I'm attempting to use the MvcContrib TestHelper fluent route testing API, but I'm seeing odd behavior. The .WithMethod(HttpVerb) extension method does not seem to be executing as expected. Here's my controller showing (2) actions (identically named) that accept different HttpVerbs:
[HttpGet]
public ActionResult IdentifyUser()
{
return View(new IdentifyUserViewModel());
}
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult IdentifyUser(IdentifyUserInputModel model)
{
return null;
}
And here is the test that should map to the action with the [HttpPost] attribute:
MvcApplication.RegisterRoutes(RouteTable.Routes);
var routeData = "~/public/registration/useridentification/identifyuser"
.WithMethod(HttpVerbs.Post)
.ShouldMapTo<UserIdentificationController>(x => x.IdentifyUser(null));
Even though the POST HttpVerb is specified in my test, it always routes to the HttpGet method. I can even comment out the action accepting HttpPost in my controller and still have the test pass!
Is there something I'm missing here?
It might have to do with how you're registering your routes. I typically create a class that does only that. So before any tests like those above, I make sure I set up my test fixture appropriately.
[TestFixtureSetUp]
public void TestFixtureSetUp()
{
RouteTable.Routes.Clear();
new RouteConfigurator().RegisterRoutes(RouteTable.Routes);
}
My guess is that since the RouteTable handles them statically, you might be running into problems by either not adding, not clearing, or adding too many routes per your test runs.
Related
I need to run some c# code each time any page based on _layout.cshtml is viewed. I don't want to put something in every controller.cs file, just something central like you used to have in ASP.NET's MasterPage.cs
Can't get this
Run a method in each request in MVC, C#?
or this
#Html.Action in Asp.Net Core
to run, not sure if it's because they're not CORE 2.0.0, I just get a lot of compilation errors. All I want to do is be able to run some code like this
public class myClass {
public static bool returnTrue() {
return true;
}
}
every time each page is loaded.
You can accomplish this with an action filter
public class GlobalFilter : IActionFilter{
public void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext context) {
//code here runs before the action method executes
}
public void OnActionExecuted(ActionExecutedContext context) {
//code here runs after the action method executes
}
}
Then in the Startup.cs file in the ConfigureServices method you wire up the ActionFilter like so:
services.AddScoped<GlobalFilter>(); //add it to IoC container.
services.AddMvc().AddMvcOptions(options => {
options.Filters.AddService(typeof(GlobalFilter)); //Tell MVC about it
});
Then you can place code in this ActionFilter which can run before every action method and you can place code in it to run after every action method. See code comments.
Through the context parameter you have access to the Controller, Controller Name, Action Descriptor, Action Name, Request object (Including the path) and so on, so there is lots of info available for you to determine which page you want to execute the code for. I'm not aware of a specific property that will tell you if the page is using _layout.cshtml but you could probably deduce that based on the other properties I mentioned.
Enjoy.
Filter would also work, but the correct way to go in .Net Core is Middleware. You can read more about it here.
If it's something simple as your example, you can go with the first examples on the link like:
app.Use(async (context, next) =>
{
returnTrue();
await next.Invoke();
});
Let me know if it helped!
I got a problem with my WCF service. Here is the
[OperationContract]
[WebGet(UriTemplate = "/needs", ResponseFormat = WebMessageFormat.Json)]
List<CustomerNeed> getAllCustomerNeeds();
When I go on the page which call this service, I got this error
GET http://localhost:666/rest/Service1.svc/needs net::ERR_CONNECTION_RESET
When I'm trying to return a string instead of a List, it works.
CustomerNeed is a class generate from my database via EntityFramework.
In my service, I'm only calling an other method which is in an other class;
public List<CustomerNeed> getAllCustomerNeeds()
{
var needs = from cn in db.CustomerNeeds
select cn;
List<CustomerNeed> list = new List<CustomerNeed>();
foreach (CustomerNeed cusN in needs)
{
list.Add(cusN);
}
return list;
}
Maybe is it because I have a foreign key in my table CustomerNeed ?
When I do "LINQ to entities" to import my database, do I have to import tables that were created because of many to many relation ?
I will recommend you to create a simple custom class which will represent your CustomerNeeds database entity, initiate this object on the server side and pass to the client application. It can help you to avoid this problem and also it is recommended way to transfer data accross the WCF services.
In this case you need to do the next steps:
1) Create a public class CustomerNeeds and mark it with the DataContract attribute. For example:
[DataContract]
public class CustomerNeeds
{
[DataMember]
public SomeDataType PropertyName {get; set;}
}
2) Initiate this object on the service, change return datatype in getAllCustomerNeeds() method from the entity class to the newly created class CustomerNeed and pass this data to the clien
And that`s all.
You haven't shown where/what db is, but I'm assuming if you're using entity framework as your tag implies it's a entities context. You might be having some issues with the context already being disposed or not newed up correctly (though I would have expected you to receive a slightly different error if that's the case.)
It looks like you're going through some unnecessary steps in your function, I would think something like this would work:
public List<CustomerNeed> getAllCustomerNeeds()
{
using (var db = new YourContext()) // plug in your context object
{
return db.CustomerNeeds.ToList();
}
}
Additionally when you say it "works as a string" are you returning something small like "hello world"? you might need to take a look at your WCF configuration to make sure it can handle the amount of data you're trying to pass back and forth.
Hope this helps!
I'm very confused about the design of my RESTful services!
If I was doing this using vanilla MVC3/4 then I would simply have action methods marked [HTTPGet] etc. and I could have multiple Get's per controller. I this way I would organise controllers by their "meta group".
