This question seems to be the essence of several others on this forum. I believe that it is possible for the active iPhone application to continue running, and specifically, to continue receiving timer call-backs, after it has entered the inactive state (either through the idle timer kicking in the screen lock, or through the user pressing the hardware lock button).
The documentation specifically says that while an application is inactive, it is executing, but not dispatching incoming events (I'm not giving a link because I'm jumpy about NDA - should I relax about that? Is this whole post a breach? sigh).
Also, two answers by user "Ambr Str" directly state that it is possible to continue receiving timer call-backs, and he supplies a snip of code to achieve it (I can't link to this because I'm a new user, sorry - search for the question: "What happens to an iPhone app when iPhone goes into stand-by mode?" to find his answer).
I've tried to create my call-backs as he suggests, but once my application becomes inactive, the call-backs cease firing.
I've just noticed that while the iPhone is plugged in, if the application becomes inactive (due to idle time out or me pressing the sleep button), call-backs do continue to occur - perhaps I should get my users to carry a battery pack with them ;-)
There is a good answer to this question on Apple's forums. Search for "Timer" and "Eskimo" (the helpful chap who provides the answers).
In brief, shortly after the application becomes inactive, the phone really does go to sleep. The only way to prevent this is to be playing some audio (or for some audio to be playing in a background application). While audio is playing the phone will not sleep, and your application continues to be run.
It is suggested that playing stay awake audio is a hack, and that you shouldn't do it if at all possible. I think in my application (which performs audio playback interspersed with silent periods), the approach is valid, if not ideal!
I have an app. which includes an embedded webserver. I'm planning to offer an option of disabling auto-sleep IFF the server is turned on, AND the device is on power. So you might consider checking the batteryState property of UIDevice. So if batteryState != UIDeviceBatteryStateUnplugged, go ahead and disable idle timer. (note: the docs say that UIDeviceBatteryStateUnknown will be returned when in simulator.)
You'll also want to listen for UIDeviceBatteryStateUnplugged notifications and set batteryMonitoringEnabled appropriately.
Related
Is it possible to put your app in the background, and have a counter that once expires, wakes up the app and have the app does some action? I know it's basic, but I just cant seem to have it work. Where do I put this counter + action? Under app did enter background?
Thanks for the help.
I don't think that this works in general:
You are allowed only to run in the background for specific tasks:
Apple doc tells which tasks that are:
One of that tasks is receiving GPS messages.
As long as you have GPS enabled and your app configured that it uses GPS for background, your app stays alive in the background.
If you disable GPS some time later it will suspend, and not wake up till the user activates it.
So to realize your problem you have to stay active in the background (e.g by reading GPS).
You can start the timer in AppDelegate:applicationDidEnterBackground or similar
If you need more time to shutdown, you explicitly can request for more time, there is one method for that. I dont know what happens if you request more at regulary intervals
When my app comes back from a suspended state is behaving in a very strange way, so I would like to restart it from scratch in this situation.
But I don't want to restart it every time it enters the background and comes back to the foreground.
Is it possible to know if the app comes back from a suspended state or if it was just a background state?
Thanx in advance!
I believe that the short answer to this is No.
Apple's state documentation isn't explicit, but I would argue that the documentation implies that didEnterBackground is called in this situation, as it states that there are methods associated with each transition, but it isn't explicit, so I tested.
I wrote a short test program that uses region monitoring to force an app to transition from suspended to background. This isn't definitive, as it is also difficult to know if an app has transitioned from background to suspended, but after a couple of minutes, apps should be in suspended unless they're using background modes or tasks.
Firing the region change ( through the debugger), I got didExtRegion callback, but no didEnterBackground.
My app registers for background location updates (not Significant Change. I need more granularity than kilometers)
That part works fine. I just want to stop the updates after the app has been in the background for 60 minutes. The way I'm doing it right now is to call stopUpdatingLocation in my CLLocationManager delegate.
However, I am unsure if this will actually stop my app from receiving background location updates, or if it will, but will just ignore them. Ideally, I'd like to not have my app be responsible for battery drain except for a small period of time after user activity.
Apple's documentation tends to send me in circles on this one. Right when I think "Executing Code in the Background" is about to spill the answer, it directs me to "Location Awareness Programming Guide." Right when that one is about to get specific about this question, it sends me back to "Executing Code in the Background." :)
I'm not sure whether your app has total control over this, but the docs for stopUpdatingLocation do state the following ...
Disabling event delivery gives the receiver the option of disabling the appropriate hardware (and thereby saving power) when no clients need location data
Which would suggest that should your app be the only one requesting background location data, and you request it to stop the GPS receiver would disable the appropriate hardware to save on power, which I think it was you're looking for.
What I can suggest is that you enable Power logging in Settings -> Developer, then run your app for an hour or so to a point where you think GPS is disabled, run for another hour and then compare the power usage in Instruments. This should provide you with a much clearer picture.
