Related
I would like to update a large number of C++ source files with an extra include directive before any existing #includes. For this sort of task, I normally use a small bash script with sed to re-write the file.
How do I get sed to replace just the first occurrence of a string in a file rather than replacing every occurrence?
If I use
sed s/#include/#include "newfile.h"\n#include/
it replaces all #includes.
Alternative suggestions to achieve the same thing are also welcome.
A sed script that will only replace the first occurrence of "Apple" by "Banana"
Example
Input: Output:
Apple Banana
Apple Apple
Orange Orange
Apple Apple
This is the simple script: Editor's note: works with GNU sed only.
sed '0,/Apple/{s/Apple/Banana/}' input_filename
The first two parameters 0 and /Apple/ are the range specifier. The s/Apple/Banana/ is what is executed within that range. So in this case "within the range of the beginning (0) up to the first instance of Apple, replace Apple with Banana. Only the first Apple will be replaced.
Background: In traditional sed the range specifier is also "begin here" and "end here" (inclusive). However the lowest "begin" is the first line (line 1), and if the "end here" is a regex, then it is only attempted to match against on the next line after "begin", so the earliest possible end is line 2. So since range is inclusive, smallest possible range is "2 lines" and smallest starting range is both lines 1 and 2 (i.e. if there's an occurrence on line 1, occurrences on line 2 will also be changed, not desired in this case). GNU sed adds its own extension of allowing specifying start as the "pseudo" line 0 so that the end of the range can be line 1, allowing it a range of "only the first line" if the regex matches the first line.
Or a simplified version (an empty RE like // means to re-use the one specified before it, so this is equivalent):
sed '0,/Apple/{s//Banana/}' input_filename
And the curly braces are optional for the s command, so this is also equivalent:
sed '0,/Apple/s//Banana/' input_filename
All of these work on GNU sed only.
You can also install GNU sed on OS X using homebrew brew install gnu-sed.
# sed script to change "foo" to "bar" only on the first occurrence
1{x;s/^/first/;x;}
1,/foo/{x;/first/s///;x;s/foo/bar/;}
#---end of script---
or, if you prefer: Editor's note: works with GNU sed only.
sed '0,/foo/s//bar/' file
Source
An overview of the many helpful existing answers, complemented with explanations:
The examples here use a simplified use case: replace the word 'foo' with 'bar' in the first matching line only.
Due to use of ANSI C-quoted strings ($'...') to provide the sample input lines, bash, ksh, or zsh is assumed as the shell.
GNU sed only:
Ben Hoffstein's anwswer shows us that GNU provides an extension to the POSIX specification for sed that allows the following 2-address form: 0,/re/ (re represents an arbitrary regular expression here).
0,/re/ allows the regex to match on the very first line also. In other words: such an address will create a range from the 1st line up to and including the line that matches re - whether re occurs on the 1st line or on any subsequent line.
Contrast this with the POSIX-compliant form 1,/re/, which creates a range that matches from the 1st line up to and including the line that matches re on subsequent lines; in other words: this will not detect the first occurrence of an re match if it happens to occur on the 1st line and also prevents the use of shorthand // for reuse of the most recently used regex (see next point).1
If you combine a 0,/re/ address with an s/.../.../ (substitution) call that uses the same regular expression, your command will effectively only perform the substitution on the first line that matches re.
sed provides a convenient shortcut for reusing the most recently applied regular expression: an empty delimiter pair, //.
$ sed '0,/foo/ s//bar/' <<<$'1st foo\nUnrelated\n2nd foo\n3rd foo'
1st bar # only 1st match of 'foo' replaced
Unrelated
2nd foo
3rd foo
A POSIX-features-only sed such as BSD (macOS) sed (will also work with GNU sed):
Since 0,/re/ cannot be used and the form 1,/re/ will not detect re if it happens to occur on the very first line (see above), special handling for the 1st line is required.
MikhailVS's answer mentions the technique, put into a concrete example here:
$ sed -e '1 s/foo/bar/; t' -e '1,// s//bar/' <<<$'1st foo\nUnrelated\n2nd foo\n3rd foo'
1st bar # only 1st match of 'foo' replaced
Unrelated
2nd foo
3rd foo
Note:
The empty regex // shortcut is employed twice here: once for the endpoint of the range, and once in the s call; in both cases, regex foo is implicitly reused, allowing us not to have to duplicate it, which makes both for shorter and more maintainable code.
POSIX sed needs actual newlines after certain functions, such as after the name of a label or even its omission, as is the case with t here; strategically splitting the script into multiple -e options is an alternative to using an actual newlines: end each -e script chunk where a newline would normally need to go.
1 s/foo/bar/ replaces foo on the 1st line only, if found there.
If so, t branches to the end of the script (skips remaining commands on the line). (The t function branches to a label only if the most recent s call performed an actual substitution; in the absence of a label, as is the case here, the end of the script is branched to).
When that happens, range address 1,//, which normally finds the first occurrence starting from line 2, will not match, and the range will not be processed, because the address is evaluated when the current line is already 2.
Conversely, if there's no match on the 1st line, 1,// will be entered, and will find the true first match.
The net effect is the same as with GNU sed's 0,/re/: only the first occurrence is replaced, whether it occurs on the 1st line or any other.
