I am using contourf to generate filled contour plots on MatLab with specified levels number.
According to the documents (https://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab/ref/contourf.html#mw_9088c636-4036-4e00-bd43-f6c5632b63ec)
It says Specify levels as a scalar value n to display the contour lines at n automatically chosen levels (heights).
I am wondering how does it choose the threshold automatically? What is the algorithm of choosing the thresholds? Take level as 1 as an example.
Many thanks!
As said in the comments, it just makes sure there are n dividing lines between your max and min.
Proof:
n=10;
z=peaks;
[m,c]=contour(z,10,'ShowText','on');
levels=linspace(min(z(:)),max(z(:)),n+2);
isequal(c.LevelList,levels(2:end-1))
I'm trying to transform my original gray image to mapped gray image using grey-scale mapping function. I have no idea how to get any two minima correspond to the grey-scale range [a,b] of the original histogram so that I can use these values for the equations below to get the mapped gray image.
f(x,y)=0 if [0,a),
f(x,y)=(255/(a-b))-a for [a,b],
f(x,y)=255 if (b,255]
Thank you!
So essentially you want to scale the histogram of your image to range from 0 - 255. All you need is the max and the min. The easiest way to find them is
a = min(I(:));
b = max(I(:));
Also I suspect you middle equation should actually be
f(x,y)=(255/(a-b))*(f(x,y)-a) for [a,b]
however that would eliminate the need for your first two equations. So it's possible that a and b are not the extrema in your case but that you are actually trying to accentuate some range of intensities that sit in the middle of your images histogram (and essentially discard all information outside of that range). In this case you have not given us enough information to suggest values for either a or b.
I want to use GMM(Gaussian mixture models for clustering a binary image and also want to plot the cluster centroids on the binary image itself.
I am using this as my reference:
http://in.mathworks.com/help/stats/gaussian-mixture-models.html
This is my initial code
I=im2double(imread('sil10001.pbm'));
K = I(:);
mu=mean(K);
sigma=std(K);
P=normpdf(K, mu, sigma);
Z = norminv(P,mu,sigma);
X = mvnrnd(mu,sigma,1110);
X=reshape(X,111,10);
scatter(X(:,1),X(:,2),10,'ko');
options = statset('Display','final');
gm = fitgmdist(X,2,'Options',options);
idx = cluster(gm,X);
cluster1 = (idx == 1);
cluster2 = (idx == 2);
scatter(X(cluster1,1),X(cluster1,2),10,'r+');
hold on
scatter(X(cluster2,1),X(cluster2,2),10,'bo');
hold off
legend('Cluster 1','Cluster 2','Location','NW')
P = posterior(gm,X);
scatter(X(cluster1,1),X(cluster1,2),10,P(cluster1,1),'+')
hold on
scatter(X(cluster2,1),X(cluster2,2),10,P(cluster2,1),'o')
hold off
legend('Cluster 1','Cluster 2','Location','NW')
clrmap = jet(80); colormap(clrmap(9:72,:))
ylabel(colorbar,'Component 1 Posterior Probability')
But the problem is that I am unable to plot the cluster centroids received from GMM in the primary binary image.How do i do this?
**Now suppose i have 10 such images in a sequence And i want to store the information of their mean position in two cell array then how do i do that.This is my code foe my new question **
images=load('gait2go.mat');%load the matrix file
for i=1:10
I{i}=images.result{i};
I{i}=im2double(I{i});
%determine 'white' pixels, size of image can be [M N], [M N 3] or [M N 4]
Idims=size(I{i});
whites=true(Idims(1),Idims(2));
df=I{i};
%we add up the various color channels
for colori=1:size(df,3)
whites=whites & df(:,:,colori)>0.5;
end
%choose indices of 'white' pixels as coordinates of data
[datax datay]=find(whites);
%cluster data into 10 clumps
K = 10; % number of mixtures/clusters
cInd = kmeans([datax datay], K, 'EmptyAction','singleton',...
'maxiter',1000,'start','cluster');
%get clusterwise means
meanx=zeros(K,1);
meany=zeros(K,1);
for i=1:K
meanx(i)=mean(datax(cInd==i));
meany(i)=mean(datay(cInd==i));
end
xc{i}=meanx(i);%cell array contaning the position of the mean for the 10
images
xb{i}=meany(i);
figure;
gscatter(datay,-datax,cInd); %funky coordinates for plotting according to
image
axis equal;
hold on;
scatter(meany,-meanx,20,'+'); %same funky coordinates
end
I am able to get 10 images segmented but no the values of themean stored in the cell arrays xc and xb.They r only storing [] in place of the values of means
I decided to post an answer to your question (where your question was determined by a maximum-likelihood guess:P), but I wrote an extensive introduction. Please read carefully, as I think you have difficulties understanding the methods you want to use, and you have difficulties understanding why others can't help you with your usual approach of asking questions. There are several problems with your question, both code-related and conceptual. Let's start with the latter.
