Is it possible to keep a socket connection alive in background, to be able to push new data and alert users at all times?
The answer to this question is a definitive yes. If you are in the background state, then you can keep a connection open and process messages from a server.
Unfortunately the complexity here is that you don't have a lot of control over the state your application is in:
foreground - The user has tapped your icon and the app is running with the UI visible.
suspended - The user was previously running your app in the foreground, but suspended it by hitting the home button or receiving a call. Basically your app is 'freeze dried' and will remain inactive until it is resumed by the user (starting where it left off) or it is terminated by the OS (see below).
background - The app was previously running in the foreground but has moved to the background state as a result of something the user has done. Normally your app will move to the suspended state in this case, but there are things you can do as the developer to prevent the instant 'freeze dry' and go into the background instead (see below). Your app will also be in the background state if it is woken up for a significant change event.
terminated - Your app has been unloaded from memory and the next time it starts will be from scratch. This is what happens when you double click the home button and then tap the x next to your app icon. It moves the app from the suspended state into the terminated state. This will also happen if the OS decides it needs room for more recently running apps and your app has been suspended for a long time.
So obviously the trick here is how do I stay in the background state as a long as possible. There are a couple of ways to do this:
Beg for more time - You can get up to 10 minutes of additional background processing when your app is closed if you ask for it.
Use UIBackgroundMode - You can declare youself a voip, audio or location app by adding the corresponding UIBackgroundMode value to the pList. There are special requirements for these types of apps which you can check out here.
So these approaches are not without their own problems (getting approved on the store being one of them) and as such I tend to agree with the other answers that using push notifications is probably your best approach for notifying your users. With the notification improvements in iOS5 this is going to be the best user experience going forward.
You can keep a socket connection alive (or do whatever else you want) in the background for about 15 minutes after your app closes. There are also more specialized background processing modes (specifically, audio, voip, and location) which Apple supports if your app fits into one of their supported categories. See here.
If you want to keep sending the user notifications indefinitely, you want to use the Apple Push Notification Service. This allows your app to continue to receive notifications when it's not running, and it conserves resources since there's only one connection to the APN service at a time.
You can definitely alert users with local and push notifications.
And as far as I know, you can keep a connection open only for limited time.
Look here for more details.
Related
Is it possible to put your app in the background, and have a counter that once expires, wakes up the app and have the app does some action? I know it's basic, but I just cant seem to have it work. Where do I put this counter + action? Under app did enter background?
Thanks for the help.
I don't think that this works in general:
You are allowed only to run in the background for specific tasks:
Apple doc tells which tasks that are:
One of that tasks is receiving GPS messages.
As long as you have GPS enabled and your app configured that it uses GPS for background, your app stays alive in the background.
If you disable GPS some time later it will suspend, and not wake up till the user activates it.
So to realize your problem you have to stay active in the background (e.g by reading GPS).
You can start the timer in AppDelegate:applicationDidEnterBackground or similar
If you need more time to shutdown, you explicitly can request for more time, there is one method for that. I dont know what happens if you request more at regulary intervals
So here is the issue I am facing. Certain portions of the application I am building open some c network sockets that allow connections to various servers/services. However, if the application goes to sleep, these socket connections are lost, and error out when trying to reload them. So what I want to do is basically notify the user when the app launches again, that the application needs to be restarted. The main question is, can I present them with a button that will kill the app by using exit(0) without my app getting rejected?
Apple says that the user should be in control of when the app is killed, and in this case I see that they are, but I am not sure of Apple's opinion on this. Has anyone else used this? Have you been rejected for this? Thanks in advance for any advice!
EDIT:
Thank you everyone for your advice. I am trying to take everything into consideration, but because the app needs to be submitted ASAP, I just need to know, if we can not get another solution, if the above proposed solution, will get rejected or not.
Your application delegate receives notifications when significant events affect the life of the application. Rather than ask your user to recreate a session, you should attempt to discontinue network operations and then resume them at the appropriate times in the application's lifecycle automatically.
You can gracefully kill network sockets (amongst other things) in any number of places as the application prepares to exit or enter the background via callbacks in your application delegate:
applicationWillResignActive:
applicationWillEnterBackground:
applicationWillTerminate:
Potentially reconstruct sockets in:
applicationDidBecomeActive
applicationWillEnterForeground
Have you tried not allowing the app to run in the background? Then it will be killed whenever the user exits to the home screen. This might be a bit aggressive, but would solve the problem. From Apple's opting out of background execution:
"If you do not want your application to remain in the background when
it is quit, you can explicitly opt out of the background execution
model by adding the UIApplicationExitsOnSuspend key to your
application’s Info.plist file and setting its value to YES.
When an application opts out, it cycles between the not running,
inactive, and active states and never enters the background or
suspended states.
When the user taps the Home button to quit the application, the
applicationWillTerminate: method of the application delegate is called
and the application has approximately five seconds to clean up and
exit before it is terminated and moved back to the not running state."
See also: How to prevent my app from running in the background on the iPhone
The documentation is pretty explicit about this, "There is no API provided for gracefully terminating an iOS application." See Technical Q&A QA1561
How do I programmatically quit my iOS application?.
To be blunt, terminating an app to cleanup a socket is just like dealing with memory management by forcing an app to exit instead of calling release.
