloudMailin Is another alternative. However there are effectively three options for setting up something like this.
Use an existing, traditional, email server and poll for the emails
Setup your own email server and create a script to run when you receive an email
Use a third party solution, as you've already mentioned.
I went through for of these for Rails a little while back here, but all the information is still relevant.
I want to create a new software that can be controlled by email.
It will work like followup.cc or followupthen.com.
The users of these softwares can give commands to the system by using only email. For example, sending an email to 1minute#followup.cc sets the system to send a notification email after 1 minute. Or sending an email to 4weeks#followup.cc sets the system to send a notification email after 4 weeks.
I have never seen an example for implementing such an email user interface. I don't know where to start. Do you know of any good tutorial or open source code that I can take as example?
Note: I appreciate anything useful but my preferred programming languages are python or java.
Use the SubEthaSMTP library to receive mail. That gives you the SMTP envelope information: reverse-path (usually the sender's email address), recipient and message content as a stream.
Based on your question it seems that you do not need to parse the message (for example to retrieve the subject), but if do need, then parse the mail using the JavaMail library.
You can find example code in the SubEthaSMTP wiki pages. A more complex example is SubEtha Mail, a mail list manager.
For an application we are building, it is required to give certain registered accounts the ability to send emails to other registered accounts.
As part of the registration, we obviously collect the real email address of every user.
I do not want to expose any of my users' email addresses so I would like to have the ability to proxy them through fake email address that basically forward to the real email address.
For example, if someone want's to email John Doe, they would send an email to abcdefg12345#mysite.com which would then forward the email to john#johndoe.com.
In case its not obvious, the purpose of this is to protect the end user from spam and keeps their real email address private. Since my application acts as the proxy, I could easily block certain email's from going through.
The most famous example of this is Facebook's email proxy for Facebook Apps.
My Question: Are there any patterns, servers, 3rd party services, or libraries that provide such a feature? Does anyone have any suggestions for how this could be built?
I've never seen a service that offers this directly. The hardest part here is the receiving of the emails and wiring things up to your app for the authentication. You could use a service like http://cloudmailin.com in order to receive the email and then forward it on or even use some sort of custom install. Another option would be to create a script that modifies a server such as postfix's configuration.
Finally although I wouldn't recommend it you could try and create your own mail server to do this. I would read up a little more on SMTP/IMAP and see what options you have.
It looks like there is no 3rd party service or tool\library to accomplish this. It is going to be a bigger task than I was hoping for so I will be putting it off until I have the time to implement it.
I think the solution is to use a mail daemon that has an API or at least allows you to manipulate the users\emails\aliases in it such that you can create new mailboxes on demand and set them to forward from someuser#proxy.mysite.com to user#theirdomain.com
I found out that there are services that provide this type of functionality as part of their offerings:
http://mailgun.net/
http://www.sendgrid.com
Both of these services are very cool and offer quite a bit for sending and analyzing emails including the ability to create forwarding\proxy emails.
A number of applications have the handy feature of allowing users to respond to notification emails from the application. The responses are slurped back into the application.
For example, if you were building a customer support system the email would likely contain some token to link the response back to the correct service ticket.
What are some guidelines, hints and tips for implementing this type of system? What are some potential pitfalls to be aware of? Hopefully those who have implemented systems like this can share their wisdom.
Some guidelines and considerations:
The address question: The best thing to do is to use the "+" extension part of an email (myaddr**+custom**#gmail.com) address. This makes it easier to route, but most of all, easier to keep track of the address routing to your system. Other techniques might use a token in the subject
Spam: Do spam processing outside the app, and have the app filter based on a header.
Queuing failed messages: Don't, for the most part. The standard email behavior is to try for up to 3 days to deliver a message. For an application email server, all this does is create giant spool files of mail you'll most likely never process. Only queue messages if the failure reasons are out of your control (e.g., server is down).
Invalid message handling: There are a multiple of ways a message can be invalid. Some are limitations of the library (it can't parse the address, even though its an RFC valid one). Others are because of broken clients (e.g., omitting quotes around certain headers). Other's might be too large, or use an unknown encoding, be missing critical headers, have multiple values where there should only be one, violate some semantic specific to your application, etc, etc, etc. Basically, where ever the Java mail API could throw an exception is an error handling case you must determine how to appropriately handle.
Error responses: Not every error deserves a response. Some are generated because of spam, and you should avoid sending messages back to those addresses. Others are from automated systems (yourself, a vacation responder, another application mail system, etc), and if you reply, it'll send you another message, repeating the cycle.
Client-specific hacks: like above, each client has little differences that'll complicate your code. Keep this in mind anytime you traverse the structure of a message.
Senders, replies, and loops: Depending on your situation, you might receive mail from some of the following sources:
Real people, maybe from external sources
Mailing lists
Yourself, or one of your own recipient addresses
Other mail servers (bounces, failures, etc)
Entity in another system (my-ldap-group#company.com, system-monitor#localhost)
An automated system
An alias to one of the above
An alias to an alias
Now, your first instinct is probably "Only accept mail from correct sources!", but that'll cause you lots of headaches down the line because people will send the damnedest things to an application mail server. I find its better to accept everything and explicitly deny the exceptions.
