I have the following Spark dataframe that is created dynamically:
val sf1 = StructField("name", StringType, nullable = true)
val sf2 = StructField("sector", StringType, nullable = true)
val sf3 = StructField("age", IntegerType, nullable = true)
val fields = List(sf1,sf2,sf3)
val schema = StructType(fields)
val row1 = Row("Andy","aaa",20)
val row2 = Row("Berta","bbb",30)
val row3 = Row("Joe","ccc",40)
val data = Seq(row1,row2,row3)
val df = spark.createDataFrame(spark.sparkContext.parallelize(data), schema)
df.createOrReplaceTempView("people")
val sqlDF = spark.sql("SELECT * FROM people")
Now, I need to iterate each row and column in sqlDF to print each column, this is my attempt:
sqlDF.foreach { row =>
row.foreach { col => println(col) }
}
row is type Row, but is not iterable that's why this code throws a compilation error in row.foreach. How to iterate each column in Row?
Consider you have a Dataframe like below
+-----+------+---+
| name|sector|age|
+-----+------+---+
| Andy| aaa| 20|
|Berta| bbb| 30|
| Joe| ccc| 40|
+-----+------+---+
To loop your Dataframe and extract the elements from the Dataframe, you can either chose one of the below approaches.
Approach 1 - Loop using foreach
Looping a dataframe directly using foreach loop is not possible. To do this, first you have to define schema of dataframe using case class and then you have to specify this schema to the dataframe.
import spark.implicits._
import org.apache.spark.sql._
case class cls_Employee(name:String, sector:String, age:Int)
val df = Seq(cls_Employee("Andy","aaa", 20), cls_Employee("Berta","bbb", 30), cls_Employee("Joe","ccc", 40)).toDF()
df.as[cls_Employee].take(df.count.toInt).foreach(t => println(s"name=${t.name},sector=${t.sector},age=${t.age}"))
Please see the result below :
Approach 2 - Loop using rdd
Use rdd.collect on top of your Dataframe. The row variable will contain each row of Dataframe of rdd row type. To get each element from a row, use row.mkString(",") which will contain value of each row in comma separated values. Using split function (inbuilt function) you can access each column value of rdd row with index.
for (row <- df.rdd.collect)
{
var name = row.mkString(",").split(",")(0)
var sector = row.mkString(",").split(",")(1)
var age = row.mkString(",").split(",")(2)
}
Note that there are two drawback of this approach.
1. If there is a , in the column value, data will be wrongly split to adjacent column.
2. rdd.collect is an action that returns all the data to the driver's memory where driver's memory might not be that much huge to hold the data, ending up with getting the application failed.
I would recommend to use Approach 1.
Approach 3 - Using where and select
You can directly use where and select which will internally loop and finds the data. Since it should not throws Index out of bound exception, an if condition is used
if(df.where($"name" === "Andy").select(col("name")).collect().length >= 1)
name = df.where($"name" === "Andy").select(col("name")).collect()(0).get(0).toString
Approach 4 - Using temp tables
You can register dataframe as temptable which will be stored in spark's memory. Then you can use a select query as like other database to query the data and then collect and save in a variable
df.registerTempTable("student")
name = sqlContext.sql("select name from student where name='Andy'").collect()(0).toString().replace("[","").replace("]","")
You can convert Row to Seq with toSeq. Once turned to Seq you can iterate over it as usual with foreach, map or whatever you need
sqlDF.foreach { row =>
row.toSeq.foreach{col => println(col) }
}
Output:
Berta
bbb
30
Joe
Andy
aaa
20
ccc
40
You should use mkString on your Row:
sqlDF.foreach { row =>
println(row.mkString(","))
}
But note that this will be printed inside the executors JVM's, so norally you won't see the output (unless you work with master = local)
sqlDF.foreach is not working for me but Approach 1 from #Sarath Avanavu answer works but it was also playing with the order of the records sometime.
I found one more way which is working
df.collect().foreach { row =>
println(row.mkString(","))
}
You should iterate over the partitions which allows the data to be processed by Spark in parallel and you can do foreach on each row inside the partition.
You can further group the data in partition into batches if need be
sqlDF.foreachPartition { partitionedRows: Iterator[Model1] =>
if (partitionedRows.take(1).nonEmpty) {
partitionedRows.grouped(numberOfRowsPerBatch).foreach { batch =>
batch.foreach { row =>
.....
