I have a collection that stored information about devices like the following:
/* 1 */
{
"_id" : {
"startDate" : "2012-12-20",
"endDate" : "2012-12-30",
"dimensions" : ["manufacturer", "model"],
"metrics" : ["deviceCount"]
},
"data" : {
"results" : "1"
}
}
/* 2 */
{
"_id" : {
"startDate" : "2012-12-20",
"endDate" : "2012-12-30",
"dimensions" : ["manufacturer", "model"],
"metrics" : ["deviceCount", "noOfUsers"]
},
"data" : {
"results" : "2"
}
}
/* 3 */
{
"_id" : {
"dimensions" : ["manufacturer", "model"],
"metrics" : ["deviceCount", "noOfUsers"]
},
"data" : {
"results" : "3"
}
}
And I am trying to query the documents using the _id field which will be unique. The problem I am having is that when I query for all the different attributes as in:
db.collection.find({$and: [{"_id.dimensions":{ $all: ["manufacturer","model"], $size: 2}}, {"_id.metrics": { $all:["noOfUsers","deviceCount"], $size: 2}}]});
This matches 2 and 3 documents (I don't care about the order of the attributes values), but I would like to only get 3 back. How can I say that there should not be any other attributes to _id than those that I specify in the search query?
Please advise. Thanks.
Unfortunately, I think the closest you can get to narrowing your query results to just unordered _id.dimensions and unordered _id.metrics requires you to know the other possible fields in the _id subdocument field, eg. startDate and endDate.
db.collection.find({$and: [
{"_id.dimensions":{ $all: ["manufacturer","model"], $size: 2}},
{"_id.metrics": { $all:["noOfUsers","deviceCount"], $size: 2}},
{"_id.startDate":{$exists:false}},
{"_id.endDate":{$exists:false}}
]});
If you don't know the set of possible fields in _id, then the other possible solution would be to specify the exact _id that you want, eg.
db.collection.find({"_id" : {
"dimensions" : ["manufacturer", "model"],
"metrics" : ["deviceCount", "noOfUsers"]
}})
but this means that the order of _id.dimensions and _id.metrics is significant. This last query does a document match on exact BSON representation of _id.
Related
I did this in my mongodb:
db.teams.insert({name:"Alpha team",employees:[{name:"john"},{name:"david"}]});
db.teams.insert({name:"True team",employees:[{name:"oliver"},{name:"sam"}]});
db.teams.insert({name:"Blue team",employees:[{name:"jane"},{name:"raji"}]});
db.teams.find({"employees.name":/.*o.*/});
But what I got was:
{ "_id" : ObjectId("5ddf3ca83c182cc5354a15dd"), "name" : "Alpha team", "employees" : [ { "name" : "john" }, { "name" : "david" } ] }
{ "_id" : ObjectId("5ddf3ca93c182cc5354a15de"), "name" : "True team", "employees" : [ { "name" : "oliver" }, { "name" : "sam" } ] }
But what I really want is
[{"name":"john"},{"name":"oliver"}]
I'm having a hard time finding examples of this without using some kind of programmatic iterator/loop. Or examples I find return the parent document, which means I'd have to parse out the embedded array employees and do some kind of UNION statement?
Eg.
How to get embedded document in mongodb?
Retrieve only the queried element in an object array in MongoDB collection
Can someone point me in the right direction?
Please add projections to filter out the fields you don't need. Please refer the project link mongodb projections
Your find query should be constructed with the projection parameters like below:
db.teams.find({"employees.name":/.*o.*/}, {_id:0, "employees.name": 1});
This will return you:
[{"name":"john"},{"name":"oliver"}]
Can be solved with a simple aggregation pipeline.
db.teams.aggregate([
{$unwind : "$employees"},
{$match : {"employees.name":/.*o.*/}},
])
EDIT:
OP Wants to skip the parent fields. Modified query:
db.teams.aggregate([
{$unwind : "$employees"},
{$match : {"employees.name":/.*o.*/}},
{$project : {"name":"$employees.name",_id:0}}
])
Output:
{ "name" : "john" }
{ "name" : "oliver" }
i have some collections for our project.
Casts collection contains movie casts
Contents collection contains movie contents
i want to run aggregate lookup for get information about movie casts with position type.
i removed collections details unnecessary fields.
