I am new to iPhone and objective c. I have spent hours and hours and hours reading documents and trying to understand how things work. I have RTFM or at least am in the process.
My main problem is that I want to understand how to specify where an event gets passed to and the only way I have been able to do it is by specifying delegates but I am certain there is an easier/quicker way in IB.
So, an example.
Lets say I have 20 different views and view controllers and one MyAppDelegate.
I want to be able to build all of these different Xib files in IB and add however many buttons and text fields and whatever and then specify that they all produce some event in the MyAppDelegate object. To do this I added a MyAppDelegate object in each view controller in IB's list view. Then I created an IBAction method in MyAppDelegate in XCode and went back to IB and linked all of the events to the MyAppDelegate object in each Xib file.
However when I tried running it it just crashed with a bad read exception.
My guess is that each Xib file is putting a MyAppDelegate object pointer that has nothing to do with the eventual MyAppDelegate adress that will actually be created at runtime.
So my question is...how can I do this?!!!
If you create an instance of MyAppDelegate in each nib file then, yes, you do end up with a lot of different instances of the class when all the nibs load. The app delegate is not identified by class or even protocol but rather by being the object pointed to by the application instance's delegate property. To find the true app delegate, you have have to ask the application object itself for its delegate
You should have all your view controllers descend from a parent view controller class that has an appDelegate property. Implement something like this:
#import "MyAppDelegateClass.h"
#interface ViewControllerBaseClass :UIViewController {
MyAppDelegateClass *appDelegate;
}
#property(nonatomic, retain) *appDelegate;
#end
#implementation ViewControllerBaseClass
#synthesize appDelegate;
-(MyAppDelegateClass *) appDelegate{
self.appDelegate=(MyAppDelegateClass *)[[UIApplication sharedInstance] delegate];
return appDelegate;
}
#end
When the view controller needs the app delegate it just calls self.appDelegate. If you want to access an attribute of the app delegate use self.appDelegate.attributeName.
The important thing is that you ask the application for its specific delegate instance at runtime. You can't do that from a nib file.
I'm not entirely clear what exactly you're trying to do, but it's probably a bad idea. There should only be one app delegate per application, and it should deal with behavior for the whole application. Typically, the app delegate initializes the root view controller(s) and displays them, but not much else (other than handling things like opening and saving data sources).
The view controllers (subclasses of UIViewController) should interact with the XIBs. Having the view-specific behavior in the view controllers makes the app much easier to manage and maintain. Typically, there should be 0 or 1 XIBs per view controller (more than that is complicated). You set up the interaction with the views using the Target/Action pattern with IBOutlets and IBActions (see here for a complete guide). It's generally a bad idea to make view controllers or XIBs dependent on the app delegate (since reducing dependencies again makes the code easier to manage).
In general you should be making a view controller for each of the views you are building, and link events to those view controllers - not the app delegate. In fact usually no event ever is wired to the app delegate from any nib file, even in the sample projects you'll note that view controllers are created and held onto by the app delegate, but it does not receive events.
Related
I'm pretty new to iOs development and I've become a bit confused how should I separate my code to avoid a huge ViewController.m-file. Currently my main viewcontroller has quite a many delegates:
#interface ViewController : UIViewController <MKMapViewDelegate, HttpClientDelegate, CLLocationManagerDelegate, NSFetchedResultsControllerDelegate>
I would like to reduce the viewController code and I guess I should create separate classes to handle delegate tasks. The problem is that if I for example create singleton class for CLLocationManager and let it implement delegate methods, how do I then communicate with the view controller?
Let's say that my CLLocationManager receives a location update, how do I tell the viewController to make changes to the UI? Should I use NSNotificationCenter to post a notification and then add observer to the view controller? Or is the best way just to let viewController implement all delegate methods as it is now?
Move some of that functionality into your data model.
It's hard to say how you should manage this given the limited information you've provided, but one has to wonder whether a single view controller should really be managing a map view and keeping track of location and managing a HTTP connection and managing a Core Data fetch. Why not move some of that into your model, where it'll be somewhat easier to divide into modules?
Let's say that my CLLocationManager receives a location update, how do
I tell the viewController to make changes to the UI? Should I use
NSNotificationCenter to post a notification and then add observer to
the view controller?
A notification would be a good solution -- it provides a way for the part of your program that manages location (again, this probably belongs in the model) to communicate the change without having to know anything in particular about the parts of the program that care about changes to location. It also allows one-to-many communication -- if you have another view controller that also cares about location, it can observe the same notification.
Or is the best way just to let viewController implement all delegate methods as it is now?