This worked fine for me
sqlDF.collect().foreach(row => row.toSeq.foreach(col => println(col)))
simple collect result and then apply foreach
df.collect().foreach(println)
My solution using FOR because it was I need:
Solution 1:
case class campos_tablas(name:String, sector:String, age:Int)
for (row <- df.as[campos_tablas].take(df.count.toInt))
{
print(row.name.toString)
}
Solution 2:
for (row <- df.take(df.count.toInt))
{
print(row(0).toString)
}
Let's assume resultDF is the Dataframe.
val resultDF = // DataFrame //
var itr = 0
val resultRow = resultDF.count
val resultSet = resultDF.collectAsList
var load_id = 0
var load_dt = ""
var load_hr = 0
while ( itr < resultRow ){
col1 = resultSet.get(itr).getInt(0)
col2 = resultSet.get(itr).getString(1) // if column is having String value
col3 = resultSet.get(itr).getLong(2) // if column is having Long value
// Write other logic for your code //
itr = itr + 1
}
Related
import scala.collection.mutable.ArrayBuffer
spark.sql("set db=test_script")
spark.sql("set table=member_test")
val colDF = sql("show columns from ${table} from ${db}")
var tempArray = new ArrayBuffer[String]()
var temp
colDF.foreach { row => row.toSeq.foreach { col =>
temp = "count(case when "+ col+ " ='X' then 1 else NULL END) AS count"+ col
tempArray += temp
}}
println(tempArray) // getting empty array
println(temp) // getting blank string
Hi, I am new to scala programming. I am trying to loop through a dataframe and append the formatted String data to my ArrayBuffer.
When I put the print statement inside the for loop, everything, seems to be fine, whereas If i try to access the arrayBuffer outside the loop, its empty.
Is it something related to the scope of the variable?
I am using arrayBuffer, because I got to know that list is mutable in Scala.
Please suggest any better way if you have.
Thanks in advance
The issue you are having is that spark is a distributed system, which means copies of your buffer are sent to each executor (And not returned back to the driver), hence why it is empty.
Also note that colDF is a DataFrame. This means that when you do
row => row.toSeq
The result of this is an Array(Any) (this isn't good practice). A better way of doing this would be:
val dataFrame: DataFrame = spark.sql("select * from test_script.member_test")
val columns: Array[String] = dataFrame.columns
val sqlStatement = columns.map(c => s"count(case when $c = 'X' then 1 else NULL END) as count$c")
However, even better is not to use SQL at all and use Spark!
val dataFrame: DataFrame = spark.sql("select * from test_script.member_test")
val columns: Array[String] = dataFrame.columns
val selectStatement: List[Column] = columns.map{ c =>
count(when(col(c) === "X", lit(1)).as(s"count$c")
}.toList
dataFrame.select(selectStatement :_*)
Can we check to see if every column in a spark dataframe contains a certain string(example "Y") using Spark-SQL or scala?
I have tried the following but don't think it is working properly.
df.select(df.col("*")).filter("'*' =='Y'")
Thanks,
Sai
You can do something like this to keep the rows where all columns contain 'Y':
//Get all columns
val columns: Array[String] = df.columns
//For each column, keep the rows with 'Y'
val seqDfs: Seq[DataFrame] = columns.map(name => df.filter(s"$name == 'Y'"))
//Union all the dataframes together into one final dataframe
val output: DataFrame = seqDfs.reduceRight(_ union _)
You can use data frame method columns to get all column's names
val columnNames: Array[String] = df.columns
and then add all filters in a loop
var filteredDf = df.select(join5.col("*"))
for(name <- columnNames) {
filteredDf = filteredDf.filter(s"$name =='Y'")
}
or you can create a SQL query using same approach
If you want to filter every row, in which any of the columns is equal to 1 (or anything else), you can dynamically create a query like this:
cols = [col(c) == lit(1) for c in patients.columns]
query = cols[0]
for c in cols[1:]:
query |= c
df.filter(query).show()
It's a bit verbose, but it is very clear what is happening. A more elegant version would be:
res = df.filter(reduce(lambda x, y: x | y, (col(c) == lit(1) for c in cols)))
res.show()
How do I select all the columns of a dataframe that has certain indexes in Scala?
For example if a dataframe has 100 columns and i want to extract only columns (10,12,13,14,15), how to do the same?
Below selects all columns from dataframe df which has the column name mentioned in the Array colNames:
df = df.select(colNames.head,colNames.tail: _*)
If there is similar, colNos array which has
colNos = Array(10,20,25,45)
How do I transform the above df.select to fetch only those columns at the specific indexes.
