I wanna use oVirt engine 3.6 in my Internet connectionless network. I installed oVirt with yum over internet. After that I tried to work offline. When I go offline Web Interface it still works fine. But I connected it to my local netowork Interface starts not to respond. I check POST/GET requests that made by it and I see it stuck on request/respond to/from GenericApiGWTService. For example, normally time between request and respond takes 1 to 600ms but when I connect it to local network it take up to 300.000ms second and eventually it fails. I use CentOS 7 x86_64. I couldn't figure out what is it cause to that.
I fix the problem by;
Use another IP from different address group then the one you use for
internet connection. Example: I used 192.168.1.10 for internet
connection. When I connect pc to local I changed it to 192.168.2.10
Delete all Gateway and DNS IPs.
Then it works fine.
Related
So this is a classic question that I’ve seen many times before...
I’m trying to connect to my home network when not at home using a raspberry pi.
I’m well aware that the way to go with this is to use a vpn server such as OpenVPN.
However, in order to connect to the vpn I would need to forward a port on my router... which I can’t do.
I’ve found remote.it which allows remote connection to a computer (pi) without port forwarding.
What I would like to know is how would I set about using the 2 together, I.e. connecting to remote.it which in turn connects me to my vpn server?
I'm sorry to be finding this question just now, but in case it's still useful to you or to anyone else, here's what you need to do:
Install remote.it
Set-up a remote.it connection to use the protocol (TCP/UDP) and port required by the VPN application
Make a remote.it connection/adding the service to your network (remoteit - Desktop application UI terminology)
Use this connection info (URL/port or localhost:port) with the VPN client
Send an e-mail to support#remote.it if you need help
I would recommend ZeroTier(https://www.zerotier.com/). It haves its own linux client , and you can connect to as many networks as you would like.
You can also configure IP address from the website.
There is also an Android an IOS app that is really simple to connect.
Apparently Softlayer changed the VPN. So I've reinstalled my MotionPro client on Win10 and can now connect. But I can no longer connect to the 10 addresses beyond it. They don't show up in the netstat -rn listing.
I can ping the remote end of the VPN, but not the 10 addresses. What else do I need to do to make this happen?
Thanks.
No worries. It turned out the VPN entry point has changed, and when I use a different one it now gives me all the correct routing.
I am using openwrt and coovachilli for registration purpose, when there is presence of internet connection to router then chilli starts and popup page appears after connect to WiFi.
But I want popup page without presence of internet. Router should popup after connect to WiFi using coovachilli without internet. Please help me out in this situation.
Thanks in advance.
OpenWrt Version:- 15.05
CoovaChilli Version:- 1.3.0
It's not possible technically due to the way Coova Chilli (and other hotspot software systems) works.
Without Internet connection, your DNS server will return failures so no DNS query will work. Without DNS queries (and IP addresses as result), there won't be a HTTP request for Coova to hijack. Your device (eg. iPhone) won't even trigger a CNA window
There are possibilities (workarounds) of course - eg. make your DNS resolver (dnsmasq?) resolve to some dummy/hardcoded IP address while the connection is down. You would have to write a script yourself that detects connection and swaps configs
It is possible with a workaround.
You have to use a local UAM server (on the same host or LAN) and authenticate with local users file or local RADIUS server. For using local users file, without RADIUS server, you must specify a dummy RADIUS server IP:
radiusserver1 127.0.0.1
localusers /etc/chilli/localusers
Then, you can add a dummyuser:dummypass to your localusers file and use it for the authentication as usual:
http://${uam_ip}:${uam_port}/logon?username=dummyuser&password=${chap_password}
In short I'm trying to browse a Mac's web site on the local wifi network under a .local hostname that is not the same as the machine's 'computer name' and think I'm missing a setup step.
I have a local install of nginx on my Macbook, with the proper /etc/hosts and nginx.conf entries to serve multiple sites, each with their own distinct local hostname. Assume the Macbook's network name is computername.local, and I have 2 sites running, one at http://computername.local and another at http://servicename.local. I can access each of these sites just fine from the local machine, but also want to be able to access http://servicename.local from an iPhone on the same WiFi network. I'm getting a timeout for that URL, but the other one works just fine.
