T-SQL syntax issue with "LTRIM(RTRIM())" not working correctly - tsql

What is wrong with this statement that it is still giving me spaces after the field. This makes me think that the syntax combining the WHEN statements is off. My boss wants them combined in one statement. What am I doing wrong?
Case WHEN LTRIM(RTRIM(cSHortName))= '' Then NULL
WHEN cShortname is NOT NULL THEN
REPLACE (cShortName,SUBSTRING,(cShortName,PATINDEX('%A-Za-z0-9""},1,) ''_
end AS SHORT_NAME

Judging from the code, it seems that you may be trying to strip spaces and non-alphanumeric characters from the beginning and ending of the string.
If so, would this work for you?
I think it provides the substring from the first alphanumeric occurrence to the last.
SELECT
SUBSTRING(
cShortName,
PATINDEX('%A-Za-z0-9',cShortName),
( LEN(cShortName)
-PATINDEX('%A-Za-z0-9',REVERSE(cShortName))
-PATINDEX('%A-Za-z0-9',cShortName)
)
) AS SHORTNAME

Replace TRIM with LTRIM.
You can also test LEN(cShortName) = 0

Ummm there seems to be some problems in this script, but try this.
Case
WHEN LTRIM(RTRIM(cSHortName))= '' Then NULL
WHEN cShortname is NOT NULL THEN REPLACE(cShortName, SUBSTRING(cShortName, PATINDEX('%A-Za-z0-9', 1) , ''), '')
end AS SHORT_NAME

Why do you think it is supposed not to give you spaces after the field?
Edit:
As far as I understand you are trying to remove any characters from the string that do not match this regular expression range [a-zA-Z0-9] (add any other characters that you want to preserve).
I see no clean way to do that in Microsoft SQL Server (you are using Microsoft SQL Server it seems) using the built-in functions. There are some examples on the web that use a temporary table and a while loop, but this is ugly. I would either return the strings as is and process them on the caller side, or write a function that does that using the CLR and invoke it from the select statement.
I hope this helps.

Related

By entering values into table, command line does not work [duplicate]