The problem with the problem
You say that you want to cluster your image with Gaussian mixture modelling. While I'm generally not familiar with clustering, after a look through your reference and the wonderful SO answer you cited elsewhere (and a quick 101 from #rayryeng) I think you are on the wrong track altogether.
Gaussian mixture modelling, as its name suggests, models your data set with a mixture of Gaussian (i.e. normal) distributions. The reason for the popularity of this method is that when you do measurements of all sorts of quantities, in many cases you will find that your data is mostly distributed like a normal distribution (which is actually the reason why it's called normal). The reason behind this is the central limit theorem, which implies that the sum of reasonably independent random variables tends to be normal in many cases.
Now, clustering, on the other hand, simply means separating your data set into disjoint smaller bunches based on some criteria. The main criterion is usually (some kind of) distance, so you want to find "close lumps of data" in your larger data set. You usually need to cluster your data before performing a GMM, because it's already hard enough to find the Gaussians underlying your data without having to guess the clusters too. I'm not familiar enough with the procedures involved to tell how well GMM algorithms can work if you just let them work on your raw data (but I expect that many implementations start with a clustering step anyway).
To get closer to your question: I guess you want to do some kind of image recognition. Looking at the picture, you want to get more strongly correlated lumps. This is clustering. If you look at a picture of a zoo, you'll see, say, an elephant and a snake. Both have their distinct shapes, and they are well separated from one another. If you cluster your image (and the snake is not riding the elephant, neither did it eat it), you'll find two lumps: one lump elephant-shaped, and one lump snake-shaped. Now, it wouldn't make sense to use GMM on these data sets: elephants, and especially snakes, are not shaped like multivariate Gaussian distributions. But you don't need this in the first place, if you just want to know where the distinct animals are located in your picture.
Still staying with the example, you should make sure that you cluster your data into an appropriate number of subsets. If you try to cluster your zoo picture into 3 clusters, you might get a second, spurious snake: the nose of the elephant. With an increasing number of clusters your partitioning might make less and less sense.
Your approach
Your code doesn't give you anything reasonable, and there's a very good reason for that: it doesn't make sense from the start. Look at the beginning:
I=im2double(imread('sil10001.pbm'));
K = I(:);
mu=mean(K);
sigma=std(K);
X = mvnrnd(mu,sigma,1110);
X=reshape(X,111,10);
You read your binary image, convert it to double, then stretch it out into a vector and compute the mean and deviation of that vector. You basically smear your intire image into 2 values: an average intensity and a deviation. And THEN you generate 111*10 standard normal points with these parameters, and try to do GMM on the first two sets of 111. Which are both independently normal with the same parameter. So you probably get two overlapping Gaussians around the same mean with the same deviation.
I think the examples you found online confused you. When you do GMM, you already have your data, so no pseudo-normal numbers should be involved. But when people post examples, they also try to provide reproducible inputs (well, some of them do, nudge nudge wink wink). A simple method for this is to generate a union of simple Gaussians, which can then be fed into GMM.
So, my point is, that you don't have to generate random numbers, but have to use the image data itself as input to your procedure. And you probably just want to cluster your image, instead of actually using GMM to draw potatoes over your cluster, since you want to cluster body parts in an image about a human. Most body parts are not shaped like multivariate Gaussians (with a few distinct exceptions for men and women).
What I think you should do
If you really want to cluster your image, like in the figure you added to your question, then you should use a method like k-means. But then again, you already have a program that does that, don't you? So I don't really think I can answer the question saying "How can I cluster my image with GMM?". Instead, here's an answer to "How can I cluster my image?" with k-means, but at least there will be a piece of code here.
%set infile to what your image file will be
infile='sil10001.pbm';
%read file
I=im2double(imread(infile));
%determine 'white' pixels, size of image can be [M N], [M N 3] or [M N 4]
Idims=size(I);
whites=true(Idims(1),Idims(2));
%we add up the various color channels
for colori=1:Idims(3)
whites=whites & I(:,:,colori)>0.5;
end
%choose indices of 'white' pixels as coordinates of data
[datax datay]=find(whites);
%cluster data into 10 clumps
K = 10; % number of mixtures/clusters
cInd = kmeans([datax datay], K, 'EmptyAction','singleton',...
'maxiter',1000,'start','cluster');
%get clusterwise means
meanx=zeros(K,1);
meany=zeros(K,1);
for i=1:K
meanx(i)=mean(datax(cInd==i));
meany(i)=mean(datay(cInd==i));
end
figure;
gscatter(datay,-datax,cInd); %funky coordinates for plotting according to image
axis equal;
hold on;
scatter(meany,-meanx,20,'ko'); %same funky coordinates
Here's what this does. It first reads your image as double like yours did. Then it tries to determine "white" pixels by checking that each color channel (of which can be either 1, 3 or 4) is brighter than 0.5. Then your input data points to the clustering will be the x and y "coordinates" (i.e. indices) of your white pixels.
