I have a heavily modified Rainloop install. Figured out a lot of ways to modify it, but having the following issue:
Rainloop shows a DKIM signature indicator (with it's own interpretation) as a green checkmark.
If you hover your mouse pointer over it (when shown), it will show a "tool-tip" of the text in that header.
The problem here is, on mobile you can't "hover", generally speaking. How can I access the header data via JS, or how can I talk to the element for the "tool-tip" for the DKIM header info so I can put a click-listener on the indicator?
It's nice they show it on the mouse-over, but I can't seem to find any way to reference it.
In addition, it would be really grand to show that info in the "info" expandable box.
This is all pertaining to the Message View in Rainloop specifically.
Really nice program. But there is no documentation on their API.
Anyone have ideas on this? I can't seem to get a handle on it through devtools.
If I could just get a solid CSS selector to reference it by that would be grand.
All I seem to be coming up with on searches are similar expressions.
Hoping maybe someone on Stack might have found a clue on this, because DKIM is important, and ordinary users need simple indications as to trust.
This is something to help other people, not just me, so if anyone has a way can you share?
Okay. So right after I posted, I did find it. Not sure how I missed it before, but the dkim results header data can be found in the "dkim icon"'s title attribute-- the "icon" is an tag (rainloop hijacks the tag as UTF8 icon containers).
So the tooltip apparently is an actual tooltip, whereas I thought it was something like a hidden div being shown on a mouse-over.
I wonder if there is a way to get it to show on a click instead of a hover (preferably using CSS).
Related
I am trying to get specific content on a confluence cloud wiki to display content based on a specific user. The scenario here is that there are links on a page but only 1 should display, the one that displays is based on whom ever is logged in.
I have been told how a macro is the way forward, but I have read the documentation and I am at a loss. I do not understand what I have to do or how to write a confluence macro. could someone help me out with either an example or some links? I have searched like crazy, but maybe i am not asking the right questions but hopfully you can all help me out?
There's a plugin for this:
https://marketplace.atlassian.com/plugins/net.customware.confluence.plugin.visibility
But I'm not sure how thoroughly it hides the content. It might still be visible if users view the page source. If you're trying to hide content which needs to be really protected, you'll probably need to do something else.
Depending on how many users are going to be using the page, you could also just make separate spaces for them, add the permissions to those spaces, and then use a page-include on your "main" page to display the content. If they don't have access it shouldn't show up. You might experience some formatting issues with that solution, however.
Finally, you could grab the username with jquery and display stuff based on that. This solution will be pretty easy if you are familiar with javascript/jquery.
Edit: Here are some helpful resources on how to use javascript and jquery within confluence:
https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/CONFKB/How+to+Use+JavaScript+in+Confluence
https://developer.atlassian.com/confdev/confluence-plugin-guide/writing-confluence-plugins/including-javascript-and-css-resources
I was filling out a form on uSell.com to ship out an old phone and when I entered my address, a dialog box popped up telling me what I entered along with their suggestion of what to change it to. I thought this was cool and was wondering how I can replicate that in my forms.
Looks like you talking about some kind of auto-completer. This can be done in various ways, depending on the languages you are using. You can make a simple auto-completer using just html, javascript and css. More complicated auto-completers can make server side calls to search through a database etc.
Have a look at the link below, they explain a very simple auto-completer.
Related topic
Hope this helps, good luck :)
I've been working on a simple little plugin and needed an image loader. I wanted to use the default Wordpress one so it could access the library, that was all pretty simple. All I need is the ability to select an image, nothing else is wanted.
I've managed to remove the unwanted inputs using the attachment_fields_to_edit filter, and the unwanted gallery tab with the media_upload_tabs filter, but what I can't seem to be able to remove is the other stuff on the page, Specifically I'm talking about the "Use as featured image" link and the "Save all changes" button. I'd also really like to change the button text from "Insert into Post" to something more appropriate to what the plugin is actually doing.
I've googled and dug through the WP files but didn't see anything that would let me actually change that (while I'd prefer something gracefull I'd take a simple html filter before it sends the uploader output to the browser and use regular expressions to get the job done at this rate). Best I've been able to do is remove the "Inser into Post" line of options, which isn't very helpful as then there is no wat to actually select the image.
Has anybody done this before? I'm surprised theres not a simple hook that lets you change those (or that I couldn't find a hook if there is one).
Have a look at http://shibashake.com/wordpress-theme/how-to-hook-into-the-media-upload-popup-interface and section "4. Set Our Own Action". That seems to be exactly what you're after.
I get the following errors from the Google Rich Snippet Tool for my website http://iancrowther.co.uk/
hcard
Warning: This information will not appear as a rich snippet in search results results, because it seems to describe an organization. Google does not currently display organization information in rich snippets
Warning: At least one field must be set for Hcard.
Warning: Missing required field "name (fn)".
Im experimenting with vcard and Schema.org and am wondering if I'm missing something or the validator is playing up. I have added vcard and Schema.org markup to the body which may be causing confusion. Also, I am making the assumption I can use both methods to markup my code.
Update:
I guess with the body tag, I'm just trying to let Google discover the elements which make up the schema object within the page. I'm not sure if this is a good / bad way to approach things? However it lets my markup be free of specific blocks of markup. I guess this is open to discussion but I like the idea of having a natural flow to the content that's decorated in the background. Do you think there is any negative impact? I'm undecided.
I am in favour of the Person structure, this was a good call as this is more representative of the current site content. I am a freelance developer and as such use this page as my Organisation landing page, so I guess I have to make a stronger decision of the sites goals and tailor the content accordingly, ie Organisation or Person.
I understand that there is no immediate rich snippet gains, but im a web guy so have a keen interest in these kind of things.
With schema testing, I find it easiest to start from the most obvious problem, and try to work our way deeper from there. Note, I have zero experience with hcard, but I don't believe the error you mentioned actually has anything to do with your hcard properties.
The most obvious problem I see, is that your body tag has an itemtype of schema.org\Organization. When you set an itemtype on a dom element, you are saying that everything inside of that element is going to help describe that itemtype. Since you've placed this on your body element, you are quite literally telling Google that your entire page is about an organization.
From the content of your page, I would recommend changing that itemtype to schema.org\Person. This would seem to be a more accurate description. Once you make that change and run the scanner again, you may see more errors relating to the schema and we can work through those too (for example, you'll probably need to set familname and givenName).
With all of that said, you should know that currently there are no rich snippets that you will gain from adding this schema data. Properly setting this up on your page, is only good to do, especially since we don't know what rich snippets Google or others will expose in the future, but currently you won't see any additional rich snippets in Google search results from adding these tags. I don't want to discourage you from setting this up properly but I just want to set your expectations.
I would like to replicate gmails functionality to "magically" not show irrelevant quoted stuff in emails but still showing mostly relevant stuff. Are there any libraries which can help me find the text that is actually new and should be shown? Or do you have any suggestions on how to proceed?
I do know which two messages belong together and which one is the answer to the other but I would love to only show relevant text.