I'm trying to match two dataframes based on a variable date window. I am not simply trying to get an exact match, which my code achieves but to get all likely candidates within a variable day window.
I was able to get exact matches on dates with my code.
But I want to find out if the records are still viable to match since they could be a few days off either side but would still be reasonable enough to join on.
I've tried looking for something similar to python's pd.to_timedelta('1 day') in spark to add to the filter but alas have struck no luck.
Here is my current code which matches the dataframe on the ID column and then runs a filter to ensure that the from_date in the second dataframe is between the start_date and the end_date of the first dataframe.
What I need is not the exact date match but be able to match records if they fall between a day or two (either side) of the actual dates.
import org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession
val spark = SparkSession.builder().getOrCreate()
val df1 = spark.read.option("header","true")
.option("inferSchema","true").csv("../data/df1.csv")
val df2 = spark.read.option("header","true")
.option("inferSchema","true")
.csv("../data/df2.csv")
val df = df2.join(df1,
(df1("ID") === df2("ID")) &&
(df2("from_date") >= df1("start_date")) &&
(df2("from_date") <= df1("end_date")),"left")
.select(df1("ID"), df1("start_date"), df1("end_date"),
$"from_date", $"to_date")
df.coalesce(1).write.format("com.databricks.spark.csv")
.option("header", "true").save("../mydata.csv")
Essentially I want to be able to edit this date window to increase or decrease the data actually matching.
Would really appreciate your input. I'm new to spark/scala but gotta say I'm loving it so far ... soo much faster (and cleaner) than python!
cheers
You can apply date_add and date_sub to start_date/end_date in your join condition, as shown below:
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions._
import java.sql.Date
val df1 = Seq(
(1, Date.valueOf("2018-12-01"), Date.valueOf("2018-12-05")),
(2, Date.valueOf("2018-12-01"), Date.valueOf("2018-12-06")),
(3, Date.valueOf("2018-12-01"), Date.valueOf("2018-12-07"))
).toDF("ID", "start_date", "end_date")
val df2 = Seq(
(1, Date.valueOf("2018-11-30")),
(2, Date.valueOf("2018-12-08")),
(3, Date.valueOf("2018-12-08"))
).toDF("ID", "from_date")
val deltaDays = 1
df2.join( df1,
df1("ID") === df2("ID") &&
df2("from_date") >= date_sub(df1("start_date"), deltaDays) &&
df2("from_date") <= date_add(df1("end_date"), deltaDays),
"left_outer"
).show
// +---+----------+----+----------+----------+
// | ID| from_date| ID|start_date| end_date|
// +---+----------+----+----------+----------+
// | 1|2018-11-30| 1|2018-12-01|2018-12-05|
// | 2|2018-12-08|null| null| null|
// | 3|2018-12-08| 3|2018-12-01|2018-12-07|
// +---+----------+----+----------+----------+
You can get the same results using datediff() function also. Check this out:
scala> val df1 = Seq((1, "2018-12-01", "2018-12-05"),(2, "2018-12-01", "2018-12-06"),(3, "2018-12-01", "2018-12-07")).toDF("ID", "start_date", "end_date").withColumn("start_date",'start_date.cast("date")).withColumn("end_date",'end_date.cast("date"))
df1: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [ID: int, start_date: date ... 1 more field]
scala> val df2 = Seq((1, "2018-11-30"), (2, "2018-12-08"),(3, "2018-12-08")).toDF("ID", "from_date").withColumn("from_date",'from_date.cast("date"))
df2: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [ID: int, from_date: date]
scala> val delta = 1;
delta: Int = 1
scala> df2.join(df1,df1("ID") === df2("ID") && datediff('from_date,'start_date) >= -delta && datediff('from_date,'end_date)<=delta, "leftOuter").show(false)
+---+----------+----+----------+----------+
|ID |from_date |ID |start_date|end_date |
+---+----------+----+----------+----------+
|1 |2018-11-30|1 |2018-12-01|2018-12-05|
|2 |2018-12-08|null|null |null |
|3 |2018-12-08|3 |2018-12-01|2018-12-07|
+---+----------+----+----------+----------+
scala>
Related
Schema of input dataframe
- employeeKey (int)
- employeeTypeId (string)
- loginDate (string)
- employeeDetailsJson (string)
{"Grade":"100","ValidTill":"2021-12-01","Supervisor":"Alex","Vendor":"technicia","HourlyRate":29}
For Perm employees , some attributes are available and some not. Same for Contracting Employees.