Casts details:
{
"_id" : ObjectId("5a6cf47415621604942386cd"),
"fa_name" : "",
"en_name" : "Ehsan",
"fa_bio" : "",
"en_bio" : ""
}
Contents details:
{
"_id" : ObjectId("5a6b8b734f1408137f79e2cc"),
"casts" : [
{
"_id" : ObjectId("5a6cf47415621604942386cd"),
"fa_fictionName" : "",
"en_fictionName" : "Ehsan2",
"positionType" : {
"id" : 3,
"fa_name" : "",
"en_name" : "Director"
}
},
{
"_id" : ObjectId("5a6cf47415621604942386cd"),
"fa_fictionName" : "",
"en_fictionName" : "Ehsan1",
"positionType" : {
"id" : 3,
"fa_name" : "",
"en_name" : "Writers"
}
}
],
"status" : 0,
"created" : Timestamp(1516997542, 4),
"updated" : Timestamp(1516997542, 5)
}
when i run aggregate lookup with bellow query, in new generated lookup array only one casts contents If in accordance with above casts array value aggregate lookup should return two casts content with two type. in casts array value exists two type of casts, 1) writers and directors. but returned director casts content. _casts should contains two object not one object!
aggregate lookup query:
{$lookup:{from:"casts",localField:"casts._id",foreignField:"_id",as:"_casts"}}
result:
{
"_id" : ObjectId("5a6b8b734f1408137f79e2cc"),
"casts" : [
{
"_id" : ObjectId("5a6cf47415621604942386cd"),
"fa_fictionName" : "",
"en_fictionName" : "Ehsan2",
"positionType" : {
"id" : 3,
"fa_name" : "",
"en_name" : "Director"
}
},
{
"_id" : ObjectId("5a6cf47415621604942386cd"),
"fa_fictionName" : "",
"en_fictionName" : "Ehsan1",
"positionType" : {
"id" : 3,
"fa_name" : "",
"en_name" : "Writers"
}
}
],
"_casts" : [
{
"_id" : ObjectId("5a6cf47415621604942386cd"),
"fa_name" : "",
"en_name" : "Ehsan",
"fa_bio" : "",
"en_bio" : ""
}
],
"status" : 0,
"created" : Timestamp(1516997542, 4),
"updated" : Timestamp(1516997542, 5)
}
EDIT-1
finally my problem is solved. i have only one problem with this query, this query doesn't show root document fields. finally solve this problem. finally query exists in EDIT-2.
query:
db.contents.aggregate([
{"$unwind":"$casts"},
{"$lookup":{"from":"casts","localField":"casts._id","foreignField":"_id","as":"casts.info"}},
{"$unwind":"$casts.info"},
{"$group":{"_id":"$_id", "casts":{"$push":"$casts"}}},
])
EDIT-2
db.contents.aggregate([
{"$unwind":"$casts"},
{"$lookup":{"from":"casts","localField":"casts._id","foreignField":"_id","as":"casts.info"}},
{"$unwind":"$casts.info"},
{$group:{"_id":"$_id", "data":{"$first":"$$ROOT"}, "casts":{"$push":"$casts"}}},
{$replaceRoot:{"newRoot":{"$mergeObjects":["$data",{"casts":"$casts"}]}}},
{$project:{"casts":0}}
]).pretty()
This is expected behavior.
From the docs,
If your localField is an array, you may want to add an $unwind stage
to your pipeline. Otherwise, the equality condition between the
localField and foreignField is foreignField: { $in: [
localField.elem1, localField.elem2, ... ] }.
So to join each local field array element with foreign field element you have to $unwind the local array.
db.content.aggregate([
{"$unwind":"$casts"},
{"$lookup":{"from":"casts","localField":"casts._id","foreignField":"_id","as":"_casts"}}
])
Vendor Collection
Items Collection
db.items.aggregate([
{ $match:
{"item_id":{$eq:"I001"}}
},
{
$lookup:{
from:"vendor",
localField:"vendor_id",
foreignField:"vendor_id",
as:"vendor_details"
}
},
{
$unwind:"$vendor_details"
},
{
$project:{
"_id":0,
"vendor_id":0,
"vendor_details.vendor_company_description":0,
"vendor_details._id":0,
"vendor_details.country":0,
"vendor_details.city":0,
"vendor_details.website":0
}
}
]);
Output
Your Casts collection shows only 1 document. Your Contents collection, likewise, shows only 1 document.
