How come Netlify CMS on localhost is not working? - github

I’m from Taiwan and not good at English, but I’ll try my best to explain my question.
I use Netlify CMS to build my Hugo website.
Everything runs well, but when I want to change and check if the CMS’s configuration and style is okay, I always need to push my repository to Github, which is disturb me a lot.
So I tried to use local_backend: true in admin/config.yml, then used this command: npx netlify-cms-proxy-server.
then the window showed:
info: Netlify CMS File System Proxy Server configured with C:\Users\june.wu\Documents\GitHub\house-blog-hugo-cms
info: Netlify CMS Proxy Server listening on port 8081
It looked it ran successfully on localhost:8081.
But when I type localhost:8081 in browser it showed: Cannot GET /
How can I solve this problem?

I can confirm what said in the previous answer. Run npx netlify-cms-proxy-server and go to localhost:8080/admin or try also localhost:8080/admin/ (with ending slash). It should work if you are using default 8080 port.
Ignore that CMS is on port 8081 as said in the script log

for anyone looking at this in and still finding it unclear, as said in the docs you need to go to your regular development server based on the SSG (static site generator) that you are using once you have started both the NetlifyCMS and SSG dev servers. See point 5 in the beta features docs here.
You are not supposed to try visit the NetlifyCMS 8081 default port to use the CMS locally.
I have also seen behaviour mentioned by a few people that it only works with a / at the end of the path. So for example if using Astro as your SSG (which uses the port :3000 for it's dev server) you should try both:
http://localhost:3000/admin/
http://localhost:3000/admin
Although I have been having issues with the NeltlifyCMS dev server with Astro still...

Related

Unable to add remote node in Rundeck 4.9.0

Following the doc from Rundeck, however the only button I have under "Sources tab" is "ResourceModelSource"
When I click that button I get a blank
PPS Issue happened on previous version - new to RunDeck, so I can't say that it EVER worked
I tried adding a manual resouces.xml in the project director y(Which I had to manually create, which tells me that's another issue) and reloading RD but that did not seem to work
While it's not the likely cause, I'll mention it here incase it IS relevant, I'm hosting on port 4440 however I'm using nginx to forward http (not https) requests on 443 to 4440, this is due to corp net sec policy.
I'm sure it's something where it's having an i/o issue on the local host, however I'm not seeing anything in the logs.
That is a known issue when you have Rundeck installed behind a proxy server, take a look at this: https://github.com/rundeck/rundeck/issues/6278 the solution is to set the grails.ServerURL (rundeck-config.properties file) with the exit URL defined for Rundeck in your proxy server (e.g: grails.serverURL=http://my_domain/rundeck), then restart the Rundeck service.

Whatsapp Business API production setup not working

I am trying to configure or setup the production environment of whatsapp business api as mentioned in the link https://developers.facebook.com/docs/whatsapp/installation/prod-single-instance
I have done everything mentioned in this my dockers are also running on port:9090 as can be seen in the image
still I can't access it. Whenever I try to call https://localhost:9090 the error with "This site can’t be reached" occurs. Whatsapp business api does not have good documentation or tutorials till now. So this site is the only last way for me.
I had a similar problem which could be your case, I saw the docker containers OK but nothing was working. After a day searching I saw where it happened, my problem was I installed mysql MANUALLY (not docker container) in the same instance where docker is running and in db.env I just used 127.0.0.1, this was passed literally to docker container, then looking at a the wait_on_mysql.sh script, the whastapp docker containers were waiting util the mysql ip has conectivity to actually do something and was printing "MySQL is not up yet - sleeping" each second, of course they wouldn't find any conectivity.
Since my instalation is for development, and I am already using such database to other stuff, my solution was to use the 172.17.0.1(docker gateway of the containers) IP instead, then add two sets of network iptables rules to the host to redirect from the docker containers IP to the IP binded by mysql when using such port (3306, the default in my case). After that everything works well. I think there are better solutions, but I didn't want to go far on it, you should evaluate you case if apply.
check the command:
docker-compose logs > debug_output.txt
That gives you insight about whats happening, hope it can helps someone.
I think your setup is already complete. You just need to start with the registration process and start sending messages. The containers are up and running but calling https://localhost:9090 won't send you any response as this is not any specified API endpoint expected to be used.
Since you're using prod single instance, the documentation can be found here which seems pretty straight forward. https://developers.facebook.com/docs/whatsapp/installation/prod-single-instance
You seem to have completed till the 7 steps. The next step can be to perform a health check to make sure it is healthy. The API endpoint for that would be https://localhost:9090/v1/health https://developers.facebook.com/docs/whatsapp/api/health
Has your db also been setup?
I cannot see it in the docker screenshot.
Also - you have to accept the certificate, as it does not have a public CA issues certificate.