NON-range approaches
potong's answer demonstrates loop techniques that bypass the need for a range; since he uses GNU sed syntax, here are the POSIX-compliant equivalents:
Loop technique 1: On first match, perform the substitution, then enter a loop that simply prints the remaining lines as-is:
$ sed -e '/foo/ {s//bar/; ' -e ':a' -e '$!{n;ba' -e '};}' <<<$'1st foo\nUnrelated\n2nd foo\n3rd foo'
1st bar
Unrelated
2nd foo
3rd foo
Loop technique 2, for smallish files only: read the entire input into memory, then perform a single substitution on it.
$ sed -e ':a' -e '$!{N;ba' -e '}; s/foo/bar/' <<<$'1st foo\nUnrelated\n2nd foo\n3rd foo'
1st bar
Unrelated
2nd foo
3rd foo
1 1.61803 provides examples of what happens with 1,/re/, with and without a subsequent s//:
sed '1,/foo/ s/foo/bar/' <<<$'1foo\n2foo' yields $'1bar\n2bar'; i.e., both lines were updated, because line number 1 matches the 1st line, and regex /foo/ - the end of the range - is then only looked for starting on the next line. Therefore, both lines are selected in this case, and the s/foo/bar/ substitution is performed on both of them.
sed '1,/foo/ s//bar/' <<<$'1foo\n2foo\n3foo' fails: with sed: first RE may not be empty (BSD/macOS) and sed: -e expression #1, char 0: no previous regular expression (GNU), because, at the time the 1st line is being processed (due to line number 1 starting the range), no regex has been applied yet, so // doesn't refer to anything.
With the exception of GNU sed's special 0,/re/ syntax, any range that starts with a line number effectively precludes use of //.
sed '0,/pattern/s/pattern/replacement/' filename
this worked for me.
example
sed '0,/<Menu>/s/<Menu>/<Menu><Menu>Sub menu<\/Menu>/' try.txt > abc.txt
Editor's note: both work with GNU sed only.
You could use awk to do something similar..
awk '/#include/ && !done { print "#include \"newfile.h\""; done=1;}; 1;' file.c
Explanation:
/#include/ && !done
Runs the action statement between {} when the line matches "#include" and we haven't already processed it.
{print "#include \"newfile.h\""; done=1;}
This prints #include "newfile.h", we need to escape the quotes. Then we set the done variable to 1, so we don't add more includes.
1;
This means "print out the line" - an empty action defaults to print $0, which prints out the whole line. A one liner and easier to understand than sed IMO :-)
Quite a comprehensive collection of answers on linuxtopia sed FAQ. It also highlights that some answers people provided won't work with non-GNU version of sed, eg
sed '0,/RE/s//to_that/' file
in non-GNU version will have to be
sed -e '1s/RE/to_that/;t' -e '1,/RE/s//to_that/'
However, this version won't work with gnu sed.
Here's a version that works with both:
-e '/RE/{s//to_that/;:a' -e '$!N;$!ba' -e '}'
ex:
sed -e '/Apple/{s//Banana/;:a' -e '$!N;$!ba' -e '}' filename
With GNU sed's -z option you could process the whole file as if it was only one line. That way a s/…/…/ would only replace the first match in the whole file. Remember: s/…/…/ only replaces the first match in each line, but with the -z option sed treats the whole file as a single line.
sed -z 's/#include/#include "newfile.h"\n#include'
In the general case you have to rewrite your sed expression since the pattern space now holds the whole file instead of just one line. Some examples:
s/text.*// can be rewritten as s/text[^\n]*//. [^\n] matches everything except the newline character. [^\n]* will match all symbols after text until a newline is reached.
s/^text// can be rewritten as s/(^|\n)text//.
s/text$// can be rewritten as s/text(\n|$)//.
#!/bin/sed -f
1,/^#include/ {
/^#include/i\
#include "newfile.h"
}
How this script works: For lines between 1 and the first #include (after line 1), if the line starts with #include, then prepend the specified line.
However, if the first #include is in line 1, then both line 1 and the next subsequent #include will have the line prepended. If you are using GNU sed, it has an extension where 0,/^#include/ (instead of 1,) will do the right thing.
Just add the number of occurrence at the end:
sed s/#include/#include "newfile.h"\n#include/1
A possible solution:
/#include/!{p;d;}
i\
#include "newfile.h"
:a
n
ba
Explanation:
read lines until we find the #include, print these lines then start new cycle
insert the new include line
enter a loop that just reads lines (by default sed will also print these lines), we won't get back to the first part of the script from here
I know this is an old post but I had a solution that I used to use:
grep -E -m 1 -n 'old' file | sed 's/:.*$//' - | sed 's/$/s\/old\/new\//' - | sed -f - file
Basically use grep to print the first occurrence and stop there. Additionally print line number ie 5:line. Pipe that into sed and remove the : and anything after so you are just left with a line number. Pipe that into sed which adds s/.*/replace to the end number, which results in a 1 line script which is piped into the last sed to run as a script on the file.
so if regex = #include and replace = blah and the first occurrence grep finds is on line 5 then the data piped to the last sed would be 5s/.*/blah/.
Works even if first occurrence is on the first line.
i would do this with an awk script:
BEGIN {i=0}
(i==0) && /#include/ {print "#include \"newfile.h\""; i=1}
{print $0}
END {}
then run it with awk:
awk -f awkscript headerfile.h > headerfilenew.h
might be sloppy, I'm new to this.