This is 1 to 1 - not 1 to 2. Aggregate is working as designed.
The Contents document has 2 "casts." These 2 casts are sub-documents. Work with those as sub-documents, or re-design your collections. I don't like using sub-documents unless I know I will not need to use them as look-ups or join on them.
I would suggest you re-design your collection.
Your Contents collection (it makes me think of "Movies") could look like this:
_id
title
releaseDate
genre
etc.
You can create a MovieCasts collection like this:
_id
movieId (this is _id from Contents collection, above)
castId (this is _id from Casts collection, below)
Casts
_id
name
age
etc.
I'm new to the MongoDB world. I'm trying to figure out how to count the number of children organizations assigned to a parent organization. I have documents that have this general structure:
{
"_id" : "001",
"parentOrganization" : {
"organizationId" : "pOrg1"
},
"childOrganization" : {
"organizationId" : "cOrg1"
}
},
{
"_id" : "002",
"parentOrganization" : {
"organizationId" : "pOrg1"
},
"childOrganization" : {
"organizationId" : "cOrg2"
}
},
{
"_id" : "003",
"parentOrganization" : {
"organizationId" : "pOrg2"
},
"childOrganization" : {
"organizationId" : "cOrg3"
}
}
Each document has a parentOrganization with an associated childOrganization. There may be multiple documents with the same parentOrganization, but different childOrganizations. There may also be multiple documents with the same parent/child relationship. Additionally, there may even be a case where a child org may associate with multiple parent orgs.
I'm trying to group by parentOrganization and then count the number of unique childOrganization's associated with each parentOrganization, as well as display the unique id's.
I have tried using an aggregation framework with $match and $group, but I'm still not getting into the child organization parts to count them. Here is what I'm currently attempting:
var s1 = {$match: {"parentOrganization.organizationId": {$exists: true}}};
var s2 = {$group: {_id: "$parentOrganization.organizationId", count: {$sum: "$childOrganization.organizationId"}}};
db.collection.aggregate(s1, s2);
My results are returning the parentOrganization, but my $sum is not returning the number of associated childOrganizations:
/* 1 */
{
"_id" : "pOrg1",
"count" : 0
}
/* 2 */
{
"_id" : "pOrg2",
"count" : 0
}
I get the feeling it is a bit more complicated than my limited knowledge has access to at this time. What details am I missing in this query?
Your $sum is referencing the childOrganization.organizationId value, which is a string. When $sum references a string, it will return the value 0.
I was a unsure of exactly what you were asking for, but I believe that these aggregations can help you on your way.
This will return a count of documents groups by the parentOrganization.organizationId
db.collection.aggregate({$group: {"_id":"$parentOrganization.organizationId", "count": {"$sum": 1}}})
Output:
{ "_id" : "pOrg2", "count" : 1 }
{ "_id" : "pOrg1", "count" : 2 }
This will return a count of unique parent/child organizations:
db.collection.aggregate(
{$group: {"_id": {"parentOrganization": "$parentOrganization.organizationId", "childOrganization": "$childOrganization.organizationId"}, "count":{$sum:1}}})
Output:
{ "_id" : { "parentOrganization" : "pOrg2", "childOrganization" : "cOrg3" }, "count" : 1 }
{ "_id" : { "parentOrganization" : "pOrg1", "childOrganization" : "cOrg2" }, "count" : 1 }
{ "_id" : { "parentOrganization" : "pOrg1", "childOrganization" : "cOrg1" }, "count" : 1 }
This will return a count of unique child organizations and get the set of unique child organizations as well using $addToSet. One caveat of using $addToSet is that the MongoDB 16MB limit on document size still holds. This means that if your collection is large enough such that the size of the set will make one document greater than 16MB, the command will fail. The first $group will create a set of child organizations grouped by parent organization. The $project is used simply to add the total size of the set to the result.
db.collection.aggregate([
{$group: {"_id" : "$parentOrganization.organizationId", "childOrgs" : { "$addToSet" : "$childOrganization.organizationId"}}},
{$project: {"_id" : "$_id", "uniqueChildOrgsCount": {"$size" : "$childOrgs"}, "uniqueChildOrgs": "$childOrgs"}}])
Output:
{ "_id" : "pOrg2", "uniqueChildOrgsCount" : 1, "uniqueChildOrgs" : [ "cOrg3" ]}
{ "_id" : "pOrg1", "uniqueChildOrgsCount" : 2, "uniqueChildOrgs" : [ "cOrg2", "cOrg1" ]}
During these aggregations, I left out the $match statement you included for simplicity, but you could add that back as well.
