I can see the count of users with the explore report like this:
However, if I want to check out how much % of users are on mobile or desktop. There is no way to show that.
The current report might have very small and huge values because the visitor of the website is very unstable. But the % of the visitors should be a stable value.
Is it possible to create a metric, that the values in it equals mobile/total?
Related
I have a predefined benchmark for each client and would also like to include a user defined benchmark. So that I can compare a selected clients performance on several metrics versus the predefined benchmark and and a group of clients the user selects, excluding the selected client.
For example using the built in Superstore data, I want to compare a sale person to other sales people in their region (predefined benchmark group) and also compare a sales person to a user selected group of other sales people (user defined benchmark group) for the metrics commission and sales. How can I do this in Tableau?
Following up on this, I have put together a Tableau Public workbook that may help you see how to use Set Actions: https://public.tableau.com/views/CompareItemsSetAction/CompareVsDynamicGroup?:display_count=y&publish=yes&:origin=viz_share_link
I'll try and write this up in the near future as well, but you should be able to deconstruct how this works. There is 1 set and the actions on the dashboard drive it.
Ok I suggest you look at using sets. This article from Tableau is very informative and should cover your use cases: https://www.tableau.com/about/blog/2018/11/8-ways-bring-powerful-new-comparisons-viz-audiences-set-actions-97207
I'm using Tableau to show items resolved over time, either 'On Time' or 'Overdue'.
I want to be able to show the users individual performance as a reference line and what the company average is as a second reference line.
The graph plots the items 'On Time' over time.
I can only get the users average individual performance to show as a reference line.
Any ideas how to create this company wide average?
Cant share workbook as has sensitive data, but can share calculations.
I'm querying GA Report API v4 to get some metrics for AdWords Keywords.
As dimension I use:
ga:keyword
As metrics I use:
ga:adClicks,
ga:adCost,
ga:CPC,
ga:sessions,
ga:bounceRate,
ga:pageviewsPerSession,
ga:goalConversionRateAll,
ga:transactions,
ga:transactionRevenue
When I compare results pulled from API with results that I'm getting by Google Analytics UI, I found out that certain metrics in some Keywords has tiny differences.
Also when I tried GA API v3 I had same result.
What is the reason?
Why some returned metrics for Keywords are fully identical to results in UI, but certain not?
I tried various date ranges: 1 day, week, month but in all cases I got some tiny differences in some metrics of certain Keywords.
Here is screenshot with example of differences in metrics how it looks like:
In red color means the difference, green color - means that values are identical
Problem: The reason for the discrepancy is that you are calling two different reports.
Report 1) UI Report.
As you have seen, this report is made up of two parts the first being Clicks, Cost, and CPC which are from the Google AdWords API, and the other metrics (sessions, bounce, etc.) which is from Google Analytics.
Because you are going into AdWords > Keywords, you are actually setting a filter to select only AdWords traffic.
Report 2) Custom Report.
This report is pulling the keywords dimension without any filters. This means that the report will also have data for organic keywords, and any UTM_term parameters set.
Because sessions from organic keywords have no AdWords data, the first three columns will be the same, however the Google Analytics specific columns will show variation in the metrics.
Solution:
To get your reports the same, you need to add a filter to your API request, such as ga:adwordsCustomerID or ga:source=google & ga:medium=cpc.
I'm been using FM for the first time and have a need to use Get Summary on a financial information table. This generates various summaries of different income by customer, year and type. The layout generated from this table is good. The use of Get Summary allows me to do math with the various results, whereas sub summary totals by income type (as far as I know) cannot be added and divided by each other.
The problem I'm facing is that I wish now to create a layout based on customers and include some of the Get Summary detail from the financial table. Because my new layout is based on customers, I understand I cannot use Get Summary from financial as either a related field or in a portal.
The end game is simply to scroll through customer records, one after the other, and have key financial information show on their 'home' screen if you will, for years and type.
Any help gratefully appreciated. Thanks
I understand I cannot use Get Summary from financial as either a
related field or in a portal.
No, that's not quite correct. The GetSummary() function returns the sub-summary value by breakfield - if records are sorted by breakfield. Thus if the portal (or the underlying relationship) sorts the related records by type, you will see sub-summary values in the portal. However, you won't be able to see only sub-summary values, since a portal has no sub-summary parts.
There are other ways to show summarized related data. If you don't have (and don't expect to have) a large amount of records, considering filtering a (one-row) portal to show only a specific type of related records, then place the summary field inside it. Of course, this assumes the types are known in advance and unchanging.
In Crystal Reports, is there a way to get both full set charting and subset charting, in the report headers?
I'm working on a report from an erstwhile co-worker and I'm still trying to make things "better".
While I haven't found the solution to accruing time
( see Accruing over time (non-overlapping) - technique? )
I'll press on with how to use the resulting data once I retrieve it.
The report is a Global Availability report for network technologies, and part of the report is graphic:
Chart availability for different
network types for last "n" months'
time.
Charts availability for each region
(for each network type for "n"
months' time).
She (co-worker) had a global chart, but for each region, she did a separate sub-report containing just the chart for that region. The query isn't optimal, and using the sub-reports, the query is repeated each time.
If there a way to use a single data-set in one report for all five charts, forcing the four regional charts to display only that region's data?
Additional info:
The charts are all Bar charts, design is
y-axis: calculated availability
x-axis: Group by network type (Switches, Trunks, "Network)
sub group by month
Bad Example:
Let me see if I understand this. In your Report Header, you have 5 Subreports for the 4 regional graphs and the global graph. And you want to collapse this all into 1 Subreport if possible?
Yes, but you can't do it like in your image where United States & Europe are side-by-side. They would have to be 1 per row. Also, the datasource also has to be formatted correctly. To do this,
Make a new subreport. Group it by the Region.
In this subreport, make your regional graph in the Group Header section.
In this subreport, also make your global graph in the Report Header section.
Insert this subreport into your main report and you should be done.
Sometimes, the only way out of the fire is through it.
After lots of un-satisfactory refactoring, I spoke with the original (years ago) requestor and got some good information. I have yet to speak to the most recent requestor again (who didn't have any knowledge of the technical requirements the last several times).
Spoke w/ the guy who is tending a related db, and I get permission to add come functions, views, store procedures, etc. to THAT db... Within reason and after code/perf review -- something that isn't normally conducted, so I welcome it. I WILL have the ability to do the procedural stuff through... a procedure. Written as a stand-alone, I should be able to re-use it for any of the queries against future needs.
And... Yes, I am pretty much going to have to (read "get to") re-design, and hopefully get rid of most of the sub-reports. Yeay, me.
Thanks for coming along for the ride.