I am using Spark and I have a table that has a specific string format in one of the columns called predictions. The format is always of the type - 0=some_probability,1=some_other_probability,2=some_other_probability .
Here are a few sample records from that table -
val table1 = Seq(
("0=0.5,1=0.3,2=0.2"),
("0=0.6,1=0.2,2=0.2"),
("0=0.1,1=0.1,2=0.8")
).toDF("predictions")
table1.show(false)
+-----------------+
|predictions |
+-----------------+
|0=0.5,1=0.3,2=0.2|
|0=0.6,1=0.2,2=0.2|
|0=0.1,1=0.1,2=0.8|
+-----------------+
Now, I also have metadata information about each of these indexes - 0,1,2...n in a separate string. The metadata string looks like -
val metadata = "AA::BB::CC"
I would like to write a UDF in Scala to map these indexes to each element in the string. The output of that UDF should give me a new column which looks like this -
+--------------------+
|labelled_predictions|
+--------------------+
|AA=0.5,BB=0.3,CC=0.2|
|AA=0.6,BB=0.2,CC=0.2|
|AA=0.1,BB=0.1,CC=0.8|
+--------------------+
So, 0 is replaced by AA since AA is the first element in the metadata string that is always split by ::.
How do I write an UDF in Scala-Spark to do this ?
val metadata = "AA::BB::CC"
based on given data, this should work for you:
def myUDF(metadata:String) = udf((s: String) => {
val metadataSplit = metadata.split("::")
val dataSplit = s.split(",")
val output = new Array[String](dataSplit.size)
for (i <- 0 until dataSplit.size) {
output(i) = metadataSplit(i) + "=" + dataSplit(i).split("=")(1)
}
output.mkString(",")
})
table1.withColumn("labelled_predictions", myUDF(metadata)(col("predictions"))).select("labelled_predictions").show(false)
output:
+--------------------+
|labelled_predictions|
+--------------------+
|AA=0.5,BB=0.3,CC=0.2|
|AA=0.6,BB=0.2,CC=0.2|
|AA=0.1,BB=0.1,CC=0.8|
+--------------------+
Related
Is there a way to create an XML SOAP REQUEST by extracting a few columns from each row of a dataframe ? 10 records in a dataframe means 10 separate SOAP XML REQUESTs.
How would you make the function call using map now?
You can do that by applying a map function to the dataframe.
val df = your dataframe
df.map(x => convertToSOAP(x))
// convertToSOAP is your function.
Putting up an example based on your comment, hope you find this useful.
case class emp(id:String,name:String,city:String)
val list = List(emp("1","user1","NY"),emp("2","user2","SFO"))
val rdd = sc.parallelize(list)
val df = rdd.toDF
df.map(x => "<root><name>" + x.getString(1) + "</name><city>"+ x.getString(2) +"</city></root>").show(false)
// Note: x is a type of org.apache.spark.sql.Row
Output will be as follows :
+--------------------------------------------------+
|value |
+--------------------------------------------------+
|<root><name>user1</name><city>NY</city></root> |
|<root><name>user2</name><city>SFO</city></root> |
+--------------------------------------------------+
I have the following Spark dataframe that is created dynamically:
val sf1 = StructField("name", StringType, nullable = true)
val sf2 = StructField("sector", StringType, nullable = true)
val sf3 = StructField("age", IntegerType, nullable = true)
val fields = List(sf1,sf2,sf3)
val schema = StructType(fields)
val row1 = Row("Andy","aaa",20)
val row2 = Row("Berta","bbb",30)
val row3 = Row("Joe","ccc",40)
val data = Seq(row1,row2,row3)
val df = spark.createDataFrame(spark.sparkContext.parallelize(data), schema)
df.createOrReplaceTempView("people")
val sqlDF = spark.sql("SELECT * FROM people")
Now, I need to iterate each row and column in sqlDF to print each column, this is my attempt:
sqlDF.foreach { row =>
row.foreach { col => println(col) }
}
row is type Row, but is not iterable that's why this code throws a compilation error in row.foreach. How to iterate each column in Row?
Consider you have a Dataframe like below
+-----+------+---+
| name|sector|age|
+-----+------+---+
| Andy| aaa| 20|
|Berta| bbb| 30|
| Joe| ccc| 40|
+-----+------+---+
To loop your Dataframe and extract the elements from the Dataframe, you can either chose one of the below approaches.
