I am trying to insert multiple values into a table from different table in postgresql and encountering an error as [21000]: ERROR: more than one row returned by a subquery used as an expression
INSERT INTO coupon (id,entityid)
values
(select nextval('seq_coupon')),(select entityid from card where country in ('China')));
This query [select entityid from card where country in ('China'))] has multiple rows.
Any help is much appreciated.
If you want to insert rows that come from a SELECT query, don't use the values clause. The SELECT query you use for the second column's value returns more than one row which is not permitted in places where a single value is required.
To include a constant value for all newly inserted rows, just add it to the SELECT list of the source query.
INSERT INTO coupon (id, entityid, coupon_code)
select nextval('seq_coupon'), entityid, 'A-51'
from card
where country in ('China');
As a side note: when using nextval() there is no need to prefix it with a SELECT, even in the values clause, e.g.
insert into coupon (id, entityid)
values (nextval('some_seq'), ...);
Related
I have table like below. For distinct combination of user ID and Product ID SQL will select product bought from store ID 1 or 2? Is it determinictic?
My code
SELECT (DISTINCT CONCAT(UserID, ProductID)), Date, StoreID FROM X
This isn't valid syntax. You can have
select [column_list] from X
or you can have
select distinct [column_list] from X
The difference is that the first will return one row for every row in the table while the second will return one row for every unique combination of the column values in your column list.
Adding "distinct" to a statement will reliably produce the same results every time unless the underlying data changes, so in this sense, "distinct" is deterministic. However, it is not a function so the term "deterministic" doesn't really apply.
You may actually want a "group by" clause like the following (in which case you have to actually specify how you want the engine to pick values for columns not in your group):
select
concat(UserId, ProductID)
, min(Date)
, max(Store)
from
x
group by
concat(UserId, ProductID)
Results:
results
I have two tables with a relation by id. And I want to insert two related records. The problem is that id is not known until I make the first insert. Is there a way to write a kind of embedded query that makes both inserts correctly? I would like to have one exact query and to avoid variables, if it is possible. What I tried is:
insert into "b" ("value", "b_id")
select 'val2', (select insert into "a" ("value") values ('val1') returning id);
I get the error:
ERROR: syntax error at or near "("
You'll need to use a CTE to do that, INSERT statements cannot be arbitrarily nested (unlike SELECT):
WITH a_results AS (
INSERT INTO a (value)
VALUES ('val1')
RETURNING id
)
INSERT INTO b (value, b_id)
SELECT 'val2', id
FROM a_results;
I am working in Postgres 9.6 and would like to insert multiple rows in a single query, using an INSERT INTO query.
I would also like, as one of the values inserted, to select a value from another table.
This is what I've tried:
insert into store_properties (property, store_id)
values
('ice cream', select id from store where postcode='SW1A 1AA'),
('petrol', select id from store where postcode='EC1N 2RN')
;
But I get a syntax error at the first select. What am I doing wrong?
Note that the value is determined per row, i.e. I'm not straightforwardly copying over values from another table.
demo:db<>fiddle
insert into store_properties (property, store_id)
values
('ice cream', (select id from store where postcode='SW1A 1AA')),
('petrol', (select id from store where property='EC1N 2RN'))
There were some missing braces. Each data set has to be surrounded by braces and the SELECT statements as well.
I don't know your table structure but maybe there is another error: The first data set is filtered by a postcode column, the second one by a property column...
I'm trying to count the number of unique pool operators for every permit # in a table but am having trouble putting this value in a new column dedicated to that count.
So I have 2 tables: doh_analysis; doh_pools.
Both of these tables have a "permit" column (TEXT), but doh_analysis has about 1000 rows with duplicates in the permit column but occasional unique values in the operator column (TEXT).
I'm trying to fill a column "operator_count" in the table "doh_pools" with a count of unique values in "pooloperator" for each permit #.
So I tried the following code but am getting a syntax error at or near "(":
update doh_pools
set operator_count = select count(distinct doh_analysis.pooloperator)
from doh_analysis
where doh_analysis.permit ilike doh_pools.permit;
When I remove the "select" from before the "count" I get "SQL Error [42803]: ERROR: aggregate functions are not allowed in UPDATE".
I can successfully query a list of distinct permit-pooloperator pairs using:
select distinct permit, pooloperator
from doh_analysis;
And I can query the # of unique pooloperators per permit 1 at a time using:
select count(distinct pooloperator)
from doh_analysis
where permit ilike '52-60-03054';
But I'm struggling to insert a count of unique pairs for each permit # in the operatorcount column.
Is there a way to do this?
There is certainly a better way of doing this but I accomplished my goal by creating 2 intermediary tables and the updating the target table with values from the 2nd intermediate table like so:
select distinct permit, pooloperator
into doh_pairs
from doh_analysis;
select permit, count(distinct pooloperator)
into doh_temp
from doh_pairs
group by permit;
select count(distinct permit)
from doh_temp;
update doh_pools
set operator_count = doh_temp.count
from doh_temp
where doh_pools.permit ilike doh_temp.permit
and doh_pools.permit is not NULL
returning count;
I am using following code to insert date by Table Valued Parameter in my SP. Actually it works when one record exists in my TVP but when it has more than one record it raises the following error :
'Violation of Primary key constraint 'PK_ReceivedCash''. Cannot insert duplicate key in object 'Banking.ReceivedCash'. The statement has been terminated.
insert into banking.receivedcash(ReceivedCashID,Date,Time)
select (select isnull(Max(ReceivedCashID),0)+1 from Banking.ReceivedCash),t.Date,t.Time from #TVPCash as t
Your query is indeed flawed if there is more than one row in #TVPCash. The query to retrieve the maximum ReceivedCashID is a constant, which is then used for each row in #TVPCash to insert into Banking.ReceivedCash.
I strongly suggest finding alternatives rather than doing it this way. Multiple users might run this query and retrieve the same maximum. If you insist on keeping the query as it is, try running the following:
insert into banking.receivedcash(
ReceivedCashID,
Date,
Time
)
select
(select isnull(Max(ReceivedCashID),0) from Banking.ReceivedCash)+
ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY t.Date,t.Time),
t.Date,
t.Time
from
#TVPCash as t
This uses ROW_NUMBER to count the row number in #TVPCash and adds this to the maximum ReceivedCashID of Banking.ReceivedCash.