You can map over columns:
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions.col
df.select(colNos map df.columns map col: _*)
or:
df.select(colNos map (df.columns andThen col): _*)
or:
df.select(colNos map (col _ compose df.columns): _*)
All the methods shown above are equivalent and don't impose performance penalty. Following mapping:
colNos map df.columns
is just a local Array access (constant time access for each index) and choosing between String or Column based variant of select doesn't affect the execution plan:
val df = Seq((1, 2, 3 ,4, 5, 6)).toDF
val colNos = Seq(0, 3, 5)
df.select(colNos map df.columns map col: _*).explain
== Physical Plan ==
LocalTableScan [_1#46, _4#49, _6#51]
df.select("_1", "_4", "_6").explain
== Physical Plan ==
LocalTableScan [_1#46, _4#49, _6#51]
#user6910411's answer above works like a charm and the number of tasks/logical plan is similar to my approach below. BUT my approach is a bit faster.
So,
I would suggest you to go with the column names rather than column numbers. Column names are much safer and much ligher than using numbers. You can use the following solution :
val colNames = Seq("col1", "col2" ...... "col99", "col100")
val selectColNames = Seq("col1", "col3", .... selected column names ... )
val selectCols = selectColNames.map(name => df.col(name))
df = df.select(selectCols:_*)
If you are hesitant to write all the 100 column names then there is a shortcut method too
val colNames = df.schema.fieldNames
Example: Grab first 14 columns of Spark Dataframe by Index using Scala.
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions.col
// Gives array of names by index (first 14 cols for example)
val sliceCols = df.columns.slice(0, 14)
// Maps names & selects columns in dataframe
val subset_df = df.select(sliceCols.map(name=>col(name)):_*)
You cannot simply do this (as I tried and failed):
// Gives array of names by index (first 14 cols for example)
val sliceCols = df.columns.slice(0, 14)
// Maps names & selects columns in dataframe
val subset_df = df.select(sliceCols)
The reason is that you have to convert your datatype of Array[String] to Array[org.apache.spark.sql.Column] in order for the slicing to work.
OR Wrap it in a function using Currying (high five to my colleague for this):
// Subsets Dataframe to using beg_val & end_val index.
def subset_frame(beg_val:Int=0, end_val:Int)(df: DataFrame): DataFrame = {
val sliceCols = df.columns.slice(beg_val, end_val)
return df.select(sliceCols.map(name => col(name)):_*)
}
// Get first 25 columns as subsetted dataframe
val subset_df:DataFrame = df_.transform(subset_frame(0, 25))
I have two DataFrames in my code with exact same dimensions, let's say 1,000,000 X 50. I need to add corresponding values in both dataframes. How to achieve that.
One option would be to add another column with ids, union both DataFrames and then use reduceByKey. But is there any other more elegent way?
Thanks.
Your approach is good. Another option can be two take the RDD and zip those together and then iterate over those to sum the columns and create a new dataframe using any of the original dataframe schemas.
Assuming the data types for all the columns are integer, this code snippets should work. Please note that, this has been done in spark 2.1.0.
import spark.implicits._
val a: DataFrame = spark.sparkContext.parallelize(Seq(
(1, 2),
(3, 6)
)).toDF("column_1", "column_2")
val b: DataFrame = spark.sparkContext.parallelize(Seq(
(3, 4),
(1, 5)
)).toDF("column_1", "column_2")
// Merge rows
val rows = a.rdd.zip(b.rdd).map{
case (rowLeft, rowRight) => {
val totalColumns = rowLeft.schema.fields.size
val summedRow = for(i <- (0 until totalColumns)) yield rowLeft.getInt(i) + rowRight.getInt(i)
Row.fromSeq(summedRow)
}
}
// Create new data frame
val ab: DataFrame = spark.createDataFrame(rows, a.schema) // use any of the schemas
ab.show()
Update:
So, I tried to experiment with the performance of my solution vs yours. I tested with 100000 rows and each row has 50 columns. In case of your approach it has 51 columns, the extra one is for the ID column. In a single machine(no cluster), my solution seems to work a bit faster.
The union and group by approach takes about 5598 milliseconds.
Where as my solution takes about 5378 milliseconds.
My assumption is the first solution takes a bit more time because of the union operation of the two dataframes.
Here are the methods which I created for testing the approaches.
def option_1()(implicit spark: SparkSession): Unit = {
import spark.implicits._
val a: DataFrame = getDummyData(withId = true)
val b: DataFrame = getDummyData(withId = true)
val allData = a.union(b)
val result = allData.groupBy($"id").agg(allData.columns.collect({ case col if col != "id" => (col, "sum") }).toMap)
println(result.count())
// result.show()
}
def option_2()(implicit spark: SparkSession): Unit = {
val a: DataFrame = getDummyData()
val b: DataFrame = getDummyData()
// Merge rows
val rows = a.rdd.zip(b.rdd).map {
case (rowLeft, rowRight) => {
val totalColumns = rowLeft.schema.fields.size
val summedRow = for (i <- (0 until totalColumns)) yield rowLeft.getInt(i) + rowRight.getInt(i)
Row.fromSeq(summedRow)
}
}
// Create new data frame
val result: DataFrame = spark.createDataFrame(rows, a.schema) // use any of the schemas
println(result.count())
// result.show()
}
I am using Spark 1.6 and I would like to know how to implement in lookup in the dataframes.
