I'm facing problem in getting the max % and min % from a table containing % difference values.
Year-----A----------B---------C---------D---------Max %----Max Type----Min %----Min Type
2012
2013---4.30%---4.42%---4.34%---4.38%----4.42%---------B-----------4.30%---------A
The table above shows the % difference in sales from previous year. Thus 2012 shows no % (because there's no 2011). I used table calculation to compute the % difference, i.e. "Percent Difference From", compute using "Table (Down)" and "Previous".
The last four columns are what I'm having trouble doing. I want to get the max % and min % and also the corresponding types. I'm not trying to add the four columns to the existing table, but to get the correct results, as my ultimate goal is to display that results on the dashboard, i.e. on my dashboard, I want to display the highest % and its corresponding type; similarly the lowest % and its corresponding type. For example: on my dashboard, I want to display:
Highest % and type: 4.42% B
Lowest % and type: 4.30% A
So, I need to have the correct formulas to get the max % and min % and their types. These are what I did:
I tried to use WINDOW_MAX and WINDOW_MIN to display the max % and min % on the table but got funky wrong results.
1) I first get the formula in calculating the % difference from the "Customize" button from "Edit Table Calculation" window of SUM([Sales]): (ZN(SUM([Sales])) - LOOKUP(ZN(SUM([Sales])), -1)) / ABS(LOOKUP(ZN(SUM([Sales])), -1))
Then I created a calculated field of the above formula. I named the calculated field "Percent-Diff".
2) I created another calculated filed (named "Max % Difference") using the formula: WINDOW_MAX([Percent-Diff]). But it shows strange results. See image below. I don't know why it gives me 2.78% and 2.91% for 2012 and 2013 respectively. It should be 0% and 4.42% for 2012 and 2013 respectively. Something is not correct.
If it is just SUM([Sales]) instead of % difference, then I get the correct result of showing the max sales using the formula WINDOW_MAX(SUM([Sales])).
3) Also I don't know how to get the corresponding type. I tried using the formula: IF [Max % Difference] = [Percent-Diff] THEN ATTR([Product Type]). But it returns:
NULL
B
I'm not sure if the formula is correct. It looks correct on the result (i.e. "B" is correct), except that it also shows a NULL value which I don't know why. I think it's because I didn't include the ELSE part in my IF formula? But why the NULL value is shown as the first value? I want the formula to return just one value, "B". So, how to only just show "B"?
I've posted twice the problem in tableau forum, but as of now, nobody has answered my problem. I believe that my formulas are incorrect. So, if anyone here can correct the formulas to get the max % and min % from % difference values and also to get the corresponding type, then it'd be very much appreciated. Thanks a million!
It's hard to tell not knowing how your database looks like (as you didn't explicitly presented it, but I can try to infer based on the clues you left on your post). But I could reproduce something like you said using the Sample - Coffee Chain Database, and it worked out well, calculated yoy sales increase by product and then window_max of that.
What you're probably missing is the partitioning. I suggest avoiding using Table or Pane to create the partitions in more complex situations (as it will work only in that specific arrangement of fields), but rather use the dimensions to partition it.
So, your [Percent-Diff] field should be compute using [Date], and your [Max % Difference] should be compute using [Product Type]. IMPORTANT, for [Max % Difference], when you go to Edit Table Calculation, you'll have to choose the Compute using for [Percent-Diff] as well (you can choose on the top of the window)
Your formula to find which type is the max (or min) is also correct (and should only respect the partitions). Nevertheless, it is very hard to have the exact output you're expecting.
What I would do is to create 2 spreadsheets (and later combine them in a dashboard).
The 1st would be what you already got (Each product [Percent-Diff]
The second one I would change your formula (3) to just [Max % Difference] = [Percent-Diff], and use it as filter (filtering only true). I would drag both Date and Product to the sheet (you choose if you want it on columns, rows, or just detail) so I can use them to partition the table. And drag [Max % Difference] to be visualized.
That way you'll only see the product that is the max, and how much is that max.
Hope it helps
Related
On one sheet, I have account code and in the cell next to it, I need to look up the account code on the next sheet to average the cost excluding those cells that are zero in col. b from the average calculation.
The answer for London should be: £496.33 but having tried various sumifs / countifs I cannot get it to work.
You probably need COUNTIFS which -- similar to the SUMIFS you are already using -- allows to define multiple critera and ranges.
So, if the column R contains the values, you want to build the average upon, and the column H in the respective row must equal $B$28 to be included in the sum, the respective COUNTIFS looks as follows
=SUMIFS('ESL Info'!$R:$R,'ESL Info'!H:H,$B$28)/COUNTIFS('ESL Info'!$H:$H,$B$28, 'ESL Info'!$R:$R, "<>0")
ie additionally to the value in the H-column to equal B28 it also requires the value R-column (ie the actual number you are summing up) to be different from 0
You could also add the same criteria 'ESL Info'!$R:$R, "<>0" to your SUMIFS, but that isn't necessary, because a 0 doesn't provide anything to you sum, thus it doesn't matter if it's included in the sum or not ...