As an alternative suggestion you may want to look at the ed command.
man 1 ed
teststr='
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <inttypes.h>
'
# for in-place file editing use "ed -s file" and replace ",p" with "w"
# cf. http://wiki.bash-hackers.org/howto/edit-ed
cat <<-'EOF' | sed -e 's/^ *//' -e 's/ *$//' | ed -s <(echo "$teststr")
H
/# *include/i
#include "newfile.h"
.
,p
q
EOF
I finally got this to work in a Bash script used to insert a unique timestamp in each item in an RSS feed:
sed "1,/====RSSpermalink====/s/====RSSpermalink====/${nowms}/" \
production-feed2.xml.tmp2 > production-feed2.xml.tmp.$counter
It changes the first occurrence only.
${nowms} is the time in milliseconds set by a Perl script, $counter is a counter used for loop control within the script, \ allows the command to be continued on the next line.
The file is read in and stdout is redirected to a work file.
The way I understand it, 1,/====RSSpermalink====/ tells sed when to stop by setting a range limitation, and then s/====RSSpermalink====/${nowms}/ is the familiar sed command to replace the first string with the second.
In my case I put the command in double quotation marks becauase I am using it in a Bash script with variables.
Using FreeBSD ed and avoid ed's "no match" error in case there is no include statement in a file to be processed:
teststr='
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <inttypes.h>
'
# using FreeBSD ed
# to avoid ed's "no match" error, see
# *emphasized text*http://codesnippets.joyent.com/posts/show/11917
cat <<-'EOF' | sed -e 's/^ *//' -e 's/ *$//' | ed -s <(echo "$teststr")
H
,g/# *include/u\
u\
i\
#include "newfile.h"\
.
,p
q
EOF
This might work for you (GNU sed):
sed -si '/#include/{s//& "newfile.h\n&/;:a;$!{n;ba}}' file1 file2 file....
or if memory is not a problem:
sed -si ':a;$!{N;ba};s/#include/& "newfile.h\n&/' file1 file2 file...
If anyone came here to replace a character for the first occurrence in all lines (like myself), use this:
sed '/old/s/old/new/1' file
-bash-4.2$ cat file
123a456a789a
12a34a56
a12
-bash-4.2$ sed '/a/s/a/b/1' file
123b456a789a
12b34a56
b12
By changing 1 to 2 for example, you can replace all the second a's only instead.
The use case can perhaps be that your occurences are spread throughout your file, but you know your only concern is in the first 10, 20 or 100 lines.
Then simply adressing those lines fixes the issue - even if the wording of the OP regards first only.
sed '1,10s/#include/#include "newfile.h"\n#include/'
The following command removes the first occurrence of a string, within a file. It removes the empty line too. It is presented on an xml file, but it would work with any file.
Useful if you work with xml files and you want to remove a tag. In this example it removes the first occurrence of the "isTag" tag.
Command:
sed -e 0,/'<isTag>false<\/isTag>'/{s/'<isTag>false<\/isTag>'//} -e 's/ *$//' -e '/^$/d' source.txt > output.txt
Source file (source.txt)
<xml>
<testdata>
<canUseUpdate>true</canUseUpdate>
<isTag>false</isTag>
<moduleLocations>
<module>esa_jee6</module>
<isTag>false</isTag>
</moduleLocations>
<node>
<isTag>false</isTag>
</node>
</testdata>
</xml>
Result file (output.txt)
<xml>
<testdata>
<canUseUpdate>true</canUseUpdate>
<moduleLocations>
<module>esa_jee6</module>
<isTag>false</isTag>
</moduleLocations>
<node>
<isTag>false</isTag>
</node>
</testdata>
</xml>
ps: it didn't work for me on Solaris SunOS 5.10 (quite old), but it works on Linux 2.6, sed version 4.1.5
Nothing new but perhaps a little more concrete answer: sed -rn '0,/foo(bar).*/ s%%\1%p'
Example: xwininfo -name unity-launcher produces output like:
xwininfo: Window id: 0x2200003 "unity-launcher"
Absolute upper-left X: -2980
Absolute upper-left Y: -198
Relative upper-left X: 0
Relative upper-left Y: 0
Width: 2880
Height: 98
Depth: 24
Visual: 0x21
Visual Class: TrueColor
Border width: 0
Class: InputOutput
Colormap: 0x20 (installed)
Bit Gravity State: ForgetGravity
Window Gravity State: NorthWestGravity
Backing Store State: NotUseful
Save Under State: no
Map State: IsViewable
Override Redirect State: no
Corners: +-2980+-198 -2980+-198 -2980-1900 +-2980-1900
-geometry 2880x98+-2980+-198
Extracting window ID with xwininfo -name unity-launcher|sed -rn '0,/^xwininfo: Window id: (0x[0-9a-fA-F]+).*/ s%%\1%p' produces:
0x2200003
POSIXly (also valid in sed), Only one regex used, need memory only for one line (as usual):
sed '/\(#include\).*/!b;//{h;s//\1 "newfile.h"/;G};:1;n;b1'
Explained:
sed '
/\(#include\).*/!b # Only one regex used. On lines not matching
# the text `#include` **yet**,
# branch to end, cause the default print. Re-start.
//{ # On first line matching previous regex.
h # hold the line.
s//\1 "newfile.h"/ # append ` "newfile.h"` to the `#include` matched.
G # append a newline.