So looking to find an efficient way to build dataframe based on only selected columns, as against transforming all columns and select the ones which I need.
Also please advise this is the best way to extract values from json string based on a key. As the attributes in the string are dynamic, I can not build StructSchema based on it. So using good old get_json_object.
(spark 2.45 and will use spark 3 in future)
val dfSelectColumns=List("Employee-Key", "Employee-Type","Login-Date","cont.Vendor-Name","cont.Hourly-Rate" )
//val dfSelectColumns=List("Employee-Key", "Employee-Type","Login-Date","perm.Level","perm-Validity","perm.Supervisor" )
val resultDF = inputDF.get
.withColumn("Employee-Key", col("employeeKey"))
.withColumn("Employee-Type", when(col("employeeTypeId") === 1, "Permanent")
.when(col("employeeTypeId") === 2, "Contractor")
.otherwise("unknown"))
.withColumn("Login-Date", to_utc_timestamp(to_timestamp(col("loginDate"), "yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss"), ""America/Chicago""))
.withColumn("perm.Level", get_json_object(col("employeeDetailsJson"), "$.Grade"))
.withColumn("perm.Validity", get_json_object(col("employeeDetailsJson"), "$.ValidTill"))
.withColumn("perm.SuperVisor", get_json_object(col("employeeDetailsJson"), "$.Supervisor"))
.withColumn("cont.Vendor-Name", get_json_object(col("employeeDetailsJson"), "$.Vendor"))
.withColumn("cont.Hourly-Rate", get_json_object(col("employeeDetailsJson"), "$.HourlyRate"))
.select(dfSelectColumns.head, dfSelectColumns.tail: _*)
I see that you have 2 schemas, one for Permanent and another for Contractor. You can have 2 schemas.
import org.apache.spark.sql.types._
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions._
val schemaBase = new StructType().add("Employee-Key", IntegerType).add("Employee-Type", StringType).add("Login-Date", DateType)
val schemaPerm = schemaBase.add("Level", IntegerType).add("Validity", StringType)// Permanent attributes
val schemaCont = schemaBase.add("Vendor", StringType).add("HourlyRate", DoubleType) // Contractor attributes
Then you can use the 2 schemas to load the data into dataframe.
For Permanent Employee:
val jsonPermDf = Seq( // Construct sample dataframe
(2, """{"Employee-Key":2, "Employee-Type":"Permanent", "Login-Date":"2021-11-01", "Level":3, "Validity":"ok"}""")
, (3, """{"Employee-Key":3, "Employee-Type":"Permanent", "Login-Date":"2020-10-01", "Level":2, "Validity":"ok-yes"}""")
).toDF("key", "raw_json")
val permDf = jsonPermDf.withColumn("data", from_json(col("raw_json"),schemaPerm)).select($"data.*")
permDf.show()
For Contractor:
val jsonContDf = Seq( // Construct sample dataframe
(1, """{"Employee-Key":1, "Employee-Type":"Contractor", "Login-Date":"2021-12-01", "Vendor":"technicia", "HourlyRate":29}""")
, (4, """{"Employee-Key":4, "Employee-Type":"Contractor", "Login-Date":"2019-09-01", "Vendor":"Minis", "HourlyRate":35}""")
).toDF("key", "raw_json")
val contDf = jsonContDf.withColumn("data", from_json(col("raw_json"),schemaCont)).select($"data.*")
contDf.show()
This is the result datafrme for Permanent:
+------------+-------------+----------+-----+--------+
|Employee-Key|Employee-Type|Login-Date|Level|Validity|
+------------+-------------+----------+-----+--------+
| 2| Permanent|2021-11-01| 3| ok|
| 3| Permanent|2020-10-01| 2| ok-yes|
+------------+-------------+----------+-----+--------+
This is the result dataframe for Contractor:
+------------+-------------+----------+---------+----------+
|Employee-Key|Employee-Type|Login-Date| Vendor|HourlyRate|
+------------+-------------+----------+---------+----------+
| 1| Contractor|2021-12-01|technicia| 29.0|
| 4| Contractor|2019-09-01| Minis| 35.0|
+------------+-------------+----------+---------+----------+
If the schema of the JSON in employeeDetailsJson is unstable, you can still parse it into Map(String, String) type using from_json function with schema map<string,string>. Then you can explode the map column and pivot to get keys as columns.