Approach 1 - Loop using foreach
Looping a dataframe directly using foreach loop is not possible. To do this, first you have to define schema of dataframe using case class and then you have to specify this schema to the dataframe.
import spark.implicits._
import org.apache.spark.sql._
case class cls_Employee(name:String, sector:String, age:Int)
val df = Seq(cls_Employee("Andy","aaa", 20), cls_Employee("Berta","bbb", 30), cls_Employee("Joe","ccc", 40)).toDF()
df.as[cls_Employee].take(df.count.toInt).foreach(t => println(s"name=${t.name},sector=${t.sector},age=${t.age}"))
Please see the result below :
Approach 2 - Loop using rdd
Use rdd.collect on top of your Dataframe. The row variable will contain each row of Dataframe of rdd row type. To get each element from a row, use row.mkString(",") which will contain value of each row in comma separated values. Using split function (inbuilt function) you can access each column value of rdd row with index.
for (row <- df.rdd.collect)
{
var name = row.mkString(",").split(",")(0)
var sector = row.mkString(",").split(",")(1)
var age = row.mkString(",").split(",")(2)
}
Note that there are two drawback of this approach.
1. If there is a , in the column value, data will be wrongly split to adjacent column.
2. rdd.collect is an action that returns all the data to the driver's memory where driver's memory might not be that much huge to hold the data, ending up with getting the application failed.
I would recommend to use Approach 1.
Approach 3 - Using where and select
You can directly use where and select which will internally loop and finds the data. Since it should not throws Index out of bound exception, an if condition is used
if(df.where($"name" === "Andy").select(col("name")).collect().length >= 1)
name = df.where($"name" === "Andy").select(col("name")).collect()(0).get(0).toString
Approach 4 - Using temp tables
You can register dataframe as temptable which will be stored in spark's memory. Then you can use a select query as like other database to query the data and then collect and save in a variable
df.registerTempTable("student")
name = sqlContext.sql("select name from student where name='Andy'").collect()(0).toString().replace("[","").replace("]","")
You can convert Row to Seq with toSeq. Once turned to Seq you can iterate over it as usual with foreach, map or whatever you need
sqlDF.foreach { row =>
row.toSeq.foreach{col => println(col) }
}
Output:
Berta
bbb
30
Joe
Andy
aaa
20
ccc
40
You should use mkString on your Row:
sqlDF.foreach { row =>
println(row.mkString(","))
}
But note that this will be printed inside the executors JVM's, so norally you won't see the output (unless you work with master = local)
sqlDF.foreach is not working for me but Approach 1 from #Sarath Avanavu answer works but it was also playing with the order of the records sometime.
I found one more way which is working
df.collect().foreach { row =>
println(row.mkString(","))
}
You should iterate over the partitions which allows the data to be processed by Spark in parallel and you can do foreach on each row inside the partition.
You can further group the data in partition into batches if need be
sqlDF.foreachPartition { partitionedRows: Iterator[Model1] =>
if (partitionedRows.take(1).nonEmpty) {
partitionedRows.grouped(numberOfRowsPerBatch).foreach { batch =>
batch.foreach { row =>
.....
This worked fine for me
sqlDF.collect().foreach(row => row.toSeq.foreach(col => println(col)))
simple collect result and then apply foreach
df.collect().foreach(println)
My solution using FOR because it was I need:
Solution 1:
case class campos_tablas(name:String, sector:String, age:Int)
for (row <- df.as[campos_tablas].take(df.count.toInt))
{
print(row.name.toString)
}
Solution 2:
for (row <- df.take(df.count.toInt))
{
print(row(0).toString)
}
Let's assume resultDF is the Dataframe.
val resultDF = // DataFrame //
var itr = 0
val resultRow = resultDF.count
val resultSet = resultDF.collectAsList
var load_id = 0
var load_dt = ""
var load_hr = 0
while ( itr < resultRow ){
col1 = resultSet.get(itr).getInt(0)
col2 = resultSet.get(itr).getString(1) // if column is having String value
col3 = resultSet.get(itr).getLong(2) // if column is having Long value
// Write other logic for your code //
itr = itr + 1
}
I have 2 dataframes in spark as mentioned below.
val test = hivecontext.sql("select max(test_dt) as test_dt from abc");
test: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [test_dt: string]
val test1 = hivecontext.table("testing");
where test1 has columns like id,name,age,audit_dt
I want to compare these 2 dataframes and filter rows from test1 where audit_dt > test_dt. Somehow I am not able to do that. I am able to compare audit_dt with literal date using lit function but i am not able to compare it with another dataframe column.
