I'm trying to sign up for Google Workspace Essentials Starter with a "private person" *.pp.ua domain, which is free to use in my country. I have a new one just registered and set up at zoho.com free plan account.
After completing several steps on account creation, I'm facing the page saying:
Sorry, we can't complete your signup
Google works hard to keep spammers from using Google Workspace. As part of this effort, we refuse to create domains that we believe will be used for spam. Unfortunately, we may sometimes refuse legitimate signups. If you've been stopped in error, we're sorry for the inconvenience.
Google weighs several factors when evaluating registration attempts, including the number of domains that have been created from that location and whether the domains have just been created or have a good reputation on the internet. Users trying to create a lot of domains, who are using shared computers or computers infected with malware; or signing up for low reputation domains may hit this limit.
Also, I have an old domain in *.pp.ua, which hasn't been used before and failed that check the same way. Can't find any reason why my domain can't pass that check nor any documentation regarding this issue. So any clue is highly appreciated.
There is nothing in the GitHub guidelines, as far as I can see, that prevents people from making multiple personal accounts. I would like to create a "more serious" account and move my serious projects there, and keep the trash on a side-account.
The problem is that I used to have two accounts a few years ago, and GitHub actually banned both accounts due to that. They told me that "you are only allowed to have 1 account". I had to petition their support to reopen my main account. But it seems like they've changed their stance now, because I can't find any wording that prevents multiple accounts anymore.
I am Googling for the term multiple accounts site:help.github.com and the pages that come up seem to indicate that it's allowed these days.
For example, https://help.github.com/en/github/setting-up-and-managing-your-github-user-account/merging-multiple-user-accounts says "We recommend using only one user account to manage both personal and professional repositories", which sounds like they accept multiple accounts too.
Does anyone know? Perhaps some of you have multiple accounts successfully!
It would be better to create an Organization instead and keep your important projects there. It's always much easier to have a single account in terms on maintainability.
For instance: in BitBucket you cannot have your single public key attached to two different accounts.
I found the actual answer in the Terms of Service:
https://help.github.com/en/github/site-policy/github-terms-of-service
"One person or legal entity may maintain no more than one free Account (if you choose to control a machine account as well, that's fine, but it can only be used for running a machine)."
So that's why they banned me all those years ago. You're only allowed to have 1 account if you aren't a paying user.
But I will accept #emix answer, since he was the first to suggest the smart solution of making an Organization for my serious projects!
You can create New organisations linked to your main personal account.
my app has passed the first review (yay) - but has now been passed to Allion for 'hardware review'.
The issue is that I am not providing hardware, i've provided voice interactions for an open source HA system, which in turn can support 00s of device types.
The Amazon review process was happy for me to provide them credentials to my service, which had access to a subset of device types, to then QA the interactions.
Is this normal for the review process?
Thus far many of the supported services have been direct hardware partners who own their own hardware and cloud. If your integration is done in a slightly different way it may require special instructions to your reviewer that may be different from normal.
I have had further comment from Google. Unless I can provide 1 of every type of physical device that the underlying HA system supports, they will not review, or certify my app. What this tells me is that either Google aren't committed to small SaaS providers & HA enthusiasts, or that this comment is not true. I note that there are several equivalent services listed on Smart home app list, which do exactly the same thing as mine. I rather doubt they provided one of every manufacturers zwave switch/light etc etc. Very disappointing, Amazon have a more welcoming approach –
I want to know if there is a possibility to add a team member in iPhone Developer Portal that will have permissions (see / modify / update) ONLY to one application.
The reason - there is a big company (that has many applications in the App Store) that uploaded one of my applications and I have hard time to send an update to the application (can't access the guy that is responsible for all the iPhone applications).
I want to ask them to add me as a team member, but they might agree only if I won't be able to see/touch any other application except the one that I have developed...
Thank you.
I don't believe this is possible; there are no per-app permissions.
The available "roles" are explained here:
http://developer.apple.com/programs/roles/index.php
It seems a bit odd if they trust you to write an application that they've published under their corporate identity, but don't trust that you'll only change what you're meant to. Either way is seems the only solution to your problem is likely to be a non-technical one; you need to find a way to get to that guy, whether it's appealing to his better nature, or finding a path to someone more senior who can lean on him.
I'm uploading a binary for the first time. iTunes Connect has asked me:
Export laws require that products containing encryption be properly authorized for export.