I've looked at the Web API MVC4 template and it gives me the automatic translation from an Http GET to the Getxxx() method - but this implies a single Get per controller and organising controllers by object, rather than function...which seems to make some sense.
I see many posts on adding named routes - but this seems to break the natural model of Get, Post, Put, Delete. If I do that - then aren't I (in essence) just going back to vanilla MVC4?
Is there any impact on having lots of controllers?
Am I thinking
about this correctly?
Shortly,
Is there any impact on having lots of controllers?
No
Am I thinking about this correctly?
Generally yes.
Default WebAPI/MVc template uses routing that relays on prefixes and naming GetXXX, PostXX.
RouteTable.Routes.MapRoute(
"WithActionApi",
"api/{controller}/{action}/{id}"
);
But you can create your own custom routing with action names instead. Then you uses in URL name of your action method and as you've wrote Attributes to set HTTP Verbs like [HttpGet]
RouteTable.Routes.MapRoute(
"DefaultApi",
"api/{controller}/{id}",
new { action="DefaultAction", id = System.Web.Http.RouteParameter.Optional }
);
[ActionName("DefaultAction")] //Map Action and you can name your method with any text
public string Get(int id)
{
return "object of id id";
}
[HttpGet]
public IEnumerable<string> ByCategoryId(int id)
{
return new string[] { "byCategory1", "byCategory2" };
}
Hi I am new to Spring MVC i am following Spring reference documentaion I have doubt in view resolver. Here is my sample code.
#Controller
#RequestMapping("/form")
public class MyController {
#RequestMapping(method = RequestMethod.GET)
public String setupForm() {
// do my stuff
return "myform";
}
#RequestMapping(method = RequestMethod.POST)
public String processForm(ModelMap model) {
// process form data
model.addAttribute("notification", "Successfully did it!");
return "redirect:/form";
}
}
here i am using two controllers, the first one returns "myform" and second one returns "redirect:/form". My question is, what is the difference between these two and how it works?
If you are familiar with jsp servlet, I think you can know the difference between redirect and forward, or you can get tons of answers from google. Then I want to explain a bit about how Spring does this. in setupForm method, it returns myform, then according to your view resovler configuration, it will try to find a myform.jsp or another likes this, and if your view resovler is internalresourceviewresovler, Spring will do a forward automatically and try to find this jsp in web-inf directory, if not, you have to specify a forward prefix. and for processForm method, that after return redirect:/form, it will force browser to send a new request /form to server which can be got by spring mvc and it will handle it with the related method.
I am using the Asp.Net Web Api. I would like to be able to filter out certain fields on the response objects based on the connected clients access rights.
Example:
class Foo
{
[AccessFilter("Uberlord")]
string Wibble { get; set; }
string Wobble { get; set; }
}
When returning data the filed Wibble should only be returned if the current users context can satisfy the value of "Uberlord".
There are three avenues that I am exploring but I have not got a working solution:
A custom WebApi MediaTypeFormatter.
A custom json.net IContractResolver.
Some sort of AOP wrapper for controllers that manipulates the response object
My issue with these are:
The custom formatter does not feel like the right place to do it but might be the only option.
The custom json serializer would not have access to the current context so I would have to work that out.
With the first two options you would require specific implementations for each response format, json, xml, some custom format, etc. This would mean that if another response type is supported then a custom formatter / serializer is required to prevent sensitive data leaking.
The AOP controller wrapper would require a lot of reflection.
An additional bonus would be to strip out values from the fields on an inbound request object using the same mechanism.
Have I missed an obvious hook? Has this been solved by another way?
It was actually a lot simpler than I first thought. What I did not realise is that the DelegatingHandler can be used to manipulate the response as well as the request in the Web Api Pipeline.
Lifecycle of an ASP.NET Web API Message
Delegating Handler
Delegating handlers are an extensibility point in the message pipeline allowing you to massage the Request before passing it on to the rest of the pipeline. The response message on its way back has to pass through the Delegating Handler as well, so any response can also be monitored/filtered/updated at this extensibility point.
Delegating Handlers if required, can bypass the rest of the pipeline too and send back and Http Response themselves.
Example
Here is an example implementation of a DelegatingHandler that can either manipulate the response object or replace it altogether.
public class ResponseDataFilterHandler : DelegatingHandler
{
protected override System.Threading.Tasks.Task<HttpResponseMessage> SendAsync(HttpRequestMessage request, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
{
return base.SendAsync(request, cancellationToken)
.ContinueWith(task =>
{
var response = task.Result;
//Manipulate content here
var content = response.Content as ObjectContent;
if (content != null && content.Value != null)
{
((SomeObject)content.Value).SomeProperty = null;
}
//Or replace the content
response.Content = new ObjectContent(typeof(object), new object(), new JsonMediaTypeFormatter());
return response;
});
}
}
Microsoft article on how to implement a delegating handler and add it to the pipeline.HTTP Message Handlers in ASP.NET Web API
I have a similar question in the works over here: ASP.NET WebAPI Conditional Serialization based on User Role
A proposed solution that I came up with is to have my ApiController inherit from a BaseApiController which overrides the Initalize function to set the appropriate formatter based on the user's role. I haven't decided if I will go this way yet, but perhaps it will work for you.
protected override void Initialize(System.Web.Http.Controllers.HttpControllerContext controllerContext)
{
base.Initialize(controllerContext);
// If the user is in a sensitive-data access role
controllerContext.Configuration.Formatters.Add(/*My Formatter*/);
// Otherwise use the default ones added in global app_start that defaults to remove sensitive data
}