What is the purpose of this test case here? - triggers

Could someone explain what this code is doing to me? I don't understand the purpose of the system.debug lines.
Test.startTest();
// 1. First check to see if it's a brand new Owner ID
System.debug('first test'); // Creating a new opportunity to start Trigger
Opportunity newtestOpp1 = TestUtil.initOpportunity(TestUtil.initAccount(),TestUtil.initContact());
User testUser1 = TestUtil.initUser();
newtestOpp1.OwnerId = testUser1.Id;//setting OwnerId
System.debug('The opp owner should be null' + newtestOpp1.Op_Owner__c);
try{
insert newtestOpp1;
} catch ( DMLException d ) {
System.debug(d);
}
System.debug('The opp owner should not be null' + newtestOpp1.Op_Owner__c);

Looks to me like it's supposed to be testing whether some kind of workflow or trigger is setting a value in the Op_Owner__c field upon inserting an Opportunity record. The debug statements should actually be System.assert or System.assertEquals calls though, if the test is meant to actually verify the application's functionality. Debug statements aren't typically viewed during test case execution.
Here's a cleaned-up version that actually makes assertions about the Op_Owner__c field's value (which is the purpose of a test case), rather than just printing something to the debug log.
Test.startTest();
Opportunity newtestOpp1 = TestUtil.initOpportunity(TestUtil.initAccount(),TestUtil.initContact());
User testUser1 = TestUtil.initUser();
newtestOpp1.OwnerId = testUser1.Id;//setting OwnerId
System.assertEquals(null, newtestOpp1.Op_Owner__c, 'The opp owner should be null');
try{
insert newtestOpp1;
} catch ( DMLException d ) {
System.debug(d);
}
System.assertNotEquals(null, newtestOpp1.Op_Owner__c, 'The opp owner should not be null');

Related

Trying to update Values in Standard Object from metaData

I am using Trigger isBefore
In System.debug(opp.get(metaData.get(0).Opportunity_Field_Name__c), it is showing correct Values but not Updating in Opportunity Object
Below is Trigger and its Apex Class Trigger
Trigger
trigger MetadataObjectFieldMapping on Opportunity (before insert, before update)
{
if(Trigger.isInsert || Trigger.isUpdate )
{
MetadataObjectFieldMappingHandler oppHandler = new MetadataObjectFieldMappingHandler();
oppHandler.Show(Trigger.new);
}
}
And Apex Class
public class MetadataObjectFieldMappingHandler {
List<String> strAccField = new List<String>();
//Getting List of MetaData Values
List<Object_Field_Mapping__mdt> metaData = new List<Object_Field_Mapping__mdt>
([SELECT Account_Field_Name__c,
Opportunity_Field_Name__c
FROM Object_Field_Mapping__mdt]);
//Function to check if Field Name Exists in Object or not
public Boolean hello(String objName, String fieldName)
{
Boolean temp = False;
//Creating Schema to get all fields from Account and Opportunity Object
Map<String, Schema.SObjectField> accFields = Schema.getGlobalDescribe().get(objName).getDescribe().fields.getMap();
for(Schema.SObjectField field : accFields.values())
{
strAccField.add(field+'');
}
//Calling Account and Opportunity Object in fieldName
if(strAccField.contains(fieldName)){
System.debug('PASS '+fieldName);
temp = true;
}
return temp;
}
public void Show(List<opportunity> newOppList)
{
Boolean test1 = hello('Account',metaData.get(0).Account_Field_Name__c);
Boolean test2 = hello('Opportunity',metaData.get(0).Opportunity_Field_Name__c);
//If both Field Value exists
if(test1 && test2){
//Getting value from Opp using dynamic Query
String query = 'Select Account.'+metaData.get(0).Account_Field_Name__c+', '+metaData.get(0).Opportunity_Field_Name__c+' from Opportunity where Id IN : newOppList ';
List<Opportunity> oppList =database.query(query);
for(Opportunity opp : oppList){
opp.put(
metaData.get(0).Opportunity_Field_Name__c,
opp.Account.get(metaData.get(0).Account_Field_Name__c)
);
System.debug(opp.get(metaData.get(0).Opportunity_Field_Name__c));
}
}
}
Can you please tell me, why Value is not Updating in Opportunity Object while it showing in Debug Logs..?
Multiple fails here I think.
Apex is case-insensitive when you do if('a' == 'A'). But when comparing Strings in collections (Lists, Sets, Map keys) it suddenly becomes case-sensitive.
List<String> fields = new List<String>{'Id', 'Name'};
System.debug(fields.contains('name')); // false
(this should have been a Set<String> by the way, for performance and logical readability). So I suspect something's fishy there, in case. You didn't show your metadata but check this one (you have only 1 row now, right? If you have more than one - we'll your metaData.get(0) essentially returns a random row).
I don't like the cast from Schema.SObjectField to String either.
Next: String query = 'Select Account.'+metaData.get(0).Account_Field_Name__c+', '+metaData.get(0).Opportunity_Field_Name__c+' from Opportunity where Id IN : newOppList ';
This has a chance of working in before update. But for sure not in before insert. Nothing's in database yet, your query will return zero results. You have to loop through trigger.new, collec AccountIds, query Accounts (directly, not via Opportunity table) and then make final loop that writes data.
You passed newOppList to Show(). If you want to get the save to database for free - you should modify values on the original, on newOppList. Instead you modify the in-memory results of query (oppList). Nothing will happen to them, they'll be discarded. If you want to save them, you'd have to do it manually (but then you risk entering a loop of update triggers and SF will stop you).
You sure this has to be code? Sounds like a job for workflow or process builder. Or make them formula fields so you always display fresh value instead of such copying... When something changes on Account it won't automatically cascade down to all opps unless you make next trigger/process builder...

