Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 14 years ago.
Improve this question
The problem is that AdSense has to crawl your pages to make suitable ads. If I have dynamic content or user-generated content, then AdSense is not suitable. How can I modify my site so that it is accessible to the Adsense crawlers, or should I approach the problem of monetizing my site from another angle?
does your content require a login?
If not then theres no reason Google can't crawl it. Just because its dynamic or user generated doesnt mean google can't see it.
If it doesn't require a login and Google still cant crawl your site, then you have done something wrong and your site is not SEO'd very well in the first place.
As far as other ad networks go, heres a few off the top of my head
Burst Media
ValueClick Media
Casale Media.
Though keep in mind these are usually much harder to join then Adsense.
Related
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
Sometimes, when you would like to publish a video, an audio item, a widget, etc., on your website, you're provided with code between <iframe> and </iframe> which you can copy into your website.
I thought it would be really cool if social networks such as Facebook, Google Plus and Twitter allowed us to post such code in our posts, status updates and tweets.
I'm not seeing this happen and I don't understand why?!?
Does anyone know?
UPDATE: Because an iframe can't contain anything that you couldn't post on a web page, I didn't think there would be any security issues. It's really sad that the BIG players are so closed minded. We could do lots of interesting things if they weren't so eager to control everything: for example sharing widgets of 3D products we could print and which may be found on http://www.shapeways.com/featured?li=nav or elsewhere. I find that we're being limited right now, because the BIG players are so busy creating proprietary silos, each one having his own app store and proprietary data formats. Personally, I'm all for open source software and open data we can all share and experience without being locked-in. There seems to be no shared vision for an integrated www where html pages representing widgets may be embedded inside other html pages. This would also be interesting in the field of data visualisation as the widget could be built on javascript frameworks such as those listed here: http://sixrevisions.com/javascript/20-fresh-javascript-data-visualization-libraries/ The www would undoubtedly be a lot richer and more interesting. IMHO the web shouldn't belong to any few major companies, because we ALL make the web what it is.
The simple answer is that these sites do not want you to be able to display anything that you want on their real estate. There are also security concerns in some situations, such as embeddeding something that looks like a log in form, but is really a phishing attack or other issues with it seeming to appear like legitimate content.
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
I just found out about Facebook Offers, which seem pretty interesting. I know how to create one, my question is, once created, does it have a permanent link? I want to link to this Facebook Offer from a link inside my blog.
Thanks
Themos
Yes, it creates a permanent link.
As an example, here's a permanent link to a Facebook Offer by a bagel shop.
When you create an offer it does get a permanent serialized link that you can share outside of Facebook (hence the Sharing utility). According to this Facebook documentation you can stop an offer and the link will still be available/visible but no one can claim the offer. You can delete the offer and the permanent link will most likely 404.
Resources:
For more information and a detailed look at Facebook Offers I found this blog entry helpful.
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I'd like to create a Faceook application which is same like Socialcam but in a different aspect, which is sports.
I can get the user Page Likes which are sports and create the video playlist according to them, in the process or creating the list of videos I would like to use Gdata api and use Youtube to pull youtube videos.
Is that possible and is there any restrictions on that from the Youtube?
Thanks all
Edit:
It seems this is not possible as far as I can see by Googling and reading their Terms because I need to run Ads on my site.
Using YouTube videos in a Facebook application is quite possible and relatively very easy (though you need to check each one has the embed flag set).
Whether you are allowed to depends on whether your application is monetised (i.e. runs ads or the user pays for it) and if the videos are the main content where they're displayed within it. The full terms of service are available at http://www.youtube.com/t/terms
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 11 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm looking for an authoritative source on which browsers people browse facebook with. Specifically, I'm curious what percent IE6 and IE7 are at.
I constantly run into issues with IE7 on Facebook, and am trying to determine if it's worth my time to search for solutions.
I doubt if Facebook would release that private information.
You could use your own web server's log files (the server that hosts your facebook app) and get stats from those files. But I presume, you don't have access to those. So you might be able to make a guess by checking out the global stats here: http://www.w3counter.com/globalstats.php or http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp
EDIT
Some information from a hosting company about its Facebook stats. However, this information is from 2009. :|
https://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=94523840758
Facebook has announced they are dropping support for IE7 (they already no longer support IE6). They have not announced numbers as far as I know. I doubt it will be worth it for you to support it as well for your Facebook app.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
I am thinking of putting together an app that will be pulling data from a very popular website. I have already looked at search and responses from the site and believe it can be done.
The only one question I have is, will apple have a problem with me doing this? The website more than likely will NOT give me permission to skim, but its public information so.... Will apple reject my app because I am skimming another site for data?
I would setup my own server to do the skimming but I am sure this website will see my ip hitting their servers a billion time a day (hopefully :) and ban my ip, so I plan on having the iphone itself skim the site.
Apple probably won't have an issue with this, but the website probably will. Most websites hate scrapers and put it in their terms of service that you're not allowed to scrape.
Apple only reject apps like this if they scrape Apple websites. Apple aren't bothered if you scrape someone else's site.