I have a database reader channel set up that actually reads the database at 10 second intervals and sends to a web service just fine. We get a valid response from the wsdl.
However, I need to update the database record so that it is flagged as having been processed. in this case we are simple changing a field from 100 to 101. However, when I try to update the field OR send an email containing ANY data that has been stored into mapper variables I get nothing. The database does not update. Emails send blanks for fields.
When I go into the channel messages for processed messages I can see good data in the Raw Message and Encoded Message tabs. There are no values in the Mappings tab.
Any suggestions on troubleshooting?
The Run-on-Update statement does not have access to the channel map, as it runs after message Encoding (and even the post-processor, I believe).
It DOES have access to the globalChannelMap and the responseMap. Put your new ID in the globalChannelMap and you should be good to go.
If you also want to send an email, would recommend you instead add an SMTP Writer destination (e.g., SMTP writer), which will have access to any channelMap variables created in a 'Destination 1'; as well as the globalChannelMap.
Related
We are currently incorporating a FIX engine (using QuickFixJ) in our application. We will be the initiator and use trade capture reports to get informed on all trades happening on the platform.
When persisting the trade capture reports, we first buffer them for performance reasons and later insert them all at once on the database in a single transaction. We are using the JdbcStore to persist the sent FIX messages on the database as we cannot rely on the hard disk. However, we do not want the JdbcStore to persist the session information (target sequence number, sender sequence number etc) because this would open a new transaction for every single message we receive (which we want to avoid due to performance reasons). Instead, we manually save the last seen and sent sequence numbers.
I have not found a configuration of QuickFixJ which would allow this. If we create a JdbcStore using the JdbcStoreFactory, it expects a table on the database to store session information. Is there any way to configure QuickFixJ to only persist the sent messages, but not the session information?
I'm sending mass messages with custom messages per subscriber, when I get the bounce-back I use my own cocktail to read the STMP emails.
What I haven't figure it out is how to add a unique ID for each email that is sent out, so in my bounce-back I can read the email's code and look for that particular ID, currently when I read the bounce I look for the recipient email compare to what I have based on creation date plus the email...
Is not efficient and 20 emails out of 1K or so gets lost cuz I can't find in bounce the headers due to some servers custom messages although it does return headers but I have nothing to compared with...
So is there a way to add this UUID in Swift services? I have seen that Swift is adding its own UUID but I haven't been able to retrieve it, when the message is sent I want that UUID so that I can save it and then latter I can read it from the bounces...
So, if I can't retrieve it, can I add my own?
I wanna have a relation email and UUID that was use when that message was sent.
$message_out = (new \Swift_Message($out->subject))
->setFrom($out->from_email, $out->from_name)
->setTo($out->email)
->setBody($content, 'text/html')
->setReplyTo('noreply#foo.com', 'No reply');
$message_out->send($mensaje_mail, $errors_sent);
Is this a header I can add the retrieve it in the bounce-back messages?
Thank you.
I need to add a custom header to an email using the System.Net.Mail.MailMessage class and then using the Microsoft.Exchange.WebServices.Data.EmailMessage class I need to read that value.
What I'm trying to do exactly is bounce processing for emails we send out. I am generating a new Guid value and adding it to the headers right before it's sent. I'm storing that value in a database and need to match it up when a separate process scans the inbox for processing. I all of that working except one part - I can't get the message ID from the header.
I know messages have a Message-ID header (which is automatically added) and I can access that but what I'm having difficulty with is getting that value when it's sent in the first place. Is that even possible? If so I'll use that instead of my own value.
I can get the email address and the other relevant information but the system I've written uses the message ID I was assigning as the foreign key used in joins in the database.
Any guidance on this would be appreciated. I doubt I'm the only person whose ever tried doing this.
Sorry everyone, the email I was testing with didn't have the header in it, that's why it couldn't be found.
I created a new email with it added and I could access it through the InternetMessageHeaders property of the EmailMessage object.
I will use java mail api to handle mails like thunderbird etc. I have to fetch mails having 1000 messages. My design will be: When user performs a synch on a folder, i will get all uids of the messages in the folder:
Message[] msgs = ufolder.getMessagesByUID(1, UIDFolder.LASTUID);
// Use a suitable FetchProfile
FetchProfile fp = new FetchProfile();
fp.add(FetchProfile.Item.ENVELOPE);
fp.add(FetchProfile.Item.FLAGS);
I wil then compare the list of uids with the list stored in my db.
For the deleted ones, for example a message is not in the folder but in the db, i will mark it as deleted.
For the new ones, for example a message is in the folder but not in the db, i will mark as possible new. But, because messageuids are not safe (can be changed by the mail server on some cases), for the new mails, i will use additioanlly a custom hash value build from message id in the header + subject + receivedate and build a md5 hash. Only for the possible new mails i will use this hash and catch new mails.
For the moved messages, because their uids will be changed in the new folder, it will be flagged as deleted in the first and will be a new message in new folder, but the message will have same custom hash value becaue message id in the header and other properties will remain same duing the movement.
Question about performance issue: On each click on folder (folder synch) i will do the compare operation of all uids in the folder with the local uid list stored in the db to learn the deleted ones. I could not find another better way to accomplish this. As you know, thunderbird catches immediately a deleted message without relogin, even if the folder is large and the deleted message is very old (5 years). I think thunderbird also compares all message uids in that folder with a list stored locally.
How can i implement a better mechanism for the synch for a better performance? Does thunderbird apply a different approach? How can thunderbird
accomplish it so quickly?
If we were interested only for the new messages, i could have kept last stored uid and only compare the new messages later than that, but for the deleted ones, i already have to compare full folder. Additionally, UIDNEXT value is always -1 in my mail server, if it were set correctly, it will not help to get deleted ones again, a full compare is a must i think, am I wrong?
Note: I canot not use or add message listeners because the appliaction is server-client based and the mail handling task is on the server side and we do not support threads listeners etc. The events should be triggered from the client and the request is being processed on ther server and a response is returned and client handles the response on the gui.
What you want is called condstore or quick resync, RFC7162 in both cases. That's what Thunderbird uses.
That's a pair of extensions support commands like "give me all the UIDs that have changed since last time I connected", "tell me what's been deleted" and so on.
If you can't use threads to listen for these events from the mail server, your options are very limited. Probably the best thing you can do is limit the resynchronization to the messages that are visible to the client.
When a new lead comes in, I want to use a before trigger and a Visualforce email template that contains lead field values to send an email using the SingleEmailMessage class. The email is being generated, but all of the lead fields are null even though (known via System.Debug) they do have values going into the call.
Since I'm passing the still-unsaved lead Id via the mail.setWhatId(lead.Id) method, I'm beginning to think that the mail class is using the Id value and trying to do a database look-up rather than as a reference to the still unsaved lead in memory.
Does anyone know if that's the case? My class works flawlessly when the lead already exists.
If it is the case that the Apex mail class does a DB read, any pattern suggestions for the case where one needs to send and email and update a lead field value before the lead is saved? I can't use the Workflow email notification because the email is being addressed to customers, and there's some additional Apex code that sorts out what address to fetch from existing Account records based on some Lead fields--hence I think the need for using VF email templates in the first place.
setWhatId (and pretty much any method that takes an ID value as an argument) definitely does expect the row to be persisted already. To get around this, you should be able to just do your field update in the before trigger, and add an after trigger to send the email.