Example:
val df1 = df.withColumn(
"employeeDetails",
from_json(col("employeeDetailsJson"), "map<string,string>")
).select(
col("employeeKey"),
col("employeeTypeId"),
col("loginDate"),
explode("employeeDetails")
).groupBy("employeeKey", "employeeTypeId", "loginDate")
.pivot("key")
.agg(first("value"))
df1.show()
//+-----------+--------------+---------------------+-----+----------+----------+----------+---------+
//|employeeKey|employeeTypeId|loginDate |Grade|HourlyRate|Supervisor|ValidTill |Vendor |
//+-----------+--------------+---------------------+-----+----------+----------+----------+---------+
//|1 |1 |2021-02-05'T'21:28:06|100 |29 |Alex |2021-12-01|technicia|
//+-----------+--------------+---------------------+-----+----------+----------+----------+---------+
I have parquet file which contain two columns (id,features).I want to subtract features from scalar and divide output by another scalar.
parquet file
df.withColumn("features", ((df("features")-constant1)/constant2))
but give me error
requirement failed: The number of columns doesn't match. Old column
names (2): id, features New column names (1): features
How to solve it?
My scala spark code to this as below . Only way to do any operation on vector sparkm datatype is casting to string. Also used UDF to perform subtraction and division.
import spark.implicits._
import org.apache.spark.ml.linalg.Vectors
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions.udf
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions._
var df = Seq((1, Vectors.dense(35)),
(2, Vectors.dense(45)),
(3, Vectors.dense(4.5073)),
(4, Vectors.dense(56)))
.toDF("id", "features")
df.show()
val constant1 = 10
val constant2 = 2
val performComputation = (s: Double, val1: Int, val2: Int) => {
Vectors.dense((s - val1) / val2)
}
val performComputationUDF = udf(performComputation)
df.printSchema()
df = df.withColumn("features",
regexp_replace(df.col("features").cast("String"),
"[\\[\\]]", "").cast("Double")
)
df = df.withColumn("features",
performComputationUDF(df.col("features"),
lit(constant1), lit(constant2))
)
df.show(20, false)
// Write State should with mode overwrite
df.write
.mode("overwrite")
.parquet("file:///usr/local/spark/dataset/output1/")
Result
+---+----------+
|id |features |
+---+----------+
|1 |[12.5] |
|2 |[17.5] |
|3 |[-2.74635]|
|4 |[23.0] |
+---+----------+
I have a spark Dataframe like Below.I'm trying to split the column into 2 more columns:
date time content
28may 11am [ssid][customerid,shopid]
val personDF2 = personDF.withColumn("temp",split(col("content"),"\\[")).select(
col("*") +: (0 until 3).map(i => col("temp").getItem(i).as(s/col$i)): _*)
date time content col1 col2 col3
28may 11 [ssid][customerid,shopid] ssid customerid shopid
Assuming a String to represent an Array of Words. Got your request. You can optimize the number of dataframes as well to reduce load on system. If there are more than 9 cols etc. you may need to use c00, c01, etc. for c10 etc. Or just use integer as name for columns. leave that up to you.
