I would like to invoke M-x helm-swoop such that it does NOT return the symbol at point. I find that it always picks up undesired symbols, e.g. when I invoke M-x helm-swoop in org-mode, I get Swoop: \*, and I then have to delete the \* before I can enter my desired search term. How can I do this?
This has been bugging me as well, for exactly the same reason (swoop in an Org-mode buffer picking up heading characters), so this question motivated me to go and look.
Looking at the source, Helm-swoop calls helm-swoop-pre-input-function to populate the prompt, and by default this is set to a function that returns (thing-at-point 'symbol), which is what causes the problem in headings.
A quick test with the following in my init file seems to work:
(setq helm-swoop-pre-input-function
(lambda () nil))
This could certainly be improved by, for example, keeping the default behaviour in non-Org buffers but as I'm only really using swoop in Org buffers this is good enough for me.
Related
I can insert an inactive timestamp interactively with org-time-stamp-inactive (C-c C-!), then pressing Enter when presented with the calendar. This inserts a value like [2021-12-10 Fri].
I would like to know if this can be achieved programmatically with org-time-stamp-inactive. I tried org-time-stamp-inactive '(16) but this also inserts a time which I do not want. I can do insert (format-time-string "[%Y-%m-%d %a]") but this uses a different approach, and I would like to know if what I want can be achieved with org-time-stamp-inactive.
EDIT (in response to comment): No, it is not possible, but you got to look at the code to make sure. org-time-stamp-inactive is a thin wrapper around org-time-stamp. That in turn calls org-insert-time-stamp, which takes a time and a with-hm argument (among others - see the doc string of the function with C-h f org-insert-time-stamp for the details). If with-hm is nil, then no time is printed. But org-time-stamp (and therefore org-time-stamp-inactive) always calls org-insert-time-stamp with a non-nil with-hm, so the time is always inserted in that case. The best you can do is call the underlying function org-insert-time-stamp like so: (org-insert-time-stamp (current-time) nil 'inactive).
I still think your simple suggested solution (elaborated a bit in the original answer below) is the best way to go about the problem.
[ORIGINAL ANSWER]
Org mode is plain text: things may appear differently, but all that is smoke and mirrors: you can cat an Org mode file in the terminal and see precisely what it contains. In particular, inactive time data are just strings of the form [2021-12-11]. So there is no penalty if you do it manually, instead of going through some Org mode interfaces: the end result is the same, so your manually inserted date is just as good as the one inserted by org-time-stamp-inactive.
So assuming that the simple solution you suggested is acceptable, here's filling in the details:
(defun my/org-insert-current-time-as-inactive-time-stamp ()
(interactive)
(insert (format-time-string "[%Y-%m-%d]")))
(define-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c _") #'my/org-insert-current-time-as-inactive-time-stamp)
C-c _ was undefined in the Org mode keymap in my case, but YMMV: choose something that is not used.
I am using emacs and have code completion working. This works nicely
on source code files .f, .c, ... However it does not complete for
.org files. Is there a command I can put in my .emacs file to solve the problem?
Expanding words that already exist in the file is easy. Use dabbrev-expand, bound to M-/ by default:
Expand previous word "dynamically".
Expands to the most recent, preceding word for which this is a prefix. If no suitable preceding word is found, words following point are considered. If still no suitable word is found, then look in the buffers accepted by the function pointed out by variable `dabbrev-friend-buffer-function'.
If you want to see all options, use dabbrev-completion (C-M-/) instead:
Completion on current word. Like M-/ but finds all expansions in the current buffer and presents suggestions for completion.
Expanding code defined in other buffers will be trickier, and I don't have a good solution for it.
This has solved the problem
(define-globalized-minor-mode real-global-auto-complete-mode
auto-complete-mode (lambda ()
(if (not (minibufferp (current-buffer)))
(auto-complete-mode 1))
))
(real-global-auto-complete-mode t)
On Emacs, while editing a text document of notes for myself (a .txt document, not a .tex document), I am using M-x set-input-method Ret TeX, in order to get easy access to various Unicode characters. So for example, typing \tospace causes a "→" to be inserted into the text, and typing x^2 causes "x2" to be inserted, because the font I am using has support for Unicode codepoints 0x2192 and 0x00B2, respectively.
One of the specially handled characters in the method is for the underscore key, _. However, the font I am using for Emacs does not appear to have support for the codepoints for the various subscript characters, such as subscript zero (codepoint 0x2080), and so when I type _0, I get something rendered as a thin blank in my output. I would prefer to just have the two characters _0 in this case.
I can get _0 by the awkward keystroke sequence _spacedel0, since the space keystroke in the middle of the sequence causes Emacs to abort the TeX input method. But this is awkward.
