I have an app secured by keycloak. Going to a secured page brings up a keycloak login page and the correct user/password gives the expected results.
Within the client, I have switched on user registation. So now the login page shows a register link, which displays another keycloak page allowing the user to register with name, username, email.
This "works" in that the user is added to the keycloak user database. But the application displays the error page because a role is not mapped to that user in keycloak.
What I would like to happen is to be able to add the new user to the apps own user database, associate a role with the user, perhaps do some verification of the user.
So I don't really know what keycloak is sending back to the app except that it eventually leads to /error. Is there a way to tell keycloak after a new registration contact this url where things can happen within the app?
I came across similar scenario and the way I solved it was by enabling a default role to the newly added user.
This role can be changed later on but with a default role in place, your flow will complete.
There are 2 ways to assign a default role in keycloak. With both these configs, whenever a new user is registered even from external service providers, they will be assigned this default role:
Assign a default role directly to user:
Assign a default group to user & map a role to that default group
Please note that Default Group & Role names in above are my own and they are not predefined in keycloak.
After logging in to Keycloak admin console --> roles -> go to 'Default Roles' tab and add the role from available section to default realm roles section and save...Now when a user is registered, it will have the role assigned .
Related
I entered the following data, but after applying these settings, the input is not carried out, several questions arise. during authorization, the user returns to the page with minio and so on indefinitely
MINIO_IDENTITY_OPENID_CONFIG_URL=https://test.local.ru/.well-known/openid-configuration
MINIO_IDENTITY_OPENID_CLIENT_ID="843351d4-1080-11ea-aa20-271ecba3924a"
MINIO_IDENTITY_OPENID_CLAIM_NAME=policy
MINIO_IDENTITY_OPENID_CLIENT_ID="292085223830"
MINIO_IDENTITY_OPENID_CLIENT_SECRET="12344556"
MINIO_IDENTITY_OPENID_SCOPES=openid
MINIO_IDENTITY_OPENID_REDIRECT_URI_DYNAMIC==https://minio.local.ru/*
how do I even understand why it brings me back to the page? are
there any logs, I don't understand how to debug
do I still need to have policies and users that are in sso? if you start, then you need to specify the access key. It is unclear why authorization is needed then. if you still get the keys to enter.
is it possible to enable both OpenID and standard authorization at the same time?
I finally figured out this problem
you need
to go to the rules section in your keycloak sso client to create a role with a name equal to the policy from the minio:
for example role name
consoleAdmin or readonly
in addition to the name, you do not need to fill in any attributes in the role, do not put it as a composite
after adding the role, we need to perform two steps
create a claim name (the name can be any), for example, minio-roles
mapper type - user client role
claim json - string
client id - the name of your sso client
token claim name - minio-roles
then it remains to assign this role to users in the users section
user - role mapping - client roles ( select client name SSO) - select the right role for this user
We're using Keycloak 12 for authentication in our portal and there are two different types of users:
Internal users (read from our internal LDAP)
External users (stored in Keycloak but without being synced with the LDAP)
We'd now like to use the "Forget Password" feature provided by Keycloak. After having configured the feature and the mail server, this works fine out-of-the-box.
However we'd like to restrict the "Forget Password" feature to all users which belong to (2), i.e. the internal users. These users are not allowed updating their password via Keycloak as this is done by another mechanism.
I couldn't find any information in the documentation so far if this is possible at all?
The Keycloak Forgot Password feature is applied at the Realm level, hence applied to all the users belonging to the Realm. For Keycloak, the LDAP is just an external storage with users to authenticate against. Consequently, out of the box, there is no way (as far as I know) for the Forgot Password to only be enabled to certain users within the Realm.
Even if it would be possible IMO it would not be a very user-friendly feature, since when one activates such a feature a new link will be shown to the users on the login page in case they have forgotten their passwords. So if a user from the LDAP would click on it, it would display an error or something?!
Alternatively, you can configure the LDAP of the so-called internal users in another Realm than the one with the Forgot Password enabled. And then configure the newly created realm to be an external Identity Provider, which the users could explicitly authenticate against it. So in practice, the users would lend in the normal login page, the external users could login normally, and would have the Forgot Password option enabled. The internal users would explicitly click on the external IDP to authenticate themselves. Log in using the external IDP would be a similar user-experience as log in to the normal login page, however, the Forgot Password option would not be shown.
You can see an example such configuration here.
I am building a SPA with a spring on the backend. I am working on signing in with Google, most of it is working already: got the id_token with the implicit flow in the frontend and I sent it and verified it on the backend.