Concourse result keeps loading

I'm new to concourse and really excited to start working with it but I have a problem running the hello world example described here: https://concourse-ci.org/hello-world.html
I'm running this example on a concourse docker setup described here: https://concourse-ci.org/docker-repository.html.
Everything seems to work just fine but when I want to verify the results of both examples it keeps saying loading:
Task result loading (image)
Any idea why this would happen? I'm running docker-compose on Mac OS X (El Capitan) but that shouldn't matter right? Is there some additional configuration that I'm missing?
I also noticed when checking the network trace that the following request doesn't return any value: /api/v1/builds/<buildnumber>/events
It keeps saying 'pending'. Is that normal? I assume it isn't but I don't know the cause of this. Is there any logging I can check?
EDIT:
It seems to have something to do with the fact that it isn't running on localhost. When I use port forwarding and open concourse on localhost:8080 the results are shown just fine. Also mapping another hostname to 127.0.0.1 with port forwarding enabled works. So only when I communicate directly with the opened docker ports it doesn't work. Am I missing something?
After much frustration I found out that to cause of this issue was that Sophos Anti-Virus was blocking Concourse server-side events...
https://community.sophos.com/products/free-antivirus-tools-for-desktops/f/sophos-anti-virus-for-mac-home-edition/5750/sophos-av-blocks-server-sent-events-sse-on-mac-os-x-yosemite

Proxy setting in gsutil tool

I use gsutil tool for download archives from Google Storage.
I use next CMD command:
python c:\gsutil\gsutil cp gs://pubsite_prod_rev_XXXXXXXXXXXXX/YYYYY/*.zip C:\Tmp\gs
Everything works fine, but if I try to run that command from corporate proxy, I receive error:
Caught socket error, retrying: [Errno 10051] A socket operation was attempted to an unreachable network
I tried several times to set the proxy settings in .boto file, but all to no avail.
Someone faced with such a problem?
Thanks!
Please see the section "I'm connecting through a proxy server, what do I need to do?" at https://developers.google.com/storage/docs/faq#troubleshooting
Basically, you need to configure the proxy settings in your .boto file, and you need to ensure that your proxy allows traffic to accounts.google.com as well as to *.storage.googleapis.com.
A change was just merged into github yesterday that fixes some of the proxy support. Please try it out, or specifically, overwrite this file with your current copy:
https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/gsutil/blob/master/gslib/util.py
I believe I am having the same problem with the proxy settings being ignored under Linux (Ubuntu 12.04.4 LTS) and gsutils 4.2 (downloaded today).
I've been watching tcpdump on the host to confirm that gsutils is attempting to directly route to Google IPs instead of to my proxy server.
It seems that on the first execution of a simple command like "gsutil -d ls" it will use my proxy settings specified .boto for the first POST and then switch back to attempting to route directly to Google instead of my proxy server.
Then if I CTRL-C and re-run the exact same command, the proxy setting is no longer used at all. This difference in behaviour baffles me. If I wait long enough, I think it will work for the initial request again so this suggests some form on caching taking place. I'm not 100% of this behaviour yet because I haven't been able to predict when it occurs.
I also noticed that it always first tries to connect to 169.254.169.254 on port 80 regardless of proxy settings. A grep shows that it's hardcoded into oauth2_client.py, test_utils.py, layer1.py, and utils.py (under different subdirectories of the gsutils root).
I've tried setting the http_proxy environment variable but it appears that there is code that unsets this.

Intalio Ajax Forms pointing to localhost

Anyone working with Intalio|BPMS?
I'm trying to implement a process using the Comunity Edition, and I'm having a problem I can't seem to solve.
The process has an AJAX Form and if I go to ui-fw in the server using localhost everything works, but if I try to access the server remotely using the url it doesn't.
The iframe for the AJAX Form is pointing to localhost and not the url.
From the very bad foruns at Intalio, I've checked /tried:
deploy from the designer using the url
finding every mention of localhost in the process deploy dir, and also in the var/conf
Still no luck.
Any ideas anyone??
Thanks in advance
Ricardo, IIRC the form is deployed according to the settings you use in the deployment manifest. I believe you can also set an other host name in the deployment manifest to deploy to localhost, but declare a different host name for the form and processes.