I'm doing an iPhone application which uses a navigation control to browse through some data. This data is stored in a sqlite database and I have a class which gets it and returns it in a NSMutableArray of NSStrings.
The problem is that in the first screen of the navigation everything works prefectly, but in the second screen (another view which is pushed) the same code fails because the NSMutableArray gets corrupted. In the debugger I can see that it is returned correctly, but when it's time to use it the pointers have become corrupted and the application crashes.
I have put breakpoints in all my functions, and I can't see anywhere where it can get corrupted. And as the first view, which uses the same exact code, even accesing the same eact tables, works correctly I don't really know where to look.
If anyone want to have a look at the code I have uploaded it to my site: http://sachafuentes.com/iBacus.zip
Thanks in advance.
UPDATE:
The problem lies in the function where I get the data, which looks like (this is a simplified version with some pseudo-code).
-(NSMutableArray *) getPaises {
NSMutableArray * paises;
paises = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init];
while( get new row ) {
NSString *aPais = get the value;
[paises addObject:aPais];
[aPais release];
}
return paises;
}
If I comment out [aPais release] everything works, but to me this looks like a memory leak, as the NSString won't be released.
Okay, here's the problem:
NSString *aPais = [NSString stringWithUTF8String:(char*)sqlite3_column_text(compiledStatement, 0)];
By convention, any time that you see an alloc and an init, you need a release somewhere down the road.
By convention, any time that you use an xWithX: style method, the resulting object will be released for you.
Therefore, this statement:
[aPais release];
will cause your method to crash, as the object is released before it should be. Just remove this line, set your NSMutableArray instance to be autorelease-d and you should get better results.
Look for wrong memory management, that's the likeliest cause for crashes. I think you release your objects somewhere where you shouldn't and therefore you have dangling pointers in the array.
Update1
[aPais release] is wrong, as you don't retain it anywhere in this method. Returned values should always be autoreleased. You should have the same amount of retain as release in your code.
(Some people argue that a retain can also be an alloc init, but I always try to use alloc init autorelease, but this is a matter of style.)
BTW
You should autorelease your array, you're only retaining it here with [[alloc] init].
Any object that you alloc and init must be release-d when you're finished with it, or you will have a memory leak.
Since you are passing the reference outside the scope of the getPaises method, you must autorelease the NSMutableArray, or you will have a memory leak:
paises = [[[NSMutableArray alloc] init] autorelease];
Can you please clarify the step here:
NSString *aPais = get the value;
It's not clear what happens in "get the value" and I suspect this is one cause of instability.
I see that the code is (verbatim)
while(sqlite3_step(compiledStatement) == SQLITE_ROW) {
NSString *aPais = [NSString stringWithUTF8String:
(char*)sqlite3_column_text(compiledStatement, 0)];
[paises addObject:aPais];
[aPais release];
}
...and it's exactly as #gs puts it. aPais is autoreleased and should not be released.
You can also use a convenience constructor to initialize the NSMutableArray:
NSMutableArray *paises = [NSMutableArray array];
This is equivalent to doing:
NSMutableArray *paises = [[[NSMutableArray alloc] init] autorelease];
Related
I'm new to Objective-C and can't seem to get the memory management code right. I have the following code:
Media* myMedia = [self.myMediaManager getNextMedia];
self.navigationItem.title = [self.myMediaManager getCategory];
[self.btnImage setImage:myMedia.imageFile forState: UIControlStateNormal];
[self.lblImage setText:myMedia.imageLabel];
//[myMedia release];
My app crashes if I uncomment the above line. Do I need to do something special when I instantiate myMedia?
EDIT:
If myMediaManager is supposed to release it, when would it do that. Here is my code for getNextMedia:
- (Media*) getNextMedia {
DLog(#"Start");
Media* nextMedia = [[Media alloc] init];
[self setNextMediaIndex];
if (self.mediaIndex > -1)
{
nextMedia = [mediaArray objectAtIndex: self.mediaIndex];
}
return nextMedia;
}
EDIT2: I fixed the crashing issue (I was releasing an object I didn't own). I still see leaks and can't seem to find what the issue is.
Only objects that you own can be released.
You can release objects if you new, alloc, copy, mutableCopy or retain them first.