I have a collection :
gStats : {
"_id" : "id1",
"criteria" : ["key1":"value1", "key2":"value2"],
"groups" : [
{"id":"XXXX", "visited":100, "liked":200},
{"id":"YYYY", "visited":30, "liked":400}
]
}
I want to be able to update a document of the stats Array of a given array of criteria (exact match).
I try to do this on 2 steps :
Pull the stat document from the array of a given "id" :
db.gStats.update({
"criteria" : {$size : 2},
"criteria" : {$all : [{"key1" : "2096955"},{"value1" : "2015610"}]}
},
{
$pull : {groups : {"id" : "XXXX"}}
}
)
Push the new document
db.gStats.findAndModify({
query : {
"criteria" : {$size : 2},
"criteria" : {$all : [{"key1" : "2015610"}, {"key2" : "2096955"}]}
},
update : {
$push : {groups : {"id" : "XXXX", "visited" : 29, "liked" : 144}}
},
upsert : true
})
The Pull query works perfect.
The Push query gives an error :
2014-12-13T15:12:58.571+0100 findAndModifyFailed failed: {
"value" : null,
"errmsg" : "exception: Cannot create base during insert of update. Cause
d by :ConflictingUpdateOperators Cannot update 'criteria' and 'criteria' at the
same time",
"code" : 12,
"ok" : 0
} at src/mongo/shell/collection.js:614
Neither query is working in reality. You cannot use a key name like "criteria" more than once unless under an operator such and $and. You are also specifying different fields (i.e groups) and querying elements that do not exist in your sample document.
So hard to tell what you really want to do here. But the error is essentially caused by the first issue I mentioned, with a little something extra. So really your { "$size": 2 } condition is being ignored and only the second condition is applied.
A valid query form should look like this:
query: {
"$and": [
{ "criteria" : { "$size" : 2 } },
{ "criteria" : { "$all": [{ "key1": "2015610" }, { "key2": "2096955" }] } }
]
}
As each set of conditions is specified within the array provided by $and the document structure of the query is valid and does not have a hash-key name overwriting the other. That's the proper way to write your two conditions, but there is a trick to making this work where the "upsert" is failing due to those conditions not matching a document. We need to overwrite what is happening when it tries to apply the $all arguments on creation:
update: {
"$setOnInsert": {
"criteria" : [{ "key1": "2015610" }, { "key2": "2096955" }]
},
"$push": { "stats": { "id": "XXXX", "visited": 29, "liked": 144 } }
}
That uses $setOnInsert so that when the "upsert" is applied and a new document created the conditions specified here rather than using the field values set in the query portion of the statement are used instead.
Of course, if what you are really looking for is truly an exact match of the content in the array, then just use that for the query instead:
query: {
"criteria" : [{ "key1": "2015610" }, { "key2": "2096955" }]
}
Then MongoDB will be happy to apply those values when a new document is created and does not get confused on how to interpret the $all expression.
I have a collection in which element has a list of objects. I would like to use $orderBy on a specific field on the first element of a list of objects that each document has.
For example:
each document represents a user, and each user has a list of sessions. I would like to sort the users on the date stored in the first session of the list.
Maybe something like { $orderby: { "sessions[0].timestamp" : 1 } } ?
Is this possible?
The operation you ask for is a simple one with .sort(). Perhaps you are not aware of the usage of "dot notation" with MongoDB
With the following documents as a minimal example:
{
"name" : "Fred",
"sessions" : [ { "timestamp" : ISODate("2014-06-05T10:38:24.371Z") } ]
}
{
"name" : "Barney",
"sessions" : [ { "timestamp" : ISODate("2014-06-05T10:38:34.557Z") } ]
}
Issue the following query:
db.users.find({},{ _id: 0}).sort({ "sessions.0.timestamp": -1 })
And get the ordered result by the first item of the array, timestamp field:
{
"name" : "Barney",
"sessions" : [ { "timestamp" : ISODate("2014-06-05T10:38:34.557Z") } ]
}
{
"name" : "Fred",
"sessions" : [ { "timestamp" : ISODate("2014-06-05T10:38:24.371Z") } ]
}