I followed this docs.
https://lumen.laravel.com/docs/5.5/authorization
Actually I dont know where to define the Gate
in register() or in boot() function
After that also it say: Class 'App\Providers\Gate' not found
And what is the correct one in 3 of these?
Illuminate\Auth\Access\Gate
Illuminate\Support\Facades\Gate
Illuminate\Contracts\Auth\Access\Gate
For the 'Checking Abilities', the docs said :
if (Gate::allows('update-post', $post)) {
But I cannot use that in my route file.
The question here is how to use gate in route?
Please support me. I'm new with this.
Thanks.
you should use this Illuminate\Support\Facades\Gate
**remember** everything that you use trough `::` like Gate::allows or
Route::get or something like that is `Facade` so for import use the uri that
contains `Facade`
Here is good tutorial which explain how to use `Gate`, hope it can be usefull
https://laravel-news.com/authorization-gates
https://code.tutsplus.com/tutorials/gates-and-policies-in-laravel--cms-29780
https://www.grafikart.fr/tutoriels/laravel/gates-policies-867
Related
I try to extend autocomplete-content macro by own logic witch should be call some rest.
I finded autocomplete-content.js file where autocomplete-content is defined, but I dont have idea how to extend it by own autocompleteModule.
I tried create own JS file as resource in own add-on, but it execute before autocomplete-content.js on confluence, and autocompleteContent object was undefined.
In the end I need to have own autocomplete tool with own rest service witch will be fatch data from other DB.
If possible use AUI Select2.
Please note: AUI Select2 is based on older Select2. You have to refer to this documentation: http://select2.github.io/select2/
Something else would be to use QuickSearchDropDown
It is not really documented, but quite easy to use. Look for a file quicksearchdropdown.js in Confluence sources.
You can use it like this:
AJS.$('#myinput').quicksearch(URL_RELATIVE_TO_CONFLUENCE_BASE, false, {
makeParams: function (params) {
return {
username: params.term,
staticParam: 'blabla'
};
}
}
maybe a simple question but for me as starter with Neo4j a hurdle. I installed the neo4jphp with composer in the same directory as my application. Vendor-Subfolder has been created and the everyman/neo4j folder below is available. For a first test I used this code snippet from the examples:
spl_autoload_register(function ($className) {
$libPath = 'vendor\\';
$classFile = $className.'.php';
$classPath = $libPath.$classFile;
if (file_exists($classPath)) {
require($classPath);
}
});
require('vendor/autoload.php');
use everyman\Neo4j\Client,
everyman\Neo4j\Transport;
$client = new Client(new Transport('localhost', 7474));
print_r($client->getServerInfo());
I always stumple upon the error
Fatal error: Cannot instantiate abstract class Everyman\Neo4j\Transport
Googling brought me to a comment from Josh Adell stating
You can't instantiate Everyman\Neo4j\Transport, since it is an abstract class. You must instantiate Everyman\Neo4j\Transport\Curl or Everyman\Neo4j\Transport\Stream depending on your needs
So I thought I just need to alter the use-statements to
use everyman\Neo4j\Client,
everyman\Neo4j\Transport\Curl;
but this doesnt work, debugging shows, that the autoloader only get "Transport.php" instead of "everyman\Neo4j\Transport\Curl.php". For "Client.php" its still working ("vendor\everyman\Neo4j\Client.php") so I am guessing that the use-statement is wrong or the code is not able to handle an additional subfolder-structure.
Using
require('phar://neo4jphp.phar');
works fine but I read that this is deprecated and should be replaced by composer / autoload.
Anyone has a hint what to change or had the same problem?
Thanks for your time,
Balael
Curl is the default transport. You only need to instantiate your own Transport object if you want to use Stream instead of Curl. If you really want to instantiate your own Curl Transport, the easiest change to your existing code is to modify the use statement to be:
use everyman\Neo4j\Client,
everyman\Neo4j\Transport\Curl as Transport;
Also, you don't need to register your own autoload function if you are using the Composer package. vendor/autoload.php does that for you.
Thanks Josh, I was trying but it seems I still stuck somewhere. I am fine with using the default CURL - so I shrinked the code down to
require('vendor/autoload.php');
use everyman\Neo4j\Client;
$client = new Everyman\Neo4j\Client('localhost', 7474);
print_r($client->getServerInfo());`
The folder structure is main (here are the files and the composer.json with the content
{
"require": {
"everyman/Neo4j": "dev-master"
}
}
and in the subfolder "vendor" we have the "autoload.php" and the subfolder everyman with the related content. When I run the file I come out with
Fatal error: Class 'Everyman\Neo4j\Client' not found
which does not happen when I have the autoloadfunction. I guess I made a mistake somewehere - can you give me a hint?
