Please anyone can help me to write this sql query into Linq.
select
P.ID,
P.Name,
Set_selected=
case when exists(
select C.ClassifierID
from dbo.ProductClassifiers C
where C.ProductID=130 and C.ClassifierID=P.ID)
then 'Yes' else 'No' end
from dbo.Classifier P
var retVal = (from s in dataContext.ProductClassifiers
join k in dataContext.Classifier
on s.ClassifierId equals k.Id
where s.ProductId == 30
select new {write here what values you want to get like s.Id,k.Name etc}).ToList();
Here's an attempt:
var query = from p in dataContext.Classifiers
select new {
p.ID,
p.Name,
p.Selected = dataContext.ProductClassifiers
.Where(c => c.ProductID == 130 &&
c.ClassifierID == p.ID)
.Any()
};
(That will make the Selected property Boolean rather than Yes/No, but that's usually going to be easier to work with.)
You should look at what the translated SQL looks like though, and in particular what the query plan is like compared with your original.
Untested, but hopefully works:
var q = classifier.Select(
p => new {
p.ID,
p.Name,
Set_selected = productClassifiers
.Select(c => c.ProductID == 130 && c.ClassifierID == p.ID)
.Any() ? "Yes" : "No"
}
);
The code assumes that you have two IEnumerable<T> representing the Classifier and ProductClassifiers tables.
Related
I need to count how many records in the tableA are not in the tableA, how to do this with LINQ?
with SQL I do the following way
select count(*) as total from produtoitemgrade g
where g.id not in (select idprodutograde from produtoestoque where idProduto = 12)
and g.idProduto = 12
my linq code so far.
var temp = (from a in Produtoitemgrades
join b in Produtoestoques on a.IdUnico equals b.IdUnicoGrade into g1
where g1.Count(y => y.IdProduto == 12)>0 && !g1.Any()
select a).ToList();
I tried to follow that example LINQ get rows from a table that don't exist in another table when using group by?
but an error occurs when running, how can I do this?
Thanks!
Your query should looks like the following, if you want to have the same SQL execution plan:
var query =
from a in Produtoitemgrades
where !Produtoestoques.Where(b => a.IdUnico == b.IdUnicoGrade && b.idProduto == 12).Any()
&& a.idProduto == 12
select a;
var result = query.Count();
I have the following sql, which I'm trying to translate to linq:
SELECT *
FROM [Service] s
inner join vendor v on vendorid=v.id
inner join VendorLocation vl on vl.VendorId=v.id
where s.active=1 and v.active=1 and vl.City = 'toronto' and vl.Active=1
I have a Service that belongs to a Vendor and the Vendor has Locations. I'm trying to filter the locations based on city, but the query returns results that don't satisfy the conditions in the ".Any" clause
var service = await _context.Service
.Where(s => s.Active && s.Vendor.Active)
.Include(s => s.Vendor)
.ThenInclude(s => s.VendorLocations)
.Where(s => s.Vendor.VendorLocations.Any(l => l.City == City && l.Active))
.ToListAsync();
The sql statement returns the correct results but the linq is not.
Any help is appreciated, thanks! Ben
You can try with query notation:
var query = from v in _context.Vendors
join s in v.Services on v.Id equals s.VendorId
join l in v.ServiceLocations on v.Id equals l.VendorId
where v.Active && s.Active && l.City=="Toronto"
select new {v,s,l};
var result= await query.ToLinqAsync();
Hi your using EF Core now , But
I suggest Use LINQ because its simplest
Please read this page for more
and this is sample code
var innerGroupJoinQuery2 =
from category in categories
join prod in products on category.ID equals prod.CategoryID into prodGroup
from prod2 in prodGroup
where prod2.UnitPrice > 2.50M
select prod2;
the query returns results that don't satisfy the conditions in the ".Any" clause
Those queries just aren't the same. The SQL Query returns one row per VendorLocation with additional columns from joined tables, and projects all the columns.
SELECT *
FROM [Service] s
inner join vendor v on vendorid=v.id
inner join VendorLocation vl on vl.VendorId=v.id
where s.active=1 and v.active=1 and vl.City = 'toronto' and vl.Active=1
In LINQ this would be something like
from vl in VendorLocation
where vl.Vendor.Active
&& vl.Vendor.Service.Active
&& vl.Active
&& vl.City = 'toronto'
select new
{
ServiceName = vl.Vendor.Service.Name,
ServiceDescription = vl.Vendor.Service.Description,
. . .
VendorName = vl.Vendor.Name,
VendorWhatever = vl.Vendor.Whatever,
. . .
vl.Name,
. . .
