Make addon for Firefox 23 or higher - firefox-addon-sdk

I am developing a simply addon that modify DOM for current page with Javascript.
I am compiling with last SDK version but I want use addon in Firefox 23 usually.
How can get this?? Something parameter in compile time for fix this?
Sorry my bad English, thank you very much!!

This is completely unsupported, please don't use older versions of Firefox, they almost certainly contain bad bugs that have been fixed.

Related

Can you run a version of vscode inside the browser without a server?

Is there any way to run a version of VS Code inside a browser without a server? (inside a React or Angular app). Something like an enhanced version of the monaco editor.
Of course that means it will have some missing functionalities.
If not, are there any other options?
Try this https://securingsincity.github.io/react-ace/
its something of the same king what you want
As far as I could find, it is possible to run VSCode in the browser (since we have vscode.dev), but there doesn't seem to be anyway to deploy it yourself yet?
This Github issue is probably what you want, but there isn't any information there (or on the repo) yet.
It does strongly suggest that https://github.com/microsoft/vscode is the version used for vscode.dev, so there might be things to be found there, until official instructions/embedding is possible.
I think it depends on how you treat vscode.
if it is just a editor software, there'll be a lot of .
For you customerization purpose, it sounds something like 'https://github.com/cdr/code-server'
Not sure if it helps, but you can try looking up gitpod.io. It opens up a visual studio code instance on your browser with options of installing extensions as well.
Use the link like gitpod.io/#https://github.com/username/repo-name
You can possibly use Gitpod self-host, https://github.com/gitpod-io/gitpod or https://github.com/gitpod-io/openvscode-server they both have documentation on how to create your own version of VSCode for the web, however, as I've never tried to create one myself, I don't know if it accomplishes your specific use case.

Eclipse Source Editor: Some items are Shown as StrikeThrough. How Come? [duplicate]

While I'm making an Android app, Eclipse will strike out some things. More specifically, Gallery. Here is a screen shot:
When I hover my mouse over the warnings, it says The type Gallery is deprecated. I don't know what Deprecated means, but I do know that it's a Java term. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
(From the question before editing: The term is deprecated, not depreciated. It's a common typo, but worth being aware of for searching purposes :)
It's basically a bit like "obsolete" - you're encouraged not to use classes or methods which are deprecated. Typically the documentation will explain why you're not meant to use them, and give you a better alternative. The deprecated version is only present for backward compatibility, usually.
It's worth taking this seriously - a lot of the time if you're using a deprecated API, you're coming at something from a fundamentally flawed approach. Date is the clearest example of this, where the Java 1.0 API was almost entirely deprecated in 1.1, when Calendar was introduced. Using the deprecated methods in Date is a sure way of storing up problems for yourself.
See the Oracle "How and when to deprecate APIs" page for more information.
Deprecated means it used to support older SDK, but not anymore. Thats why you get the warning.
It is just a warning most of the times it works, but you most be careful because it could cause problem with newer versions.
Deprecated isn't a Java term. It is used in many other things but a lot in programming. It simply means that it is no longer supported...normally replaced with something else. The Android Docs will help you adapt it to what you need depending on what you're doing

Does Chrome browser support GWT 2.5?

I've recently gone through the following link:
https://developers.google.com/web-toolkit/release-notes#Release_Notes_Current
There's a point under title : Breaking Changes and Other Changes of Note
GWT no longer supports ChromeFrame. The implementation caused more bugs than it solved.
Does this mean that Chrome browser won't support GWT 2.5? Or am I misunderstood? Can anyone explain this?
Thanks in advance.
EDIT Google confirms an error in the release notes: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit-contributors/wzilCaLySCU/aYMwD2zzOrsJ
This is probably related to http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6665
Technically, there should be nothing special to support ChromeFrame (which is not the same as Chrome, so to answer your question: yes you're misunderstanding that statement from the release notes).
Actually, I believe the release notes are wrong: GWT 2.4 had issues with ChromeFrame (actually, when it was installed but disabled), and this has been fixed in 2.5 (see link to issue above).
I'll get in touch with Google to know more about it and possibly have the release notes fixed (if the above is right). Edit: done (will contact some directly by mail if needed).
ChromeFrame is a plugin for Internet Explorer that uses Chrome's rendering and JavaScript engine instead of IE's equivalents. So this statement does not refer to the standalone Chrome browser (and it would be strange indeed if it did).
ChromeFrame is a plugin for other browsers than Chrome

TinyMCE upgrade an modified editor to the latest version mayhem

It is this sad moment to a developer's life that he has to maintain and fix legacy code... In my case I have to deal with a modified (core scripts) tinyMCE 3.2.2 which I have to update to the latest version in order to play in IE9+...
So my question is if there is a way to check which files have been changed since version 3.2.2 and try to update only those cause it is an overkill to check all the code for the modifications...
Thanks in advance
I fear there are so many changes in so many files that most of them have changed since then and in order to work with IE9.
If possible you should never ever modify the core code. Instead use custom plugins if possible.

can you DUMP the DOM to a file?

I am using Firefox with Firebug, and came to a point where I have a more mature version of my page that has more features, but apparently one feature has gone bad, and I have an earlier version in which it works, but is way behind.
I was thinking that I may make use of dumping the DOM of both versions and compare them,
how can I do that ?
Thanks !