So, my question: How can I locally customize my Emacs to not remap the _ key at all when I am in the TeX input method? Or how can I create a modified clone (or extension, etc) of the TeX input method that leaves out underscore from its magic?
Things I have tried so far:
I have already done M-xdescribe-key on _; but it is just bound to self-insert-command, like many other text characters. I did see a post-self-insert-hook there, but I have not explored trying to use that to subvert the TeX input method.
Things I have not tried so far:
I have not tried learning anything about the input method architecture or its source code. From my quick purview of the code and methods. it did not seem like something I could quickly jump into.
So here is the solution I just found: Make a personalized copy of the TeX input method, with all of the undesirable entries removed. Then when using M-x set-input-method, select the personalized version instead of TeX.
I would have tried this earlier, but the built-in documentation for set-input-mode and its ilk does not provide sufficient guidance to the actual source for the input-methods for me to find it. It was only after doing another search on SO and finding this: Emacs: Can't activate input method that I was able to get enough information to do this on my own.
Details:
In Emacs, open /usr/share/emacs/22.1/leim/leim-list.el and find the entry for the input method you want to customize. The entry will be something like the following form:
(register-input-method
"TeX" "UTF-8" 'quail-use-package
"\\" "LaTeX-like input method for many characters."
"quail/latin-ltx")
Note the file name prefix referenced in the last element in the form above. Find the corresponding Elisp source file; in this case, it is a relative path to the file quail/latin-ltx.el[.gz]. Open that file in Emacs, and check it out; it should have the entries for the method remappings, both desired and undesired.
Make a user-local copy of that Elisp source file amongst your other Emacs customizations. Open that local copy in Emacs.
In your local copy, find the (quail-define-package ...) form in the file, and change the name of the package; I used FSK-TeX as my new name, like so:
(quail-define-package
"FSK-TeX" "UTF-8" "\\" t ;; <-- The first argument here is the important bit to change.
"LaTeX-like input method for many characters but not as many as you might think.
...)
Go through your local copy, and delete all the S-expressions for mappings that you don't want.
In your .emacs configuration file, register your customized input method, using a form analogous to the one you saw when you looked at leim-list.el in step 1:
(register-input-method
"FSK-TeX" "UTF-8" 'quail-use-package
"\\" "FSK-customized LaTeX-like input method for many characters."
"~/ConfigFiles/Elisp/leim/latin-ltx")
Restart Emacs and test your new input-method; in my case, by doing M-x set-input-method FSK-TeX, typing a_0, and confirming that a_0 shows up in the buffer.
So, there's at least one answer that is less awkward once you have it installed than some of the workarounds listed in the question (and as it turns out, are also officially documented in the Emacs 22 manual as a way to cut off input method processing).
However, I am not really happy with this solution, since I would prefer to inherit future changes to TeX mode, and just have my .emacs remove the undesirable entries on startup.
So I will wait to see if anyone else comes up with a better answer than this.
I did not test this myself, but this seems to be the exact thing you are looking for:
"How to disable underscore subscript in TeX mode in emacs" - source
Two solutions are given in this blogpot:
By the author of the blogpost: (setq font-lock-maximum-decoration nil) (from maximum)
Mentioned as comment:
(eval-after-load "tex-mode" '(fset 'tex-font-lock-subscript 'ignore))
The evil plugin for vim-like modal keybinding allows to map two subsequent presses of the _ key to the insertion of a single _ character:
(set-input-method 'TeX)
(define-key evil-insert-state-local-map (kbd "_ _")
(lambda () (interactive) (insert "_")))
(define-key evil-insert-state-local-map (kbd "^ ^")
(lambda () (interactive) (insert "^")))
When _ and then 1 is pressed, we get ₁ as before, but
when _ and then _ is pressed, we get _.
Analogous for ^.
As already explained in pnkfelix answer, it seems we have to make a personalized copy of the TeX input method. But here comes a lighter way to do that, without any file tweaking. Simply put the following in your .emacs :
(eval-after-load "quail/latin-ltx"
'(let ((pkg (copy-tree (quail-package "TeX"))))
(setcar pkg "MyTeX")
(assq-delete-all ?_ (nth 2 pkg))
(quail-add-package pkg)))
(set-input-method 'TeX)
(register-input-method "MyTeX" "UTF-8" 'quail-use-package "\\")
(set-input-method 'MyTeX)
The important part is the assq-delete-all line in the middle that remove all shortcut entries starting with _. It's a bit of a lisp hack but it seems to work. Since I'm also annoyed by the shortcuts starting with - and ^, I also use the following two lines to disable them :
(assq-delete-all ?- (nth 2 pkg))
(assq-delete-all ?^ (nth 2 pkg))
Note that afterwards you can M-x set-input-method at any time and indicate TeX or MyTeX to switch between the pristine TeX input method or the customized one.