I have two dataframes employee & department.
Employee Dataframe
-------------------
Emp Id | Emp Name
------------------
1 | john
2 | David
Department Dataframe
--------------------
Dept Id | Dept Name | Emp Id
-----------------------------
1 | Admin | 1
2 | HR | 2
I would like to lookup emp id from the employee table to the department table and get the dept name. So, the resultset would be
Emp Id | Dept Name
-------------------
1 | Admin
2 | HR
How do I implement this look up UDF feature in SPARK. I don't want to use JOIN on both the dataframes.
As already mentioned in the comments, joining the dataframes is the way to go.
You can use a lookup, but I think there is no "distributed" solution, i.e. you have to collect the lookup-table into driver memory. Also note that this approach assumes that EmpID is unique:
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions._
import sqlContext.implicits._
import scala.collection.Map
val emp = Seq((1,"John"),(2,"David"))
val deps = Seq((1,"Admin",1),(2,"HR",2))
val empRdd = sc.parallelize(emp)
val depsDF = sc.parallelize(deps).toDF("DepID","Name","EmpID")
val lookupMap = empRdd.collectAsMap()
def lookup(lookupMap:Map[Int,String]) = udf((empID:Int) => lookupMap.get(empID))
val combinedDF = depsDF
.withColumn("empNames",lookup(lookupMap)($"EmpID"))
My initial thought was to pass the empRdd to the UDF and use the lookup method defined on PairRDD, but this does of course not work because you cannot have spark actions (i.e. lookup) within transformations (ie. the UDF).
EDIT:
If your empDf has multiple columns (e.g. Name,Age), you can use this
val empRdd = empDf.rdd.map{row =>
(row.getInt(0),(row.getString(1),row.getInt(2)))}
val lookupMap = empRdd.collectAsMap()
def lookup(lookupMap:Map[Int,(String,Int)]) =
udf((empID:Int) => lookupMap.lift(empID))
depsDF
.withColumn("lookup",lookup(lookupMap)($"EmpID"))
.withColumn("empName",$"lookup._1")
.withColumn("empAge",$"lookup._2")
.drop($"lookup")
.show()
As you are saying you already have Dataframes then its pretty easy follow these steps:
1)create a sqlcontext
val sqlContext = new org.apache.spark.sql.SQLContext(sc)
2) Create Temporary tables for all 3 Eg:
EmployeeDataframe.createOrReplaceTempView("EmpTable")
3) Query using MySQL Queries
val MatchingDetails = sqlContext.sql("SELECT DISTINCT E.EmpID, DeptName FROM EmpTable E inner join DeptTable G on " +
"E.EmpID=g.EmpID")
Starting with some "lookup" data, there are two approaches:
Method #1 -- using a lookup DataFrame
// use a DataFrame (via a join)
val lookupDF = sc.parallelize(Seq(
("banana", "yellow"),
("apple", "red"),
("grape", "purple"),
("blueberry","blue")
)).toDF("SomeKeys","SomeValues")
Method #2 -- using a map in a UDF
// turn the above DataFrame into a map which a UDF uses
val Keys = lookupDF.select("SomeKeys").collect().map(_(0).toString).toList
val Values = lookupDF.select("SomeValues").collect().map(_(0).toString).toList
val KeyValueMap = Keys.zip(Values).toMap
def ThingToColor(key: String): String = {
if (key == null) return ""
val firstword = key.split(" ")(0) // fragile!
val result: String = KeyValueMap.getOrElse(firstword,"not found!")
return (result)
}
val ThingToColorUDF = udf( ThingToColor(_: String): String )
Take a sample data frame of things that will be looked up:
val thingsDF = sc.parallelize(Seq(
("blueberry muffin"),
("grape nuts"),
("apple pie"),
("rutabaga pudding")
)).toDF("SomeThings")
Method #1 is to join on the lookup DataFrame
Here, the rlike is doing the matching. And null appears where that does not work. Both columns of the lookup DataFrame get added.
val result_1_DF = thingsDF.join(lookupDF, expr("SomeThings rlike SomeKeys"),
"left_outer")
Method #2 is to add a column using the UDF
Here, only 1 column is added. And the UDF can return a non-Null value. However, if the lookup data is very large it may fail to "serialize" as required to send to the workers in the cluster.
val result_2_DF = thingsDF.withColumn("AddValues",ThingToColorUDF($"SomeThings"))
Which gives you:
In my case I had some lookup data that was over 1 million values, so Method #1 was my only choice.