I would like to replicate gmails functionality to "magically" not show irrelevant quoted stuff in emails but still showing mostly relevant stuff. Are there any libraries which can help me find the text that is actually new and should be shown? Or do you have any suggestions on how to proceed?
I do know which two messages belong together and which one is the answer to the other but I would love to only show relevant text.
Related
I have a heavily modified Rainloop install. Figured out a lot of ways to modify it, but having the following issue:
Rainloop shows a DKIM signature indicator (with it's own interpretation) as a green checkmark.
If you hover your mouse pointer over it (when shown), it will show a "tool-tip" of the text in that header.
The problem here is, on mobile you can't "hover", generally speaking. How can I access the header data via JS, or how can I talk to the element for the "tool-tip" for the DKIM header info so I can put a click-listener on the indicator?
It's nice they show it on the mouse-over, but I can't seem to find any way to reference it.
In addition, it would be really grand to show that info in the "info" expandable box.
This is all pertaining to the Message View in Rainloop specifically.
Really nice program. But there is no documentation on their API.
Anyone have ideas on this? I can't seem to get a handle on it through devtools.
If I could just get a solid CSS selector to reference it by that would be grand.
All I seem to be coming up with on searches are similar expressions.
Hoping maybe someone on Stack might have found a clue on this, because DKIM is important, and ordinary users need simple indications as to trust.
This is something to help other people, not just me, so if anyone has a way can you share?
Okay. So right after I posted, I did find it. Not sure how I missed it before, but the dkim results header data can be found in the "dkim icon"'s title attribute-- the "icon" is an tag (rainloop hijacks the tag as UTF8 icon containers).
So the tooltip apparently is an actual tooltip, whereas I thought it was something like a hidden div being shown on a mouse-over.
I wonder if there is a way to get it to show on a click instead of a hover (preferably using CSS).
I have a simple tab structure I like for translation access. https://myally.co/l/emailTemplates/followup.php
I send the same html/css as an email and get the following:
the tabs are not overlaid and radio buttons are not styled
the same in gmail and outlook. Hints on how to correct my html/css? Email clients ignore absolute positioning so try this other approach?
You ask a lot of questions and don't post your code as expected in Stack Overflow. This makes it really hard to know what you're doing and give you solutions.
Since you're asking questions and not posting samples, nobody will really help you because that's not the way this SO works.
To answer some of your questions:
Radio buttons do not work in email.
The JavaScript you are most likely using does not work in email.
tabbing does not work with Outlook
Absolute positioning does not work in email
Email development is not Web development. They use the same technologies in different ways.
For more help on what does and does not work, please visit https://www.campaignmonitor.com/css/.
Good luck.
I'm working with a PLC program that runs over a hundred subroutines in parallel, and each one affects the flow of the others. Countless labels and GOTOs, function calls, etc. My office desk is covered with little stickynotes to help me visualize and track the flow through the program, but it's starting to get too complex to manage that way. Has anyone ever heard of any sort of graphical flowchart-ish program to help organize stuff like that? What I'm picturing is a little text box that I can fill full of pseudocode, then link to other textboxes. Unless I'm actually working in them, the boxes stay collapsed, and you only see a title or something to show what it is. All the links connected to my "open" box are red, or bold, and all other links are dim gray, or maybe not even shown.
Does anything like this exist? I've heard that MATLAB uses something similar to what I'm picturing, but what I want is just a generic sort of "fill in your own info" program; not language-specific. I'd be tempted to make one on my own, but I'm way too busy with WORK-work to start creating NOT-AT-WORK-work for myself.
You can try Dia or yEd. Both are available for linux, I know that yEd is also for Windows. Those are diagramming tools, maybe you'll find them useful.
Graphviz http://graphviz.org/ would be a good tool to achieve this.
It allows you to write your graph descriptions as simple text and it generates and lays out the graph. It can handle pretty large and complicated flows. Here is a simple example to give you an idea of the syntax:
digraph g {
NodeA -> NodeB;
}
I was filling out a form on uSell.com to ship out an old phone and when I entered my address, a dialog box popped up telling me what I entered along with their suggestion of what to change it to. I thought this was cool and was wondering how I can replicate that in my forms.
Looks like you talking about some kind of auto-completer. This can be done in various ways, depending on the languages you are using. You can make a simple auto-completer using just html, javascript and css. More complicated auto-completers can make server side calls to search through a database etc.
Have a look at the link below, they explain a very simple auto-completer.
Related topic
Hope this helps, good luck :)
Has anyone had experience with MySource Matrix as a content management system? If so, thoughts/opinions/comments?
Thanks in advance.
Absolutely excellent. It takes little while to get used to how it does things with its asset structure, but it is really flexible and powerful. Simple edit interfaces are great too.
Make sure you give it enough hardware. If you want dynamic content without caching you need heaps of grunt to make it hum.
Hands down the best CMS I have ever used. We use it on the Pacific Union College website, as well as many side projects. I am still amazed at all it has to offer compared to other products that are not free.
Give it a good look, and take some time to get past the learning curve, but once you do, it will be more than worth it. :)
I've recently been trying to use it in an organization where many non power users are generating content. - it has many interface bugs and odd behavior, so that many simple tasks (i.e. loading images) often have to be done by an power user (i.e. me).
When you are editing the HTML of page content white space is not preserved. If you where to format the HTML in the WYSIWYG editor, save you changes, and then come back the whitespace you've added will be removed - actually when you switch the WYSIWYG editor into HTML mode it doesn't show you the exact HTML, and does some silly things - like pressing enter inserts non breaking spaces - but doesn't show them until you save and re-enter HTML mode.
it is a number of little details like this which make it generally frustrating to use and disliked by everyone here.