I want to know is it possible to run pyqt5 on micropython(pyboard),I think micropython library is too small.
pyQT is not an option here. Read following discussion here to find and choose suitable GUI lib for your micropython project.
From my personal experience- my choice was LVGL library for small ILI9341 touch screen.
Related
I am reading through Webots official tutorials, and I see they use their IDE, Pycharm etc. But can I use Jupyter? I like Jupyter's ability to run code block-by-block...
I see examples in the net, but they are ready to use simulators, while I want to understand how to install and configure the thing.
Thank you.
Webots has its own code editor for coding the robot controller. We can use other IDEs when writing our code but we cannot run from those IDEs as Webots has its own libraries like the Robot nodes.
If we use an IDE to write the code one of the advantages that we get is that we can reduce the typos that we get when we type the controller code. The method I follow is that I write the code on the separate IDE and I simulate the code in Webots code editor to see if the code is working correctly in Webots.
I want to use Eclipse to develop code I will be uploading to my Atmega 2560 microcontroller. I could easily use the Arduino IDE to do this, but in my opinion, developing on Eclipse is a whole lot easier.
So, I followed this guide.
I get to the step where I have to add a programmer, but when I click on the Add button, nothing happens.
Does anyone have an idea as to what might be the problem?
The issue here is that 6.0.x series of avrdude uses a different configuration file which the avr-eclipse plugin is not able to parse. There is a ticket filed for this in the bug tracker in SourceForge.
A temporary solution would be to downgrade to avrdude 5.11.x.
Cheers.
I tried to use Eclipse for Arduino development and I followed this tutorial too but it didn't work for me. Also I couldn't find normal description of how I have to use it. From the other side so called Arduino IDE in my opinion isn't IDE it's very primitive buggy editor(looks like amateur product).
To upload my program to Atmega controller I decided to use avrdude direct from the console, where I specify programmer type and hex file that I want to upload. In this case I write program in c and use avrgcc toolchain for compiling and linking. However the question about IDE is still opened for me(the main problem for me that I don't know how to debug my code without IDE).
Also exist Atmel IDE AVrStudio. I didn'y try to use it, my I will mention it like a variant that you can try if you want.
Getting AVRDude (used by the AVR-ecplipse plugin) running on Windows with USB connected AVR programmers can be a real pain, often involving very specific driver uninstall/install sequences, such as those described at the bottom of this forum topic. I used to use Eclipse for my AVR programming, but have since moved to the new iteration of Atmel Studio. Version 6 is now available, and its relatively straight forward to get everything working well. There are a few things odd about it, but it has improved a lot since AS4.
I am currently working on a small project in QuickBasic that requires the use of MIDI files.
As the DOS environment I'm using DOSBox 0.74, which provides emulation of the Gravis Ultrasound card.
So far, I've been able to access GUS only by using the PLAYMIDI.EXE file in the C:\ULTRASND directory. However, it is impossible to launch it from inside QuickBasic: the SHELL statement creates a child COMMAND.COM process, so when PLAYMIDI.EXE starts playing in the background the child process finishes and terminates, and the music stops. All of this means that the only way to launch PLAYMIDI.EXE is through a batch file before the actual program, but it also means that there is no way to control the music from the QuickBasic program. Edit (Jul 24, 2011): It is actually possible to launch it using SHELL (my mistake), but the TSR version of PLAYMIDI.EXE takes a lot of memory, so there isn't enough left for my program. The question still stands.
Therefore, my question is whether there is a Gravis Ultrasound library for QuickBasic available.
Edit (Jul 19, 2011): Might be in another language as well, as QuickBasic can link those too.
P.S. Sound Blaster library available here, but I don't like the sound it produces.
Resources
libTiMidity: http://libtimidity.sourceforge.net/
Assembly Gravis Ultrasound library: guslib11.arj
Assembly tutorials (including QBasic): http://www.petesqbsite.com/sections/tutorials/assembly.shtml
Direct Sound 4 QB++ : ds4qbpp12.zip
Bells, Whistles and Soundboards: bwsb.zip
QMIDI 4.1: http://www.phatcode.net/downloads.php?id=191
As an huge fan of QB, I'm happy to see someone still using it. So I made it a point to find an answer for you. Here's what I've found. There is an ASM Gravis library on this page. Using the ASM tutorials, you should be able to combine the two. FYI, here's another great resource. Good luck.