};
I have the query below, and its sql code. It's running really slow, so it was re written in sql, now I'm just not sure how to convert the sql back to a lambda expression.
This is the part of the expression giving me the problems, somewhere in
r.RecordProducts.Any()
records = records
.Include(r => r.Employer)
.Include(r => r.Contractor)
.Include(r => r.RecordProducts)
.ThenInclude(rp => rp.ProductDefendant.Defendant)
.Where(r => EF.Functions.Like(r.Employer.DefendantCode, "%" + input.DefendantCode + "%")
|| EF.Functions.Like(r.Contractor.DefendantCode, "%" + input.DefendantCode + "%")
|| r.RecordProducts.Any(rp => EF.Functions.Like(rp.ProductDefendant.Defendant.DefendantCode, "%" + input.DefendantCode + "%") && rp.IsActive == true));
the any clause does an exist and some funky stuff in the sql where clause below
SELECT [t].[Id], [t].[StartDate], [t].[EndDate], [t].[WitnessName], [t].[SourceCode], [t].[JobsiteName], [t].[ShipName], [t].[EmployerCode]
FROM (
SELECT DISTINCT [r].[RecordID] AS [Id], [r].[StartDate], [r].[EndDate], [r.Witness].[FullName] AS [WitnessName], CASE
WHEN [r].[SourceID] IS NOT NULL
THEN [r.Source].[SourceCode] ELSE N'zzzzz'
END AS [SourceCode], CASE
WHEN [r].[JobsiteID] IS NOT NULL
THEN [r.Jobsite].[JobsiteName] ELSE N'zzzzz'
END AS [JobsiteName], CASE
WHEN [r].[ShipID] IS NOT NULL
THEN [r.Ship].[ShipName] ELSE N'zzzzz'
END AS [ShipName], CASE
WHEN [r].[EmployerID] IS NOT NULL
THEN [r.Employer].[DefendantCode] ELSE N'zzzzz'
END AS [EmployerCode]
FROM [Records] AS [r]
LEFT JOIN [Ships] AS [r.Ship] ON [r].[ShipID] = [r.Ship].[ShipID]
LEFT JOIN [Jobsites] AS [r.Jobsite] ON [r].[JobsiteID] = [r.Jobsite].[JobsiteID]
LEFT JOIN [Sources] AS [r.Source] ON [r].[SourceID] = [r.Source].[SourceID]
LEFT JOIN [Witnesses] AS [r.Witness] ON [r].[WitnessID] = [r.Witness].[WitnessID]
LEFT JOIN [Defendants] AS [r.Contractor] ON [r].[ContractorID] = [r.Contractor].[DefendantID]
LEFT JOIN [Defendants] AS [r.Employer] ON [r].[EmployerID] = [r.Employer].[DefendantID]
WHERE ([r].[IsActive] = 1) AND (([r.Employer].[DefendantCode] LIKE (N'%' + 'cert') + N'%' OR [r.Contractor].[DefendantCode] LIKE (N'%' + 'cert') + N'%') OR EXISTS (
SELECT 1
FROM [Records_Products] AS [rp]
INNER JOIN [Product_Defendant] AS [rp.ProductDefendant] ON [rp].[DefendantProductID] = [rp.ProductDefendant].[DefendantProductID]
INNER JOIN [Defendants] AS [rp.ProductDefendant.Defendant] ON [rp.ProductDefendant].[DefendantID] = [rp.ProductDefendant.Defendant].[DefendantID]
WHERE ([rp.ProductDefendant.Defendant].[DefendantCode] LIKE (N'%' + 'cert') + N'%' AND ([rp].[IsActive] = 1)) AND ([r].[RecordID] = [rp].[RecordID])))
) AS [t]
ORDER BY [t].[SourceCode]
OFFSET 0 ROWS FETCH NEXT 500 ROWS ONLY
Here is the new sql that works better, just not sure how to convert it back to a lambda expression
SELECT [t].[Id]
,[t].[StartDate]
,[t].[EndDate]
,[t].[WitnessName]
,[t].[SourceCode]
,[t].[JobsiteName]
,[t].[ShipName]
,[t].[EmployerCode]
FROM (
SELECT DISTINCT [r].[RecordID] AS [Id]
,[r].[StartDate]
,[r].[EndDate]
,[r.Witness].[FullName] AS [WitnessName]
,CASE
WHEN [r].[SourceID] IS NOT NULL
THEN [r.Source].[SourceCode]
ELSE N'zzzzz'
END AS [SourceCode]
,CASE
WHEN [r].[JobsiteID] IS NOT NULL
THEN [r.Jobsite].[JobsiteName]
ELSE N'zzzzz'
END AS [JobsiteName]
,CASE
WHEN [r].[ShipID] IS NOT NULL
THEN [r.Ship].[ShipName]
ELSE N'zzzzz'
END AS [ShipName]
,CASE
WHEN [r].[EmployerID] IS NOT NULL
THEN [r.Employer].[DefendantCode]
ELSE N'zzzzz'