} # end of replacement.
:1 # Once **one** replacement got done (the first match)
n # Loop continually reading a line each time
b1 # and printing it by default.
' # end of sed script.
A possible solution here might be to tell the compiler to include the header without it being mentioned in the source files. IN GCC there are these options:
-include file
Process file as if "#include "file"" appeared as the first line of
the primary source file. However, the first directory searched for
file is the preprocessor's working directory instead of the
directory containing the main source file. If not found there, it
is searched for in the remainder of the "#include "..."" search
chain as normal.
If multiple -include options are given, the files are included in
the order they appear on the command line.
-imacros file
Exactly like -include, except that any output produced by scanning
file is thrown away. Macros it defines remain defined. This
allows you to acquire all the macros from a header without also
processing its declarations.
All files specified by -imacros are processed before all files
specified by -include.
Microsoft's compiler has the /FI (forced include) option.
This feature can be handy for some common header, like platform configuration. The Linux kernel's Makefile uses -include for this.
I needed a solution that would work both on GNU and BSD, and I also knew that the first line would never be the one I'd need to update:
sed -e "1,/pattern/s/pattern/replacement/"
Trying the // feature to not repeat the pattern did not work for me, hence needing to repeat it.
I will make a suggestion that is not exactly what the original question asks for, but for those who also want to specifically replace perhaps the second occurrence of a match, or any other specifically enumerated regular expression match. Use a python script, and a for loop, call it from a bash script if needed. Here's what it looked like for me, where I was replacing specific lines containing the string --project:
def replace_models(file_path, pixel_model, obj_model):
# find your file --project matches
pattern = re.compile(r'--project.*')
new_file = ""
with open(file_path, 'r') as f:
match = 1
for line in f:
# Remove line ending before we do replacement
line = line.strip()
# replace first --project line match with pixel
if match == 1:
result = re.sub(pattern, "--project='" + pixel_model + "'", line)
# replace second --project line match with object
elif match == 2:
result = re.sub(pattern, "--project='" + obj_model + "'", line)
else:
result = line
# Check that a substitution was actually made
if result is not line:
# Add a backslash to the replaced line
result += " \\"
print("\nReplaced ", line, " with ", result)
# Increment number of matches found
match += 1
# Add the potentially modified line to our new file
new_file = new_file + result + "\n"
# close file / save output
f.close()
fout = open(file_path, "w")
fout.write(new_file)
fout.close()
sed -e 's/pattern/REPLACEMENT/1' <INPUTFILE
I'm very much a junior when it comes to the sed command, and my Bruce Barnett guide sits right next to me, but one thing has been troubling me. With a file, can you filter it using sed to select only specific items? For example, in the following file:
alpha|november
bravo|october
charlie|papa
alpha|quebec
bravo|romeo
charlie|sahara
Would it be possible to set a command to return only the bravos, like:
bravo|october
bravo|romeo
With sed:
sed '/^bravo|/!d' filename
Alternatively, with grep (because it's sort of made for this stuff):
grep '^bravo|' filename
or with awk, which works nicely for tabular data,
awk -F '|' '$1 == "bravo"' filename
The first two use a regular expression, selecting those lines that match it. In ^bravo|, ^ matches the beginning of the line and bravo| the literal string bravo|, so this selects all lines that begin with bravo|.
The awk way splits the line across the field separator | and selects those lines whose first field is bravo.
You could also use a regex with awk:
awk '/^bravo|/' filename
...but I don't think this plays to awk's strengths in this case.
Another solution with sed:
sed -n '/^bravo|/p' filename
-n option => no printing by default.
If line begins with bravo|, print it (p)
2 way (at least) with sed
removing unwanted line
sed '/^bravo\|/ !d' YourFile
Printing only wanted lines
sed -n '/^bravo\|/ p' YourFile
if no other constraint or action occur, both are the same and a grep is better.
If there will be some action after, it could change the performance where a d cycle directly to the next line and a p will print then continue the following action.
Note the escape of pipe is needed for GNU sed, not on posix version
I have a huge file that contains lines that follow this format:
New-England-Center-For-Children-L0000392290
Southboro-Housing-Authority-L0000392464
Crew-Star-Inc-L0000391998
Saxony-Ii-Barber-Shop-L0000392491
Test-L0000392334
What I'm trying to do is narrow it down to just this:
New-England-Center-For-Children
Southboro-Housing-Authority
Crew-Star-Inc
Test
Can anyone help with this?
Using GNU awk:
awk -F\- 'NF--' OFS=\- file
New-England-Center-For-Children
Southboro-Housing-Authority
Crew-Star-Inc
Saxony-Ii-Barber-Shop
Test
Set the input and output field separator to -.
NF contains number of fields. Reduce it by 1 to remove the last field.
Using sed:
sed 's/\(.*\)-.*/\1/' file
New-England-Center-For-Children
Southboro-Housing-Authority
Crew-Star-Inc
Saxony-Ii-Barber-Shop
Test
Simple greedy regex to match up to the last hyphen.
In replacement use the captured group and discard the rest.
