I am the technical writer and i have started to writing my article using Calibri font it was suitable, but i am looking for the most attractive and most user readable fonts, so guys please help me in my search.
That's a highly subjective thing. And what font you're to use will depend largely on who is going to publish your work. Whatever you use, the publisher's going to change things around to fit their own format of course, so as to keep consistency between their products.
If you want to create attractive and the most user readable fonts, you can go for Times New Roman, Calibri, and Arial. However, to make more attractive and readable in documents, you need to format them and emphasize wherever required with bold and italic styles. Differentiate headers and paragraph contents with suitable styles.
Related
My organisation now has a policy to make all documents accessible, and a long list of guidance how to do so. Most of the requirements are OK. Alt-text is only a small amount of work; sans-serif fonts may not be as nice as Times Roman, but they’re readable; spacing using paragraph formatting rather than carriage returns is good practice anyway.
But then there’s figures. On a paginated document, large figures look great floating with text wrapped around them, but terrible inline, because page breaks often cause huge blank gaps in the page before the inline image. Same goes for tables. But our accessibility guidance insists that only inline images/tables are acceptable for screen readers – and Word’s accessibility checker does as well, though the requirement is missing in Microsoft’s accessibility documentation.
Is there some way to make floating images (and floating tables) accessible, so that popular screen readers will know where to parse them in the context of the document? I'm expecting that the documents will be shared as an exported PDF, but even for screen readers to work with the DOCX file would be sufficient.
It sounds as though this is a 'flaw' (design fault) in Microsoft Word's accessibility checker, which doesn't understand text frames being used for table and image layout. Both #slugolicious and my organization's accessibility trainer confirm that having images and tables floating with no additional text apart from the caption is actually fine for modern screen readers.
My error was assuming that my organization's standards included 'No errors from Microsoft Accessibility Checker'. That is not the case.
I am using wagtail and my user wishes to be able to change font sizes in the Rich text editor. I have attempted to use TinyMCE but the install is problematic (see this question and non-answer)
Is there an alternative that would provide the functionality that I am looking for?
You'd probably consider this a non-answer too, but if a rich text editor with that feature did exist, it would be breaking the design principles of Wagtail. Wagtail is a system for capturing and presenting information, not a web design package, and mixing the two is liable to lead to all kinds of problems down the line (inconsistent styling between pages, difficulty redesigning or migrating the site in future, accessibility for screen-reader users).
The correct alternative is to find out what information your client wishes to communicate with different font sizes, and then make sure you're modelling that information in your page models. For example, if they want to include pull-quotes in their text, you can model the page content as a StreamField with a pull-quote block type (with its own text style defined by you in HTML/CSS). If they don't have any specific informational purpose in mind, and just want to play around with fonts, then gently advise them that that's your job, not theirs...
Is there a good way to implement Rich Text using the existing CCLabel class or another class? I'ma ttempting to render something like the image below
I wasn't able to find any information in the guides on rich text, the wiki entry on CCLabel doesn't mention anything about it, and the documentation doesn't seem to indicate support of rich text. I also didn't find anything searching on these forums for "rich text".
My main problem with concatenating multiple CCLabels together is it makes the word wrapping a challenge. I'm sure if that's the only way to implement this in CocosSharp I can figure it out, but it'd be much nicer to use any built-in support for rich text if it exists.
I know cocos2d-x has support for rich text through their UIRichText class. Does anything like that exist in CocosSharp? Is there a different term I should be searching for, or is there support somewhere in there that I just missed?
After years of experience with custom made CMS systems, I come to this conclusion:
Clients really want to copy and paste information from word processors into their website CMS. They don't like to create large texts in a website box, and prefer to do so from their good old word processor. Or they simply have their text already prepared for other purposes, and therefore want to copy and paste.
Clients do not like to lose their format. They've spent time on their boldface text, headings, etc, and they do not like to do this all over again.
Rich Text Format fields (TinyMCE, CKEditor, etc) are not yet able to properly convert all formatted text into the right HTML. I do not blame them; this has to be very difficult given the odd 'source code' that word processors put in the clipboard. But reading all SO topics about richttext related issues, I feel this is a known limitation.
What do you do in such cases? I've tried the following:
Explain the client beforehand that this is not a word processor we are implementing, and it has limitations. They can understand, but still want to copy and paste.
Only show very few buttons for formatting (bold, italic, links). That way, we can strip the tags and clean this up quite well, and this limits issues. Works better, but clients keep asking for font options, more colors, headers, etc.
So not a really good solution in sight. Are there others who have tackled this issue successfully?
One solution (and probably the best I've come up with) is to post-process the pasted content. So, catch the publish event and correct all the crappy HTML -- catch all the "mso-normal" styles, for instance, and remove them. You'd have a set of rules which clean stuff coming out of, say, MS Word.
Though, this is not just a word processing problem. You're pasting from one rich text editor to another, and styles just don't transfer between rich editing environments. This is not so much a technical problem as it is a logical problems.
Update: Someone pointed me to this: Copy-Pasting Word to your Web CMS. No real solutions, but just confirmation that it's a sticky problem.
I totally agree with you:
Last week I did a very interesting test with a customer for which I had to prepare some demo's of .NET based CMS systems (Umbraco, Sitefinity, DNN, Composite C1 ect). The customer himself had a Drupal based site and I was ashamed none of my CMS demo's did a 100% job with a complicated Word table (Ceteris paribus: I did not do some CMS fine-tuning, used every CMS out of the box). The worst part was his Drupal CMS did a 100% good job! It was exactly the same as it was in Word. For a client working a lot with Word my CMS-ses were a showstopper. Of course there are a lot of discussions on the web about 'you should not copy from Word' or 'do NOT use Word for CMS things'. Fact is: clients work with Word so we should deal with it.
i am building a webapp that will have notes fields all over the place, but i dont know what kind of markup i should use.
these are my requirements
User must be able to change the text style (bold, italic, underlined)
User must be able to create bullet lists
User must be able to create numbered lists
User must be able to change the font-size or use pre-definded headings
User must be able to add links
User must have a WYSIWYG - Editor that hides the actual markup
the last one is the most important requirement, my target users struggle even with word, so using markup style input like here on stackoverflow is not an option.
so what kind`s of markup do you know that fits ans has some fancy WYSIWYG - Editor?
if you think that i missed a important requirement please feel free to suggest it.
tia
You'll need to check out tinyMCE.
It's the best javascript-based WYSIWYG editor I've found.