I have a strongly typed partial view CheckBox.ascx that renders a checkbox. This is used by another partial view that renders a list of checkboxes using CheckBox.ascx.
I am having problems figuring out how to use the Html.Label helper method to get labels working correctly, i.e. setting the label for property to be the id of the related checkbox.
My view markup for the checkbox looks like this:
(I'm using non-sequential list binding as described under Non-Sequential Indices)
<%= Html.CheckBox(string.Format("checkBoxes[{0}].Checked", Model.Id), Model.Checked)%>
The complexity here is that my checkbox ID will be mangled - [, ], . characters replaced with _.
Can the Html.Label helper method help me here?
My solution was to manually code the label element...
<label for="<%= string.Format("checkBoxes_{0}__Checked", Model.Id)%>"><%= Html.Encode(Model.Label)%></label>
(noting that the ., [ and ] characters in the checkbox name get rendered as underscores)
Related
In Chrome DevTools, the element tab shows the constructed DOM and I can click on elements in the DOM which also highlights the element on the page. Image of both versions shown in DevTools
If the DOM shows:
<input class="gLFyf">
Then the page highlight will show:
input.gLFyF
I realise these are two ways of writing the same thing, I also realise the former is HTML style and the latter follows CSS conventions. However, I lack the vocabulary to properly refer to either.
What do I call each format?
Eg. would it make sense to refer to <input class="gLFyf"> as HTML syntax and input.gLFyF as CSS syntax? Is there a more widely accepted way to differentiate and name them?
gLFyf is the name of the class which is an attribute that can be referred to in the stylesheet to match styles with elements of that class on the page.
A class leads with a period (.) - whereas an ID would lead with a hash (#).
So .gLFyf is a class.
And #gLFyf would be an ID.
It is a class, whether viewing HTML markup or the DOM inspector. They both refer to the same thing as you already state.
This may be of some use/reference.
I have a simple XML view (fragment) like this:
<html:div id="holder"></html:div>
I want to add content programmatically like this:
var holder = this.byId("holder");
var label = new sap.m.Label({
text: "Label"
});
holder.addContent(label);
Effect is nothing, no error, no added content.
Why does it not work?
This is because content is not an aggregation (an easy mistake to make, since content usually is an aggregation).
sap.ui.core.HTML's content metadata object is a property of type string. From the jsdoc:
HTML content to be displayed, defined as a string.
You will need to use a different container for your label, such as sap.ui.layout.VerticalLayout, or you could just use raw HTML to stick in your holder object, rather than that sap.m.Label type.
Here is a jsbin that takes the XML view part of this question out of the equation.
Note: See #hirse's comment below for an important distinction when using html:div in XML views
The HTML element and the UI5 Controls are not directly compatible. UI5 Controls are JavaScript objects that have a render function. The render function creates a html fragment on demand. That html fragment ist then inserted into the page.
I have never tried it, but a solution could be to use the placeAt() method of your label:
label.placeAt("holder");
If you are using an XML View, the holder id will be prefixed. Then you should use something like this:
label.placeAt(this.getView().createId("holder"));
You can get DOM element of UI5 control by using getDomRef of sap.ui.core.Element class.
Then add your content to this DOM element by using placeAt()
Here is working example.
In the past I have built labels for my form like this:
<label wicket:for="name"><wicket:label><wicket:message key="name"></wicket:message></wicket:label>:</label><input wicket:id="name" type="text"/>
Do I still need to use the wicket:label tag? I am not using wicket:label in wicket 7 and it seems to work fine. I may not be understanding the purpose of using wicket:label. It seems like wicket:label is just additional markup. Below is what I am doing now. Is this correct?:
<label wicket:for="name"><wicket:message key="name"></wicket:message>:</label><input wicket:id="name" type="text"/>
This example is related to Wicket XHTML tags
Have a look at the JavaDoc of AutoLabelResolver and AutoLabelTextResolver.
The <label wicket:for="name"> is handled by AutoLabelResolver. It links the HTML label tag to the HTML form component (in your case the input tag) by filling in the correct ID in the HTML for attribute of the label. It also adds css classes to the label tag for for example errors, so you can style the text in the label tag in case of an error.
The <wicket:label> has two purposes. If you give it a value either by the key attribute (as you did) or by having some text between the tags, the text is set as the label model of the Java FormComponent, which then is used in validation messages like this '${label}' is required. (see LabeledWebMarkupContainer#setLabel and LabeledWebMarkupContainer#getLabel).
If you don't assign any text to the <wicket:label> tag, then it is used as output. That means the value of the label model of your Java FormComponent is used to replace the tag.
If you have no <wicket:label> in the HTML markup and no label model set in your Java code, then your Java FormComponent will have an empty label model and Wicket falls back to using the Wicket ID as label. So depending on how your Wicket IDs look, you will get validator messages like 'user_name' is required. instead of something nice looking like 'User name' is required.
I can't disable escaping in a Zend_Form_Element_Submit, so when the label has special characters it won't display it's value..