END AS [EmployerCode]
FROM [Records] AS [r]
LEFT JOIN [Ships] AS [r.Ship] ON [r].[ShipID] = [r.Ship].[ShipID]
LEFT JOIN [Jobsites] AS [r.Jobsite] ON [r].[JobsiteID] = [r.Jobsite].[JobsiteID]
LEFT JOIN [Sources] AS [r.Source] ON [r].[SourceID] = [r.Source].[SourceID]
LEFT JOIN [Witnesses] AS [r.Witness] ON [r].[WitnessID] = [r.Witness].[WitnessID]
LEFT JOIN [Defendants] AS [r.Contractor] ON [r].[ContractorID] = [r.Contractor].[DefendantID]
LEFT JOIN [Defendants] AS [r.Employer] ON [r].[EmployerID] = [r.Employer].[DefendantID]
LEFT JOIN (
SELECT [rp].[RecordID]
FROM [Records_Products] AS [rp]
INNER JOIN [Product_Defendant] AS [rp.ProductDefendant] ON [rp].[DefendantProductID] = [rp.ProductDefendant].[DefendantProductID]
INNER JOIN [Defendants] AS [rp.ProductDefendant.Defendant] ON [rp.ProductDefendant].[DefendantID] = [rp.ProductDefendant.Defendant].[DefendantID]
WHERE (
[rp.ProductDefendant.Defendant].[DefendantCode] LIKE (N'%' + 'cert') + N'%'
AND ([rp].[IsActive] = 1)
)
) AS RecordProduct ON [r].[RecordID] = RecordProduct.[RecordID]
WHERE ([r].[IsActive] = 1)
AND (
(
[r.Employer].[DefendantCode] LIKE (N'%' + 'cert') + N'%'
OR [r.Contractor].[DefendantCode] LIKE (N'%' + 'cert') + N'%'
)
OR RecordProduct.RecordID IS NOT NULL --OR EXISTS ( -- SELECT 1 -- FROM [Records_Products] AS [rp] -- INNER JOIN [Product_Defendant] AS [rp.ProductDefendant] ON [rp].[DefendantProductID] = [rp.ProductDefendant].[DefendantProductID] -- INNER JOIN [Defendants] AS [rp.ProductDefendant.Defendant] ON [rp.ProductDefendant].[DefendantID] = [rp.ProductDefendant.Defendant].[DefendantID] -- WHERE ([rp.ProductDefendant.Defendant].[DefendantCode] LIKE (N'%' + 'cert') + N'%' -- AND ([rp].[IsActive] = 1)) AND ([r].[RecordID] = [rp].[RecordID]) -- ) )) AS [t]ORDER BY [t].[SourceCode]OFFSET 0 ROWS FETCH NEXT 500 ROWS ONLY
)
)
The linq expression you supplied and the SQL generated do not match. For one, the linq expression is performing an Include on the various related tables which would have included all of those entity columns in the top-level SELECT which are not present in your example SQL. I also don't see conditions in the Linq expression for the Take 500 & OrderBy, or IsActive assertion on Record.
To be able to help determine the source of any performance concern we need to see the complete Linq expression and the resulting SQL.
Looking at the basis of the Linq expression you provided:
records = records
.Include(r => r.Employer)
.Include(r => r.Contractor)
.Include(r => r.RecordProducts)
.ThenInclude(rp => rp.ProductDefendant.Defendant)
.Where(r => EF.Functions.Like(r.Employer.DefendantCode, "%" + input.DefendantCode + "%")
|| EF.Functions.Like(r.Contractor.DefendantCode, "%" + input.DefendantCode + "%")
|| r.RecordProducts.Any(rp => EF.Functions.Like(rp.ProductDefendant.Defendant.DefendantCode, "%" + input.DefendantCode + "%") && rp.IsActive == true));
There are a few suggestions I can make:
There is no need for the Functions.Like. You should be able to achieve the same with Contains.
Avoid using Include and instead utilize Select to retrieve the columns from the resulting structure that you actually need. Populate these into ViewModels or consume them in the code. The less data you pull back, the better optimized the SQL can be for indexing, and the less data pulled across the wire. Consuming entities also leads to unexpected lazy-load scenarios as systems mature and someone forgets to Include a new relation.