I have a table test(id,name).
I need to insert values like: user's log, 'my user', customer's.
insert into test values (1,'user's log');
insert into test values (2,''my users'');
insert into test values (3,'customer's');
I am getting an error if I run any of the above statements.
If there is any method to do this correctly please share. I don't want any prepared statements.
Is it possible using sql escaping mechanism?
String literals
Escaping single quotes ' by doubling them up → '' is the standard way and works of course:
'user's log' -- incorrect syntax (unbalanced quote)
'user''s log'
Plain single quotes (ASCII / UTF-8 code 39), mind you, not backticks `, which have no special purpose in Postgres (unlike certain other RDBMS) and not double-quotes ", used for identifiers.
In old versions or if you still run with standard_conforming_strings = off or, generally, if you prepend your string with E to declare Posix escape string syntax, you can also escape with the backslash \:
E'user\'s log'
Backslash itself is escaped with another backslash. But that's generally not preferable.
If you have to deal with many single quotes or multiple layers of escaping, you can avoid quoting hell in PostgreSQL with dollar-quoted strings:
'escape '' with '''''
$$escape ' with ''$$
To further avoid confusion among dollar-quotes, add a unique token to each pair:
$token$escape ' with ''$token$
Which can be nested any number of levels:
$token2$Inner string: $token1$escape ' with ''$token1$ is nested$token2$
Pay attention if the $ character should have special meaning in your client software. You may have to escape it in addition. This is not the case with standard PostgreSQL clients like psql or pgAdmin.
That is all very useful for writing PL/pgSQL functions or ad-hoc SQL commands. It cannot alleviate the need to use prepared statements or some other method to safeguard against SQL injection in your application when user input is possible, though. #Craig's answer has more on that. More details:
SQL injection in Postgres functions vs prepared queries
Values inside Postgres
When dealing with values inside the database, there are a couple of useful functions to quote strings properly:
quote_literal() or quote_nullable() - the latter outputs the unquoted string NULL for null input.
There is also quote_ident() to double-quote strings where needed to get valid SQL identifiers.
format() with the format specifier %L is equivalent to quote_nullable().
Like: format('%L', string_var)
concat() or concat_ws() are typically no good for this purpose as those do not escape nested single quotes and backslashes.
According to PostgreSQL documentation (4.1.2.1. String Constants):
To include a single-quote character within a string constant, write
two adjacent single quotes, e.g. 'Dianne''s horse'.
See also the standard_conforming_strings parameter, which controls whether escaping with backslashes works.
This is so many worlds of bad, because your question implies that you probably have gaping SQL injection holes in your application.
You should be using parameterized statements. For Java, use PreparedStatement with placeholders. You say you don't want to use parameterised statements, but you don't explain why, and frankly it has to be a very good reason not to use them because they're the simplest, safest way to fix the problem you are trying to solve.
See Preventing SQL Injection in Java. Don't be Bobby's next victim.
There is no public function in PgJDBC for string quoting and escaping. That's partly because it might make it seem like a good idea.
There are built-in quoting functions quote_literal and quote_ident in PostgreSQL, but they are for PL/PgSQL functions that use EXECUTE. These days quote_literal is mostly obsoleted by EXECUTE ... USING, which is the parameterised version, because it's safer and easier. You cannot use them for the purpose you explain here, because they're server-side functions.
Imagine what happens if you get the value ');DROP SCHEMA public;-- from a malicious user. You'd produce:
insert into test values (1,'');DROP SCHEMA public;--');
which breaks down to two statements and a comment that gets ignored:
insert into test values (1,'');
DROP SCHEMA public;
--');
Whoops, there goes your database.
In postgresql if you want to insert values with ' in it then for this you have to give extra '
insert into test values (1,'user''s log');
insert into test values (2,'''my users''');
insert into test values (3,'customer''s');
you can use the postrgesql chr(int) function:
insert into test values (2,'|| chr(39)||'my users'||chr(39)||');
When I used Python to insert values into PostgreSQL, I also met the question: column "xxx" does not exist.
The I find the reason in wiki.postgresql:
PostgreSQL uses only single quotes for this (i.e. WHERE name = 'John'). Double quotes are used to quote system identifiers; field names, table names, etc. (i.e. WHERE "last name" = 'Smith').
MySQL uses ` (accent mark or backtick) to quote system identifiers, which is decidedly non-standard.
It means PostgreSQL can use only single quote for field names, table names, etc. So you can not use single quote in value.
My situation is: I want to insert values "the difference of it’s adj for sb and it's adj of sb" into PostgreSQL.
How I figure out this problem:
I replace ' with ’, and I replace " with '. Because PostgreSQL value does not support double quote.
So I think you can use following codes to insert values:
insert into test values (1,'user’s log');
insert into test values (2,'my users');
insert into test values (3,'customer’s');
If you need to get the work done inside Pg:
to_json(value)
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/functions-json.html#FUNCTIONS-JSON-TABLE
You must have to add an extra single quotes -> ' and make doubling quote them up like below examples -> ' ' is the standard way and works of course:
Wrong way: 'user's log'
Right way: 'user''s log'
problem:
insert into test values (1,'user's log');
insert into test values (2,''my users'');
insert into test values (3,'customer's');
Solutions:
insert into test values (1,'user''s log');
insert into test values (2,'''my users''');
insert into test values (3,'customer''s');