I want to have users with roles and manage that locally (so, no adding info in the oidc provider). What are the options to go from the id_token to having an authenticated user in spring? I did not find any example doing that link manually (id_token-spring_sec_user).
I have checked several sources like the Spring Security 5 presentation at SpringOne https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WhrOCurxFWU, several SO questions and posts on okta's and auth0's blogs but I am still missing the link.
You will have to create your own (application) specific roles.
Use these steps :
Get authenticated from Google
Access the profile section from google (username, name etc )
Use your own user table to store this info
Create admin APIs in your own system and assign your app-specific roles to the user.
When you login again you will authenticate against google login/password and roles specific to your application .
Create an account or session with the id_token
Check if the user is already in your user database. If so, establish an authenticated session for the user. If the user isn't yet in your user database, create a new user record with default role from the information in the ID token payload, and establish a session for the user. You can prompt the user for any additional profile information you require when you detect a newly created user in your app.
I would like to setup Google federation using Keycloak however only for authorized users in my company.
Setting up Google federation allows any Google account to login.
I have looked at the authentication flow on Keycloak but I have been unable to find a way to set it up. I can think of a few simple scenarios that I had hoped Keycloak allowed out of the box
Instead of automatically creating an account when somebody tries to login, require that an account with the exact same email/username already exists and just link them based on the email when that specific user tries to login.
Automatically create an account the first time the user logs in using Google, link them however require an admin to manually activate the account before it can be used
A combination of the first 2. Enable registration, allow the user to register an account and require an admin to activate the account, at which point the user can link them.
Try as I might, I seem to be unable to configure this. There seems to be no way to have Keycloak create an account that requires activation and if I try to create a flow where the "unique account creation" authenticator is not include, it immediately throws the user to an "invalid username/password" screen.
Did I miss something? Is there no other option than manually creating an account and linking it for every single user (or write my own authenticator which I am trying to avoid)?
If you are OK with folks from a single domain (e.g. #yourco.com), you can use the Hosted Domain parameter on the settings page. For google specifically, at least as of keycloak 11.x, both google and keycloak will ensure the user's email address matches the entered domain. I do not know if it's possible to enter multiple domains.
What we do is use the hosted domain option, and grant these new users a simple role that allows them to log into the admin panel and have read permissions on a few simple areas. This makes it easy to setup new accounts in Keycloak, we just tell users to go log in and they are setup with basic access. If someone warrants more advanced access to read private data or even write some data, they have to contact our ops team who may choose to grant them some more roles in keycloak
You could implement a custom form action. It's easier than you would expect.
If you don't want to write code you could maybe use the 'script' form action which is already available. You can get to it this way:
Authentication -> Select 'First broker login' in the dropdown -> Make a copy of it (Making a copy of it allows you to edit it). Now click 'Add execution' and chose 'Script'. Move it upwards to the top, so it's the first form action in your flow. Put the radio button on 'REQUIRED' and go to actions -> config. Now in the script you could check the username or email to match a pattern (maybe the domain name of your company), if the pattern match fails, you can call the context.failure(..) method, which is already available in the default script.
Make sure that you select this (new) first broker login in your identity provider configuration.
I am using keycloak, and I have created a dropwizard service that I want to start enforcing roles in.
I have tried using the #RolesAllowd("user") annotation, but it always returns 403.
I have also tried #PermitAll, and that works fine.
I know I am connected correctly to the server, as the user has the correct information in it (email, name, etc), but where do the roles come from?
Is there a way to see the roles that a user has?
(answering my own question)
The issue that I was having #RolesAllowd("user") always returns a 403, is because of a checkbox in the Keycloak UI called "Scope Param Required". and the tooltip reads:
This role will be granted just if scope parameter with role name is used during authorization/token request.
It turns out, if you are trying to use that role, and the checkbox is on, it will not be sent to the client, so it will seem to the client that the user does not have that role. That checkbox was clicked ON for me, so that is why the annotation was showing the user was not authenticated.
So, if that checkbox is checked, you need to explicitly ask for the role, here is how you do that with user:
"scope" : {
"realm" : [ "user" ]
}
And here is more information from Keyclaok: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-231
In your application realm on the keycloak admin console, you have a section called roles. There you must add the roles that will be checked by java security.
If you want that a user after a registration automatically receive a role, you need to add this role into default roles (roles -> default roles). You can also add manually roles to existent users in users -(select a user)->role mapping->assigned roles