I am trying to make Tab completion work with RefTeX. When typing C-c [ and selecting the type of reference I have then a prompt in the minibuffer. When I know the beginning of the bib key I want to enter, say for instance Campbell2006, I would like to type Camp Tab and get Campbell2006 [sole completion].
I have managed to set it up for some documents but I do not understand exactly why it works for them and not for others. I have noticed that for the documents that have proper Tab> completion, the following line is added to the file name_of_tex_file.el created in a auto subfolder:
(TeX-add-style-hook "name_of_tex_file"
(lambda ()
(LaTeX-add-bibliographies
"absolute_path_to_bib")))
I think I obtained this results by adding %%% reftex-default-bibliography: absolute_path_to_bib at the end of my files but this is kind of a nuisance, especially when editing the same file on several computers.
Note that RefTeX is working because when I type C-c [ Camp Ret, I get a list (sometime a bit odd) with the Campbell2006 entry.
I have tried to set the %BIBINPUTS% environment variables with no success.
Adding (setq reftex-bibpath-environment-variables '("c:/path_to_bib_file/")) seemed necessary for the C-c [ Camp Ret method to work.
It has somehow the same defects as adding a %%% reftex-default-bibliography: to the end of the file and did not provided the Tab completion.
I have tried various combinations of /, //, \\ and \ as file separators when specifying files but I do not know exact which I should use (I'm using emacs in a windows environment). The issue might be as simple as that but as there are lots of parameters to try I fail do determine where is the problem.
What is the step-by-step method to make RefTeX work smoothly with bibliography, including the Tab completion?
EDIT:
Completion is possible according to the Reftex manual entry about the command reftex-citation:
The regular expression uses an expanded syntax: &&' is interpreted as and. Thus,aaaa&&bbb' matches entries which contain both aaaa' andbbb'. While entering the regexp, completion on knows [sic] citation keys is possible. `=' is a good regular expression to match all entries in all files.
it does not provide precise guidance on how to make it work though.
Kindahero suggests setting a list of the bib entries and use the completing-read command. This sounds sensible, however I would like to generate this list automatically and it seems feasible because it works with some of my documents.
The documentation of reftex-citation is a bit confusing. It promises completion on known citation keys but I believe "known" refers to keys that have been used previously in this session rather than all keys in the appropriate bibliography. You can use the LaTeX-add-all-bibitems-from-bibtex command defined below to load all keys in your bibliography:
(defun get-bibtex-keys (file)
(with-current-buffer (find-file-noselect file)
(mapcar 'car (bibtex-parse-keys))))
(defun LaTeX-add-all-bibitems-from-bibtex ()
(interactive)
(mapc 'LaTeX-add-bibitems
(apply 'append
(mapcar 'get-bibtex-keys (reftex-get-bibfile-list)))))
Suggestions on appropriate hooks to make this happen automatically are welcome.
M-x < TAB > prints all the defined functions.
To check a variable is defined or not evaluating the following expression,
(boundp 'variable-name) C-x C-e will print t if the variable-name is defined else nill.
How to print all the defined variables in emacs.
It's unclear exactly what you want to do with a full list of symbols, since the way in which M-x displays function names is somewhat specialized.
Assuming that you want to programmatically obtain a list of all defined symbols, here's how auto-complete.el does it:
(loop for x being the symbols
if (boundp x)
collect (symbol-name x))
Note that you can also enter M-x describe-var RET, and then press TAB to get a sorted completion list of all symbols.
I presume (apropos-variable "." t) would show you all the variables defined at that point in time.
edit: I presumed wrongly, it would seem.
Interestingly, this actually shows me significantly fewer results than the auto-completions from describe-var.
Can anyone shed light on that?
e.g. the differences between these, when winner-mode has been enabled:
C-uM-x apropos-variable RET winner- RET
C-hv winner- TAB
edit 2: Ah... it looks like apropos may ignore any symbol which lacks a documentation string.
If it's possible, I suggest reassigning the accepted answer.
Extrapolating (heavily!) what is being asked for, here is a way to get a pretty-printed alist of all buffer-local variables with their values. This is very convenient for finding out why for instance a mode isn't behaving the way one expects.
To get this listing, do:
M-x pp-eval-expression RET (buffer-local-variables) RET
Relevant portions from this list can be added almost verbatim to a .dir-locals.el file for use with multiple files.