EEPROM programming in Evaluation Board (ADRF6720-27) - eeprom

I have a ADRF6720-27 EVAL Board. It connects to the host PC using CY7C68013a; the board also has a 64Kb EEPROM 24LC641; ADRF6720-27 is a RF modulator which is programmed via its SPI pins connected to pins 33, 34 and 35 of CY7C68013a.
The evaluation software runs fine. What I want to do is to load a program into the EEPROM (24LC641) such that the board generates stepped frequency from 700MHz to 2GHz.
I suppose this can be achieved if the program drives the three GPIO pins (say 33, 34, 35 in CY7C68013a) to drive the SPI slave (ADRF 6720-27) using bit-banging.
Installing the FX2LP-USB software detects the board correctly. My question is: in the IDE Keil uVision, which header files do I include while writing the program? There are many files in a demo project like bulkloop.c, which ones do I modify and which ones should be left as it is for my own purpose mentioned in the 1st and 2nd paragraph?
Thanks

Related

Using SD card module on SPI1 instead of SPI0 raspberry Pico with Arduino core

So I am trying to connect and then launch the SD card reader to Raspberry Pico using SPI1 and not the default pico one because the default one is taken by a LoRa module.
I am using the arduino core.
SPI1.setRX(12); // 16 12
SPI1.setTX(15); // 20 15
SPI1.setSCK(14); // 19 14
SPI1.setCS(13); // 17 13
I figured out this the way to define my SPI1 pins, but I still have no clue how to launch the SD card library on SPI1 and not the default SPI0.
I know that the defining code is right because I tested the SD card module on alternative SPI0 pins and it worked. I also asked the wise man that created the core how to do it and that's what he replied:
"There are 2 SPI port, SPI and SPI1. You can use the 2nd port, SPI1 at the same time as SPI. I don't think it's safe from the SPI protocol to change pins between transactions (glitches/etc. might upset the devices)."
But I still have no clue on how to run a SPI device on SPI1.

Can't receive from USB bulk endpoint despite Windows enumerates and libusb reads descriptor of STM32 custom device class

For a fast ADC sampling USB device, I am using the USB 2.0 High Speed capable STM32F733 with the embedded USB-HS PHY. In USBView, I can see that the device is enumerated, the libusb code opens the device and claims interface, but when I try to receive data with libusb_bulk_transfer, the operation times out (return code -12). Things I have tried: I have confirmed than when I request data with libusb_bulk_transfer, the device is interrupted. Note: I have DMA enabled in my class configuration C file and it is not clear to me how that is triggered. I have verified that the transfersize and packet count registers are being set correctly by the LL library function, and that when I request data from
Any tips on debugging such problems will be much appreciated - this board is my undergrad thesis due in under two months!
Desktop sequence:
libusb_get_device_list, libusb_get_device_descriptor, libusb_open, libusb_get_string_descriptor_ascii, libusb_free_device_list, libusb_bulk_transfer(devh, fat_EPIN_ADDR, inframe, fat_EPIN_SIZE, &gotBytes, 100). Where gotBytes is integer, and inframe is a large array.
Device firmware:
MX_USB_DEVICE_Init();
uint8_t txBuffer[10*fat_EPIN_SIZE];
while (1)
{
USBD_LL_Transmit(&hUsbDeviceHS, Custom_fat_EPIN_ADDR, txBuffer, Custom_fat_EPIN_SIZE);
HAL_Delay(1);
}
Custom_fat_EPIN_SIZE is 0x200 and the endpoint address is 0x81 (EP IN 1)
Installed driver for device is WinUSB (verified in Device Manger to be winusb.sys), and I am linking libusb-1.0 into my desktop program. You can find my source code at https://gitlab.com/tywonemi-school-stuff/silicon-radar-fun, the firmware is My SW/v1 and the desktop software is a Qt Creator project in My SW/Viewer, of note is usb.cpp. You can also compare with testing project/HIDTest, which is code that I tested with STM32F303 nucleo dev board where I was able to read an array through IN bulk endpoint with the Viewer application. However, F3 has the USB peripheral, while F7 has OTG_USB, and I am now attempting USB 2.0 compliant HS so there may be more protocol-based pitfalls. You can also find the output of the device descriptor etc from USBView in my SW/USBView_broken.txt
EDIT 1: I have found finally some concrete error in the STM32 behavior. The DMAADDR is set for EPIN 0x81, and never increments, despite the DMA being enabled. I have went through literally every occurrence of the word "DMA" in the USB_OTG periphery.
I thought it might be that my linker script makes my array be stored in DTCM or similar, and the OTG DMA can't access it, but the address of txBuffer is 0x2003EBEC which is in SRAM2. The AHB matrix in the reference manual clearly shows, that the USB OTG HS DMA is master for a bus that SRAM2 is a slave of. And DTCM is connected too. I will look for application notes for USB OTG HS DMA - it just seems to be refusing to copy data!
I have fixed my issue by disabling the DMA setting. I have re-read the relevant portions of the reference manual and still don't know how exactly the values propagate into the Tx FIFOs. It is possible that DMA-less operation will be a major bottleneck in my project, I might return to this later.