I am able to compare literal date using lit function as mentioned below
val output = test1.filter(to_date(test1("audit_date")).gt(lit("2017-03-23")))
Max Date in test dataframe is -> 2017-04-26
Data in test1 Dataframe ->
Id,Name,Age,Audit_Dt
1,Rahul,23,2017-04-26
2,Ankit,25,2017-04-26
3,Pradeep,28,2017-04-27
I just need the data for Id=3 since that only row qualifies the greater than criteria of max date.
I have already tried below mentioned option but it is not working.
val test = hivecontext.sql("select max(test_dt) as test_dt from abc")
val MAX_AUDIT_DT = test.first().toString()
val output = test.filter(to_date(test("audit_date")).gt((lit(MAX_AUDIT_DT))))
Can anyone suggest as way to compare it with column of dataframe test?
Thanks
You can use non-equi joins, if both columns "test_dt" and "audit_date" are of class date.
/// cast to correct type
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions.to_date
val new_test = test.withColumn("test_dt",to_date($"test_dt"))
val new_test1 = test1.withColumn("Audit_Dt", to_date($"Audit_Dt"))
/// join
new_test1.join(new_test, $"Audit_Dt" > $"test_dt")
.drop("test_dt").show()
+---+-------+---+----------+
| Id| Name|Age| Audit_Dt|
+---+-------+---+----------+
| 3|Pradeep| 28|2017-04-27|
+---+-------+---+----------+
Data
val test1 = sc.parallelize(Seq((1,"Rahul",23,"2017-04-26"),(2,"Ankit",25,"2017-04-26"),
(3,"Pradeep",28,"2017-04-27"))).toDF("Id","Name", "Age", "Audit_Dt")
val test = sc.parallelize(Seq(("2017-04-26"))).toDF("test_dt")
Try with this:
test1.filter(to_date(test1("audit_date")).gt(to_date(test("test_dt"))))
Store the value in a variable and use in filter.
val dtValue = test.select("test_dt")
OR
val dtValue = test.first().getString(0)
Now apply filter
val output = test1.filter(to_date(test1("audit_date")).gt(lit(dtValue)))
I am using Spark 1.6 and I would like to know how to implement in lookup in the dataframes.
I have two dataframes employee & department.
Employee Dataframe
-------------------
Emp Id | Emp Name
------------------
1 | john
2 | David
Department Dataframe
--------------------
Dept Id | Dept Name | Emp Id
-----------------------------
1 | Admin | 1
2 | HR | 2
I would like to lookup emp id from the employee table to the department table and get the dept name. So, the resultset would be
Emp Id | Dept Name
-------------------
1 | Admin
2 | HR
How do I implement this look up UDF feature in SPARK. I don't want to use JOIN on both the dataframes.
As already mentioned in the comments, joining the dataframes is the way to go.
You can use a lookup, but I think there is no "distributed" solution, i.e. you have to collect the lookup-table into driver memory. Also note that this approach assumes that EmpID is unique:
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions._
import sqlContext.implicits._
import scala.collection.Map
val emp = Seq((1,"John"),(2,"David"))
val deps = Seq((1,"Admin",1),(2,"HR",2))
val empRdd = sc.parallelize(emp)
val depsDF = sc.parallelize(deps).toDF("DepID","Name","EmpID")
val lookupMap = empRdd.collectAsMap()
def lookup(lookupMap:Map[Int,String]) = udf((empID:Int) => lookupMap.get(empID))
val combinedDF = depsDF
.withColumn("empNames",lookup(lookupMap)($"EmpID"))
My initial thought was to pass the empRdd to the UDF and use the lookup method defined on PairRDD, but this does of course not work because you cannot have spark actions (i.e. lookup) within transformations (ie. the UDF).