I try to think about dividing responsibilities appropriately more than limiting the size of the code. If you have a class that does one job but needs a lot of code to do it, that's fine. If you have one class that manages many unrelated things, that's not so good. The trouble is that a lot of jobs seem to fall into the traditional "manages a screenful of content" role of a view controller. Try to separate the task of managing the presentation of the data (which is the view controller's rightful job) from managing the data itself (which is the model's job).
Implement a class responsible for delegate methods:
#interface DelegateManager : NSObject <MKMapViewDelegate, HttpClientDelegate, CLLocationManagerDelegate, NSFetchedResultsControllerDelegate>
-(id)initWithViewController:(ViewController*)vc;
#property (weak) ViewController *delegate;
#end
In your ViewController:
#interface ViewController : UIViewController
-(void)doSomething;
#end
In your ViewController, create an instance of DelegateManager with self as parameter. Set all your delegates' target to your DelegateManager. In the delegate methods of your DelegateManager, call [self.delegate doSomething]; to communicate back to your ViewController.
I'm trying to get an instance of my AppDelegate accessible to all methods in each ViewController that I have. If I try to declare it with other class variables I get Initializer Element is not a compile-time constant. If I declare it in a method within the ViewController however I am able to use it. I am trying to save integers and floats to properties I have set up in the AppDelegate (a big no-no I know, but this is a project for an introductory class and I'm not expected to get too advanced, especially since everything we've done so far is not compliant with the MVC paradigm). The app uses a toolbar to switch between views using the app's ViewController to load the other ViewControllers as subviews. I was going to put the AppDelegate declaration and update statements in the ViewDidUnload method of each view controller, but I'm not sure that the Views are unloaded whenever they are switched (they're switched by removing the current View from the SuperView and loading the new one as a Subview at index 0). What happens to the views that are not currently being viewed then? Is there a method that detects that that I could implement the AppDelegate declaration and updates into?
I guess ideally I'd like to be able to access the AppDelegate object in any method in my ViewControllers because I have a lot of quantities being updated throughout and would like to have those quantities updated in the AppDelegates values as soon as they happen, since I'm not sure what happens with a View is cleared from SuperView
Thanks in advance everyone
You can access your app delegate via [[UIApplication sharedApplication] delegate] from anywhere in your application.
You should never instantiate another copy of the object on your own. The system does this for you at startup.
As for detecting changes, you can override the viewDidDisappear method of UIViewController. (You're correct--in general, they will not be unloaded when switched, and viewDidUnload will not be called)
I'm having this problem because I originially made everything in the main NIB, but then after reading learned that it is better to use subviews.
I've got my IBActions in the AppDelegate, and I've successfully connected and loaded my subviews. However, when I try to connect my buttons in the subviews to the IBActions in the AppDelegate, the IBActions appear under the "First Responder". They seem to connect fine, but when running the application they do not trigger the IBActions (I've confirmed this with some NSLogs, it's not an error in the code within the IBActions). What am I doing wrong?
Thanks!
The AppDelegate should only be used for very specific items such as implementing the UIApplicationDelegate protocol (i.e. methods like applicationDidFinishLaunching) or in some cases storing global variables.
You should keep IBActions and other outlets in their respective view controller files (i.e. if you created MyViewController.h and MyViewController.m which are linked with MyViewController.xib where you have some buttons, images, etc.). They can then be hooked up via dragging the inspector control you want (i.e. TouchUpInside) to the File's Owner.
Something you should read to better understand view controllers: http://developer.apple.com/iphone/library/featuredarticles/ViewControllerPGforiPhoneOS/Introduction/Introduction.html
Typically it is best to create a unique view controller for each view you will present to the user. For instance, if I had a main screen and then an "about" or a settings screen, I would make each of those their own view controller. It helps organize things better than using one view with a whole bunch of subviews that you hide/show and will also improve loading times and general performance.
Update for your 2nd question in the comments about accessing the app delegate:
First, you need to import the .h file (i.e. #import "AppDelegate.h") for the app delegate into whichever view controller .m file you wanna use to access whatever variables, arrays, etc you have stored in the app delegate files. Make sure you synthesize whichever objects you create in the app delegate's .h file in the app delegate's .m file so the getters and setters are created (so you can access them).
Then in the view controller .m file, in whichever method you are using:
-(void)someMethod {
// here we just create a shortcut to the app delegate called "theAppDelegate"
YourAppDelegateFileNameHere *theAppDelegate = (YourAppDelegateFileNameHere *)[[UIApplication sharedApplication] delegate];
// now you can use the dot notation if you wanna access a variable
int SomeNewInteger = theAppDelegate.someIntegerYouHaveStored;
// or some array you have stored
return [theAppDelegate.someArrayYouCreated count];
}
Hope that helps!