Failure to comply could result in severe penalties.
For further information, click here.
Does your product contain encryption?
I use https://, but only via NSURLConnection and UIWebView.
My reading of this is that my app doesn't "contain encryption," but I'm wondering if this is spelled out anywhere. "Severe penalties" doesn't sound pleasant at all, so "I think that's right" is a bit sketchy... an authoritative answer would be better.
Thanks.
UPDATE: Using HTTPS is now exempt from the ERN as of late September, 2016
https://stackoverflow.com/a/40919650/4976373
Unfortunately, I believe that your app "contains encryption" in terms of US BIS even if you just use HTTPS (if your app is not an exception included in question 2).
Quote from FAQ on iTunes Connect:
"How do I know if I can follow the Exporter Registration and Reporting (ERN) process?
If your app uses, accesses, implements or incorporates industry standard encryption algorithms for purposes other than those listed as exemptions under question 2, you need to submit for an ERN authorization. Examples of standard encryption are: AES, SSL, https. This authorization requires that you submit an annual report to two U.S. Government agencies with information about your app every January.
"
"2nd Question: Does your product qualify for any exemptions provided under category 5 part 2?
There are several exemptions available in US export regulations under Category 5 Part 2 (Information Security & Encryption regulations) for applications and software that use, access, implement or incorporate encryption.
All liabilities associated with misinterpretation of the export regulations or claiming exemption inaccurately are borne by owners and developers of the apps.
You can answer “YES” to the question if you meet any of the following criteria:
(i) if you determine that your app is not classified under Category 5, Part 2 of the EAR based on the guidance provided by BIS at encryption question. The Statement of Understanding for medical equipment in Supplement No. 3 to Part 774 of the EAR can be accessed at Electronic Code of Federal Regulations site. Please visit the Question #15 in the FAQ section of the encryption page for sample items BIS has listed that can claim Note 4 exemptions.
(ii) your app uses, accesses, implements or incorporates encryption for authentication only
(iii) your app uses, accesses, implements or incorporates encryption with key lengths not exceeding 56 bits symmetric, 512 bits asymmetric and/or 112 bit elliptic curve
(iv) your app is a mass market product with key lengths not exceeding 64 bits symmetric, or if no symmetric algorithms, not exceeding 768 bits asymmetric and/or 128 bits elliptic curve.
Please review Note 3 in Category 5 Part 2 to understand the criteria for mass market definition.
(v) your app is specially designed and limited for banking use or ‘money transactions.’ The term ‘money transactions’ includes the collection and settlement of fares or credit functions.
(vi) the source code of your app is “publicly available”, your app distributed at free of cost to general public, and you have met the notification requirements provided under 740.13.(e).
Please visit encryption web page in case you need further help in determining if your app qualifies for any exemptions.
If you believe that your app qualifies for an exemption, please answer “YES” to the question."
It's not hard to get approval for your app the proper way. SSL (HTTPS/TLS) is still encryption and unless you are using it just for authentication, then you should get the proper approval. I just received approval, and my app is in the store now for something that uses SSL to encrypt data traffic (not just authentication).
Here is a blog entry I made so that others can do this the proper way.
apple itunes export restrictions
Short answer: Yes, but you don't have to do anything
I was searching the web for this for some hours. Actually it is pretty easy and you can verify this in itunes connect:
1. All you have to do
If your app uses only HTTPS or uses encryption only for authentication, tokens, etc., there is nothing you have to do, just include
<key>ITSAppUsesNonExemptEncryption</key><false/>
in your Info.plist and you are done.
2. Verification
You can verify this in itunes connect.
select your app
chose features
chose encryption
click "+"
follow the dialog
for https or authentication the answer is yes and yes
In any case you should of course read yourself carefully through the dialog.
A very helpful article can be found here:
https://www.cocoanetics.com/2017/02/itunes-connect-encryption-info/
I asked Apple the very same question and got the answer (from a Sr. Export Compliance Specialist), that "sending information over https is forcing the data to go through a secure channel from SSL, therefore it falls under the U.S. Government requirement for a CCATS review and approval." Note that it doesn't matter that Apple has already done this for their SSL implementation, but for the government, if you USE encryption that is the same (to them) as you would've coded it yourself. I also updated our blog (http://blog.theanimail.com) since Tim linked to it with updates and details on the process. Hope that helps.
