I was trying to change site template with site that I had saved. The target site was using project site template and the solution was activated. Checking on Microsoft site, I don't understand what this if it appropriate means. Is there something that I need to do before I could setup this project site template.
I knew I have to do something to make it enable. In Site Creation option you need to choose either Automatically create a site on next publish or Allow users to choose.
it then became enable.
Related
I have created the SPFx web part for custom development in SharePoint online modern site.
I have created multiple subsites under one site collection. I need to add the SPFx web part to all sub-sites.
I have tried to save a template of one site but it doesn't allow me to save the site as a template. It has thrown me the below error,
Sorry, this site can't be saved as a template. It contains apps that
don't work in templates: spfx-demo-client-side-solution
I have tried another way. I have created a site to add all necessary lists, libraries, and pages. I have successfully saved the template for that site. I have created many subsites using that custom template.
Now, I need to add my SPFx web part to the sites that were created using a template.
For that, I need to add the SPFx app to all subsite's Site Contents and add the SPFx web part to all subsite's Site Pages. Can I achieve that with PowerShell or do I need to prefer some alternative way?
Can anyone help me with the same?
Thanks in Advance.
Is it possible to copy a website with its plugin? There's a site which I want to have. However, it's really too expensive to buy. As I said, is there a way to copy that website with its plugin?
Regards
yes it is possible. if it is WordPress website then copy everything and paste into server and change the Database setting in wp-config.php and also change the site url and home url in wp-option table.
I am using Liferay 6.2 and want to set the options for the folder subscription feature in the Documents and Media portlet. My problem is that the button "subscribe" only appears for my Admin-user. For every other user of my portal it is not showing up.
I checked every permission that is set for users in the portal and the subscription-feature is nowhere to be seen. How can I have my normal users subscribe to folders?
Where can I find the right settings?
TIA
I found the solution myself.
The problem was that the users were not assigned to the open site. Although they had all the roles they needed they HAD to be assigned to the site, not only the community.
I want a plugin for joomla like jforms or chronoforms in order to make a form to upload videos along with other custom fields to db and manage them. The only problem is I want this functionality to be made from inside the administrator console and not to appear on a page at my site's frontend. My site does not have a login service , so I need to make the admin able to login to administration panel and from there to upload and manage videos.
Do you know of a plugin wich supports this functionality? Thank you in advance.
Found the correct plugin. It is fabrik. http://fabrikar.com
Background:
I am working on a legacy ASP.NET 3.5 Web Forms applications. The application allows users to buy a subscription to a 'white-label' website which is generated for them and they can customize it further. It uses forms authentication.
A typical use-case is that the user creates an account on our system, purchases a website, and then proceeds to customize their website. The URL they will use to edit their purchased website is something like this: https://www.example.com/EditWebsite.aspx. There are many other pages also within our website editing toolbox with other URLs.
Problem:
My team has now been tasked with allowing people to use one account to access multiple website subscriptions. This means that one authenticated user could be trying to access one of many websites to edit if they use the URL mentioned above. Our system can be made aware of multiple subscriptionIds per User but the website editor web app only has support for one subscription.
To clarify with a simpler example: this would be like if Google all of a sudden allowed you to view two different inboxes with one GMail account. How would the system know which one you were trying to access if the URLs were the same for both?
We originally wanted to change the application to use URLs like: https://www.example.com/[subID]/EditWebsite.aspx which would give us all the information we need to send the user to the correct website. We looked into URL Routing to accomplish this but it seems that we would have to change all of the web app's internal links to use the route config to generate the correct URLs. Maybe we have the wrong idea here but it seems like too much work for a legacy application.
Another potential solution we came up with was simply using our systems' control panel web app (where they click links to edit any of their websites) to set a session cookie which our edit website web app can read to know which website to bring up. This has the disadvantage that the pages would not be bookmark-able and you could not look at multiple websites at once in different tabs of the same browser.
Question(s):
Is there any other options we have not investigated or thought of? Is there any other web sites which allow for this kind of behavior; how do they handle it? Is URL Routing the right way to do this and we just need to take the plunge?
Any input is appreciated!
The solution we ended up using was adding a URL parameter to the link which specifies which website you are trying to edit.
https://www.example.com/EditWebsite.aspx?subID=123
This parameter is included in the links to 'Edit Website' from the page which lists all of a user's websites.
When present, this sets a session cookie for the user. If the request parameter is not present, the app looks for the cookie being set; this handles all the internal links within the application. if a cookie doesn't exist and the request parameter was not set, we just pick the authenticated user's first subscription from the list.
This isn't perfect but it has worked without issue so far. The only consequence it has caused is that a user cannot edit multiple websites in the same browser session, e.g. using multiple tabs. This hasn't resulted in any support issues yet though so it is pretty much a non-issue.