I've been ripping my hear out trying to figure out why this is happening, any help would be very much appreciated!
I'm trying to divide the result of a calculated field by another calculated field in order to get a percentage ("X% of transactions were at or below SLA" essentially). Not sure if the problem is how I'm calculating the two fields, or this new calculation I'm using.
Here is the calculation I'm using: sum([CALC1]) / ([CALC2]) --I'm getting a result of 1 using this, but am expecting something like .982.
CALC1: IF [Total Time (seconds)] > 180 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END
CALC2: COUNT([Trans Id])
I thought it would make sense to add this in the answers portion, even though the correct answer is listed in the comments.
The issue is with how you are displaying the answer. Right click on the measure in the left hand pane and scroll down to "default properties". Go to "Number format" and adjust to the desired number of decimal places.
Related
i'm totally new to Tableau but that is what I could potentially use at the workplace, so asking this question to decide if its worth it.
I've a monthly values dataset and I'd like the tool (Tableau) to generate a report to point out anomalies - the ones i have in mind right now are:
1) same data value for x months in a row
2) data value is 0
3) 5 parameters been reported last 3 months and all of sudden only 4 are reported
Is this possible in Tableau?
You can certainly do this. The below is a general example for doing anomaly detection (one standard deviation outside of mean) but you can modify the calc to fit your criteria. If you place your date field in the column position and your metric, lets say Sales, in the row position you can then create this calculated field to label the anomalies.
IF SUM([Sales]) < (WINDOW_AVG(SUM([Sales])) – WINDOW_STDEV(SUM([Sales]))) THEN “Bad
Anomaly”
ELSEIF SUM([Sales]) > (WINDOW_AVG(SUM([Sales])) + WINDOW_STDEV(SUM([Sales]))) THEN
“Good Anomaly”
ELSE “Expected”
END
You can then place the new field on your color mark to highlight each of the results.
So instead of having a SUM of all the amounts per person, I now instead have a Circle View of all the amounts they have spent (each circle being a transaction).
Now, I need to create a calculated field to see if a transaction is above the standard deviation of ALL transactions (hence making it an outlier).
Any way you can help me create a calculated field? I keep getting errors.
My Calculated Field formula went something like this
If [AMOUNT] > STDEV([AMOUNT]) THEN "bad"
ELSE "good"
END
My Data Points Image
You cannot mix aggregate and non-aggregate arguements. You need to use an LOD (Level of Detail) expression in this case. Below is a valid calculation.
If [AMOUNT] > {STDEV([AMOUNT])} THEN "bad"
ELSE "good"
END
You can change the expression based on the Level Of detail required. Please refer to this article for detailed explanation.
Put curly braces {} around the second expression, but not the first.
if [AMOUNT] > { STDEV([AMOUNT]) } then ...
To understand why, read about LOD calculations in the online help
My requirement is to get the second max date available in report and filter the data set on this.
I tried something like this:
datediff('day',dt,max(dt))=1
Referred to this link
any help?
You're going to need Tableau 9.0 for this. Basically because any calculation you do on Tableau depends on the level of detail you have on the worksheet (the dimensions you put in there). So datediff('day',dt,max(dt))=1 won't work. First because you're mixing aggregated fields (max(dt)) with non-aggreagated (dt). Second, because the aggregation depends on the dimensions in the workfield.
But Tableau 9.0 has a new awesome feature, called Level of Detail calculations. It allows you to perform calculations in the level of detail you choose, depending not on the dimensions on the sheet. It is also calculated BEFORE any calculation on the worksheet (just after context filters).
Now to the answer. First I'll figure out what is the max(dt). Let's call it max_dt
{ FIXED : MAX(dt) }
This will calculated the maximum of dt in all your database
Now to get the second max, you can go like this:
{ FIXED : MAX(IF dt != max_dt
THEN dt
END)
}
This will calculated the maximum of dt, ignoring those who are equal to max_dt (that is the true max(dt)). Therefore, the second max.
Take a look on those LOD calculations. They were just released, I'm having tons of fun with them right now
If the view has date dimension
The easy way to do this,is to create a calculated Last()=1
then filter off the records that evaluate to TRUE
I'm facing problem in getting the max % and min % from a table containing % difference values.
Year-----A----------B---------C---------D---------Max %----Max Type----Min %----Min Type
2012
2013---4.30%---4.42%---4.34%---4.38%----4.42%---------B-----------4.30%---------A
The table above shows the % difference in sales from previous year. Thus 2012 shows no % (because there's no 2011). I used table calculation to compute the % difference, i.e. "Percent Difference From", compute using "Table (Down)" and "Previous".