Thanks a lot, B
Hmmm... I was just trying around and it seems the Transport CLASS is not needed in the use-statement and the class instantiation. This seems to work:
require('vendor/autoload.php');
use everyman\Neo4j\Client;
$client = new Client();
print_r($client->getServerInfo());
also valid for having a dedicated server/port:
$client = new Everyman\Neo4j\Client('localhost', 7474);
If you have more input I would be happy to learn more - thanks, all input & thoughts are very appreciated.
Balael
I want to link to a method that has the following signature:
public SomeResponse getSomeObjects(#RequestParam(value = "foo", defaultValue = "bar") Foo fooValue)
Now I want the link to look like this:
http://myhost/api/someobjects
I tried using methodOn from Spring HATEOAS's ControllerLinkBuilder as seen below:
discoverResponse.add(linkTo(methodOn(SomeController.class).getSomeObjects(null)).withRel("someobjects"))
But it doesn't lead to the desired link because a ?foo is added at its end. How can I achieve the above objective?
Since backward compatibility is such an issue for you, you could always manually construct your Link objects like so:
discoverResponse.add(new Link(baseUri() + "/someobjects", "someobjects"));
The other option would be to fork Spring HATEOAS on GitHub, build the project yourself, and change the way defaults are handled in ControllerLinkBuilder. I don't really know how you'd expect an out-of-context Link builder to be able to differentiate between whether it should advertise an optional parameter. In the HATEOAS world, if the parameter isn't included, the client doesn't know about it. So why even have the optional parameter?
I know there are 7 years gone now, but I had a similar problem today which lead me here. In spring hateoas 1.1.0 the behavior is slightly different, instead it will generate URI-Templates by default for non-required #RequestParams:
http://myhost/api/someobjects{?foo}
If you don't want them in your link, you can just expand it
Map<String, Object> parameters = new HashMap<>();
parameters.put("foo", null);
link = link.expand(parameters);
It will result in the desired URL
http://myhost/api/someobjects
I have been sitting with a problem for quite a while now and I just can't seem to find what I'm missing.
I have written a custom trace listener component for Enterprise Library 5.0 for the Logging application block which works but the configured ILogFormatter just won't resolve and so I always end up with the basic string text when it gets handled by my component.
I saw in the enterprise library source code that they use the "Container.ResolvedIfNotNull()" method. It doesn't seem to work for me. I need it to write out a custom formatted string for my component to use. You know, not just the message but the timestamp, machinename, threadId, etc.
Does anyone have any ideas on how to fix this?
Thanks in advance.
Like I've mentioned on this site: http://entlib.codeplex.com/discussions/261749
When you create your CreationExpression in the TraceListener data class make sure you have a flat constructor definition. To put it in other words, don't return:
() => new MyTraceListener(new TraceListenerConfig(..., Container.ResolvedIfNotNull<ILogFormatter>(), ...));
just have it in the constructor of the MyTraceListener:
() => new MyTraceListener(..., Container.ResolvedIfNotNull<ILogFormatter>(), ...);
I use modules layout to structure my controllers:
:module/:controller/:action
I would like to add a new custom route so that the following url will work.
domain.com/username
where username is a username of any registered user on the website.
Can anyone point me in the right direction?
Thank you
See this blog post for a detailed explanation of how to do this in ZF:
http://tfountain.co.uk/blog/2010/9/9/vanity-urls-zend-framework
Not sure if you can make something like domain.com/username. Instead you could do domain.com/u/username or domain.com/user/username. For example, to make the second route in you application.ini you could put something similar to the following:
resources.router.routes.user.route = "/user/:user"
resources.router.routes.user.type = "Zend_Controller_Router_Route"
resources.router.routes.user.defaults.module = default
resources.router.routes.user.defaults.controller = user
resources.router.routes.user.defaults.action = user
resources.router.routes.user.defaults.user =
resources.router.routes.user.reqs.user = "\s+"
http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.controller.router.html covers quite well all the different ways you can add routes. Keep in mind, once you add custom routes, the default one will not work anymore unless you explicitly define it (as well as in url view helpers etc.).