Get Line Items in an Invoice logic hook in SuiteCRM

Via a logic hook I'm trying to update fields of my products, after an invoice has been saved.
What I understand so far is, that I need to get the invoice related AOS_Products_Quotes and from there I could get the products, update the required fields and save the products. Does that sound about right?
The logic hook is being triggered but relationships won't load.
function decrement_stocks ( $bean, $event, $arguments) {
//$bean->product_value_c = $bean->$product_unit_price * $bean->product_qty;
$file = 'custom/modules/AOS_Invoices/decrement.txt';
// Get the Invoice ID:
$sInvoiceID = $bean->id;
$oInvoice = new AOS_Invoices();
$oInvoice->retrieve($sInvoiceID);
$oInvoice->load_relationship('aos_invoices_aos_product_quotes');
$aProductQuotes = $oInvoice->aos_invoices_aos_product_quotes->getBeans();
/*
$aLineItemslist = array();
foreach ($oInvoice->aos_invoices_aos_product_quotes->getBeans() as $lineitem) {
$aLineItemslist[$lineitem->id] = $lineitem;
}
*/
$sBean = var_export($bean, true);
$sInvoice = var_export($oInvoice, true);
$sProductQuotes = var_export($aProductQuotes, true);
$current = $sProductQuotes . "\n\n\n------\n\n\n" . $sInvoice . "\n\n\n------\n\n\n" . $sBean;
file_put_contents($file, $current);
}
The invoice is being retrieved just fine. But either load_relationship isn't doing anything ($sInvoice isn't changing with or without it) and $aProductQuotes is Null.
I'm working on SuiteCRM 7.8.3 and tried it on 7.9.1 as well without success. What am I doing wrong?
I'm not familiar with SuiteCRM specifics, however I'd always suggest to check:
Return value of retrieve(): bean or null?
If null, then no bean with the given ID was found.
In such case $oInvoice would stay empty (Your comment suggests that's not the case here though)
Return value of load_relationship(): true (success) or false (failure, check logs)
And I do wonder, why don't you use $bean?
Instead you seem to receive another copy/reference of $bean (and calling it $oInvoice)? Why?
Or did you mean to receive a different type bean that is somehow connected to $bean?
Then its surely doesn't have the same id as $bean, unless you specifically coded it that way.

Salesforce trigger - passing values from trigger record

Objective here – to extract the account__r.id from the record in the trigger and add the value to a list with each for-loop…
CODE SAMPLE ONE
if (trigger.isinsert) {
for (loan__c oloan : trigger.new){
system.debug(oloan);
Loan__c loanintrigger = new loan__c();
loanintrigger = [ SELECT loan__c.name,account__r.id from loan__c WHERE loan__c.id = : oloan.id];
Account a = new account ();
a.id = loanintrigger.account__r.id;
// debug to test insertion of value directly from trigger object.....
system.debug(a.id);
CODE SAMPLE TWO
if (trigger.isinsert) {
for (loan__c oloan : trigger.new){
system.debug(oloan);
Account a = new account ();
a.id = oloan.account__r.id;
// debug to test insertion of value directly from trigger object.....
system.debug(a.id);
So… trigger one runs and completes its assignment. Trigger two fails due to “missing argument.” I.e. – system.debug(a.id) shows that the id in the account object is null.
1, of course, requires a query for every record in the trigger. No style points.
This foreshadows another important and vexing question….
In the context of an after delete trigger, not even #1 works because you cannot query DB for data that has been deleted!
Can anybody suggest alternate approach? What am I missing?