Beagle Bone Black I2C2 Issues

I am having troubles using an I2C sensor with the Beagle Bone Black (BBB). The BBB is running a newly flashed 18.04 Ubuntu image specifically for the BBB.
I wired the sensor (VIN, GND, SCL, SDA) to the corresponding I2C2 pins (4, 2, 19, 20) on the BBB using the below pinout.
The sensor is supposed to be using address 0x40, but scanning I2C2 (using i2cdetect -r 2) does not show the sensor.
I have tested this with two separate sensors as I thought at first I may have fried the original sensor somehow, but the results are the same. In fact, running the I2C2 scan command yields the exact same results when nothing is connected at all.
I have read in many places that I2C2 may not be enabled by default, but I assume it is enabled in my case as I can scan I2C2 without getting an error. Is this assumption incorrect? Again, this is a freshly flashed BBB, and I have not enabled/disabled anything - it should be in the default state.
I have also verified the connectivity of my wires between the sensor and BBB. The voltage between VIN and GND on the chip is 3.3V, so it is definitely being powered.
Why can't I connect to my I2C sensors using the BBB?
it could be that the source you are using is outdated or not a viable entry for i2c.
Also, you could use this command to make sure i2c2 pins are available:
config-pin p9.21 i2c
config-pin p9.22 i2c
This may work, also. If this does not work, please reply with your entire source.
Seth
P.S. Also, if you have time, you may want to get an i2c library to use if your software falls short of setting up your own i2c library. They have smbus2 you can install with pip and other i2c libraries out there still.
Here are a few things you should check (in random order).
List all I2C buses wich i2cdetect -l and try them all. Depending on the platform, the i2c bus number in Linux may be different from the peripheral number used in the datasheet and pinout. E.g. "I2C2" might be bus i2c-1 or i2c-3 in Linux).
Use an oscilloscope or logical analyzer to see if the SCL and SDA lines are being driven. If they aren't check the bus number as above. If they are, then check whether the device gives an ACK; if it doesn't, anything else will never work: double-check the chip slave address. There are cheap logical analyzers that you can buy and user with pulseview.
Simply load the Linux driver for your chip (see the kernel docs on how to do it from userspace for a quick test). Then see check if the device appears or use dmesg to see any kernel error messages while probing.

Raspberry Pi GPIO stops working after some time

when using the GPIO library on the Raspberry PI and having an example code like this:
while True:
GPIO.setup(21, GPIO.OUT)
pwm = GPIO.PWM(21, 50)
pwm.start(0)
for i in range(0, 101, 2):
pwm.ChangeDutyCycle(i)
time.sleep(0.03)
for i in range(100, -1, -2):
pwm.ChangeDutyCycle(i)
time.sleep(0.03)
pwm.stop()
GPIO.cleanup(21)
time.sleep(1)
The code might stop suddenly after a while. No error, just no changes via pwm are recognized any longer. Anyone got an idea why this is?
This issue has been mentioned here in the old sourceforge repo:
https://sourceforge.net/p/raspberry-gpio-python/tickets/111/
https://sourceforge.net/p/raspberry-gpio-python/tickets/94/
Its because the GPIO library by default creates a new pthread for every call without cleaning up afterwards, but the number of threads might be limited to a number of 250 or so.
I created a fork of this repo (https://github.com/wuestkamp/raspberry-gpio-python) which solves this and contains instructions on how to use this on your PI.

Bluetooth low energy (BLE 112 ) Difference between BGAPI and BGScript

What is the Difference between BGAPI and BGScript ?
And if we write any code for BG profile than how can we burn it in BLE 112?
The BGAPI interface defines the protocol used to talk to the module over USB or serial link.
BGScript is something which runs on the module processor itself, when the USB or serial link is not used.
I have the dongle, BLED112, which is the same thing as BLE112 with a USB connector on it, and the code is "burned" to it using standard USB DFU interface.
The downloading of the code to BLE112 can be done using several methods:
(1) Bring out the DD, DC debug interface pins from your module and use the CC-Debugger (digikey part 296-30207-ND, $55). This works every time. If you have the DKBLE112 kit, the CC-Debugger fits on the 10-pin .050 connector in lower right corner. You can "burn" any firmware and any stack this way. Works awesome.
(2) Hope that the current firmware on the CC2540 has serial bootloader, and load the new firmware (hopefully also containing serial bootloader) using UART. TI has the tools, but it sure seems quite convoluted to me, and I did not try it.