Version 1 of the Question
The first version of the input was in the form of HTML and parts had to be removed both before and after the desired text:
$ sed -r 's|.*[A-Z]/([a-zA-Z-]+)-L0.*|\1|' input
Special-Restaurant
Eliot-Cleaning
Kennedy-Plumbing
Version 2 of the Question
In the revised question, it is only necessary to remove the text that starts with -L00:
$ sed 's|-L00.*||' input2
New-England-Center-For-Children
Southboro-Housing-Authority
Crew-Star-Inc
Saxony-Ii-Barber-Shop
Test
Both of these commands use a single "substitute" command. The command has the form s|old|new|.
The perl code for this would be: perl -nle'print $1 if(m{-.*?/(.*?-.*?)-})
We can break the Regex down to matching the following:
- for that's between the city and state
.*? match the smallest set of character(s) that makes the Regex work, i.e. the State
/ matches the slash between the State and the data you want
( starts the capture of the data you are interested in
.*?-.*? will match the data you care about
) will close out the capture
- will match the dash before the L####### to give the regex something to match after your data. This will prevent the minimal Regex from matching 0 characters.
Then the print statement will print out what was captured (your data).
awk likes these things:
$ awk -F[/-] -v OFS="-" '{print $(NF-3), $(NF-2)}' file
Special-Restaurant
Eliot-Cleaning
Kennedy-Plumbing
This sets / and - as possible field separators. Based on them, it prints the last_field-3 and last_field-2 separated by the delimiter -. Note that $NF stands for last parameter, hence $(NF-1) is the penultimate, etc.
This sed is also helpful:
$ sed -r 's#.*/(\w*-\w*)-\w*\.\w*</loc>$#\1#' file
Special-Restaurant
Eliot-Cleaning
Kennedy-Plumbing
It selects the block word-word after a slash / and followed with word.word</loc> + end_of_line. Then, it prints back this block.
Update
Based on your new input, this can make it:
$ sed -r 's/(.*)-L\w*$/\1/' file
New-England-Center-For-Children
Southboro-Housing-Authority
Crew-Star-Inc
Saxony-Ii-Barber-Shop
Test
It selects everything up to the block -L + something + end of line, and prints it back.
You can use also another trick:
rev file | cut -d- -f2- | rev
As what you want is every slice of - separated fields, let's get all of them but last one. How? By reversing the line, getting all of them from the 2nd one and then reversing back.
Here's how I'd do it with Perl:
perl -nle 'm{example[.]com/bp/(.*?)/(.*?)-L\d+[.]htm} && print $2' filename
Note: the original question was matching input lines like this:
<loc>http://www.example.com/bp/Lowell-MA/Special-Restaurant-L0000423916.htm</loc>
<loc>http://www.example.com/bp/Houston-TX/Eliot-Cleaning-L0000422797.htm</loc>
<loc>http://www.example.com/bp/New-Orleans-LA/Kennedy-Plumbing-L0000423121.htm</loc>
The -n option tells Perl to loop over every line of the file (but not print them out).
The -l option adds a newline onto the end of every print
The -e 'perl-code' option executes perl-code for each line of input
The pattern:
/regex/ && print
Will only print if the regex matches. If the regex contains capture parentheses you can refer to the first captured section as $1, the second as $2 etc.
If your regex contains slashes, it may be cleaner to use a different regex delimiter ('m' stands for 'match'):
m{regex} && print
If you have a modern Perl, you can use -E to enable modern feature and use say instead of print to print with a newline appended:
perl -nE 'm{example[.]com/bp/(.*?)/(.*?)-L\d+[.]htm} && say $2' filename
This is very concise in Perl
perl -i.bak -lpe's/-[^-]+$//' myfile
Note that this will modify the input file in-place but will keep a backup of the original data in called myfile.bak
I need to replace a pattern in a file, only if it is followed by an empty line. Suppose I have following file:
test
test
test
...
the following command would replace all occurrences of test with xxx
cat file | sed 's/test/xxx/g'
but I need to only replace test if next line is empty. I have tried matching a hex code, but that doesn ot work:
cat file | sed 's/test\x0a/xxx/g'
The desired output should look like this:
test
xxx
xxx
...
Suggested solutions for sed, perl and awk:
sed
sed -rn '1h;1!H;${g;s/test([^\n]*\n\n)/xxx\1/g;p;}' file
I got the idea from sed multiline search and replace. Basically slurp the entire file into sed's hold space and do global replacement on the whole chunk at once.
perl
$ perl -00 -pe 's/test(?=[^\n]*\n\n)$/xxx/m' file
-00 triggers paragraph mode which makes perl read chunks separated by one or several empty lines (just what OP is looking for). Positive look ahead (?=) to anchor substitution to the last line of the chunk.
Caveat: -00 will squash multiple empty lines into single empty lines.
awk
$ awk 'NR==1 {l=$0; next}
/^$/ {gsub(/test/,"xxx", l)}
{print l; l=$0}
END {print l}' file
Basically store previous line in l, substitute pattern in l if current line is empty. Print l. Finally print the very last line.
Output in all three cases
test
xxx
xxx
...
This might work for you (GNU sed):
sed -r '$!N;s/test(\n\s*)$/xxx\1/;P;D' file
Keep a window of 2 lines throughout the length of the file and if the second line is empty and the first line contains the pattern then make a substitution.
Using sed
sed -r ':a;$!{N;ba};s/test([^\n]*\n(\n|$))/xxx\1/g'
explanation
:a # set label a
$ !{ # if not end of file
N # Add a newline to the pattern space, then append the next line of input to the pattern space
b a # Unconditionally branch to label. The label may be omitted, in which case the next cycle is started.
