In iOS5 using storyboard feature I want to create a custom container which will have 2 ViewControllers embedded in it. For Example, embed Table view controller as well as a view controller both in one ViewController.
That is, one view controller will have 2 relationship:
to table view controller
to view controller which in turn will have 4 UIImage view Or UIButton in it
Is creating this type of relationship possible using storyboard's drag drop feature only & not programmatically?
,You should only have one view controller to control the scene. However, this viewController might have two other view controllers that control particular subviews on your scene. To do this you create properties in your scene viewController, in your case one for your tableViewController and one for your view. I like to keep things together so I make both these viewControllers outlets and create them in interface builder. To create them in interface builder pull in an Object from the Object library and set its type to the relevant viewController. Hook it up to the appropriate outlet you just created in your scene's viewController - Note: this is important otherwise the viewController will be released if you are using ARC and crash your app. Then hook these viewControllers up to the view you want them to control and you are done.
Alternatively you can instantiate and hop up your viewControllers in your scenes viewController should you prefer to do this.
Hope this helps.
Edit: On reflection this is not a good idea and actually goes against the HIG you should maintain only one ViewController for each screen of content and instead try to create a suitable view class and have the single view controller deal with the interactions between the various views.
There is a way to do it that isn't too hacky. It is described at the following URL for UITabBarControllers, which you could use the first view controller in the list control the first subview, and the second one control the other. Or, you can probably adapt the code to work with UISplitViewController.
http://bartlettpublishing.com/site/bartpub/blog/3/entry/351
Basically, it works by replacing the tabbarcontroller at runtime after iOS has finished configuring it.
Related
I have a "container" viewController, that hold a few container views using storyboard.
each of that container view has a link to an embedded viewcontroller's view.
Since im working on a big project, it turns out that the storyboard file is massive and contains a lot of "child" viecontrollers view layout. it will be a problem working on that file when a few people needs to be working simultaneously on it. and thats not good for me.
i would like to know if theres a way to load into each container view a viewcontroller's xib file, and still be using storyboard.
Meaning, creating .xib files for each viewcontroller instead of holding them in the storyboard itself, and link them to the container views in the storyboard.
thanks,
You can move your view controller layout into a separate xib. As you say, this is a very convenient way to share layouts across storyboards.
When setting up a container view in your storyboard, make sure you delete the provided view in the embedded ViewController. Set the custom class for the ViewController to your class name. Name the xib to match the class (e.g. FooViewController.xib so it can be found when FooViewController.m is loaded.)
If you don't delete the View in the storyboard view controller layout, you'll see that empty view instead. Your viewDidLoad method in your view controller won't be called, because the View is the default Storyboard View.
I'm using Xcode 6.1 for iOS 8 on a pre-iOS 7 project.
Yes, you can. A few observations:
All you need to do is to put in the sort of code that we used to use when using NIBs. In the case of containers, that means the typical container methods. If you've not done containment via code, see Creating Custom Container View Controllers in the View Controller Programming Guide. Bottom line, as you transition to a non-storyboard scene (or add a non-storyboard child view controller), just code it like you always used to in the NIB-based environment. You cannot represent this NIB-based scene in the storyboard. But you just get the controller like you always do with NIBs:
SecondViewController *controller = [[SecondViewController alloc] initWithNibName:nil bundle:nil];
You obviously lose many of the benefits of using storyboards (e.g. sizing the child scene on the basis of the container view in the parent scene), but you're no worse off than you were in a NIB environment. But in answer to your question as to whether you can "link them to the container views in the storyboard", you cannot represent this relationship in the storyboard itself, but rather you link them up programmatically.
If your separate teams are working in single-scene environments, you can use this NIB approach. You should also contemplate, though, just having multiple storyboards, one for each logical team. You'll still have to resort to code as you transition between storyboards, just like you do in this NIB approach, but if one of your teams has multiple scenes to deal with, they can enjoy storyboard benefits within their portion of the project. When you want to get to the first scene in the next storyboard, you can:
UIStoryboard *secondaryStoryboard = [UIStoryboard storyboardWithName:#"SecondStoryboard" bundle:nil];
SecondViewController *controller = [secondaryStoryboard instantiateInitialViewController];
If your child needs to transition to a new scene on your storyboard, I find it useful to add my own parentStoryboard property to my child controller, which it can then useful if you need to do something like instantiateViewControllerWithIdentifier. Obviously, if you're not transitioning to new controllers, you may not need to do that, but if you are, having a UIStoryboard property can be useful.