I'm guessing something has to be done to allow servicename.local to be used on the local network, which I've left out. What is required to do that? Do I need to use Bonjour for that? Where would I add this new local hostname?
Another Mac on the same network can access this one under servicename.local just fine if I define the IP in its /etc/hosts file too, but I can't modify that file on the iPhone obviously. It's not jailbroken, and I'm not really interested in doing that just to get this working.
Not sure if it will help the OP, but another way of doing this - besides running a DNS server or jailbreaking the phone - is to run an HTTP proxy on the Mac, and configure the iPhone to use the proxy. Then the iPhone will pick up the Mac's local hosts file entries because it resolves DNS queries through the proxy. I've blogged about how to do this using the free Mac proxy "SquidMan" here: http://egalo.com/99j
When developing and testing WP7 apps you're pc is connected to either a real WP7 phone or to the WP7 Device Emulator. For a specific development-purpose I would like to connect directly to the development pc (let's call it the host pc) from the WP7 app without having to rely on an external toast-server. I'm using plain sockets, System.Net.Sockets.Socket.
There seem to be two options:
Obtain the host pc's LAN IP and connect to that
Connect to localhost
Option 1 usually works well, but not always: The host pc may not necessaily have an IP, in which case there's nothing to connect to. Also, in some scenarios all LAN traffic is directed through a company-wide proxy which will disrupt this mechanism.
That lead me to try out option 2. To my surprise it seems to work, but I need to be more sure than simply "it seems to work". I've googled all over but can't find any definitive answer, not even on Microsoft's site like e.g. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff754351(v=VS.92).aspx. So this is my question:
What exactly is the defined behavior of connecting to localhost from a WP7 app?
Altrernatively, is there a fool-proof way of connecting back to the host-pc?
(Let me stress this again: For this particular purpose I can't use toasts, because the development pc may not even be online.)
Edit:
I work at EQATEC and the application in question is the EQATEC Profiler. Right now the profiler/app-communication is handled by injecting a socket/http-client into the deployed WP7 app that connects back to the profiler's LAN IP address. It works very well and is really fast, but in some very rare cases users are offline and therefore doesn't have an IP, or have some prohibitive lan proxy rules.
Therefore connecting to "localhost" would be excellent if that somehow magically would always work for everybody. It works for me and a couple of test-users, but does it work for all our many thousand profiler users all over the world? I'd like to be more sure.
"localhost" by definition is the machine running the code (well specifically the NIC doing the communication). For either the Phone or the Emulator, that would mean the phone or the emulator, not the PC they are attached to.
When you attach to a PC, you do have a network - it's an RNDIS connection in which both sides get an IP address which traditionally (pre-WP7) could be resolved with 'ppp-peer', though I've not tested that resolution on the Phone. I suspect it will be the same, since WMDC is still what's connecting and they'd have little reason to change that connection mechanism.
If the emulator is resolving localhost to the PC on which is resides, that's a definite bug and I would not count on it continuing to work as they add more robust socket support to the Phone platform.
System.Net.Sockets.Socket isn't really currently available for WP7 programming, but it might be available at some future point (maybe in Mango... maybe...)
AFAIK, the only way to reliably do what you want to do is to set up an http server on the development PC and to provide your app with an HTTP address of that server - or to route messages via some "Cloud proxy"
I'm surprised localhost works at all on the real device... I can only assume that they are asking the connected PC to resolve that DNS name - but even then I'm surprised 127.0.0.1 works.
The ip you're looking for is "192.168.55.100"
That's the ip address the phone uses to connect to the host pc.
If you'd like to connect to the phone, apparently its ip address will be "192.168.55.101"
For the emulator just use localhost or 127.0.0.1
This is from the old ActiveSync days, so I don't know how official it is or how likely it is to last, but for right now at least it worked on my phone.