}
# simply, above command :a;$!{N;ba} is used to read the whole file into pattern.
s/test([^\n]*\n(\n|$))/xxx\1/g # replace the key word if next line is empty (\n\n) or end of line ($)
How can I replace a newline ("\n") with a space ("") using the sed command?
I unsuccessfully tried:
sed 's#\n# #g' file
sed 's#^$# #g' file
How do I fix it?
sed is intended to be used on line-based input. Although it can do what you need.
A better option here is to use the tr command as follows:
tr '\n' ' ' < input_filename
or remove the newline characters entirely:
tr -d '\n' < input.txt > output.txt
or if you have the GNU version (with its long options)
tr --delete '\n' < input.txt > output.txt
Use this solution with GNU sed:
sed ':a;N;$!ba;s/\n/ /g' file
This will read the whole file in a loop (':a;N;$!ba), then replaces the newline(s) with a space (s/\n/ /g). Additional substitutions can be simply appended if needed.
Explanation:
sed starts by reading the first line excluding the newline into the pattern space.
Create a label via :a.
Append a newline and next line to the pattern space via N.
If we are before the last line, branch to the created label $!ba ($! means not to do it on the last line. This is necessary to avoid executing N again, which would terminate the script if there is no more input!).
Finally the substitution replaces every newline with a space on the pattern space (which is the whole file).
Here is cross-platform compatible syntax which works with BSD and OS X's sed (as per #Benjie comment):
sed -e ':a' -e 'N' -e '$!ba' -e 's/\n/ /g' file
As you can see, using sed for this otherwise simple problem is problematic. For a simpler and adequate solution see this answer.
Fast answer
sed ':a;N;$!ba;s/\n/ /g' file
:a create a label 'a'
N append the next line to the pattern space
$! if not the last line, ba branch (go to) label 'a'
s substitute, /\n/ regex for new line, / / by a space, /g global match (as many times as it can)
sed will loop through step 1 to 3 until it reach the last line, getting all lines fit in the pattern space where sed will substitute all \n characters
Alternatives
All alternatives, unlike sed will not need to reach the last line to begin the process
with bash, slow
while read line; do printf "%s" "$line "; done < file
with perl, sed-like speed
perl -p -e 's/\n/ /' file
with tr, faster than sed, can replace by one character only
tr '\n' ' ' < file
with paste, tr-like speed, can replace by one character only
paste -s -d ' ' file
with awk, tr-like speed
awk 1 ORS=' ' file
Other alternative like "echo $(< file)" is slow, works only on small files and needs to process the whole file to begin the process.
Long answer from the sed FAQ 5.10
5.10. Why can't I match or delete a newline using the \n escape
sequence? Why can't I match 2 or more lines using \n?
The \n will never match the newline at the end-of-line because the
newline is always stripped off before the line is placed into the
pattern space. To get 2 or more lines into the pattern space, use
the 'N' command or something similar (such as 'H;...;g;').
Sed works like this: sed reads one line at a time, chops off the
terminating newline, puts what is left into the pattern space where
the sed script can address or change it, and when the pattern space
is printed, appends a newline to stdout (or to a file). If the
pattern space is entirely or partially deleted with 'd' or 'D', the
newline is not added in such cases. Thus, scripts like
sed 's/\n//' file # to delete newlines from each line
sed 's/\n/foo\n/' file # to add a word to the end of each line
will NEVER work, because the trailing newline is removed before
the line is put into the pattern space. To perform the above tasks,
use one of these scripts instead:
tr -d '\n' < file # use tr to delete newlines
sed ':a;N;$!ba;s/\n//g' file # GNU sed to delete newlines
sed 's/$/ foo/' file # add "foo" to end of each line
Since versions of sed other than GNU sed have limits to the size of
the pattern buffer, the Unix 'tr' utility is to be preferred here.
If the last line of the file contains a newline, GNU sed will add
that newline to the output but delete all others, whereas tr will
delete all newlines.
To match a block of two or more lines, there are 3 basic choices:
(1) use the 'N' command to add the Next line to the pattern space;
(2) use the 'H' command at least twice to append the current line
to the Hold space, and then retrieve the lines from the hold space
with x, g, or G; or (3) use address ranges (see section 3.3, above)
to match lines between two specified addresses.
Choices (1) and (2) will put an \n into the pattern space, where it
can be addressed as desired ('s/ABC\nXYZ/alphabet/g'). One example
of using 'N' to delete a block of lines appears in section 4.13
("How do I delete a block of specific consecutive lines?"). This
example can be modified by changing the delete command to something
else, like 'p' (print), 'i' (insert), 'c' (change), 'a' (append),
or 's' (substitute).
Choice (3) will not put an \n into the pattern space, but it does
match a block of consecutive lines, so it may be that you don't
even need the \n to find what you're looking for. Since GNU sed
version 3.02.80 now supports this syntax:
sed '/start/,+4d' # to delete "start" plus the next 4 lines,
in addition to the traditional '/from here/,/to there/{...}' range
addresses, it may be possible to avoid the use of \n entirely.
A shorter awk alternative:
awk 1 ORS=' '
Explanation
An awk program is built up of rules which consist of conditional code-blocks, i.e.:
condition { code-block }
If the code-block is omitted, the default is used: { print $0 }. Thus, the 1 is interpreted as a true condition and print $0 is executed for each line.