Next it does the clustering via kmeans. This part of the code is loosely based on the already cited answer of Amro. I had to set a large maximal number of iterations, as the problem is ill-posed in the sense that there aren't 10 clear clusters in the picture. Then we compute the mean for each cluster, and plot the clusters with gscatter, and the means with scatter. Note that in order to have the picture facing in the right directions in a scatter plot you have to shift around the input coordinates. Alternatively you could define datax and datay correspondingly at the beginning.
And here's my output, run with the already processed figure you provided in your question:
I do believe you must had made a naive mistake in the plot and that's why you see just a straight line: You are plotting only the x values.
In my opinion, the second argument in the scatter command should be X(cluster1,2) or X(cluster2,2) depending on which scatter command is being used in the code.
The code can be made more simple:
%read file
I=im2double(imread('sil10340.pbm'));
%choose indices of 'white' pixels as coordinates of data
[datax datay]=find(I);
%cluster data into 10 clumps
K = 10; % number of mixtures/clusters
[cInd, c] = kmeans([datax datay], K, 'EmptyAction','singleton',...
'maxiter',1000,'start','cluster');
figure;
gscatter(datay,-datax,cInd); %funky coordinates for plotting according to
image
axis equal;
hold on;
scatter(c(:,2),-c(:,1),20,'ko'); %same funky coordinates
I don't think there is nay need for the looping as the c itself return a 10x2 double array which contains the position of the means
I have two time series and I plot some similarity measures using colorbar. However, for one of my metrics, one of the results is very high compared to the other. Therefore, I can't distinguish enough variability in the charts. Is there a way to exclude some too high data from the figure ?
Thnx
How about just apply a threshold before plotting:
%//Code assumes 2D image:
I_th = I;
I_th(I < threshold ) = threshold ; %//where threshold is a constant you define
imagesc(I_th);
you can force the values above a certain threshold to be the threshold value.For example,
A=[1 2 3 4 5];
A(A>3)=3;
this will give you A=[1 2 3 3 3];
Alternatively, instead of excluding values, you might consider doing a color scale with a log transform, so that you can distinguish the colors better.
here is one example:
http://www.mikesoltys.com/2012/03/16/matlab-tip-logarithmic-color-scales-for-contour-and-image-plots/
I have a vector that I want to print a histogram of of data for. This data ranges from -100 to +100. The amount of data around the outer edges is insignificant and therefore I don't want to see it. I am most interested in showing data from -20 to +20.
1.) How can I limit that window to print on my histogram?
The amount of data I have at 0 outnumbers of the amount of data I have anywhere in the dataset by a minimum of 10:1. When I print the histogram, the layout of element frequency is lost because it is outnumbered by 0.
2.) Is there a way that I can scale the number of 0 values to be three times the number of -1 entries?
I am expecting an exponential drop of this dataset (in general) and therefore three times the frequency of -1 would easily allow me to see the frequency of the other data.
You can use something like
binCenters = -20:5:20;
[N,X] = hist(V,binCenters);
N = N./scalingVector;
bar(X(2:end-1),N(2:end-1));
Note that the code excludes the extremes of N and X from the bar plot, since they contain the number of values smaller than -20 and larger than 20. Also, by building scalingVector appropriately, you can scale N as you please.
You could also just toss out any values outside the [-20,20] range by using
subsetData=data(abs(data)<=20)
1) You can limit the histogram range you see on the plot by just setting the X axes limits:
xlim([-20 20])
Setting bins in hist command is good, but remember thatall the values outside the bins will fall into the most left and right bin. So you will need to set the axes limits anyway.
2) If there is a big difference between values in different bins, one way is to transform values on Y axes to log scale. Unfortunately just setting Y axes to log (set(gca,'YScale','log')) does not work for bar plot. Calculate the histogram with hist or histc (depending on whether you want to specify bins centers or edges) and log2 the values:
[y, xbin] = hist(data);
bar(xbin, log2(y) ,'hist')
Histogram has a few different methods of calling it. I strongly recommend you read the documentation on the function (doc hist)
What you are looking for is to put in a custom range in the histogram bin. It depends a bit on how many bins you want, but something like this will work.
Data=randn(1000,1)*20;
hist(Data,-20:20);
You could, if you want to, change the frequency of the binning as well. You could also change the axis so that you only focus on the range from -20 to 20, using a xaxis([-20 20]) command. You could also ignore the bin at 0, by using an yaxis and limiting the values to exclude the 0 bin. Without knowing what you want exactly, I can only give you suggestions.