sonar does not report status on github pull request - github

It seems that sonar no longer report for my pull requests. In october, it was working: https://github.com/edemo/PDEngine/pull/113
That one was using 7.4.0, which is later than 7.2.0, for which some kind of deprecation was announced here: https://docs.sonarqube.org/latest/setup/upgrade-notes/
Today it does not report: https://github.com/edemo/PDEngine/pull/118
it uses 7.7.0, and no change in the build environment I am aware of.
I have specifically checked that none of the files in the repo which have anything to do with sonar have any relevant changes.
Where should I look for the problem's cause?

It seems that the change is in github. Adding Sonarcloud GitHub app to the organization solved the problem. It is another check than the old one, so I had to update the branch protection rules as well.

Related

Pull-Request auto-complete doesn't automatically complete when all requirements are met - Azure DevOps

To keep it short, I'm using a script in Azure DevOps that generates a pull request automatically every time a new branch is pushed to the repository.
Said script enables the pull request "auto-complete" funcionality, which lets me merge code using GIT after I complete all the branch policies. I have only one branch policy enabled, which compiles my code and checks whether it should complete the pull request or not, based on the pipeline compilation results.
Everything was working fine before one week ago, people pushed their branches normally and ADO automatically created the PR, build checked, merged and auto-completed the PR, as my only branch policy had always been met.
Now even all branch policies are met, the PR is stuck and won't auto-complete for some reason, even after the build compilation turns out as success and there are no merge conflicts.
If I click on approve, it then begins to complete automatically as it should. However, this manual step was never necessary for the PR to finish, nor I have a branch policy that demands an approval to complete the PR.
This is affecting all the projects in my ADO organization, so it may not be a configuration problem.
Maybe anyone has stumbled across the same problem?
Edit: Microsoft is looking at the issue: https://developercommunity.visualstudio.com/t/Pull-Request-doesnt-automatically-compl/10082816
Based on the link provided in the question, this issue apepears to have been fixed on Jul 28, 2022
"Microsoft Solution - Feedback Bot
Closed - Fixed
We have released a fix for this issue! Thank you for providing valuable feedback to help improve the product."
You could check if the user account has the permission: Bypass policies when completing pull requests.

Integration Percy visual regression testing status check with Github

I am trying to integrate Percy.io, a visual regression testing tool with Github status check.
I have signed up for free account with Percy and paid Github version.
I wanted to setup status check with Percy with each pull request as below suggested at percy doc on status check
I have integrated Percy in Github
Added rules in Github
but still don't see check on pull request.
Added same project in percy.io too
Any Idea what I am missing over here?
It's hard to be specific without knowing more about your application, however one piece that seems to be missing from your setup is a CI/CD configuration.
Basically, you need a Continuous Integration service (such as Travis, Jenkins, CircleCI or others to trigger a build for your project so that percy can capture snapshots. Did you configure one?
See the documentation here.
Here an example configuration for one of my projects. Note that how you set this up may differ if you use a different set of tools than what's in the article.

How to prevent the pull request integration for SonarQube to report issues as inline comments on Githuib?

I configured SonarQube analysis to report it's status to pull requests on my GitHub project. SonarCloud already supports pull requests as first class citizen as described in https://blog.sonarsource.com/sonarcloud-loves-your-build-pipeline. As I understand, this kind of integration is not using the GitHub Plugin for SonarQube.
The configuration provides these properties (look here for the complete configuration)
sonar.pullrequest.provider
sonar.pullrequest.github.repository
sonar.pullrequest.branch
sonar.pullrequest.key
The credentials for the technical user are set in the SonarCloud project administration.
You can see the results here: https://github.com/BudgetFreak/BudgetFreak/pull/86#pullrequestreview-125364230
Every issue is reported as an inline comment, one summary comment is made and the status is reported for the code-quality/sonarqube check.
I would like to disable the inline comment on every issue. This was possible using the GitHub plugin. Can this also be achieved with the new pull request integration?
Unfortunately, on SonarCloud, this feature is not available.

VSTS Filter by repository folder?

I'm using Visual Studio Team Services to build my project which is stored in GitHub (here). The master branch contains multiple projects which make up the solution. Amongst those are a WebAPI project and a Cordova project. I need to build those using two separate build definitions in VSTS.
Previously I had set-up my build definition and used the branch filters to filter on what had been pushed to the repo. For instance:
master/src/API
This worked, but it doesn't any more. It seems as if the underlying code has changed. A filter of 'master' still works and I understand how this feature is probably meant to filter specifically on branches and maybe not on folders within the branch?
It's not a huge problem, but at this time all of my builds will trigger with every check-in, even if nothing changed in the meantime for that source code. So I'm not wondering what a good solution for this issue would be:
Put every project in it's own branch. Seems like a workaround
Some other filter option or maybe another syntax or something?
Leave it as it and don't worry about the extra builds (but that itches, you know...)
Anyone running a similar set-up?
Path filters is not supported for VSTS GitHub CI Build, it is available for Git CI Build on VSTS. You can vote this user voice: https://visualstudio.uservoice.com/forums/330519-team-services/suggestions/15140571-enable-continuous-integration-path-filters-for-git
The workaround is as you said that put every project in its own branch.

Jenkins how to set build status on Github commit?

I have set up Jenkins and Github such that whenever I push a commit to an existing pull request, it automatically adds a comment and triggers a Jenkins build. Prior to today, Jenkins amended that comment with the status of the build and the functional tests executed. (So I know that part works.)
Today, I updated Jenkins and Jenkins ceases to notify Github of the build status. When I check the Jenkins configuration, the post-build section says:
Set build status on Github commit [deprecated]
This notifier will set GH commit status. This step is DEPRECATED and will be migrated to new step in one of the next major plugin releases. Please refer to new universal step.
Are they saying they removed functionality and I need to either downgrade or wait for them to restore it when they get around to releasing an update?
Alternatively, if they want me to start using this new "universal step", where can I find the documentation on setting that up?
I looked at Show current state of Jenkins build on GitHub repo but it appears the answers to that question are now obsolete (answered six months ago).
I am currently using Jenkins version 2.3, Github plugin 1.19.1 and Github API plugin 1.75.
I think you may have been bitten by this issue: https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Plugins+affected+by+fix+for+SECURITY-170
It says
If using the standard ${sha1} branch spec, builds will fail with "Couldn't find any revision to build".
Pull requests remain in the "pending" state as the plugin fails to update the PR with the build outcome
It sounds like this can be fixed by using a whitelist of terms. In my case, this was handled by another engineer, so I can't provide firsthand details.