Since there is no alloc/copy/retain in [self.myMediaManager getNextMedia]; you can't release it.
Since myMedia is not retained here, you don't need to release it. When the origin (self.myMediaManager) releases it, it gets destroyed immediately.
NSString *string = [[NSString alloc] init];
[string release]; // now we have to release the string, since we allocated it.
NSString *string = self.navigationItem.title;
// now we don't, since it's a property of `navigationItem` and we didn't retain it.
At this point, since you are just learning, you should probably just start off using ARC with the iOS5 beta versions of XCode. It's good to have an understanding but using ARC will save you many potential pitfalls - by the time you learn enough to produce something iOS5 will be out. You can still build applications targeting iOS4, so you'll still be able to reach a lot of people.
The general rule for memory management is as follows:
For every retain, alloc, copy, or new, you need to call release or autorelease.
Since you did not call any these, you do not need to release myMedia.
For more information, take a look at this other answer I posted that deals with the subject. Also, since you are new to iOS development, I suggest looking at this answer as well.
This updated code is suspicious:
Media* nextMedia = [[Media alloc] init];
[self setNextMediaIndex];
if (self.mediaIndex > -1)
{
nextMedia = [mediaArray objectAtIndex: self.mediaIndex];
}
Depending on the condition in the if() clause, you assign a new value to nextMedia, which makes the value you just allocated unreachable, i.e. it can't be released.
Also, you don't retain the value you get from the array, so you should not release it either. But if the if() clause does not run, you still have the instance you alloc-ed, and that should be released.
That is not good. Try:
Media* nextMedia = [[Media alloc] init];
[self setNextMediaIndex];
if (self.mediaIndex > -1)
{
[nextMedia release];
nextMedia = [[mediaArray objectAtIndex: self.mediaIndex] retain];
}
You could also do (and I would prefer that):
Media *nextMedia;
[self setNextMediaIndex];
if (self.mediaIndex > -1)
{
nextMedia = [[mediaArray objectAtIndex: self.mediaIndex] retain];
}
else
{
nextMedia = [[Media alloc] init];
}
Now you can release nextMedia when that is not needed anymore, without any ambiguity about the retain count.
I'm new to cocoa / objective-c and i'm struggeling with the releases of my objects. I have the following code:
gastroCategoryList = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init];
for (NSDictionary *gastrocategory in gastrocategories) {
NSString *oid = [gastrocategory objectForKey:#"id"];
GastroCategory *gc = [[GastroCategory alloc] initWithId:[oid intValue] name:[gastrocategory objectForKey:#"name"]];
[gastroCategoryList addObject:gc];
}
The analyzer shows me that the "gastrocategory" defined in the for is a potential memory leak. But i'm not sure if i can release this at the end of the for loop?
Also at the following code:
- (NSArray *)eventsForStage:(int)stageId {
NSMutableArray *result = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init];
for (Event *e in eventList) {
if ([e stageId] == stageId) {
[result addObject:e];
}
}
return result;
}
The Analyzer tells me that my "result" is a potential leak. But where should I release this?
Is there also a simple rule to memorize when i should use assign, copy, retain etc. at the #property ?
Another problem:
- (IBAction)showHungryView:(id)sender {
GastroCategoriesView *gastroCategoriesView = [[GastroCategoriesView alloc] initWithNibName:#"GastroCategoriesView" bundle:nil];
[gastroCategoriesView setDataManager:dataManager];
UIView *currentView = [self view];
UIView *window = [currentView superview];
UIView *gastroView = [gastroCategoriesView view];
[window addSubview:gastroView];
CGRect pageFrame = currentView.frame;
CGFloat pageWidth = pageFrame.size.width;
gastroView.frame = CGRectOffset(pageFrame,pageWidth,0);
[UIView beginAnimations:nil context:NULL];
currentView.frame = CGRectOffset(pageFrame,-pageWidth,0);
gastroView.frame = pageFrame;
[UIView commitAnimations];
//[gastroCategoriesView release];
}
I don't get it, the "gastroCategoriesView" is a potential leak. I tried to release it at the end or with autorelease but neither works fine. Everytime I call the method my app is terminating. Thank you very much again!