I am trying to call a method in my root view controller from a child view controller such that when I change my options they will automatically update the root view, which will in turn update several other view controllers. For the second part I have used notifications, but for this first I am trying to use a delegate because it (so I have been lead to believe) is a good programming practice. I am having trouble making it work and know that I can set up another notification easily to do the job. Should I continue trying to implement the delegate or just use a notification?
Delegating is a good programming practice for many situations but that doesn't mean you have to use it if you're not comfortable with it. Both delegating and notifications help decouple the view controllers from each other, which is a good thing. Notifications might be a little easier to code and offer the advantage that multiple objects can observe one notification. With delegates, such a thing cannot be done without modifying the delegating object (and is unusual).
Some advantages of delegating:
The connection between delegating object and delegate is made clearer, especially if implementing the delegate is mandatory.
If more than one type of message has to be passed from delegatee to delegate, delegating can make this clearer by specifying one delegate method per message. For notifications, you can use multiple notification names but all notifications end up in the same method on the side of the observer (possibly requiring a nasty switch statement).
Only you can decide what pattern is more appropriate for you. In any case, you should consider not having your view controller send the notification or the delegate message. In many cases, the view controller should change the model and then the model should inform its observers or its delegate that it has been changed.
Implementing a delegate pattern is simple:
In your ChildViewController.h, declare the delegate protocol that the delegate must implement later:
#protocol ChildViewControllerDelegate <NSObject>
#optional
- (void)viewControllerDidChange:(ChildViewController *)controller;
#end
At the top of the file, create an instance variable to hold the pointer to the delegate in your ChildViewController:
#protocol ChildViewControllerDelegate;
#interface ChildViewController : UIViewController {
id <ChildViewControllerDelegate> delegate;
...
}
#property (assign) id <ChildViewControllerDelegate> delegate;
...
#end
In RootViewController.h, make your class conform to the delegate protocol:
#interface RootViewController : UIViewController <ChildViewControllerDelegate> {
...
In the RootViewController implementation, implement the delegate method. Also, when you create the ChildViewController instance, you have to assign the delegate.
#implement RootViewController
...
// in some method:
ChildViewController *controller = [[ChildViewController alloc] initWithNibName:...
controller.delegate = self;
...
- (void)viewControllerDidChange:(ChildViewController *)controller {
NSLog(#"Delegate method was called.");
}
...
In the ChildViewController implementation, call the delegate method at the appropriate time:
#implementation ChildViewController
...
// in some method:
if ([self.delegate respondsToSelector:#selector(viewControllerDidChange:)]) {
[self.delegate viewControllerDidChange:self];
}
...
That's it. (Note: I have written this from memory so there are probably some typos/bugs in it.)
I would like to add:
objects receiving notifications can
react only after the event has
occurred. This is a significant
difference from delegation. The
delegate is given a chance to reject
or modify the operation proposed by
the delegating object. Observing
objects, on the other hand, cannot
directly affect an impending
operation.
Typically, if you need to update the UI based on a change to data in a model, you would have the view controllers observe the relevant model data and update their views when notified of changes.
I see delegation as a bit more formal and like the distinction that Peter Hosey shared recently:
The difference is that delegation is
for to-one (and bidirectional)
communication, whereas notifications
are for to-many, unidirectional
communication.
Also, I have found that (completely) updating the view in viewWillAppear: works fine (but this is not the best solution where performance is a concern).
Notifications can make the runtime behavior of your program significantly more complex. Think of it like a goto with multiple destinations. The order of those destinations is not defined. If you ever crash there is little stack trace information.
There are cases when it makes sense to use notifications--the typical one being to communicate a model change or a global state change to your views. Example, the network is down, the application will resign, etc!
It is worthwhile to learn the delegate pattern in iOS. Delegates give you complete stack traces when you debug. They result in significantly simpler runtime behavior while still achieving the goal of decoupling your objects.
Delegates are a little hard to get used to, but I think it's the best practice and, like Apple, they just work.
I always use the formal protocol declaration. It's a bit more logical in my mind, and it's very clear in the code. I suggest using a UIView to change your options instead of a controller. I always use one main controller and have a lot of subclassed UIViews that the one controller can control. (However, you can modify the following code for a controller, if you really need a controller instead of a normal view.) In the header file of the child view, make it look like this:
// ChildView.h
#import <UIKit/UIKit.h>
#protocol ChildViewDelegate; // tells the compiler that there will be a protocol definition later
#interface ChildViewController : UIView {
id <ChildViewDelegate> delegate;
// more stuff
}
// properties and class/instance methods
#end
#protocol ChildViewDelegate // this is the formal definition
- (void)childView:(ChildView *)c willDismissWithButtonIndex:(NSInteger)i; // change the part after (ChildView *)c to reflect the chosen options
#end
The method between #protocol and the second #end can be called somewhere in the implementation of the ChildView, and then your root view controller can be the delegate that receives the 'notification.'