EDIT:
If your empDf has multiple columns (e.g. Name,Age), you can use this
val empRdd = empDf.rdd.map{row =>
(row.getInt(0),(row.getString(1),row.getInt(2)))}
val lookupMap = empRdd.collectAsMap()
def lookup(lookupMap:Map[Int,(String,Int)]) =
udf((empID:Int) => lookupMap.lift(empID))
depsDF
.withColumn("lookup",lookup(lookupMap)($"EmpID"))
.withColumn("empName",$"lookup._1")
.withColumn("empAge",$"lookup._2")
.drop($"lookup")
.show()
As you are saying you already have Dataframes then its pretty easy follow these steps:
1)create a sqlcontext
val sqlContext = new org.apache.spark.sql.SQLContext(sc)
2) Create Temporary tables for all 3 Eg:
EmployeeDataframe.createOrReplaceTempView("EmpTable")
3) Query using MySQL Queries
val MatchingDetails = sqlContext.sql("SELECT DISTINCT E.EmpID, DeptName FROM EmpTable E inner join DeptTable G on " +
"E.EmpID=g.EmpID")
Starting with some "lookup" data, there are two approaches:
Method #1 -- using a lookup DataFrame
// use a DataFrame (via a join)
val lookupDF = sc.parallelize(Seq(
("banana", "yellow"),
("apple", "red"),
("grape", "purple"),
("blueberry","blue")
)).toDF("SomeKeys","SomeValues")
Method #2 -- using a map in a UDF
// turn the above DataFrame into a map which a UDF uses
val Keys = lookupDF.select("SomeKeys").collect().map(_(0).toString).toList
val Values = lookupDF.select("SomeValues").collect().map(_(0).toString).toList
val KeyValueMap = Keys.zip(Values).toMap
def ThingToColor(key: String): String = {
if (key == null) return ""
val firstword = key.split(" ")(0) // fragile!
val result: String = KeyValueMap.getOrElse(firstword,"not found!")
return (result)
}
val ThingToColorUDF = udf( ThingToColor(_: String): String )
Take a sample data frame of things that will be looked up:
val thingsDF = sc.parallelize(Seq(
("blueberry muffin"),
("grape nuts"),
("apple pie"),
("rutabaga pudding")
)).toDF("SomeThings")
Method #1 is to join on the lookup DataFrame
Here, the rlike is doing the matching. And null appears where that does not work. Both columns of the lookup DataFrame get added.
val result_1_DF = thingsDF.join(lookupDF, expr("SomeThings rlike SomeKeys"),
"left_outer")
Method #2 is to add a column using the UDF
Here, only 1 column is added. And the UDF can return a non-Null value. However, if the lookup data is very large it may fail to "serialize" as required to send to the workers in the cluster.
val result_2_DF = thingsDF.withColumn("AddValues",ThingToColorUDF($"SomeThings"))
Which gives you:
In my case I had some lookup data that was over 1 million values, so Method #1 was my only choice.
I am new to spark and scala. Lets say I have a data frame of lists that are key value pairs. Is there a way to map the id vars of column ids as new columns?
df.show()
+--------------------+-------------------- +
| ids | vals |
+--------------------+-------------------- +
|[id1,id2,id3] | null |
|[id2,id5,id6] |[WrappedArray(0,2,4)] |
|[id2,id4,id7] |[WrappedArray(6,8,10)]|
Expected output:
+----+----+
|id1 | id2| ...
+----+----+
|null| 0 | ...
|null| 6 | ...
A possible way would be to compute the columns of the new DataFrame and use those columns to construct the rows.
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions._
val data = List((Seq("id1","id2","id3"),None),(Seq("id2","id4","id5"),Some(Seq(2,4,5))),(Seq("id3","id5","id6"),Some(Seq(3,5,6))))
val df = sparkContext.parallelize(data).toDF("ids","values")
val values = df.flatMap{
case Row(t1:Seq[String], t2:Seq[Int]) => Some((t1 zip t2).toMap)
case Row(_, null) => None
}
// get the unique names of the columns across the original data
val ids = df.select(explode($"ids")).distinct.collect.map(_.getString(0))
// map the values to the new columns (to Some value or None)
val transposed = values.map(entry => Row.fromSeq(ids.map(id => entry.get(id))))
// programmatically recreate the target schema with the columns we found in the data
import org.apache.spark.sql.types._
val schema = StructType(ids.map(id => StructField(id, IntegerType, nullable=true)))
// Create the new DataFrame
val transposedDf = sqlContext.createDataFrame(transposed, schema)
This process will pass through the data 2 times, although depending on the backing data source, calculating the column names can be rather cheap.
Also, this goes back and forth between DataFrames and RDD. I would be interested in seeing a "pure" DataFrame process.