When awk reads the input it splits it into records based on the value of RS (Record Separator), which by default is a newline, thus awk will by default parse the input line-wise. The splitting also involves stripping off RS from the input record.
Now, when printing a record, ORS (Output Record Separator) is appended to it, default is again a newline. So by changing ORS to a space all newlines are changed to spaces.
GNU sed has an option, -z, for null-separated records (lines). You can just call:
sed -z 's/\n/ /g'
The Perl version works the way you expected.
perl -i -p -e 's/\n//' file
As pointed out in the comments, it's worth noting that this edits in place. -i.bak will give you a backup of the original file before the replacement in case your regular expression isn't as smart as you thought.
Who needs sed? Here is the bash way:
cat test.txt | while read line; do echo -n "$line "; done
In order to replace all newlines with spaces using awk, without reading the whole file into memory:
awk '{printf "%s ", $0}' inputfile
If you want a final newline:
awk '{printf "%s ", $0} END {printf "\n"}' inputfile
You can use a character other than space:
awk '{printf "%s|", $0} END {printf "\n"}' inputfile
tr '\n' ' '
is the command.
Simple and easy to use.
Three things.
tr (or cat, etc.) is absolutely not needed. (GNU) sed and (GNU) awk, when combined, can do 99.9% of any text processing you need.
stream != line based. ed is a line-based editor. sed is not. See sed lecture for more information on the difference. Most people confuse sed to be line-based because it is, by default, not very greedy in its pattern matching for SIMPLE matches - for instance, when doing pattern searching and replacing by one or two characters, it by default only replaces on the first match it finds (unless specified otherwise by the global command). There would not even be a global command if it were line-based rather than STREAM-based, because it would evaluate only lines at a time. Try running ed; you'll notice the difference. ed is pretty useful if you want to iterate over specific lines (such as in a for-loop), but most of the times you'll just want sed.
That being said,
sed -e '{:q;N;s/\n/ /g;t q}' file
works just fine in GNU sed version 4.2.1. The above command will replace all newlines with spaces. It's ugly and a bit cumbersome to type in, but it works just fine. The {}'s can be left out, as they're only included for sanity reasons.
Why didn't I find a simple solution with awk?
awk '{printf $0}' file
printf will print the every line without newlines, if you want to separate the original lines with a space or other:
awk '{printf $0 " "}' file
The answer with the :a label ...
How can I replace a newline (\n) using sed?
... does not work in freebsd 7.2 on the command line:
( echo foo ; echo bar ) | sed ':a;N;$!ba;s/\n/ /g'
sed: 1: ":a;N;$!ba;s/\n/ /g": unused label 'a;N;$!ba;s/\n/ /g'
foo
bar
But does if you put the sed script in a file or use -e to "build" the sed script...
> (echo foo; echo bar) | sed -e :a -e N -e '$!ba' -e 's/\n/ /g'
foo bar
or ...
> cat > x.sed << eof
:a
N
$!ba
s/\n/ /g
eof
> (echo foo; echo bar) | sed -f x.sed
foo bar
Maybe the sed in OS X is similar.
Easy-to-understand Solution
I had this problem. The kicker was that I needed the solution to work on BSD's (Mac OS X) and GNU's (Linux and Cygwin) sed and tr:
$ echo 'foo
bar
baz
foo2
bar2
baz2' \
| tr '\n' '\000' \
| sed 's:\x00\x00.*:\n:g' \
| tr '\000' '\n'
Output:
foo
bar
baz
(has trailing newline)
It works on Linux, OS X, and BSD - even without UTF-8 support or with a crappy terminal.
Use tr to swap the newline with another character.
NULL (\000 or \x00) is nice because it doesn't need UTF-8 support and it's not likely to be used.
Use sed to match the NULL
Use tr to swap back extra newlines if you need them
You can use xargs:
seq 10 | xargs
or
seq 10 | xargs echo -n
cat file | xargs
for the sake of completeness
If you are unfortunate enough to have to deal with Windows line endings, you need to remove the \r and the \n:
tr '\r\n' ' ' < $input > $output
I'm not an expert, but I guess in sed you'd first need to append the next line into the pattern space, bij using "N". From the section "Multiline Pattern Space" in "Advanced sed Commands" of the book sed & awk (Dale Dougherty and Arnold Robbins; O'Reilly 1997; page 107 in the preview):
The multiline Next (N) command creates a multiline pattern space by reading a new line of input and appending it to the contents of the pattern space. The original contents of pattern space and the new input line are separated by a newline. The embedded newline character can be matched in patterns by the escape sequence "\n". In a multiline pattern space, the metacharacter "^" matches the very first character of the pattern space, and not the character(s) following any embedded newline(s). Similarly, "$" matches only the final newline in the pattern space, and not any embedded newline(s). After the Next command is executed, control is then passed to subsequent commands in the script.
From man sed:
[2addr]N
Append the next line of input to the pattern space, using an embedded newline character to separate the appended material from the original contents. Note that the current line number changes.
I've used this to search (multiple) badly formatted log files, in which the search string may be found on an "orphaned" next line.
In response to the "tr" solution above, on Windows (probably using the Gnuwin32 version of tr), the proposed solution:
tr '\n' ' ' < input
was not working for me, it'd either error or actually replace the \n w/ '' for some reason.