Calling stopUpdatingLocation will indeed stop GPS and so on, but if you place this call inside locationManager:didUpdateToLocation:fromLocation of your CLLocationManager delegate, then it might never be called.
Keep in mind that this method is only executed whenever a more accurate position or a (according to the active distance filter) significantly different position is available. If the device does not move at all and if the circumstances affecting the accuracy also do not change, it may not be called for hours (I have verified it for several minutes myself) and GPS will also stay enabled for this long.
For apps that only work in the foreground, you can use an NSTimer of 60minutes, but for apps that run in the background, the closest to a working solution that I have found so far, is a scheduled UILocalNotification. But even that requires the user to confirm an alert, before the app is restarted and able to turn the GPS off.
Maybe beginBackgroundTaskWithExpirationHandler: is the key to a better solution, but I have not completely figured it out, yet.
Is it possible to keep a socket connection alive in background, to be able to push new data and alert users at all times?
The answer to this question is a definitive yes. If you are in the background state, then you can keep a connection open and process messages from a server.
Unfortunately the complexity here is that you don't have a lot of control over the state your application is in:
foreground - The user has tapped your icon and the app is running with the UI visible.
suspended - The user was previously running your app in the foreground, but suspended it by hitting the home button or receiving a call. Basically your app is 'freeze dried' and will remain inactive until it is resumed by the user (starting where it left off) or it is terminated by the OS (see below).
background - The app was previously running in the foreground but has moved to the background state as a result of something the user has done. Normally your app will move to the suspended state in this case, but there are things you can do as the developer to prevent the instant 'freeze dry' and go into the background instead (see below). Your app will also be in the background state if it is woken up for a significant change event.
terminated - Your app has been unloaded from memory and the next time it starts will be from scratch. This is what happens when you double click the home button and then tap the x next to your app icon. It moves the app from the suspended state into the terminated state. This will also happen if the OS decides it needs room for more recently running apps and your app has been suspended for a long time.
So obviously the trick here is how do I stay in the background state as a long as possible. There are a couple of ways to do this:
Beg for more time - You can get up to 10 minutes of additional background processing when your app is closed if you ask for it.
Use UIBackgroundMode - You can declare youself a voip, audio or location app by adding the corresponding UIBackgroundMode value to the pList. There are special requirements for these types of apps which you can check out here.
So these approaches are not without their own problems (getting approved on the store being one of them) and as such I tend to agree with the other answers that using push notifications is probably your best approach for notifying your users. With the notification improvements in iOS5 this is going to be the best user experience going forward.
You can keep a socket connection alive (or do whatever else you want) in the background for about 15 minutes after your app closes. There are also more specialized background processing modes (specifically, audio, voip, and location) which Apple supports if your app fits into one of their supported categories. See here.
If you want to keep sending the user notifications indefinitely, you want to use the Apple Push Notification Service. This allows your app to continue to receive notifications when it's not running, and it conserves resources since there's only one connection to the APN service at a time.
You can definitely alert users with local and push notifications.
And as far as I know, you can keep a connection open only for limited time.
Look here for more details.
I am writing an application that records a users position at regular intervals whilst walking. I am using an NSTimers to schedule "startUpdatingLocation" followed by calling "stopUpdatingLocation" shortly afterwards to save as much battery as possible.
I want the user to be able to start the application and lock the phone thereby putting the application in an inactive state. My question is when this happens my application (when running via Xcode) seems to continue as normal, but I am curious if there are any differences in the way the application runs in this state as apposed to when the application is running as active?
From the docs it only mentions "applicationWillResignActive" with regards to the application passing through that state on its way to the background. I am more interested in how an application behaves when a used locks the UI and puts the phone away, I just want to make sure its going to keep doing what it should be doing or do I need to take extra measures?
When you app hits applicationWillResignActive it can continue to receive location updates if you use the UIBackgroundModes option in your apps info.plist.
Add the location key.
It is important that you do not use a timer in the background as timers will run but hold their "fire" until the app becomes active again. Thus you will only get one read when the user comes back to the app. The GPS location accuracy level is what will drive how much the battery is affected.
In your app description in the App Store, Apples requires:
Continued use of GPS running in the
background can dramatically decrease
battery life.
You app will not be allowed to go live until the above text is in the description for the user to read.
You should definitely be testing this on a device. The simulator doesn't auto-lock, for instance.
applicationWillResignActive is called when the user presses the home button, when another app fires a notification the user accepts (including when a call comes in), and when the device locks.
Look into the multitasking documentation, and what it has to say about background location updates.
My suggestion is that you conserve the user's battery by:
- starting a timer, which when fired, starts location updates (and stops the timer)
- when you get an adequately-accurate position record, stop location updates and restart the timer
- if location updates fail, restart the timer for a longer period. Maybe they're underground.
The most efficient approach is using significant location update service while your application is in the background or the screen is locked on your app. You might get one update every ten minutes or so.
Remember also, the user can disable your app's location services permissions. Especially these days...