In your loop, release each gc after adding it to the list since you won't need it in your loop scope anymore:
gastroCategoryList = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init];
for (NSDictionary *gastrocategory in gastrocategories) {
NSString *oid = [gastrocategory objectForKey:#"id"];
GastroCategory *gc = [[GastroCategory alloc] initWithId:[oid intValue] name:[gastrocategory objectForKey:#"name"]];
[gastroCategoryList addObject:gc];
[gc release];
}
In your method, declare result to be autoreleased to absolve ownership of it from your method:
NSMutableArray *result = [[[NSMutableArray alloc] init] autorelease];
// An alternative to the above, produces an empty autoreleased array
NSMutableArray *result = [NSMutableArray array];
EDIT: in your third issue, you can't release your view controller because its view is being used by the window. Setting it to autorelease also causes the same fate, only delayed.
You'll have to retain your GastroCategoriesView controller somewhere, e.g. in an instance variable of your app delegate.
BoltClock's answer is spot-on as to the first part of your question. I'll try to tackle the rest.
Assign is for simple, non-object types such as int, double, or struct. It generates a setter that does a plain old assignment, as in "foo = newFoo". Copy & retain will, as their names imply, either make a copy of the new value ("foo = [newFoo copy]") or retain it ("foo = [newFoo retain]"). In both cases, the setter will release the old value as appropriate.
So the question is, when to copy and when to retain. The answer is... it depends. How does your class use the new value? Will your class break if some other code modifies the incoming object? Say, for example, you have an NSString* property imaginatively named "theString." Other code can assign an NSMutableString instance to theString - that's legal, because it's an NSString subclass. But that other code might also keep its own reference to the mutable string object, and change its value - is your code prepared to deal with that possibility? If not, it should make its own copy, which the other code can't change.
On the other hand, if your own code makes no assumptions about whether theString might have been changed, and works just as well whether or not it was, then you'd save memory by retaining the incoming object instead of unnecessarily making a copy of it.
Basically, the rule, which is unfortunately not so simple sometimes, is to think carefully about whether your own code needs its own private copy, or can correctly deal with a shared object whose value might be changed by other code.
The reason you can release gc after it is added to the gastroCategoryList is that when an object is added to an array, the array retains that object. So, even though you release your gc, it will still be around; retained by the gastroCategoryList.
When you are returning a newly created object from a method, you need to call autorelease. This will cause the object to be released only after the runtime leaves the scope of the calling method, thereby giving the calling method a chance to do something with the returned value.
Note that if your method starts with the word copy or new, then you should not autorelease your object; you should leave it for the calling method to release.
As for copy vs retain vs assign... as a general rule, copy objects that have a mutable version, such as NSArray, NSSet, NSDictionary, and NSString. This will ensure that the object you have a pointer to is not mutable when you don't want it to be.
Otherwise, use retain whenever you want your class to be ensured that an object is still in memory. This will apply to almost every object except for objects that are considered parents of your object, in which case you would use assign. (See the section on retain cycles here).
Also note that you have to use assign for non-object types such as int.
Read through the Memory Management Programming Guide a bit; it's quite helpful.
I have been very confused on how to handle the releasing of an NSMutableArray when I need to return it from a method. I am not even sure if I am suppose to release it or not.
I have the code:
-(NSArray *)methodToCall {
NSMutableArray *mutArray = [[NSMutableArray alloc] initWithCapacity:10];
//Fill the array with stuff here
[mutArray release]; //Am I suppose to have this to keep the memory down?
return mutArray;
}
My question is whether or not I am suppose to have the [mutArray release]; in the code or not. Could someone explain this? I am at a loss and I want to keep my code as clean and leak free as possible.
The caller of your method is going to expect a valid NSArray, but which it doesn't own.
If you release it the way you're doing in your question, you're returning an invalid object (because you've both allocated and released it.) So that's not what you want.
You should "autorelease" the array before returning it. Then you'll be allocating it, but relinquishing ownership (without forcibly releasing it) before returning it. It will be valid until the end of the current event loop when the autorelease pool gets cleaned up, and your caller can retain it or let it go as appropriate:
-(NSArray *)methodToCall {
NSMutableArray *mutArray = [[NSMutableArray alloc] initWithCapacity:10];
//Fill the array with stuff here
return [mutArray autorelease];
}
Your other alternative, since you don't need to keep the reference around either, is to use one of the "autoreleasing" convenience methods to create it in the first place:
-(NSArray *)methodToCall {
// We're not doing an explicit alloc/init here, so...