I have an WizardSequenceViewController with an IBOutlet WizardView *_wizardView. In many WizardSequenceViewController.xib file I have the view outlet connected to the File's Owner - WizardSequenceViewController. I have a subview of that view defined with the class attribute set to WizardView. I have connected that WizardView to the outlet in the File's Owner. Finally, in my WizardView.xib I have a UILabel that I have placed in the file to test if the view is being rendered. When I select the WizardSequenceViewController from my tab bar, I see the superview view but not the subview _wizardView. When I set a breakpoint in my -(id)initWithCoder method in my WizardView.m file I see it stop there, so I know that it is calling that initializer (and thus it should be using the xib to load that file). I have tried many iterations and variations to get this thing to work but I can't and I am going crazy. Does anybody have any ideas?
From Apple doc "View Controller Basics, About Custom View Controllers":
The one-to-one correspondence between a view controller and the views in its view hierarchy is the key design consideration. You should not use multiple custom view controllers to manage different portions of the same view hierarchy. Similarly, you should not use a single custom view controller object to manage multiple screens worth of content.
Note: If you want to divide a view hierarchy into multiple subareas and manage each one separately, use generic controller objects (custom objects descending from NSObject) instead of view controller objects to manage each subarea. Then use a single view controller object to manage the generic controller objects.
Maybe you can't do a view-and-subview outlet setup in a view controller. And I'm not sure assigning the subview outlet to a separate NSObject subclass would work either, because how would you present it? Could you write your subview programmatically, using initWithFrame and addSubview, instead of making it an outlet? Or, if you really want to set it up graphically, could you assign it to a separate view controller as owner? Then the top view controller will call presentModal on the sub view controller. Or, if all you need is a UILabel as a subview, just add the label to the main view?
Even I faced a similar issue. But got it resolved by following steps given in the following link. Hope it helps.
http://blog.yangmeyer.de/blog/2012/07/09/an-update-on-nested-nib-loading
I have created Storyboard with several views calling each other, now I need to create the code
I notice that XCode didn't created .h and .m controller files for each View from storyboard.
Should I create them manually?
Should I keep only one controller? (or few depending of separation of concerns on MVC)
Is there a pattern for developing this?
thanks
The usual approach is one view controller pr. screen full of content. You can imagine having one view controller for a tableview, with any sort of content, and then another view controller that presents that content in a new screen full of content if a row is pressed.
Normally when you have subviews inside of your view controllers, you wire them up in interfacebuilder. Then for instance if you want to populate a view that has a uiimageview and a uiactivityindicatorview inside it, you can control their behavior and how their populated from the view controllers code. You could also if you want something very generic and you feel that one view will probably take up a lot of code in your view controller, create a uiview subclass for it, and then set the class in interface builder.
Did this help? Please let me know if you need more clarification.
It's entirely up to you whether you have a ViewController for each view. If you have many views I would recommend it. Even if you have 2 or 3 views you probably still should. Things can get really confusing when each view has a different task but all have similar IBOutlets.
TLDR; Personally, I would say it was good practice to have a ViewController for each view if each view has a separate task.
In an iPad application I have a tab Controller containing several view controllers. One of these view Controller (call it MainViewController) needs 2 table views side by side.
So I wrote 2 UITableViewController subclasses and from MainViewController, I alloc/init both subclasses of UITableViewController, and add the tableview from each to the MainViewController's view.
This means that UITableViewController subclasses's views are subviews of MainViewController's view.
This answer: https://stackoverflow.com/a/7684648/191463 says that doing that is incorrect and it seems Apple are starting to cut down on it.
I really do not want to have to put all the code from both UITableViewControllers in MainViewController, as it will make it much harder to read and in future could create duplicate code, if I want to use one of the tableview elsewhere in the app by itself.