All of this can be very confusing for an app developer that's simply using TLS to connect to their own web servers. Because ATS (App Transport Security) is becoming more important and we are encouraged to convert everything to https - I think more developers are going to encounter this issue.
My app simply exchanges data between our server and the user using the https protocol. Seeing the words "USES ENCRYPTION" in the disclaimers is a bit scary so I gave the US government office a call at their office and spoke to a representative of the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) http://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/about-bis/contact-bis.
The representative asked me about my app and since it passed the "primary function test" in that it had nothing to do with security/communications and simply uses https as a channel for connecting my customer data to our servers - it fell in the EAR99 category which means it's exempt from getting government permission (see https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/licensing/commerce-control-list-classification/export-control-classification-number-eccn)
I hope this helps other app developers.
If you use the Security framework or CommonCrypto libraries provided by Apple you do include crypto in your App and you have to answer yes - so simply because libraries were provided by Apple does not take you off the hook.
With regards to the original question, recent posts in the Apple Development Forums lead me to believe that you need to answer yes even if all you use is SSL.
As of September 20th, 2016, registering is no longer required for apps that use https (or perhaps other forms of encryption): https://web.archive.org/web/20170312060607/https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/informationsecurity2016-updates
In fact, on SNAP-R you can no longer choose 'encryption registration':
Specifically, they note:
Encryption Registrations no longer required – some of the information
from the registration now goes into the Supp. No. 8 to Part 742
report.
This means you may need to send an annual report to BIS, but you don't need to register and you can note when submitting your app that it is exempt.
Yes, according to iTunes Connect Export Compliance Information screens, if you use built-in iOS or MacOS encryption (keychain, https), you are using encryption for purposes of US Government Export regulations. Whether you qualify for an export compliance exemption depends on what your app does and how it uses this encryption. Attached images show the iTunes Connect Export Compliance Screens to help you determine your export reporting obligations. In particular, it states:
If you are making use of ATS or making a call to HTTPS please note that you are required to submit a year-end self classification report to the US government. Learn more
#hisnameisjimmy is correct: You will notice (at least as of today, Dec 1st 2016) when you go to submit your app for review and reach the Export Compliance walkthrough, you'll notice the menu now states that HTTPS is an exempt version of encryption (if you use it for every call):
I found this FAQ from the US Bureau of Industry and Security very helpful.
encryption
Question 15 (What is Note 4?) is the important point:
...
Examples of items that are excluded from Category 5, Part 2 by Note 4 include, but are not limited to, the following:
Consumer applications. Some examples:
piracy and theft prevention for software or music;
music, movies, tunes/music, digital photos – players, recorders and organizers
games/gaming – devices, runtime software, HDMI and other component interfaces, development tools
LCD TV, Blu-ray / DVD, video on demand (VoD), cinema, digital video recorders (DVRs) / personal video recorders (PVRs) – devices, on-line media guides, commercial content integrity and protection, HDMI and other component interfaces (not videoconferencing);
printers, copiers, scanners, digital cameras, Internet cameras – including parts and sub-assemblies
household utilities and appliances
Simple answers are Yes(App has encryption) and Yes(App uses Exempt encryption).
In my application, I am just opening my company's website in WKWebView but as it uses "https", it will be considered as exempt encryption.
Apple document for more info: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/security/complying_with_encryption_export_regulations?language=objc
Alternatively, you can just add key "ITSAppUsesNonExemptEncryption" and value "NO" in your app's info.plist file. and this way iTunes connect won't ask you that questions anymore.
More info: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/bundleresources/information_property_list/itsappusesnonexemptencryption?language=objc
You can follow these 3 simple steps to verify if your application is exempt or not: https://help.apple.com/app-store-connect/#/dev63c95e436
You may need to submit this annual-self-classification to US gov. For more info: https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/policy-guidance/encryption/4-reports-and-reviews/a-annual-self-classification
LOOKS LIKE HTTPS COUNTS
link to "Learn more":
https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/policy-guidance/encryption/4-reports-and-reviews/a-annual-self-classification
Just adding my personal interpretation of a very special case:
In my app the user has the option to go to a website themselves or let my app open Safari and Safari will call an HTTPS website. Could be any - own website, article etc etc. I interpret Safari making the actual HTTPS call, not my app and therefore answer the first question with No (or set the flag in the info.plist) and have no requirement to annually report.
If you're not explicitly using an encryption library, or rolling your own encryption code, then I think the answer is "no"