NSMutableArray *mutArray = [NSMutableArray arrayWithCapacity:10];
// ...no autorelease necessary.
return mutArray;
}
Short answer - No.
As it is now, you are allocating an array and then releasing (freeing) it before the return. So the when you try accessing the return object from your calling method you're going to get a crash.
My suggestion would be to use autorelease or to have the calling method or class ivar be responsible for this array object if it is used often.
An example of the autorelease:
NSMutableArray *mutArray = [[[NSMutableArray alloc] initWithCapacity:10] autorelease];
I also suggest reading the Memory Management from the Developer Documents.
if you go for explicit object allocation by calling alloc and init you are owner of your object, so you are responsible for its object retain value else you do it by implicit you don't need to care about it. it will take care of itself.
-(NSMutableArray *)getArray
{
NSMutableArray *array=[[NSMutableArray alloc] initWithCapacity:10];
//your code
return [array autorelease];
}
in the above code we are the owner of the object so we need to handle its retain count by passing autorelease the autoreleasepool will take care of it.
-(NSMutableArray *)getArray
{
NSMutableArray *array=[NSMutableArray allocWithCapacity:10];
//your code
return array;
}
in the above code we didn't alloc any object we just call class method to define the size of the array.
if you want more details go for the object ownership in Memory management guide from apple library
In general, instead of using alloc/init to create a temporary array, consider using a convenience creation method (+arrayWithCapacity: in this case):
- (NSArray *)methodToCall
{
NSMutableArray *mutableArray = [NSMutableArray arrayWithCapacity:10];
// Fill the array with stuff here
return mutableArray;
}
Convenience creation methods such as +arrayWithCapacity: return an object that the caller is not responsible for, relieving the calling code of the burden of managing memory. Since the calling code is simply returning the reference rather than storing it, that'll simplify things.
ok. I have a really odd and mind boggling problem. I have two class files, both of which are NSObject inheritors. The series of code is as follows
CustomClass *obj;
obj = [[CustomClass alloc] init];
[myArray addObject:obj]; <--------Immediately after this line if I hover over the array it shows it as having 1 object that is out of scope.
If I hover over both objects they both have what look to be initialized memory locations so I really have no idea what is going on here. Thanks in advance.
UPDATE: There is a place in the code where I call a function repeatedly with a timer. Inside of the timer I do the following.
CustomClass *obj = [CustomClass alloc];
obj = [myArray objectAtIndex:0];
obj.var += 10;
[obj release];
On the line obj.var I get a EXC_BAD_ACCESS error. I am probably doing the alloc and releases incorrectly considering it is called repeatedly but I have tried everything I can think of.
I think you are referring to the XCode debugging feature which shows you the content of variables.
I did encounter the same issue as well, and what I'm sure of is that this is generally not a problem with your code.
Now what I'm not sure of is why this happens, but I believe that the variable obj in your example is not used after the call anymore. This means the compiler reuses the place where this reference was stored, thus the debugger could "lose" the pointer to your variable and it will appear as out of scope (but I am no expert in the ways of gcc or the debugger, so I could be wrong here).
This code is wrong:
CustomClass *obj = [CustomClass alloc];
obj = [myArray objectAtIndex:0];
obj.var += 10; [obj release];
What you are doing is allocing a new CustomClass (without initializing it, which should never be done), then replacing it with the object from the array (leaking the old one), and then afterwards releasing the object from the array. This will cause a crash the next time the object in the array is accessed. Instead, just say:
CustomClass *obj = [myArray objectAtIndex:0];
obj.var += 10;
Don't release unless you retain in advance. (See the Cocoa memory management guide for more information).
This isn't the problem you are referring to, but please don't do this:
CustomClass *obj = [CustomClass alloc];
Never issue an alloc without an init of some sort. Also, in the context of the code you posted it isn't required, as you assign a value to obj on the next line.
