If I want to replace one screen of an app with another, but I don't use a navbar/tabbar controller, then I could just remove oldViewController.view from window and add newViewController.view to it. That's all, now newViewController will get rotation events, etc.
But UIView does not reference "its" controller, so how is this possible, how iOS know it should make newViewController an active one? Does iOS do some magic, it internally references controller from view or what?
UPDATE:
I think I was misunderstood: I don't ask how to make some view controller an active one - I know that. I'm just curious, how is it possible that I pass some view to UIWindow object ([window addSubview:view]) and it somehow finds view controller although view doesn't know its controller.
yeh I had the same question like you. and I figured it out.
UIView is derived from UIResponder. and UIView must subclass UIResponder::nextResponder.
Its default implementation is returning a view controller of the view (if it hadn't, it would be super view)
So, consequently view can see its controller. that means window know the topmost view and also
its controller.
good luck.
Unfortunately, iOS only send events to the first ViewController of the stack. You can try and present a new one on the top of others with video for example, it will never rotate.
If you don't use navbar/tabbar controller you will have to add and remove everytime from the Window to keep only one at the time if you wand to have events.
The main UIWindow class for your application will have a view controller set in its rootViewController property. That controller's view is the "main" view for the app. This is usually setup in the main .xib for the project. That view controller will receive the usual events like "viewDidAppear" or "willRotateToInterfaceOrientation". You can put up your own view over top of it if you want to, but you will need to manage those events yourself. Usually you don't do that though. You just use a UINavigationController or UITabBarController as your rootViewController and allow them to manage getting the events to new "pushed" view controllers, or you popup view controllers with "presentModalViewController".
Related
I'm creating an app using the iPhone Utility App framework, and I'm trying to use a navigation controller on the flipside view, as there will be a lot of drilldown options on this view. When I'm done with this view, I call the following code:
- (IBAction)done:(id)sender
{
[self dismissModalViewControllerAnimated:YES];
}
When I dismiss this view, I want to be able to go back to the place in the navigation I was currently at when I reopen this view again. However, when I dismiss this view using this method, the vc gets deallocated, therefore the menu starts back at the beginning when I try to go back to the menu.
Thoughts?
You'll need to retain a reference to the object (I'm calling it the options controller). I would say the easiest way is to create an iVar in the presenting view controller that references the options controller. Then, when you go to present the options controller again, just present the referenced options controller rather than creating a new controller. If different view controller objects can present the options controller, you'll need to either pass that reference around, or store it in some object that all the other view controllers have access to.
Hmm not much code so maybe I'm misunderstanding your setup, but...
You could use the AppDelegate to store (as a property) your current position (index) in the views collection of the Navigation controller, and then write a method that pushes to that (stored) position when you re-visit it later.
Might be an easier way to do it though..
So what you want is to flip from a view to another view? If you want to keep the navigation bar status between flipping, I recommend you use only one view controller to control this 2 views. you can use + transitionFromView:toView:duration:options:completion: of UIView to flip views.
In an iPad application I have a tab Controller containing several view controllers. One of these view Controller (call it MainViewController) needs 2 table views side by side.
So I wrote 2 UITableViewController subclasses and from MainViewController, I alloc/init both subclasses of UITableViewController, and add the tableview from each to the MainViewController's view.
This means that UITableViewController subclasses's views are subviews of MainViewController's view.
This answer: https://stackoverflow.com/a/7684648/191463 says that doing that is incorrect and it seems Apple are starting to cut down on it.
I really do not want to have to put all the code from both UITableViewControllers in MainViewController, as it will make it much harder to read and in future could create duplicate code, if I want to use one of the tableview elsewhere in the app by itself.
Is this actually a problem, if it is how do I do it properly?
Apple isn't cutting down on it. This is the only way to create custom container view controllers prior to iOS 5. Apple actually listened to the developers and made it easier to do this sort of thing in iOS 5 with child and parent view controller methods, not to mention they made it so it worked hierarchically.
In most cases, this wouldn't actually be a problem in terms of applications crashing or performance or anything. It can be a problem in some cases, because let's say you have a child view controller. You add the view controller's view to your root view controller. Prior to iOS 5, child view controllers were things like navigation controller view controllers, tab bar controller view controllers, and modal view controllers. What happens when you have a button that calls [self.parentViewController dismissModalViewControllerAnimated:YES];? Technically, the view controller isn't being presented as a modal view controller, you added the view to the root view controller view.
In iOS5, you're able to add child view controllers to view controllers and are able to transition from one child view controller to another.
Now even if your view controller doesn't have a different parent, adding a "root" view controller to another root view controller isn't the best way to do it (especially since you don't get access to the parent view controller unless you explicitly create a parentViewController pointer in the child view controller). So in the end, Apple just made it easier and more decoupled.
It is OK to do it so long you take the responsibility of managing the viewController life cycle events
initWithNibName...
loadView:
viewDidLoad:...
.
.
viewDidUnload..
dealloc
memoryWarnings
orientation changes
So if you create a custom "container view controller" it becomes your responsibility to call all these methods on child viewControllers at the appropriate time. Think of it as "If you were to implement UITabBarController" what all will you have to manage regarding the children ??"
It quickly gets complex. Adding another viewController's view as subview is childs play.
iOS 5 does some of this stuff for you by specifying parent child relationship, however I still haven't seen any sample code anywhere yet to point to.