The last four columns are what I'm having trouble doing. I want to get the max % and min % and also the corresponding types. I'm not trying to add the four columns to the existing table, but to get the correct results, as my ultimate goal is to display that results on the dashboard, i.e. on my dashboard, I want to display the highest % and its corresponding type; similarly the lowest % and its corresponding type. For example: on my dashboard, I want to display:
Highest % and type: 4.42% B
Lowest % and type: 4.30% A
So, I need to have the correct formulas to get the max % and min % and their types. These are what I did:
I tried to use WINDOW_MAX and WINDOW_MIN to display the max % and min % on the table but got funky wrong results.
1) I first get the formula in calculating the % difference from the "Customize" button from "Edit Table Calculation" window of SUM([Sales]): (ZN(SUM([Sales])) - LOOKUP(ZN(SUM([Sales])), -1)) / ABS(LOOKUP(ZN(SUM([Sales])), -1))
Then I created a calculated field of the above formula. I named the calculated field "Percent-Diff".
2) I created another calculated filed (named "Max % Difference") using the formula: WINDOW_MAX([Percent-Diff]). But it shows strange results. See image below. I don't know why it gives me 2.78% and 2.91% for 2012 and 2013 respectively. It should be 0% and 4.42% for 2012 and 2013 respectively. Something is not correct.
If it is just SUM([Sales]) instead of % difference, then I get the correct result of showing the max sales using the formula WINDOW_MAX(SUM([Sales])).
3) Also I don't know how to get the corresponding type. I tried using the formula: IF [Max % Difference] = [Percent-Diff] THEN ATTR([Product Type]). But it returns:
NULL
B
I'm not sure if the formula is correct. It looks correct on the result (i.e. "B" is correct), except that it also shows a NULL value which I don't know why. I think it's because I didn't include the ELSE part in my IF formula? But why the NULL value is shown as the first value? I want the formula to return just one value, "B". So, how to only just show "B"?
I've posted twice the problem in tableau forum, but as of now, nobody has answered my problem. I believe that my formulas are incorrect. So, if anyone here can correct the formulas to get the max % and min % from % difference values and also to get the corresponding type, then it'd be very much appreciated. Thanks a million!
It's hard to tell not knowing how your database looks like (as you didn't explicitly presented it, but I can try to infer based on the clues you left on your post). But I could reproduce something like you said using the Sample - Coffee Chain Database, and it worked out well, calculated yoy sales increase by product and then window_max of that.
What you're probably missing is the partitioning. I suggest avoiding using Table or Pane to create the partitions in more complex situations (as it will work only in that specific arrangement of fields), but rather use the dimensions to partition it.
So, your [Percent-Diff] field should be compute using [Date], and your [Max % Difference] should be compute using [Product Type]. IMPORTANT, for [Max % Difference], when you go to Edit Table Calculation, you'll have to choose the Compute using for [Percent-Diff] as well (you can choose on the top of the window)
Your formula to find which type is the max (or min) is also correct (and should only respect the partitions). Nevertheless, it is very hard to have the exact output you're expecting.
What I would do is to create 2 spreadsheets (and later combine them in a dashboard).
The 1st would be what you already got (Each product [Percent-Diff]
The second one I would change your formula (3) to just [Max % Difference] = [Percent-Diff], and use it as filter (filtering only true). I would drag both Date and Product to the sheet (you choose if you want it on columns, rows, or just detail) so I can use them to partition the table. And drag [Max % Difference] to be visualized.
That way you'll only see the product that is the max, and how much is that max.
Hope it helps
I am new to Crystal and do not use visual basic, but I need to get this report written.
I have one table that I need to check surfaces to determine which path to follow.
Basically,
If surface <500 follow path to check a tooth number and calculate differently than
If surface >500 and <1000 follow path to check tooth number with different calcuation
There are too many variables of tooth/surface to add the outer check to each tooth line so I was trying to wrap an if around each different grouping of of surfaces
Any help is appreciated.
If the calculation for determining the tooth number depends only on the single surface value, why not do something like this? Sorry if this is an oversimplification...
If {Tooth.Surface} < 500 Then
formula=[Do something here] 'Surface is less than 500
ElseIf {Tooth.Surface} < 1000 Then
formula=[Do something different] 'Surface is between 500 and 999
Else
formula=[And something else] 'Surface is 1000 or greater
End If