Strip out the characters which is non numeric, dashes and pipes

I am trying to find a solution but somehow i am getting wrong output (referred some online solutions and confusing myself. please advise where i am going wrong.
I need to Strip out any characters that is non-numeric,dash "-" or pipe "|" using plsql.
As an example:
if I need to filter the string 0094-78556232_imk*.ext|4444; the output should be 0094-78556232|4444
Use REGEXP_REPLACE:
SELECT
col,
REGEXP_REPLACE (col, '[^0-9|-]', '') AS col_updated
FROM yourTable;
Demo
Don't use regexp_replace, especially if performance is important.
Instead use the standard string function TRANSLATE. Like so:
select col,
translate(col, '0123456789|-' || col, '01234567890|-') as col_updated
from yourTable;
This translates each character in the col value, according to the following scheme: 0 is translated to itself, ...., - is translated to itself. Any other character in col, which is not in this list already, is "translated" to nothing, since there is nothing for it to be translated to in the third argument to the function. So those characters that are NOT on the list are simply removed from the string.

PostgreSQL regexp.replace all unwanted chars

I have registration codes in my PostgreSQL table which are written messy, like MU-321-AB, MU/321/AB, MU 321-AB and so forth...
I would need to clear all of this to get MU321AB.
For this I uses following expression:
SELECT DISTINCT regexp_replace(ccode, '([^A-Za-z0-9])', ''), ...
This expression work as expected in 'NET' but not in PostgreSQL where it 'clears' only first occurrence of unwanted character.
How would I modify regular expression which will replace all unwanted chars in string to get clear code with only letters and numbers?
Use the global flag, but without any capture groups:
SELECT DISTINCT regexp_replace(ccode, '[^A-Za-z0-9]', '', 'g'), ...
Note that the global flag is part of the standard regular expression parser, so .NET is not following the standard in this case. Also, since you do not want anything extracted from the string - you just want to replace some characters - you should not use capture groups ().

Please explain what the sentence REPLACE(tablecolumn,CHR(13),'') really mean in db2 (Native SQL)

Please help me in understanding what does the below code really mean?
CASE WHEN REPLACE(tablename.columnname,CHR(13),'') <> ''
THEN
REPLACE(tablename.columnname,CHR(13), '')
ELSE
REPLACE(tablename.columnname,CHR(13),'')
For your reference:
tablename.columname = mara.matnr
mara is a table and matnr is a field name in the table Mara.
CHR(13) is a carriage return, sometimes seen in text fields. I've worked on a number of solutions where I had to strip those out of strings so that when I displayed them on a reporting front-end (such as Excel), they didn't go to a new row. That is essentially what this code is doing - removing carriage returns by replacing them with a zero-length string.
The CASE expression you reference above is essentially useless, since it is using the same expression in both the THEN and ELSE. The entire script could be rewritten as:
REPLACE(tablename.columnname,CHR(13),'')

list trigger no system ending with "_BI"

I want to list the trigger no system ending with "_BI" in firebird database,
but no result with this
select * from rdb$triggers
where
rdb$trigger_source is not null
and (coalesce(rdb$system_flag,0) = 0)
and (rdb$trigger_source not starting with 'CHECK' )
and (rdb$trigger_name like '%BI')
but with this syntaxs it gives me a "_bi" and "_BI0U" and "_BI0U" ending result
and (rdb$trigger_name like '%BI%')
but with this syntaxs it gives me null result
and (rdb$trigger_name like '%#_BI')
thank you beforehand
The problem is that the Firebird system tables use CHAR(31) for object names, this means that they are padded with spaces up to the declared length. As a result, use of like '%BI') will not yield results, unless BI are the 30th and 31st character.
There are several solutions
For example you can trim the name before checking
trim(rdb$trigger_name) like '%BI'
or you can require that the name is followed by at least one space
rdb$trigger_name || ' ' like '%BI %'
On a related note, if you want to check if your trigger name ends in _BI, then you should also include the underscore in your condition. And as an underscore in like is a single character matcher, you need to escape it:
trim(rdb$trigger_name) like '%\_BI' escape '\'
Alternatively you could also try to use a regular expressions, as you won't need to trim or otherwise mangle the lefthand side of the expression:
rdb$trigger_name similar to '%\_BI[[:SPACE:]]*' escape '\'