.
records = records
.Where(r => r.IsActive
&& (r.Employer.DefendantCode.Contains(input.DefendantCode)
|| r.Contractor.DefendantCode.Contains(input.DefendantCode)
|| r.RecordProducts.Any(rp => rp.IsActive
&& rp.ProductDefendant.Defendant.DefendantCode.Contains(input.DefendantCode))
.OrderBy(r => r.SourceCode)
.Select(r => new RecordViewModel
{
// Populate the data you want here.
}).Take(500).ToList();
This also adds the IsActive check, OrderBy, and Take(500) based on your sample SQL.
Im using Linqpad to test out my EF query and I cant seem to get my end result to include a few extra columns that represent sums of a field based on different conditions
StorePaymentInvoices table contains a FK over to CustomerStatementBatchPayments. So I need to sum the CustomerStatementBatchPayment.net field if there is a corresponding value in StorePaymentInvoices
Getting the sums is turning out to be a real mess. Any suggestions?
Sometimes what is hard to do in one statement, ends up being easier done in multiple steps.
var retval = (
from a in CustomerStatementBatches
join b in CustomerStatementBatchPayments on a.ID equals b.CustomerStatementBatchID into grp1
from c in grp1
where a.CustomerStatementID == StatementId
group c by c.CustomerStatementBatchID into grp2
from e in grp2
select new {
StatementId = e.CustomerStatementBatch.CustomerStatementID,
BatchId = e.CustomerStatementBatchID,
Applied = CustomerStatementBatchPayments.Where(csbp => !StorePaymentInvoices.Select (pi => pi.CustomerStatementBatchPaymentID ).ToList().Contains(e.ID)).Sum (csbp => csbp.Net )
}
).ToList();
retval.Dump();
[ UPDATE 1]
This is what Ive done to get the "conditional" sum values and I seem to be getting the correct numbers. The resulting SQL that it generates is kinda ugly, but executes in < 1 second.
var retval1 = (
from a in CustomerStatementBatches
join b in CustomerStatementBatchPayments on a.ID equals b.CustomerStatementBatchID into grp1
from c in grp1
where a.CustomerStatementID == StatementId
group c by new { a.CustomerStatementID, c.CustomerStatementBatchID} into grp2
from e in grp2.Distinct()
select new {
StatementId = e.CustomerStatementBatch.CustomerStatementID,
BatchId = e.CustomerStatementBatchID
}
).ToList()
.Distinct()
.Select(a => new
{
StatementId = a.StatementId,
BatchId = a.BatchId,
AppliedTotal = (from b in CustomerStatementBatchPayments.Where(r => r.CustomerStatementBatchID == a.BatchId)
join c in StorePaymentInvoices on b.ID equals c.CustomerStatementBatchPaymentID
group b by b.CustomerStatementBatchID into g1
from d in g1
select new{ Total = (decimal?)d.Net}).DefaultIfEmpty().Sum (at => (decimal?)at.Total ) ?? 0.0m,
Unappliedtotal = (from b in CustomerStatementBatchPayments.Where(r => r.CustomerStatementBatchID == a.BatchId)
.Where(s => !StorePaymentInvoices.Any (pi => pi.CustomerStatementBatchPaymentID == s.ID ) )
select new{ Total = (decimal?)b.Net}).DefaultIfEmpty().Sum (at => (decimal?)at.Total ) ?? 0.0m
})
.ToList();
Try this
from a in db.CustomerStatementBatches
join b in db.CustomerStatementBatchPayments
//.Where(i => ...)
.GroupBy(i => i.CustomerStatementBatchesId)
.Select(i => new {
CustomerStatementBatchesId = i.Key,
SumOfPayments = i.Sum(t => t.Net)
}
)
into tmp from b in tmp.DefaultIfEmpty()
on a.CustomerStatementBatchesId equals b.CustomerStatementBatchesId
select new
{
StatementId = a.CustomerStatementId,
BatchId = a.CustomerStatementBatchId,
Applied = ((b == null) ? 0 : b.SumOfPayments)
}
How can I write the following subquery in Linq:
Context.Set<Process>()
.Include(...)
.Where(x => x.Activity.Name.CompareTo(Context.Set<Activity>().Where(a => a.Id == activityId).Select(c => a.Name)) > 0)
.Take(1);
This is a simplifed version of query, WHERE clause only includes the part that is not working. If I change Context.Set().... subquery to a string constant, then the query works. As it is, it gives NotSupportedException
LINQ to entities does not recognize method Set<Activity>
Try this:
(from p in context.Set<Process>().Include(...)
from a in context.Set<Activity>()
where a.Id == activityId
where p.Activity.Name.CompareTo(a.Name) > 0
select p).Take(1);