Using another feature of tr, the "delete" option -d did work though:
tr -d '\n' < input
or '\r\n' instead of '\n'
I used a hybrid approach to get around the newline thing by using tr to replace newlines with tabs, then replacing tabs with whatever I want. In this case, " " since I'm trying to generate HTML breaks.
echo -e "a\nb\nc\n" |tr '\n' '\t' | sed 's/\t/ <br> /g'`
You can also use this method:
sed 'x;G;1!h;s/\n/ /g;$!d'
Explanation
x - which is used to exchange the data from both space (pattern and hold).
G - which is used to append the data from hold space to pattern space.
h - which is used to copy the pattern space to hold space.
1!h - During first line won't copy pattern space to hold space due to \n is
available in pattern space.
$!d - Clear the pattern space every time before getting the next line until the
the last line.
Flow
When the first line get from the input, an exchange is made, so 1 goes to hold space and \n comes to pattern space, appending the hold space to pattern space, and a substitution is performed and deletes the pattern space.
During the second line, an exchange is made, 2 goes to hold space and 1 comes to the pattern space, G append the hold space into the pattern space, h copy the pattern to it, the substitution is made and deleted. This operation is continued until EOF is reached and prints the exact result.
Bullet-proof solution. Binary-data-safe and POSIX-compliant, but slow.
POSIX sed
requires input according to the
POSIX text file
and
POSIX line
definitions, so NULL-bytes and too long lines are not allowed and each line must end with a newline (including the last line). This makes it hard to use sed for processing arbitrary input data.
The following solution avoids sed and instead converts the input bytes to octal codes and then to bytes again, but intercepts octal code 012 (newline) and outputs the replacement string in place of it. As far as I can tell the solution is POSIX-compliant, so it should work on a wide variety of platforms.
od -A n -t o1 -v | tr ' \t' '\n\n' | grep . |
while read x; do [ "0$x" -eq 012 ] && printf '<br>\n' || printf "\\$x"; done
POSIX reference documentation:
sh,
shell command language,
od,
tr,
grep,
read,
[,
printf.
Both read, [, and printf are built-ins in at least bash, but that is probably not guaranteed by POSIX, so on some platforms it could be that each input byte will start one or more new processes, which will slow things down. Even in bash this solution only reaches about 50 kB/s, so it's not suited for large files.
Tested on Ubuntu (bash, dash, and busybox), FreeBSD, and OpenBSD.
In some situations maybe you can change RS to some other string or character. This way, \n is available for sub/gsub:
$ gawk 'BEGIN {RS="dn" } {gsub("\n"," ") ;print $0 }' file
The power of shell scripting is that if you do not know how to do it in one way you can do it in another way. And many times you have more things to take into account than make a complex solution on a simple problem.
Regarding the thing that gawk is slow... and reads the file into memory, I do not know this, but to me gawk seems to work with one line at the time and is very very fast (not that fast as some of the others, but the time to write and test also counts).
I process MB and even GB of data, and the only limit I found is line size.
Finds and replaces using allowing \n
sed -ie -z 's/Marker\n/# Marker Comment\nMarker\n/g' myfile.txt
Marker
Becomes
# Marker Comment
Marker
You could use xargs — it will replace \n with a space by default.
However, it would have problems if your input has any case of an unterminated quote, e.g. if the quote signs on a given line don't match.
On Mac OS X (using FreeBSD sed):
# replace each newline with a space
printf "a\nb\nc\nd\ne\nf" | sed -E -e :a -e '$!N; s/\n/ /g; ta'
printf "a\nb\nc\nd\ne\nf" | sed -E -e :a -e '$!N; s/\n/ /g' -e ta
To remove empty lines:
sed -n "s/^$//;t;p;"
Using Awk:
awk "BEGIN { o=\"\" } { o=o \" \" \$0 } END { print o; }"
A solution I particularly like is to append all the file in the hold space and replace all newlines at the end of file:
$ (echo foo; echo bar) | sed -n 'H;${x;s/\n//g;p;}'
foobar
However, someone said me the hold space can be finite in some sed implementations.
Replace newlines with any string, and replace the last newline too
The pure tr solutions can only replace with a single character, and the pure sed solutions don't replace the last newline of the input. The following solution fixes these problems, and seems to be safe for binary data (even with a UTF-8 locale):
printf '1\n2\n3\n' |
sed 's/%/%p/g;s/#/%a/g' | tr '\n' # | sed 's/#/<br>/g;s/%a/#/g;s/%p/%/g'
Result:
1<br>2<br>3<br>
It is sed that introduces the new-lines after "normal" substitution. First, it trims the new-line char, then it processes according to your instructions, then it introduces a new-line.
Using sed you can replace "the end" of a line (not the new-line char) after being trimmed, with a string of your choice, for each input line; but, sed will output different lines. For example, suppose you wanted to replace the "end of line" with "===" (more general than a replacing with a single space):
PROMPT~$ cat <<EOF |sed 's/$/===/g'
first line
second line
3rd line
EOF
first line===
second line===
3rd line===
PROMPT~$
To replace the new-line char with the string, you can, inefficiently though, use tr , as pointed before, to replace the newline-chars with a "special char" and then use sed to replace that special char with the string you want.
For example:
PROMPT~$ cat <<EOF | tr '\n' $'\x01'|sed -e 's/\x01/===/g'
first line
second line
3rd line
EOF
first line===second line===3rd line===PROMPT~$