I'd say it is not incorrect or wrong to create view controller containers, especially when Apple engineers do that themselves. UITabBarController, UINavigationController or UISplitViewController - they are all view controller containers. More over many great apps with unique UX do that more common than you think. However the real issue is that it's quite hard to do it the right way, so e.g. view lifecycle, memory management and rotation handling is done properly along the hierarchy of views. Fortunately Apple guys did a decent job and iOS5 introduced lots of functionalities regarding controller containers:
UIViewController class reference
View Controller Programming Guide for iOS
If you're interested how above problems had to be addressed before iOS5, read these two very good blog posts:
Writing high-quality view controller containers
Using view controllers wisely
In iOS5 using storyboard feature I want to create a custom container which will have 2 ViewControllers embedded in it. For Example, embed Table view controller as well as a view controller both in one ViewController.
That is, one view controller will have 2 relationship:
to table view controller
to view controller which in turn will have 4 UIImage view Or UIButton in it
Is creating this type of relationship possible using storyboard's drag drop feature only & not programmatically?
,You should only have one view controller to control the scene. However, this viewController might have two other view controllers that control particular subviews on your scene. To do this you create properties in your scene viewController, in your case one for your tableViewController and one for your view. I like to keep things together so I make both these viewControllers outlets and create them in interface builder. To create them in interface builder pull in an Object from the Object library and set its type to the relevant viewController. Hook it up to the appropriate outlet you just created in your scene's viewController - Note: this is important otherwise the viewController will be released if you are using ARC and crash your app. Then hook these viewControllers up to the view you want them to control and you are done.
Alternatively you can instantiate and hop up your viewControllers in your scenes viewController should you prefer to do this.
Hope this helps.
Edit: On reflection this is not a good idea and actually goes against the HIG you should maintain only one ViewController for each screen of content and instead try to create a suitable view class and have the single view controller deal with the interactions between the various views.
There is a way to do it that isn't too hacky. It is described at the following URL for UITabBarControllers, which you could use the first view controller in the list control the first subview, and the second one control the other. Or, you can probably adapt the code to work with UISplitViewController.
http://bartlettpublishing.com/site/bartpub/blog/3/entry/351
Basically, it works by replacing the tabbarcontroller at runtime after iOS has finished configuring it.
Using a UINavigationViewController, how do I find out how a view has appeared?
The view has either appeared in a straightforward manner, as the first view in the UINavigationController stack. Or it has appeared because a second view has been popped and the first view has revealed itself again. How do you find out which of these happened?
The only reliable way to do this, as far as I'm aware, is to subclass UINavigationController and override the UINavigationBarDelegate methods:
– navigationBar:shouldPushItem:
– navigationBar:didPushItem:
– navigationBar:shouldPopItem:
– navigationBar:didPopItem:
Don't forget to call super, of course.
Simple approach is to add a property to your RootViewController to track whether or not it has pushed another view onto the navigationController.
-(BOOL)hasPushedSecondView;
Initialize to NO in your init method.
Before pushing secondViewControllers view onto the stack, update the property to YES.
In viewWillAppear, check the value and update your view accordingly. Depending on how you want the application to behave you may need to reset the hasPushedsecondview property back to NO.
you could take a look at the leftBarButtonItem or backBarButtonItem, based on how your application is written and determine how the view appeared. If it is on top, unless you have a custom leftBarButtonItem, there would be no object there.
You can determine this directly via a couple of methods on your UIViewController subclass.
From Apple's documentation:
Occasionally, it can be useful to know why a view is appearing or
disappearing. For example, you might want to know whether a view
appeared because it was just added to a container or whether it
appeared because some other content that obscured it was removed. This
particular example often appears when using navigation controllers;
your content controller’s view may appear because the view controller
was just pushed onto the navigation stack or it might appear because
controllers previously above it were popped from the stack.
The UIViewController class provides methods your view controller can
call to determine why the appearance change occurred.
isMovingFromParentViewController: view was hidden because view controller was removed from container
isMovingToParentViewController: view is shown because it's being added to a container
isBeingPresented: view is being shown because it was presented by another view controller
isBeingDismissed: view is being hidden because it was just dimissed
So I'm trying to find out the best way to swap views for an iPhone game I'm making. I have a "root view controller" that has a reference to all the view controllers I want to swap between. So I add the main menu view to this root view controller - [self.view addSubview:mainMenuController.view]; - Then in the main menu view I have an instructions button. I define an IBAction in the mainMenuController to respond to the instructions button being clicked. From there, I call [self.view removeFromSuperview] which works great. It gets rid of the main menu. So next I want to add the instructions view. I figured that it would be as simple as [super.view addSubview:super.instructionsController.view], but no luck! I've thought of a few ways to get around this, but they all seem very inelegant, as I would like to keep all references to my view controllers in one place, the root view controller. Any thoughts?
Could you not have your main menu view controller tell the root view controller that it's closed, along with a reference to what view it should load next? I'm assuming you're not doing something akin to what UITableView does, in which case you'd likely want to use a stack.
Are you mixing super (an Objective-C keyword) with self.superview (an UIView property)?
At any rate it's indeed a better design to inform your main controller to switch to another view, rather than making that decision from the added subview.
I just got around it by setting a delegate property in each of my controllers to the root view controller.