In this question, someone asked how to write a validation method for Core Data. I did that, and it looks cool. But one thing doesn't happen: The validation. I can easily set any "bad" value and this method doesn't get called automatically. What's the concept behind this? Must I always first call the validation method before setting any value? So would I write setter methods which call the appropriate validation method first?
And if yes, what's the point of following a strict convention in how to write the validation method signature? I guess there's also some automatic way of validation, then. How to activate this?
Validation is not "automatic" especially on iOS. On the desktop you will have the UI elements handling the call to validation. On iOS you should be calling validateValue:forKey:error: with the appropriate key and dealing with the error should there be one. The reason for this is the lack of a standard error display on iOS and the overhead of validating all values.
Note this comment in the documentation:
If you do implement custom validation methods, you should typically not invoke them directly. Instead you should call validateValue:forKey:error: with the appropriate key. This ensures that any constraints defined in the managed object model are also applied.
Related
In our implementation of the Rules Engine we have a test form similar to Rule Test Form on the online demo on "Business Rules Engine Demo". What we would like to do is conditionally show only the Test Fields for the items in use in the rule. We are doing this by grabbing the rule.definition JSON from the ruleeditor then look for the items which we can conditionally create using AngularJS's ng-if directive. This works great with Fields. If the user selects a method, our method of parsing the string is failing. What it appears is the Field Names are stored in the JSON as plain text however the Method Names are not. Is there a way we can configure the control to either A not encrypt the method names or is there a way that we can tap into the encryption to identify if a method is in use in our rule? Thanks in advance.
Methods and actions can have overloads which the Code Effects rule editor supports. Therefore, we can't have multiple menu entries with the same name. Instead, we use a signature hash on all in-rule methods and rule actions regardless of whether it has an overload or not to make them unique on the client.
You need to have either the Full Source or the Editor Source license in order to change the code to either stop that hashing, or tap into the process, or implement it your own way. You don't have that option with any other Code Effects perpetual license.
I am building simple crud for an entity. Initial state is read on particular entity(key) using view>form.bindElement('/entity(key)').
when I click on new button I clear the form and when the cancel button is clicked during the new/create process(without performing the save), how to go back to the previous entity. Is there some place ui5 stores, the previous entity or should I have some variable and assign it to the controller.previousEntity = oldsPath?
what are the different members in the oModel,it start with
a(aBindings)
b(bUseBatch)
m(mContexts)
o(oHeaders)
p(pCallAsync)
s(sPathUrl).
Is there a naming convention in these?
From what I can see, there are following things you need to notice and work upon.
Its generally not a good idea if you use the same form to display and to create/update also. A simpler approach would be to
use a new popover to show the form for create and in that case, the view binding would not be changed when you cancel the operation.
However, if you still want to use the same form, yes you would have to bind the view/form again on cancel operation. You can have a variable declared in the Component.js to store the path for you. In UI5, the model captures the current state to ensure the back the binding concept by default.
You can check all properties and their definitions here: oData Model
Yes, there is a naming convention followed here.
a - Array, s-String, b- Boolean etc.
Read more about Hungarian notations for naming conventions
The previous entity is still there in the cache (ODataModel.oData), but you'll need to re-bind it. For that purpose, as you have written, you'll need to store the path to the entity yourself. Once you bind the control, I don't think the previous binding context is stored somewhere (why should it).
I am new to tastypie. I have a tastypie model resource where I want to use hydrate() to take serialized data from the client and turn it into a proper format that the data model can use. I have tried hydrate() hydrate_foo() but it seems all the hydrate() functions are not getting called, while dehydrate() will always get called. In my resource model, there're also obj_get(), obj_update(). Are there restrictions/constraints as to how the hydrate() function should be defined in the resource model so that I could use it to manipulate data submitted by the client?
I know this post is pretty old but, since documentation and examples on Tastypie are very limited, I'm adding my small experience here.
Without code it is hard to give a proper answer but I've seen that hydrate methods are only called if we explicitly call in the obj_create function the full_hydrate method as follows:
bundle = self.full_hydrate(bundle)
I thought they were automatically called by Tastypie but it seems not the case.
I'm using the #Check annotation in order to validate my dsl. my dsl is for json.
at first the method was invoked for a specific object and once per change
but it suddenly doesn't work in the same way anymore (and i'm not sure what i've done that effected it)
the method signature is:
#Check
public void validateJson(ObjectValue object) {...}
now its entering this method for each node in the gui although i'm editing only one node
The validator works normally in this case. When Xtext re-parses your model, it cannot always avoid re-creating the EMF model that is validated in the Check expression - in other words, the model is practically re-created every time, thus warranting a full validation.
However, in some cases, it is possible that only a partial re-creation of the model is necessary - in these cases it is possible that not all elements are re-validated (however, I am not sure whether this optimization was included).
Is there any way I can use the format_number_choice function inside of a actions file. In fact I need to use it for a Form error message.
'max_size' => 'File is too large (maximum is %max_size% bytes).',
In English it's simply "bytes", but in other languages the syntax changes after a certain value (for example if the number is greater than 20 it's: "20 of bytes").
I can use parenthesis, of course, but if the framework offers support for doing this specific thing, why not to use it?!
The way it's currently implemented in the 1.4 branch, you can define only one translation per message using il18n XML files.
What you could do is create a custom validator which inherits the current validator (sfValidatorFile in your example) and does the size checking in the doClean method before calling its parent's method.
I suggest you take a look at the source to see how it works : sfValidatorFile
The correct way to handle number ranges for translation is explained here in the Definitive Guide. I won't reproduce it here as the documentation itself is clear and concise. Note however that the string is not extracted automatically by the i18n-extract task, so you need to add it manually - again, the documentation explains this.
So yes, you can use the format_number_choice() function inside an action - you just need to load the helper inside the action like this:
sfContext::getInstance()->getConfiguration()->loadHelpers('I18N');