The .m file should be like this:
// ChildView.m
#import "ChildView.h"
#implementation ChildView
- (id)initWithDelegate:(id<ChildViewDelegate>)del { // make this whatever you want
if (self = [super initWithFrame:CGRect(0, 0, 50, 50)]) { // if frame is a parameter for the init method, you can make that here, your choice
delegate = del; // this defines what class listens to the 'notification'
}
return self;
}
// other methods
// example: a method that will remove the subview
- (void)dismiss {
// tell the delegate (listener) that you're about to dismiss this view
[delegate childView:self willDismissWithButtonIndex:3];
[self removeFromSuperView];
}
#end
Then the root view controller's .h file would include the following code:
// RootViewController.h
#import "ChildView.h"
#interface RootViewController : UIViewController <ChildViewDelegate> {
// stuff
}
// stuff
#end
And the implementation file will implement the method defined in the protocol in ChildView.h, because it will run when the ChildView calls for it to be run. In that method, put the stuff that happens when you'd get the notification.
In this case, you don't need to use either delegation or notification because you don't really need to communicate directly between your views. As gerry3 said, you need to change the data model itself and then let all other views respond to that change.
Your data model should be an independent object that all your view controllers have access to . (The lazy way is to park it as an attribute of the app delegate.) When the user makes a change in View A, View A's controller writes that change to the data model. Then whenever Views B through Z open up, their controllers read the data model and configure the views appropriately.
This way, the neither the views, nor their controllers need to be aware of each other and all changes occur in one central object so they are easily tracked.
Is it really necessary for your root view controller to know about the changes, or just the subviews?
If the root controller does not have to know, having the settings send out the notifications the other views are looking for seems like a better answer to me, as it simplifies code. There is no need to introduce more complexity than you have to.
I have an app with a root view controller, a primary view controller, and a secondary view controller. I would like to be able to send a message to the primary view controller from the secondary view controller. How can I get a reference to the primary so that I can send messages to it? Is there a better way to architect this?
The short answer: you can get back to your application delegate like this:
YourAppDelegate *delegate = [[UIApplication sharedApplication] delegate];
You likely already have a pointer to your root view controller in your application delegate class. And you probably have pointers to your primary and secondary view controllers in the root controller object. So, you could write code like this:
SecondaryViewController *primary = delegate.rootController.primaryController;
You can then send messages to it to your heart's content. No outlets required; just properties to each view controller.
There are many longer answers and also a discussion about why this practice might be questionable since it introduces potentially unwanted linkages between objects. In a "pure" object oriented design, you'll follow a clean design pattern with clear linkages between objects in various directions allowing you to better reuse the code.
Another option is to pass in pointers to the objects the class will need at initialization time. Implement a new initWithSomethingOrOther for your view controller classes and pass objects in as parameters. Cache these pointers you need (don't forget to retain them) for later use.
The clean way to do it is to define a protocol for a delegate for the secondary controller which lists the methods it needs the primary controller to provide:
#protocol SecondaryControllerDelegate <NSObject>
- (void)secondaryController:(SecondaryController*)secondaryController
frobFooWithBar:(Bar*)myBar;
- (BOOL)secondaryController:(SecondaryController*)secondaryController
shouldTwiddleBaz:(Baz*)currentBaz;
#end
Now add a delegate property to the SecondaryController:
#interface SecondaryController : UIViewController {
id <SecondaryControllerDelegate> delegate;
...
}
// delegates are one of the few places you don't retain an object
#property (assign) id <SecondaryControllerDelegate> delegate;
...
In SecondaryController's implementation section, synthesize the delegate property. (Do not release it in the destructor.) When SecondaryController needs to communicate with the PrimaryController, it should call the appropriate method on the delegate.
Now make your PrimaryController implement the SecondaryControllerDelegate protocol:
#interface PrimaryController : UIViewController <SecondaryControllerDelegate> {
...
Implement the delegate methods in PrimaryController.
Finally, have your PrimaryController set itself as the SecondaryController's delegate. Exactly how you do this will depend on whether you create SecondaryController in a nib or not. If you do, make the connection there; if not, make it just after you allocate and init the SecondaryController.
Why do you do this song and dance? Well, when you have to introduce another controller between the Primary and Secondary, or use the Secondary elsewhere in the app, or even use the Secondary in another app (I have one controller that gets used in three of my four apps), you don't have to change SecondaryController at all; you just change whatever class should now be its delegate. This is an incredible time saver in the long run.
If the controllers are loaded from a NIB, you could define an outlet on the secondary controller and connect it to the primary controller in interface builder.
Use NSNotificationCenter for decoupled communication between objects.