You could look at DS4QB++, which allows you to play music and sound effects using the Windows API. I haven't tried it with later versions of Windows though. There's also BWSB which is DOS based and can play MOD/S3M files. Both available on my old QB site:
http://piptol.qbasicnews.com/files.htm
QB64 uses TiMidity, i guess via _SNDOPEN.
I am not a web application pro but need to start working on a project so I need to know if pyjamas ( or shall I say the javascript generated o/p of pyjamas ) is as good as pyqt in terms of 2d graphics and widget features. I have a desktop python application which has some rich 2d graphics (with animations / collision detection etc..) implemented using pyqt.
Now I am specifically looking for equivalent web client with similar graphics and widget features . Does pyjamas support all the pyqt UI features with same look and feel??
I am also exploring GWT for this since I believe GWT has a good set of UIs and also supports decent 3rd party tools like vaadin,smartgwt but my preference is for pyjamas because its python and I am writing a equivalent pyqt based desktop app so am more comfortable with python then java. Also am not sure if GWTs look and feel would match with that of pyqt based UI on windows.
Any insights would be very helpful
Thanks in advance
Regards
Shyam
Probably too late, but if anyone else would need an answer,
Pyjamas' widgets are mostly same as GWT's (most are direct translation from GWT, but we have some own widgets too), and do not target Qt, GTK or any other toolkit.
If you are looking into using webkit, you could get best of the two worlds, and use Pyjamas with PyJD. This way your very same application could be compiled into html/css/javascript and run in web browsers and at the same time you could run it in pyqt-webkit, xulrunner or mshtml with original python code.
I have a bunch of related Perl scripts that I would like to put together in one convenient place. So I was thinking of building a GUI and incorporating the scripts. I'm using Strawberry Perl on Windows XP and have just installed Tk from cpan about fifteen minutes ago. Before I go for it, I want some sound advice either for or against it.
My other option is to translate the Perl scripts into VB and use Visual Studio 2008, but that might be too much hassle for an outcome that might end up all the same had I just stuck with Perl & Tk.
I haven't looked yet, but maybe there is a module for Visual Studio that would allow me to invoke Perl scripts?
The main requirements are:
It must be able to communicate with MySQL
It must be able to fetch & parse XML files from the internet
It must be transportable, scalable, and sustainable
What direction would you take?
I've built Perl/Tk apps on Windows before and found it just fine, including using PAR to package everything up for distribution to others. It was nice being able to do most of my development on a proper Linux system and have things just magically work on Windows :) The only gotcha I encountered is that Tk doesn't play well with ithreads.
I personally would recommend wxPerl over Tk. It has native looking widgets, at least in my view leads to cleaner code and you can use wxGlade as a GUI designer.
If you haven't programmed with Perl/Tk I would think that Tkx (developed by Activestate) would be a better option. Tkx is a thin layer over Tcl/Tk, which gives it access to the new themed widgets in Tcl/Tk so your application would look better.
Perl/Tk has a lot more documentation around, but the module itself does not seem to be developed anymore. The documentation for Tkx is very sparse but by following the Tkx tutorial files on CPAN, it should be easy to get started.
WxWidgets (available for Perl via wxPerl) is an excellent graphical toolkit, but wxPerl only implements a subset of the available widgets.
PAR is convenient but if you go with Perl/Tk, the result will not run natively on OS X. (Users will need to run X11 first, which is problematic, especially with more recent version of OS X). If you go with Tkx, you can get native application on Mac OSX. Also, ActiveStates's PDK gives you a simple way to package everything to deploy to Windows, Linux, and OS X.
For reference, see the the software (AntConc and AntWordProfiler) at the following site http://www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/software.html, where AntConc was developed using Perl/Tk and AntWordProfiler was developed using Tkx.
The Process class allows to start new processes from a C# (WPF/Winforms) frontend.
I guess that way you can keep your Perl scripts and use the nice Visual Studio GUI builder.