This is my actual Zend Form piece of code:
$this->submit = new Zend_Form_Element_Submit('submit');
$this->submit->setLabel('Iniciar Sesión');
$this->submit->setIgnore(true);
$this->addElement($this->submit);
I've tried $this->submit->getDecorator('Label')->setOption('escape', false); but I obtain an "non-object" error (maybe submit isn't using the "Label" Decorator)..
I've also tried as suggested $this->submit->setAttrib('escape', false); but no text will be shown either.. Any idea? Thanks
Should be as simple as doing this:
$element->addDecorator('Label', аrray('escape'=>false));
Or see setEscape(). http://framework.zend.com/manual/1.12/en/zend.form.standardDecorators.html
Regarding failure to retrieve named decorator... Try getDecorators() Do you see 'label' in the results?
There is no Label decorator for submit form element by default (this is why you get the error).
The $this->submit->setLabel('Iniciar Sesión'); value goes to Zend_View_Helper_FormSubmit, which always does escaping and uses the label as a value.
The helper used by the Submit element escapes by default. Unlike with the label decorator, submit labels are included in a HTML attribute so they need to be escaped.
Your label - Iniciar Sesión - is a perfectly valid UTF-8 string, so the escaped version of it will be the same. If your label is not appearing then something else is going wrong. I'd guess that your page is being served using a charset that doesn't match what Zend View is using (UTF-8 by default).
View the page source to see what actually gets output - that might give you some more clues. Alternatively if the page this form is on is public, if you can provide a URL we might be able to spot the issue.
I ran into a similar issue. In my instance, I added both a label and a description to a text field element. This line of code allowed me to turn off the html escaping for the description attached to that field element:
$form->getElement('txtUPC')->getDecorator('description')->setOption('escape', false);
In my testing, the setEscape() was not recognized by the form elements or their decorators.
Does anyone know of an easy way, using jQuery, to select all <select> elements whose val() attribute yields a certain value?
I'm trying to do some validation logic and would like to just select all those elements with a single selector, then apply a warning class to each of their parents. This I know how to do once I select all the elements, but I didn't see a selector that handles this case.
Am I going to have to select all of the <select> elements into a selector, then iterate through them and check each of their values? I was hoping there would be a simpler way.
Thanks.
Why doesn't select[value=x] work? Well firstly because <select> doesn't actually have a value attribute. There is not a single value of a select box: there may be no selected options (there shouldn't normally be, but there can be in at least IE), and, in a <select multiple>, there can be any number of selected options.
Even input[value=x] doesn't work, even though <input> does have a value attribute. Well, it does work, it just doesn't do what you think. It fetches the value of the value="..." attribute in the HTML, not the current value you have entered into the form. The value="..." attribute actually corresponds to the defaultValue property and not value.
Similarly, option[value=x][selected] doesn't work because it is checking the <option selected> attribute from the HTML source (selected attribute -> defaultSelected property) and not the current selectedness of the option (selected property not attribute) - which might have changed since the page was loaded.
Except in IE, which gets the value, selected etc form attributes wrong.
Except (again): Tesserex's example may seem to work, and the reason for that is that that it's using a non-standard jQuery-specific selector, :has. This causes the native querySelectorAll methods of modern browsers to fail, and consequently jQuery falls back to its own (native JavaScript, slow) selector engine instead. This selector engine has a bug where it confuses properties for attributes, allowing [value=x] to do what you expected, and not fail like it should! (Update: this is probably no longer the case in newer jQuery versions.)
Summary: form field state checking and selectors don't mix. Apart from these issues, you also have to worry about escaping issues - for example, what if the value you want to test against contains quotes or square brackets?
So instead, yes, you should check it manually. For example using a filter:
$('select').filter(function() {
return $(this).val()==='the target value';
}).parent().addClass('warning');
(There is a value property in HTML5 and supported by modern browsers, that when you read it gives you the value of the first selected <option>. jQuery's val() is safe to use here because it provides the same method of getting the first selected option even on browsers that don't support this.)
The existing answers don't work on select tags, but I found something that does. Ask for a select that has a selected option.
$("select:has(option[value=blah]:selected)")
You can use :
$("select[value=X]");
where X is the value against which you want to check the select's value.
Attribute selectors Is what you're looking for I believe.
Something like $+('element[attribute="value"]')
See also:
*= anywhere
^= starts with
$= ends with
~= contains word
etc.
You can create a change event that puts the value in a custom attribute on the select element whenever the value changes. You can then use a simple selector to find all of the select elements that have that value. For example:
$("select").on("change", function (e) {
var $select = $(e.currentTarget);
$select.attr("select-value", $select.val());
});
And then you can do this:
var $matches = $("select[select-value='" + searchVal + "']");
$matches will have all of your matching selects.
This is a lot easier than having to iterate through elements. Remember to set select-value to the initial value when rendering the page so you don't need to trigger a change event for each select so the select-value is set.