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions._
import scala.collection.mutable.WrappedArray
// Set up data
val df = spark.sparkContext.parallelize(Seq(
("A", "[foo][customerid,shopid][Donald,Trump,Esq][single]"),
("B", "[foo]")
)).toDF("k", "v")
val df2 = df.withColumn("words_temp", regexp_replace($"v", lit("]"), lit("" )))
val df3 = df2.withColumn("words_temp2", regexp_replace($"words_temp", lit(","), lit("[" ))).drop("words_temp")
val df4 = df3.withColumn("words_temp3", expr("substring(words_temp2, 2, length(words_temp2))")).withColumn("cnt", expr("length(words_temp2)")).drop("words_temp2")
val df5 = df4.withColumn("words",split(col("words_temp3"),"\\[")).drop("words_temp3")
val df6 = df5.withColumn("num_words", size($"words"))
val df7 = df6.withColumn("v2", explode($"words"))
// Convert to Array of sorts via group by
val df8 = df7.groupBy("k")
.agg(collect_list("v2"))
// Convert to rdd Tuple and then find position so as to gen col names! That is the clue so as to be able to use pivot
val rdd = df8.rdd
val rdd2 = rdd.map(row => (row.getAs[String](0), row.getAs[WrappedArray[String]](1).toArray))
val rdd3 = rdd2.map { case (k, list) => (k, list.zipWithIndex) }
val df9 = rdd3.toDF("k", "v")
val df10 = df9.withColumn("vn", explode($"v"))
val df11 = df10.select($"k", $"vn".getField("_1"), concat(lit("c"),$"vn".getField("_2"))).toDF("k", "v", "c")
// Final manipulation
val result = df11.groupBy("k")
.pivot("c")
.agg(expr("coalesce(first(v),null)")) // May never occur in your case, just done for completeness and variable length cols.
result.show(100,false)
returns in this case:
+---+---+----------+------+------+-----+----+------+
|k |c0 |c1 |c2 |c3 |c4 |c5 |c6 |
+---+---+----------+------+------+-----+----+------+
|B |foo|null |null |null |null |null|null |
|A |foo|customerid|shopid|Donald|Trump|Esq |single|
+---+---+----------+------+------+-----+----+------+
Update:
Based on original title stating array of words. See other answer.
If new, then a few things here. Can also be done with dataset and map I assume. Here is a solution using DFs and rdd's. I might well investigate a complete DS in future, but this works for sure and at scale.
// Can amalgamate more steps
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions._
import scala.collection.mutable.WrappedArray
// Set up data
val df = spark.sparkContext.parallelize(Seq(
("A", Array(Array("foo", "bar"), Array("Donald", "Trump","Esq"), Array("single"))),
("B", Array(Array("foo2", "bar2"), Array("single2"))),
("C", Array(Array("foo3", "bar3", "x", "y", "z")))
)).toDF("k", "v")
// flatten via 2x explode, can be done more elegeantly with def or UDF, but keeping it simple here
val df2 = df.withColumn("v2", explode($"v"))
val df3 = df2.withColumn("v3", explode($"v2"))
// Convert to Array of sorts via group by
val df4 = df3.groupBy("k")
.agg(collect_list("v3"))
// Convert to rdd Tuple and then find position so as to gen col names! That is the clue so as to be able to use pivot
val rdd = df4.rdd
val rdd2 = rdd.map(row => (row.getAs[String](0), row.getAs[WrappedArray[String]](1).toArray))
val rdd3 = rdd2.map { case (k, list) => (k, list.zipWithIndex) }
val df5 = rdd3.toDF("k", "v")
val df6 = df5.withColumn("vn", explode($"v"))
val df7 = df6.select($"k", $"vn".getField("_1"), concat(lit("c"),$"vn".getField("_2"))).toDF("k", "v", "c")
// Final manipulation
val result = df7.groupBy("k")
.pivot("c")
.agg(expr("coalesce(first(v),null)")) // May never occur in your case, just done for completeness and variable length cols.