Debugging: Save a copy of the headers of any message you receive. This will help out tremendously anytime you have a problem.
--Edit--
I bought the book, Building Scalable Web Sites, mentioned by rossfabricant. It -does- have a good email section. A couple of important points it has are about handling email from wireless carriers and authentication of emails.
You can set the address that the email is sent from, what will be put into the To: address if someone just presses 'Reply-to'. Make that unique, and you'll be able to tell where it came from, and to where it must be directed back to.
When it comes to putting a name beside it though '"something here" ' - put something inviting to have them just reply to the mail. I've seen one major web-app, with Email capturing that has 'do not reply', which turns people off from actually sending anything to it though.
Building Scalable Web sites has a nice section on handling email. It's written by a Flickr developer.
(source: lsl.com.au)
EDIT: I misunderstood your question.
You could configure your email server to catch-all, and generate a unique reply-to address. E.g. CST-2343434#example.com.
A polling process on the server could read the inbox and parse out the relevant part from the received email, CS-2343434 could mean Customer Support ticket ID no. 2343434.
I implemented something like this using JavaMail API.
Just a thought.
The best way to achieve this will be to write a window service that acts like a mail client [pop3 or imap]. This windows service should execute a timed action triggered by a timer, which connects to the mail server and polls the server for any unread message(s) available in the email inbox. The email ID to check for is the email ID on which the users will give their input on/to. If the windows service client finds that there exists any new mail(s) then it should download and filter the email body and push further for processing based on the user input in the email. You can host the input processing in the same windows service but it is not advisable to do so. The windows service can put the inputs in a special application directory or database from where your main appication can read the user inputs received in email and process them as needed.
You will be required to develop a high performance TCP/IP client for doing so. I advise you not to use the default .Net library due to performance issues, instead use one of the best availabel open source TCP/IP implementations for .Net like XF.Server from kodart. we have used this in our applications and achieved remarkably grear results.
Hope this helps..
Bose has a pretty great system where they embed a Queue and Ticket ID into the email itself.
My company has the traditional Case # on the subject line, but when CREATING a case, require a specific character string "New Case" "Tech Support Issue" on the subject line to get through the spam filters.
If the email doesn't match the create or update semantics, the autoresponder sends an email back to the recipient demonstrating how to properly send an email, or directs them to our forums or web support site.
It helps eliminate the spam issue, and yet is still accessible to a wide technical audience that is still heavily email dependent.
Spam is going to be a bit of a concern. However since you are initiating the conversation you can use the presence of your unique identifier (I prefer to use the subject line - "Trouble ticket: Unable to log into web...[artf123456]") to filter out spam. Be sure to check the filter on occasion since some folks mangle the subject when replying.
Email is a cesspool of bad standards and broken clients. You need to be prepared to accept almost anything as input. You will need to be very forgiving about what kinds of input are tolerated. Anything easy for you to program will likely be difficult for your users to use correctly. Consider the old mailing list programs that require you to issue commands in the subject line. Only hardcore nerds can use those effectively. And some of those trouble-ticket CRM things you mentioned have bizarre requirements, such as forcing the user to reply between two specific text markers in the text. That sort of thing is confusing to people.
You'll need to deal with email clients that send you formatted text instead of plain text. Some email clients still don't handle HTML properly (cough GMail) so your replies will also need to be designed appropriately. There are various ways in which photos might be "uploaded" via email as well, especially when mobile phones are involved. You will need to implement various hacks and heuristics to deal with these situations.
It's also entirely possible that you will get email that is valid but unusable by the email parsing library you are using. Whether or not this is important enough to roll your own will be a judgement call.
Finally, others have mentioned using specific email addresses to uniquely identify a "conversation". This is probably the easiest way to do this, as the content of the mail will often not survive a round trip to a client. Be prepared, however, to get mail to old IDs from old customers who, instead of opening a new ticket somehow, reply to an old ticket. Your application will probably need some way to push emails with an old ID into a new case, either manually or automatically. For a CRM system it's very likely that a user would reply to an old email even if you already sent him a new email with a new ID in it. As for whether you should use some.email.address+some.id#yourdomain.com or just some.id#yourdomain.com, I'd go with the latter because the plus-sign confuses some email clients. Make your IDs guids or something and have some way to validate them (such as a CRC or something) and you'll get less junk. Humans should never have to type in the GUIDs, just reply to them. The downside is spam filtering: a user's computer might view such email addresses as spam, and there wouldn't be an easy way to whitelist the addresses.
Which reminds me: sending email these days is full of pitfalls. There are many anti-spam technologies which make it extremely hard for you to send email to your customers. You will need to research all of these and you need to be careful, and do some testing, to ensure that you can reach the major email providers. A website like Campaign Monitor
can help you if you are sending email.