I am using neos version beta 1.0.2.
I have a custom package in neos installation.
But when i create new content elements it always shows "untitled" in node tree.
Its very difficult to differentiate content elements if the tree title is same.
Checkout \TYPO3\TYPO3CR\Domain\Model\DefaultNodeLabelGenerator and implement the interface for your content types.
Related
I have just started my Typo3 journey. I want to put 2 content elements side-by-side (in one row). Can anyone tell how is it possible. Because whenever I place any content element, it is displayed as a block and fill the entire row.
Thank you for your time and consideration :)
You have to use container elements which come with the extension 'container'. Please have a look at https://extensions.typo3.org/extension/container
There is no build in solution for your problem.
But in TYPO3 you are free to build any kind of html structure for your output. This is necessary as you also can do any rendering of content. either with your own CSS and HTML-markup or if you use frameworks like Bootstrap.
You can build a new page layout, or any special content element which contains other content elements.
Changing layouts can (and should) be reflected in backend-layouts. (https://docs.typo3.org/m/typo3/reference-coreapi/11.5/en-us/ApiOverview/Backend/BackendLayout.html) (there are a lot of other tutorials)
But you also can build/ use individual defined containing content elements. Her you can get support by different extensions (eg. mask, DCE, gridelements) or define it completely on your own (https://docs.typo3.org/m/typo3/reference-coreapi/11.5/en-us/ApiOverview/ContentElements/Index.html)
I have to implement a media download feature. The backend user should be able to upload a media file, set the title, description, release date and so on... The result should then be visible and the file available for download in the frontend.
I am not sure what is the best way to achieve this: Plugin or Custom content element ?
Whats the main difference between the two and what would be the best solution for my task ?
Plugins are used for more complex rendering of records with different views (for example a list and a detail view of records stored somewhere in a storage folder). A custom content element (CE) should be preferred if all relevant data is stored in the record.
For your case, a Content Element seems to be the right solution. This kind of custom content elements can also be easily created with helpful extensions like "mask" which may takes you 10 minutes to create a custom CE.
https://typo3.org/extensions/repository/view/mask
If I understood you properly.
You can define plugin as type of "list_type", or as "CType" (if you need to code specific function, which is hard or unable to achieve using eg. Fluid contents) or even as another menu type defined as "menu_type".
These all types can be the same way made plugin, this separation for types are basically only for making it appear in different selectors. So:
your plugin defined as menu_type is to be selected in "Special Menus" content type in "Menu type" selector,
defined as list_type (so called) is to be selected in "Insert Plugin" content in "Selected plugin" selector,
defined as CType is totally new content type.
But they work the same way and this is easily to be switched using parameter in ext_tables plugin register call:
\TYPO3\CMS\Core\Utility\ExtensionManagementUtility::addPlugin( ['Label', $_EXTKEY.'_myPluginSuffix'], 'CType');
1) You can use the "File Link" content element and adapt its TypoScript (tt_content.uploads.20.renderObj) to your needs.
2) You can use the file_list extension and adapt its Fluid templates to your needs
In typo3 4.7 (cannot upgrade this instance) I often need to put a few lightweight extensions on one page. In the backend, I quickly lose track of all these extensions.
I wonder if there is a way to attach a label to such an extension placeholder.
I want a similar functionality as the freetext field: "Name (not visible in frontend)" which is available for "Default HTML" content elements, but not for "Plugin" content elements.
Here is an illustration of what I mean. In the backend, WEB Module/Page, editing any page:
... or can they?
Answering my own question:
The "Behavior" tab contains a deprecated textfield "Plugin Mode" that can be used as a label. Internally the value from this field will be stored in a column called "CODE".
According to the context-sensitive help for this field, it can function aas a label unless the plugin uses this value.
And indeed, the text from the 2nd red box above appears in the backend and facilitates orientation.
But here I am talking about my own extensions where I know that this field is unused.
im working with Claus' Fluid Powered TYPO3 and I'm quiet happy with it. At the moment I have to implement a template wich should contain another extension (e.g. news) in the sidebar.
What is the preferred way to implement this.
My idea was to add the f:cObject ViewHelper and insert the extension in that way.
Is this the correct approach?
Thx
Markus
This depends on the type of template you are building:
Page templates should have proper content areas into which you can insert content. If the content needs to be shared, you have a few options: a) create the element in a sys folder and reference it from your Flux form settings then use v:content.render to render it by UID. b) Place any number of shared elements in a sys folder and render all by PID. c) Use content sliding in a column in your template which is there in all templates and is designed to contain elements which "slide" to every subpage (and can also be edited on subpages if editor has access).
Content templates can use flux:grid with flux:form.column, or flux:form.content as a shortcut to quickly make a single column, to add a content area, then flux:content.render to render those elements. This allows you to control that gets rendered around the plugin.
Plugin templates can associate a Flux form and use the steps described in point 2.
I think you're looking for 1a) or 1c) in this case.
My Requirement is to have a global header and footer with author able properties.
So if we update the properties on one page it should be reflected across all pages.
What is the best approach to achieve this in CQ5.
ACS AEM Commons now supports this functionality without use of an iparsys - Shared Component Properties (http://adobe-consulting-services.github.io/acs-aem-commons/features/shared-component-properties.html)
Configure your menu with Shared and/or Global properties and you can simply template it directly onto all of your pages (no iparsys required). You can then edit the header/footer from any page on the site and it will by updated on all pages.
Unlike using design dialogs, Shared Component Properties supports standard content activation and internationalization (values stored below the homepage) and anything else you would expect from content.
If all of your pages site under a hierarchy, you could use an Inherited Paragraph System (iparsys). This is from an old version of the documentation, but is still a good intro:
The inherited paragraph system is a paragraph system that also allows
you to inherit the created paragraphs from the parent. You add
paragraphs to iparsys at for example, /content/geometrixx/en/products
and as result, all the subpages of products that also have iparsys
with the same name inherit the created paragraphs from the parent. On
each level, you can add more paragraphs, which are then inherited by
the children pages. You can also cancel paragraph inheritance at a
level at any time.
While not quite what you're describing in the original post (edit anywhere) it will allow you to edit the content once (at the parent page) and inherit the changes everywhere.
Traditionally you could create the components and swap the dialogs out for design dialogs. Basically you would rename your component dialog to design_dialog.
What this will do is save the changes you make to this object to a design path under etc. You can set a design path for site by going to the top level parent and setting a designPath property.
So node structure might look something like
parentNode
- #prop designPath = "designs/myapplication"
childNode1
childNode2
etc...
Any component using a design_dialog on the parentNode or its children nodes will get their information from the designPath. If you do not set a design path, the infomration is saved under etc/designs/default (or defaults, not sure, going off the top of my head).
There are some alternatives to this:
What our team did was in our siteHeader component we use http://dev.day.com/docs/en/cq/current/javadoc/com/day/cq/commons/inherit/InheritanceValueMap.html (inheritancevalue map) instead of the regular value map. The inherited value map will traverse the tree up looking for items from it's parents. This is a great source for learning how to use valuemap instead of just the default properties object:
http://experiencedelivers.adobe.com/cemblog/en/experiencedelivers/2013/02/valuemap-and-his-friend.html
This does get complicated with larger sites, and you'll have to do a lot of customization to get the system working the way you want, but it's an option if you don't want to have to manually set designPaths for every new site your authors create.
Alternatively, if you do like the idea of using designPaths and design_dialogs, you can always hook into the page creation workflow and have the page component add a designPath property on creation (this is a lot easier said than done though).
hope that helps