result.show(100,false)
returns in correct col order:
+---+----+----+-------+-----+----+------+
|k |c0 |c1 |c2 |c3 |c4 |c5 |
+---+----+----+-------+-----+----+------+
|B |foo2|bar2|single2|null |null|null |
|C |foo3|bar3|x |y |z |null |
|A |foo |bar |Donald |Trump|Esq |single|
+---+----+----+-------+-----+----+------+
I want to make a conceptual check of my code. The goal is to calculate minimum value of the field minTimestamp and maximum value of the field maxTimestamp in the DataFrame df, and delete all other values.
For example:
df
src dst minTimestamp maxTimestamp
1 3 1530809948 1530969948
1 3 1540711155 1530809945
1 3 1520005712 1530809940
2 3 1520005712 1530809940
The answer should be the following one:
result:
src dst minTimestamp maxTimestamp
1 3 1520005712 1530969948
2 3 1520005712 1530809940
This is my code:
val cw_min = Window.partitionBy($"src", $"dst").orderBy($"minTimestamp".asc)
val cw_max = Window.partitionBy($"src", $"dst").orderBy($"maxTimestamp".desc)
val result = df
.withColumn("rn", row_number.over(cw_min)).where($"rn" === 1).drop("rn")
.withColumn("rn", row_number.over(cw_max)).where($"rn" === 1).drop("rn")
Is it possible to use Window function sequentially as I did in my code sample?
The problem is that I always get the same values of minTimestamp and maxTimestamp.
You can use DataFrame groupBy to aggregate the min and max:
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions._
val df = Seq(
(1, 3, 1530809948L, 1530969948L),
(1, 3, 1540711155L, 1530809945L),
(1, 3, 1520005712L, 1530809940L),
(2, 3, 1520005712L, 1530809940L)
).toDF("src", "dst", "minTimestamp", "maxTimestamp")
df.groupBy("src", "dst").agg(
min($"minTimestamp").as("minTimestamp"), max($"maxTimestamp").as("maxTimestamp")
).
show
// +---+---+------------+------------+
// |src|dst|minTimestamp|maxTimestamp|
// +---+---+------------+------------+
// | 2| 3| 1520005712| 1530809940|
// | 1| 3| 1520005712| 1530969948|
// +---+---+------------+------------+
Why not do use spark SQL and do
val spark: SparkSession = ???
df.createOrReplaceTempView("myDf")
val df2 = spark.sql("""
select
src,
dst,
min(minTimestamp) as minTimestamp,
max(maxTimestamp) as maxTimestamp
from myDf group by src, dst""")
You can also use the API to do the same:
val df2 = df
.groupBy("src", "dst")
.agg(min("minTimestamp"), max("maxTimestamp"))
Description
Given a dataframe df
id | date
---------------
1 | 2015-09-01
2 | 2015-09-01
1 | 2015-09-03
1 | 2015-09-04
2 | 2015-09-04
I want to create a running counter or index,
grouped by the same id and
sorted by date in that group,
thus
id | date | counter
--------------------------
1 | 2015-09-01 | 1
1 | 2015-09-03 | 2
1 | 2015-09-04 | 3
2 | 2015-09-01 | 1
2 | 2015-09-04 | 2
This is something I can achieve with window function, e.g.
val w = Window.partitionBy("id").orderBy("date")
val resultDF = df.select( df("id"), rowNumber().over(w) )
Unfortunately, Spark 1.4.1 does not support window functions for regular dataframes:
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Could not resolve window function 'row_number'. Note that, using window functions currently requires a HiveContext;
Questions
How can I achieve the above computation on current Spark 1.4.1 without using window functions?