Trigger works but test doesn't cover 75% of the code

I have a trigger which works in the sandbox. The workflow checks the field in the campaign level and compares it with the custom setting. If it matches, then it returns the target to the DS Multiplier field. The trigger looks as follows
trigger PopulateTarget on Campaign (before insert, before update)
{
for(Campaign campaign : Trigger.new)
{
if (String.isNotBlank(campaign.Apex_Calculator__c) == true)
{
DSTargets__c targetInstance = DSTargets__c.getInstance(campaign.Apex_Calculator__c);
{
String target = targetInstance .Target__c;
campaign.DS_Target_Multiplier__c = Target;
}
}
}
}
However, I had problems to write a proper test to this and asked for the help on the internet. I received the test
#isTest
private class testPopulateTarget{
static testMethod void testMethod1(){
// Load the Custom Settings
DSTargets__c testSetting = new DSTargets__c(Name='Africa - 10 Weeks; CW 10',Target__c='0.1538', SetupOwnerId = apexCalculatorUserId);
insert testSetting;
// Create Campaign. Since it would execute trigger, put it in start and stoptests
Test.startTest();
Campaign testCamp = new Campaign();
// populate all reqd. fields.
testCamp.Name = 'test DS campaign';
testCamp.RecordTypeId = '012200000001b3v';
testCamp.Started_Campaign_weeks_before_Event__c = '12 Weeks';
testCamp.ParentId= '701g0000000EZRk';
insert testCamp;
Test.stopTest();
testCamp = [Select ID,Apex_Calculator__c,DS_Target_Multiplier__c from Campaign where Id = :testCamp.Id];
system.assertEquals(testCamp.DS_Target_Multiplier__c,testSetting.Target__c);// assert that target is populated right
}
}
Such test returns the error "Compile Error: Variable does not exist: apexCalculatorUserId at line 6 column 122". If I remove that ApexCalculator part System.assertEquals then the test passes. However it covers 4/6 part of the code (which is 66%)
Could anyone help me how should I amend the code to make the coverage of 75%?
Yes, apexCalculatorUserId has not been defined. The code you were given appears to be incomplete. You'll need to look at the constructor DSTargets__c and see what kind of ID it is expecting there.
At a guess, you could try UserInfo.getUserId() to get the ID of the current user, but that may not be the ID that's expected in the constructor. It would be worth trying it to see if the test coverage improves.
1) Replace apexCalculatorUserId with UserInfo.getUserId()
2) I'm not sure what kind of field is Apex_Calculator__c on campaign. If its not a formula you want to insert a new line before "insert testCamp". Something like:
testCamp.Apex_Calculator__c = UserInfo.getUserId();

It is possible to execute MySQLi prepared statement before the other one is closed?

Lets say I have a prepared statement. The query that it prepares doesn't matter. I fetch the result like above (I can't show actual code, as it is something I don't want to show off. Please concentrate on the problem, not the examples meaningless) and I get
Fatal error: Call to a member function bind_param() on a non-object in... error. The error caused in the called object.
<?php
$mysqli = new mysqli(DB_HOST, DB_USER, DB_PASSWORD, DB_NAME);
class table2Info{
private $mysqli;
public function __construct($_mysqli){
$this->mysqli = $_mysqli;
}
public function getInfo($id)
{
$db = $this->mysqli->prepare('SELECT info FROM table2 WHERE id = ? LIMIT 1');
$db->bind_param('i',$db_id);
$db_id = $id;
$db->bind_result($info);
$db->execute();
$db->fetch();
$db->close();
return $info;
}
}
$t2I = new table2Info($mysqli);
$stmt->prepare('SELECT id FROM table1 WHERE name = ?');
$stmt->bind_param('s',$name);
$name = $_GET['name'];
$stmt->bind_result($id);
$stmt->execute();
while($stmt->fetch())
{
//This will cause the fatal-error
echo $t2I->getInfo($id);
}
$stmt->close();
?>
The question is: is there a way to do another prepared statement while another one is still open? It would simplify the code for me. I can't solve this with SQL JOIN or something like that, it must be this way. Now I collect the fetched data in an array and loop through it after $stmt->close(); but that just isn't good solution. Why should I do two loops when one is better?
From the error you're getting it appears that your statement preparation failed. mysqli::prepare returns a MySQLi_STMT object or false on failure.
Check for the return value from your statement preparation that is causing the error. If it is false you can see more details by looking at mysqli::error.