What about bringing up a modal view controller telling the user to quit the application? You could make this view controller without any dismiss button, so the user is obligated to kill the app.
I have an iphone app that has a 30second process that does some network IO. Basically, while the app is in the background, i want this process to run every hour (actually once a day, but if it fails i want it to re-run in an hours time).
With the background features of ios 4, is this possible? If so, how? What are the limitations that i'll come up against?
Thanks so much!
Take a look at Apple's documentation about running code in the background.
http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/iphone/conceptual/iphoneosprogrammingguide/BackgroundExecution/BackgroundExecution.html
There are few different ways of approaching backgrounded tasks. The only apps that can have fully backgrounded processes are "audio", "voip" and "location" apps, and this needs to be declared in the Info.plist.
If your app is not of this type, you'll probably find it difficult to do what you want easily. There are methods which allow you to keep your app alive in the background for a finite period of time (also at that link), but eventually your app will be shut down.
Local Notifications will only prompt the user to open the app - do you really want to have an alert pop-up on the phone every 30 seconds?
I was making some kind of similar research, have a look at this SO answer in case you didn't manage to find it before. Applications like DataMan or Data Usage must have some sort of periodic code execution in the background, so I'm not 100% convinced that what you're asking for is impossible..
I believe that Using Local notifications will help....
check following....
http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/NetworkingInternet/Conceptual/RemoteNotificationsPG/IPhoneOSClientImp/IPhoneOSClientImp.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40008194-CH103-SW1
An application can create and schedule a local notification, and the operating system then delivers it at the schedule date and time. If it delivers it when the application is not active in the foreground, it displays an alert, badges the application icon, or plays a sound—whatever is specified in the UILocalNotification object. If the application is running in the foreground, there is no alert, badging, or sound; instead, the application:didReceiveLocalNotification: method is called if the delegate implements it.
The delegate can inspect the properties of the notification and, if the notification includes custom data in its userInfo dictionary, it can access that data and process it accordingly. On the other hand, if the local notification only badges the application icon, and the user in response launches the application, the application:didFinishLaunchingWithOptions: method is invoked, but no UILocalNotification object is included in the options dictionary.
I am writing an application that records a users position at regular intervals whilst walking. I am using an NSTimers to schedule "startUpdatingLocation" followed by calling "stopUpdatingLocation" shortly afterwards to save as much battery as possible.
I want the user to be able to start the application and lock the phone thereby putting the application in an inactive state. My question is when this happens my application (when running via Xcode) seems to continue as normal, but I am curious if there are any differences in the way the application runs in this state as apposed to when the application is running as active?
From the docs it only mentions "applicationWillResignActive" with regards to the application passing through that state on its way to the background. I am more interested in how an application behaves when a used locks the UI and puts the phone away, I just want to make sure its going to keep doing what it should be doing or do I need to take extra measures?
When you app hits applicationWillResignActive it can continue to receive location updates if you use the UIBackgroundModes option in your apps info.plist.
Add the location key.
It is important that you do not use a timer in the background as timers will run but hold their "fire" until the app becomes active again. Thus you will only get one read when the user comes back to the app. The GPS location accuracy level is what will drive how much the battery is affected.
In your app description in the App Store, Apples requires:
Continued use of GPS running in the
background can dramatically decrease
battery life.
You app will not be allowed to go live until the above text is in the description for the user to read.
You should definitely be testing this on a device. The simulator doesn't auto-lock, for instance.
applicationWillResignActive is called when the user presses the home button, when another app fires a notification the user accepts (including when a call comes in), and when the device locks.
Look into the multitasking documentation, and what it has to say about background location updates.
My suggestion is that you conserve the user's battery by:
- starting a timer, which when fired, starts location updates (and stops the timer)
- when you get an adequately-accurate position record, stop location updates and restart the timer
- if location updates fail, restart the timer for a longer period. Maybe they're underground.
The most efficient approach is using significant location update service while your application is in the background or the screen is locked on your app. You might get one update every ten minutes or so.
Remember also, the user can disable your app's location services permissions. Especially these days...
I can't seem to find a clear answer to this-- I'm spec'ing out an iPhone app that I'd like to have live in the background and notify the user at certain periods throughout the day. So the user would launch the app in the morning and then continue to use their phone, then every few hours the app would pop open a notification dialog.
Will my app ever be shut down (automatically) by the OS? Or will it just live forever, notifying user when it needs to?
thanks,
Eric
Basically there are three kinds of running in the background on iOS 4:
Running in the background to "finish" stuff (e.g. upload a posting or a picture, finish processing something etc.). You ask the OS to grant you extra time after the user switches to another app, and it will tell you how much time you got. You can't run in the background for an indefinite time.
Running in the background to do specific stuff: VoIP, tracking location (e.g. for GPS navigation), or playing audio. You can only do the stuff that you told the OS you would do in the background.
Local notifications (UILocalNotification). From your description, this is what you're looking for. You're not actually running, you just schedule notifications, and when it's time to notify the user, they'll be notified and can go to your app. If you need to notify the user dynamically (i.e. you don't know ahead at what times they need to be notified and it's not location or VoIP triggered), you might want to look into push notifications.
Apple has a good overview here:
https://developer.apple.com/documentation/uikit/app_and_environment/scenes/preparing_your_ui_to_run_in_the_background/about_the_background_execution_sequence