When will window functions for regular dataframes be supported in Spark?
Thanks!
You can use HiveContext for local DataFrames as well and, unless you have a very good reason not to, it is probably a good idea anyway. It is a default SQLContext available in spark-shell and pyspark shell (as for now sparkR seems to use plain SQLContext) and its parser is recommended by Spark SQL and DataFrame Guide.
import org.apache.spark.{SparkContext, SparkConf}
import org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveContext
import org.apache.spark.sql.expressions.Window
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions.rowNumber
object HiveContextTest {
def main(args: Array[String]) {
val conf = new SparkConf().setAppName("Hive Context")
val sc = new SparkContext(conf)
val sqlContext = new HiveContext(sc)
import sqlContext.implicits._
val df = sc.parallelize(
("foo", 1) :: ("foo", 2) :: ("bar", 1) :: ("bar", 2) :: Nil
).toDF("k", "v")
val w = Window.partitionBy($"k").orderBy($"v")
df.select($"k", $"v", rowNumber.over(w).alias("rn")).show
}
}
You can do this with RDDs. Personally I find the API for RDDs makes a lot more sense - I don't always want my data to be 'flat' like a dataframe.
val df = sqlContext.sql("select 1, '2015-09-01'"
).unionAll(sqlContext.sql("select 2, '2015-09-01'")
).unionAll(sqlContext.sql("select 1, '2015-09-03'")
).unionAll(sqlContext.sql("select 1, '2015-09-04'")
).unionAll(sqlContext.sql("select 2, '2015-09-04'"))
// dataframe as an RDD (of Row objects)
df.rdd
// grouping by the first column of the row
.groupBy(r => r(0))
// map each group - an Iterable[Row] - to a list and sort by the second column
.map(g => g._2.toList.sortBy(row => row(1).toString))
.collect()
The above gives a result like the following:
Array[List[org.apache.spark.sql.Row]] =
Array(
List([1,2015-09-01], [1,2015-09-03], [1,2015-09-04]),
List([2,2015-09-01], [2,2015-09-04]))
If you want the position within the 'group' as well, you can use zipWithIndex.
df.rdd.groupBy(r => r(0)).map(g =>
g._2.toList.sortBy(row => row(1).toString).zipWithIndex).collect()
Array[List[(org.apache.spark.sql.Row, Int)]] = Array(
List(([1,2015-09-01],0), ([1,2015-09-03],1), ([1,2015-09-04],2)),
List(([2,2015-09-01],0), ([2,2015-09-04],1)))
You could flatten this back to a simple List/Array of Row objects using FlatMap, but if you need to perform anything on the 'group' that won't be a great idea.
The downside to using RDD like this is that it's tedious to convert from DataFrame to RDD and back again.
I totally agree that Window functions for DataFrames are the way to go if you have Spark version (>=)1.5. But if you are really stuck with an older version(e.g 1.4.1), here is a hacky way to solve this
val df = sc.parallelize((1, "2015-09-01") :: (2, "2015-09-01") :: (1, "2015-09-03") :: (1, "2015-09-04") :: (1, "2015-09-04") :: Nil)
.toDF("id", "date")
val dfDuplicate = df.selecExpr("id as idDup", "date as dateDup")
val dfWithCounter = df.join(dfDuplicate,$"id"===$"idDup")
.where($"date"<=$"dateDup")
.groupBy($"id", $"date")
.agg($"id", $"date", count($"idDup").as("counter"))
.select($"id",$"date",$"counter")
Now if you do dfWithCounter.show
You will get:
+---+----------+-------+
| id| date|counter|
+---+----------+-------+
| 1|2015-09-01| 1|
| 1|2015-09-04| 3|
| 1|2015-09-03| 2|
| 2|2015-09-01| 1|
| 2|2015-09-04| 2|
+---+----------+-------+
Note that date is not sorted, but the counter is correct. Also you can change the ordering of the counter by changing the <= to >= in the where statement.