And depending on the Excel version you are using, you may even have the AVERAGEIFS function available, which does exactly what you want
=AVERAGEIFS('ESL Info'!$R:$R,'ESL Info'!$H:$H;$B$28,'ESL Info'!$R:$R,"<>0")
i'm totally new to Tableau but that is what I could potentially use at the workplace, so asking this question to decide if its worth it.
I've a monthly values dataset and I'd like the tool (Tableau) to generate a report to point out anomalies - the ones i have in mind right now are:
1) same data value for x months in a row
2) data value is 0
3) 5 parameters been reported last 3 months and all of sudden only 4 are reported
Is this possible in Tableau?
You can certainly do this. The below is a general example for doing anomaly detection (one standard deviation outside of mean) but you can modify the calc to fit your criteria. If you place your date field in the column position and your metric, lets say Sales, in the row position you can then create this calculated field to label the anomalies.
IF SUM([Sales]) < (WINDOW_AVG(SUM([Sales])) – WINDOW_STDEV(SUM([Sales]))) THEN “Bad
Anomaly”
ELSEIF SUM([Sales]) > (WINDOW_AVG(SUM([Sales])) + WINDOW_STDEV(SUM([Sales]))) THEN
“Good Anomaly”
ELSE “Expected”
END
You can then place the new field on your color mark to highlight each of the results.
I'm having an issue with tables calculations in tableau. I've got sales per manager and the target. I wanna have a calculation of the targets achievement.
That's what my data looks like and the percentage I wanna get:
Unfortunately, Tableau sums up the percentage and gives me the following results:
Target columns is a calculated field. E.g.
IF [Manager Name] = "Manager 1" THEN "190000"
The % columns is a calculated field and calculated as the following:
FLOAT([Profit]) / FLOAT([Target])
I tried to play with Table Calculations but it never worked.
You are right in that a table calculation would help solve your issue. As you have the % field now, Tableau is just summing the field for each manager to get your subtotal. To get Tableau to calculate the subtotal smartly, as you would expect, you need to modify your % field formula.
Your way: Calculate Percentage for each manager and then SUM for subtotal
Fixed Way: Indicate to Tableau that you want the field to be calculated by summing all profit values first in the partition (Location) and then divide to get the percentage. In this case (330000/532000).
You can modify your % field to look something like the following:
WINDOW_SUM(FLOAT(SUM([Profit])))/WINDOW_SUM(FLOAT(SUM([Target])))
See the below thread for some more information on how the windowing functions can help with aggregate calculations
https://community.tableau.com/thread/200670
My requirement is to get the second max date available in report and filter the data set on this.
I tried something like this:
datediff('day',dt,max(dt))=1
Referred to this link
any help?
You're going to need Tableau 9.0 for this. Basically because any calculation you do on Tableau depends on the level of detail you have on the worksheet (the dimensions you put in there). So datediff('day',dt,max(dt))=1 won't work. First because you're mixing aggregated fields (max(dt)) with non-aggreagated (dt). Second, because the aggregation depends on the dimensions in the workfield.
But Tableau 9.0 has a new awesome feature, called Level of Detail calculations. It allows you to perform calculations in the level of detail you choose, depending not on the dimensions on the sheet. It is also calculated BEFORE any calculation on the worksheet (just after context filters).
Now to the answer. First I'll figure out what is the max(dt). Let's call it max_dt
{ FIXED : MAX(dt) }
This will calculated the maximum of dt in all your database
Now to get the second max, you can go like this:
{ FIXED : MAX(IF dt != max_dt
THEN dt
END)
}
This will calculated the maximum of dt, ignoring those who are equal to max_dt (that is the true max(dt)). Therefore, the second max.
Take a look on those LOD calculations. They were just released, I'm having tons of fun with them right now
If the view has date dimension
The easy way to do this,is to create a calculated Last()=1
then filter off the records that evaluate to TRUE
i'm trying to draw a Graph with a user-friendly timeline having every day/week (to be decided by time range) as a label at x-axis. However, the datasource values are given on another basis - there might be 10 entries one day and the eleventh comes in a month.
See the photoshop image:
With the latest Core Plot drop I cannot find a way to do it, need your help.
Regards,
user792677.
The scatter plot asks the datasource for x-y pairs of data. There is no requirement that either value follow some sort of sequence or regular pattern. Other plot types work similarly, although the names and number of data fields can vary.
In your example, return 4 from the -numberOfRecordsForPlot: method. Return the following values from the -numberForPlot:field:recordIndex: method. The table assumes your y-values are calculated by a function f(x), but they can of course come from any source. Use the field parameter to determine whether the plot is asking for the x- or y- value.
Index X-Value Y-Value
0 1 f(1)
1 3 f(3)
2 9 f(9)
3 10 f(10)