Is this actually a problem, if it is how do I do it properly?
Apple isn't cutting down on it. This is the only way to create custom container view controllers prior to iOS 5. Apple actually listened to the developers and made it easier to do this sort of thing in iOS 5 with child and parent view controller methods, not to mention they made it so it worked hierarchically.
In most cases, this wouldn't actually be a problem in terms of applications crashing or performance or anything. It can be a problem in some cases, because let's say you have a child view controller. You add the view controller's view to your root view controller. Prior to iOS 5, child view controllers were things like navigation controller view controllers, tab bar controller view controllers, and modal view controllers. What happens when you have a button that calls [self.parentViewController dismissModalViewControllerAnimated:YES];? Technically, the view controller isn't being presented as a modal view controller, you added the view to the root view controller view.
In iOS5, you're able to add child view controllers to view controllers and are able to transition from one child view controller to another.
Now even if your view controller doesn't have a different parent, adding a "root" view controller to another root view controller isn't the best way to do it (especially since you don't get access to the parent view controller unless you explicitly create a parentViewController pointer in the child view controller). So in the end, Apple just made it easier and more decoupled.
It is OK to do it so long you take the responsibility of managing the viewController life cycle events
initWithNibName...
loadView:
viewDidLoad:...
.
.
viewDidUnload..
dealloc
memoryWarnings
orientation changes
So if you create a custom "container view controller" it becomes your responsibility to call all these methods on child viewControllers at the appropriate time. Think of it as "If you were to implement UITabBarController" what all will you have to manage regarding the children ??"
It quickly gets complex. Adding another viewController's view as subview is childs play.
iOS 5 does some of this stuff for you by specifying parent child relationship, however I still haven't seen any sample code anywhere yet to point to.
I'd say it is not incorrect or wrong to create view controller containers, especially when Apple engineers do that themselves. UITabBarController, UINavigationController or UISplitViewController - they are all view controller containers. More over many great apps with unique UX do that more common than you think. However the real issue is that it's quite hard to do it the right way, so e.g. view lifecycle, memory management and rotation handling is done properly along the hierarchy of views. Fortunately Apple guys did a decent job and iOS5 introduced lots of functionalities regarding controller containers:
UIViewController class reference
View Controller Programming Guide for iOS
If you're interested how above problems had to be addressed before iOS5, read these two very good blog posts:
Writing high-quality view controller containers
Using view controllers wisely
If I want to replace one screen of an app with another, but I don't use a navbar/tabbar controller, then I could just remove oldViewController.view from window and add newViewController.view to it. That's all, now newViewController will get rotation events, etc.
But UIView does not reference "its" controller, so how is this possible, how iOS know it should make newViewController an active one? Does iOS do some magic, it internally references controller from view or what?
UPDATE:
I think I was misunderstood: I don't ask how to make some view controller an active one - I know that. I'm just curious, how is it possible that I pass some view to UIWindow object ([window addSubview:view]) and it somehow finds view controller although view doesn't know its controller.
yeh I had the same question like you. and I figured it out.
UIView is derived from UIResponder. and UIView must subclass UIResponder::nextResponder.
Its default implementation is returning a view controller of the view (if it hadn't, it would be super view)
So, consequently view can see its controller. that means window know the topmost view and also
its controller.
good luck.
Unfortunately, iOS only send events to the first ViewController of the stack. You can try and present a new one on the top of others with video for example, it will never rotate.
If you don't use navbar/tabbar controller you will have to add and remove everytime from the Window to keep only one at the time if you wand to have events.
The main UIWindow class for your application will have a view controller set in its rootViewController property. That controller's view is the "main" view for the app. This is usually setup in the main .xib for the project. That view controller will receive the usual events like "viewDidAppear" or "willRotateToInterfaceOrientation". You can put up your own view over top of it if you want to, but you will need to manage those events yourself. Usually you don't do that though. You just use a UINavigationController or UITabBarController as your rootViewController and allow them to manage getting the events to new "pushed" view controllers, or you popup view controllers with "presentModalViewController".