I'm trying to sign up for Google Workspace Essentials Starter with a "private person" *.pp.ua domain, which is free to use in my country. I have a new one just registered and set up at zoho.com free plan account.
After completing several steps on account creation, I'm facing the page saying:
Sorry, we can't complete your signup
Google works hard to keep spammers from using Google Workspace. As part of this effort, we refuse to create domains that we believe will be used for spam. Unfortunately, we may sometimes refuse legitimate signups. If you've been stopped in error, we're sorry for the inconvenience.
Google weighs several factors when evaluating registration attempts, including the number of domains that have been created from that location and whether the domains have just been created or have a good reputation on the internet. Users trying to create a lot of domains, who are using shared computers or computers infected with malware; or signing up for low reputation domains may hit this limit.
Also, I have an old domain in *.pp.ua, which hasn't been used before and failed that check the same way. Can't find any reason why my domain can't pass that check nor any documentation regarding this issue. So any clue is highly appreciated.
Related
All of a sudden Google started to say my application is a virus. Does anyone know the best way to reach out to them and to have a "closer" look? Microsoft has a SmartScreen submission page where you can upload your application and ask them to review it, and it works great & fast...
Every single antivrus other than Google's Cyren says my application is safe, including: AVG, ESET-NOD32, Mailware Bytes, McAfee, Symantec, Webroot, BitDefender, and etc... (I just listed the "famous" ones)
Cyren currently does have a way to submit such samples. They accept submissions via E-mail (with zipped and password-protected attachment), and via FTP.
For details, please see: https://www.cyren.com/support/reporting-av-misclassifications
Please note that Cyren is not owned by Google, and VirusTotal is in fact listing it as a separate positive result. I was unable to find what Google product is used. My best guess would be Google's SafeBrowsing.
There is nothing in the GitHub guidelines, as far as I can see, that prevents people from making multiple personal accounts. I would like to create a "more serious" account and move my serious projects there, and keep the trash on a side-account.
The problem is that I used to have two accounts a few years ago, and GitHub actually banned both accounts due to that. They told me that "you are only allowed to have 1 account". I had to petition their support to reopen my main account. But it seems like they've changed their stance now, because I can't find any wording that prevents multiple accounts anymore.
I am Googling for the term multiple accounts site:help.github.com and the pages that come up seem to indicate that it's allowed these days.
For example, https://help.github.com/en/github/setting-up-and-managing-your-github-user-account/merging-multiple-user-accounts says "We recommend using only one user account to manage both personal and professional repositories", which sounds like they accept multiple accounts too.
Does anyone know? Perhaps some of you have multiple accounts successfully!
It would be better to create an Organization instead and keep your important projects there. It's always much easier to have a single account in terms on maintainability.
For instance: in BitBucket you cannot have your single public key attached to two different accounts.
I found the actual answer in the Terms of Service:
https://help.github.com/en/github/site-policy/github-terms-of-service
"One person or legal entity may maintain no more than one free Account (if you choose to control a machine account as well, that's fine, but it can only be used for running a machine)."
So that's why they banned me all those years ago. You're only allowed to have 1 account if you aren't a paying user.
But I will accept #emix answer, since he was the first to suggest the smart solution of making an Organization for my serious projects!
You can create New organisations linked to your main personal account.
Forgive me if I sound gibberish. I use coding as my hobby in my free time (Non IT professional) and thinking to release a website on GitHub or Dropbox.
However, I guess these support The websites that are static in nature. The website which I am developing has form which is crucial where users will fill the details and click on submit in order to get the data.
Now before I dive into paid service of hosting, I would like to first begin with testing stage or host the website for free by using GitHub or so until I get confidence.
So my question- is it possible to run the website that has forms such contact name , number, address etc on GitHub or Dropbox?
Any answer or help, comments, suggestions is much appreciated. Alternative to GitHub are also welcome ( links leading on how to release would be helpful).
Thank you in advance.
I am not sure about hosting a website on Github and dropbox is really a good option or not. However as you are in starting face and you do not have any specific requirements like space and bandwidth and all I would not stop you to host your website on dropbox and github and it is free, you dont have to pay anything. for more information on it click here
I have another two options for you in which you might be interested.
(1) Heroku is one of the most popular platform for hosting your web-site or web-application. You can get up to 5 repositories free on basic account. I think you do not require any database but just in case if you do in future they do provide postgresql. You might find Little-bit challenging in starting for hosting on it as you are not IT professional however you will eventually start learning.
for more information on heroku click here
(2) you can host your website on freehosting which is free for 1 year and they provide 2 GB space for your website as you have static page I am sure it wont increase more than that. On top of that they do provide one MySql database too which in case you need.
I hope this helps you.
I originally posted this question as an 'answer' to:
Can a single company really not use QB API?...Semi Rant
but am reposting, because it is a question.
The original poster and I face a similar problem wanting to use the QBO API for an application designed for a single company. What would be the disadvantage of connecting my app to my QBO account using the intuit development server indefinitely, i.e., never take my app through the production qualification process?
Thank you.
I believe that is possible but then you can use at max 10 developer connections.
As we already mentioned we do not not support custom integrations at this time.
Even we wouldn’t recommend moving you to production as it would cost us $1k per year to security review it, and we would only recover about $60 per year in connection fees.
So, the disadvantage for you will be in terms of number of connections, limited support and your app vulnerability since it has not gone through the security review process.
Please read the policy docs mentioned here:
https://developer.intuit.com/docs/0025_quickbooksapi/0005_introduction_to_quickbooksapi/z_developer_policies_and_guidelines
Edit for the question asked:
When you login into developer.intuit.com, Go to Manage My Apps, then click your app.
You will see the number of connections for that app under Test connections.
It refers to the numbers of company files your app is associated with or has been authorized to access data.
I was setting up Google Apps for a small company (25 employees) and discovered that google want to be paid for each user when your organisation has more than 10 users. I am sure the limit used to be much higher (50 users).
Is there an alternative to using google apps that has similar feature set and can be used for free by a small organisation (25 users)
Edit: Additionally...
If I already have an account, can I add another domain as a sub-organisation, and therefore benefit from my existing higher user limit? Has anyone done this?
The limit used to be higher (25-50, though I don't recall for certain) and if the account was set up then, it's grandfathered.
Subdomain's are only available in the paid version, and they'd only get you an alternative domain going to the same inbox, rather than additional addresses. So you'd be able to have billy#domain.com and billy#subdomain.com, rather than bill#domain.com and billy2#subdomain.com.
I've not seen anything approaching the same features.
Is there an alternative to using google apps that has similar feature set and can be used for free by a small organisation (25 users)
You can use Microsoft's Live Domains for a similiar functionality to Google apps. It's free too. However the kind of powerful filters and email customization proivided by Gapps is lacking here.
If I already have an account, can I add another domain as a sub-organisation, and therefore benefit from my existing higher user limit? Has anyone done this?
Yes you can add any number of additional domains which allow use of the existing unused licenses on one domain's Google apps, or domain aliases which share the inbox of other domains, in Google Apps.