Then [obj release]; isn't required, as you haven't retained the obj value you obtain from myArray. You are probably doing it because of the preceding alloc, which as I have said isn't required.
if a reference to obj.var is causing a BAD_ACCESS, then either obj or var has been dealloced by code elsewhere, almost certainly var.
I'm following a book on iPhone development and there is a particular pattern I keep seeing in the example code that doesn't make much sense to me. Whenever a property is set they first assign a pointer to the new value for the property, then set the property to the pointer, then release the pointer. Example:
Interface:
#interface DoubleComponentPickerViewController : UIViewController {
NSArray *breadTypes;
}
#property(nonatomic, retain) NSArray *breadTypes;
#end
Class method:
- (void)viewDidLoad {
NSArray *breadArray = [[NSArray alloc] initWithObjects:#"White", #"Whole Wheat", #"Rye", #"Sourdough", #"Seven Grain", nil];
self.breadTypes = breadArray;
[breadArray release];
}
Is there any reason to do this instead of just doing the following?
- (void)viewDidLoad {
self.breadTypes = [[NSArray alloc] initWithObjects:#"White", #"Whole Wheat", #"Rye", #"Sourdough", #"Seven Grain", nil];
}
Thanks for the light that will no doubt be shed :)
Let me try and explain it in a different way.
A method that has alloc, copy or new in its name will allocate memory for an object, and gives ownership of that object to the caller, and it is the caller's responsibility to release that memory.
In your viewDidLoad method, you call a method that gives you ownership of an object. It is your method's responsibility to release it. However, before you do that, you want to do something with it - after all, that's why you alloc'ed it, not to just release it, but to do something useful with it.
Regardless of what it is that you want to do with it, you have to release it (or autorelease it*). In this case your use of the object is to pass it to self.breadTypes. self.breadTypes may not look like a method, but it is (it is a setter). You pass it breadArray. It does what it needs to with it. It might retain it for use later, or it might copy some info out of it, or make a copy of the entire thing. Your viewDidLoad doesn't really care. It assumes that self.breadTypes does what it needs to and when it returns, it doesn't care what you do with breadArray.
And what you do with it, is what you have to do with anything that you own - release (or autorelease* it).
That's why you have to use the temp variable, breadArray. You can't quite release the results from alloc on the same line, since the object would get released before self.breadTypes can have at it:
self.breadTypes = [[[NSArray alloc] initWithObjects:#"White", ..., nil] release];
Thus you are forced to assign to a temp variable, pass it to self.breadTypes, and then release the object that is saved in breadArray.
Now, you could try to do it this way so you don't use a temp variable:
- (void)viewDidLoad {
self.breadTypes = [[NSArray alloc] initWithObjects:#"White", #..., nil];
[self.breadTypes release];
}
but that is not very efficient since you are calling yet another method (self.breadTypes as a getter) that you didn't really need to if you have just stored the value in a temp variable.
*Now, as a responder said, you could use autorelease for an alternative version:
- (void)viewDidLoad {
self.breadTypes = [[[NSArray alloc] initWithObjects:#"White", ..., nil]
autorelease];
}
Apple urges us to think twice about whether we want to use autorelease vs. release. Autorelease may not be the best choice for every situation. I personally like to clean up after myself as soon as I possibly can, and not use autorelease needlessly. Autoreleased objects get released at the end of the execution of the run loop, for example soon after viewDidLoad returns. You should read up a bit more about autorelease (and memory management on the iPhone which is slightly different than MacOS X Cocoa), as I am oversimplifying it all.
BTW: If you retain an object, you are assuming ownership of it, and you will have the same responsibility again, to release it after you are done with it.
Yes. Those methods are alloc'ing the variables so they must be released. The fact that the property has a retain attribute means that when you say #synthesize breadTypes; the compiler is actually generating a setBreadTypes that properly releases the current breadType member and retains the new one. Thus your function must not retain the variable it alloc'ed.
You could, however write:
- (void)viewDidLoad {
self.breadTypes = [[[NSArray alloc] initWithObjects:#"White",
#"Whole Wheat", #"Rye", #"Sourdough",
#"Seven Grain", nil]
autorelease];
}
You'll want to brush up on Cocoa Memory Management