Advice for emacs with Dvorak keyboard layout - emacs

There are lots of good discussions of emacs or of the Dvorak layout. There is even some discussion that touches on the combination, but I think it's worth pulling this into one thread so those of us using Dvorak and emacs don't have to read through dozens of pages.
I'm looking for specific pointers or general advice on using emacs with Dvorak. Emacs is extremely configurable, so I think there have to be some great tricks. What are others doing? Re-binding keys in emacs? Re-binding keys everywhere? Changing shortcuts in emacs?
Consider that many of us on Dvorak came from qwerty and some of us may go back in the future. In my case, I still have some familiarity with emacs on qwerty and I sometimes use qwerty, but not currently for emacs - muscle memory has outlasted explicit memory and my fingers sometimes go to the qwerty keys when thinking of emacs shortcuts. (Thank goodness for undo!)
My favorite thing about emacs was the many keyboard shortcuts (such as Ctl -f, -b, -p, -n, -d, etc.) and I have fully learned to touch-type Dvorak at ~ my old speed, but my brain seems to rebel at emacs shortcuts on dvorak. I learned emacs when I coded regularly ~10 years ago, but I stopped coding regularly ~5 years ago, and then I switched to Dvorak. There's good discussion of switching to Dvorak at is-the-switch-to-dvorak-worth-it, but my reason was that I wanted to a) slow myself down for a while because I was suffering from repetitive strain, and b) because I saw mixed reviews of the ergonomics of Dvorak and I wanted to give it a try. For me, it has worked really well - I recovered while slow and after getting back up to approximate full speed (~80 wpm) I can type more, longer without pain - but now that I want to code again I want to make reclaim emacs and I'm not giving up Dvorak.

Just found this question while searching for similar information. I'm a new Dvorak typist, but I've been using Emacs for a few years. The chords are burned into my brain, and I'd rather not retrain myself.
What I've found quite workable is C-\ english-dvorak (set-input-method). The keyboard is remapped to Dvorak, but the chords remain the same (that is, C-x C-f is C-(second key from l-shift) C-(fourth key from caps)). This is a very convenient middleground, giving me the option to remap keybindings in the future, but not forcing me to learn two new systems at once.
If you set the variable default-input-method to english-dvorak, you can just hit C-\ to activate it. This doesn't work if your system keyboard is also mapped to Dvorak, but it's worked for me because I do mostly everything in emacs.

I'm programming every day with Emacs on Dvorak, and I have kept the original key bindings. My main reason for not changing is to be able to use one colleague's Emacs, or start it up on an account I don't want to mess around with. I grew very accustomed of it, so I'm pretty happy with them now.
Obviously, a few one-handed short cuts became two-handed, such as C-x C-s or C-x C-c, but as Dvorak users are generally touch-typing anyway, we always have our two hands on the keyboard.
So, I can only suggest to keep trying, maybe concentrating on fewer commands at the time, and then building back?

I used Emacs for years on Qwerty, and for four years since my switch to Dvorak. I don't make any changes to the default Emacs bindings to accommodate Dvorak...I find that everything works fine as is (although I thought I might have to do something about C-f for a while, but it hasn't turned out to be a problem - that's more because of how I hold my hands than because of the keyboard layout).
On the topic of muscle memory, I don't recommend trying to rebind everything for the new layout - it's a lot of work, and it's often just much easier to change someone else's Qwerty into a Dvorak layout than it is to modify an Emacs init to suit a whole set of bindings for Dvorak, which, IMHO, isn't necessary.

While not specific to Dvorak, I just discovered the "At home modifier":
It allows keys to serve dual functions. For example, when I press space, I get a space; but if I press space in conjunction with another key, it functions as ctrl.
This makes some of the more awkward combos a bit easier to type.

I'm using mostly the default key bindings, but I found that combos starting with C-x are much more comfortable to type with this:
(keyboard-translate ?\C-t ?\C-x)
(keyboard-translate ?\C-x ?\C-t)
I only have one left Ctrl key at the Caps Lock position (since reprogramming the Truly Ergonomic keyboard to Dvorak turned right Ctrl into a dash) and C-x is a rather uncomfortable stretch.

I have used dvorak for a few years now (6-7 years), used it long before I used Emacs for 'real'. So I learned the combos in their original forms, I think they are usually ok, the biggest problem is the combos beginning with C-c, since I only have one Ctrl-key it gets kind of awkward. I have to stretch out across the keyboard.
Recently I found out about (keyboard-translate FROM TO), so I rebound my C-j to C-c, and C-c to C-j. I'm not too sure what I think about it yet - it messes with your head and your fingers, but it's a bit more convenient than the old C-c. Try it out.
(keyboard-translate ?\C-j ?\C-c)

Related

Is there an emacs game for practicing cursor control?

So I was wondering if there's a game out there that lets me practice my emacs cursor skills. I just started using emacs and thought that a game letting me control the player with the standard emacs bindings would be an awesome way to get going. When searching for one I stumbled upon this for VIM.
Does anyone know of something similar for emacs?
This is not a game, but I'd suggest installing hardcore-mode (available on Melpa too), and configure it to your liking (here's my configuration if interested). That package when enabled globally will force you to not use the arrow keys and use the C-f, C-b, C-n, C-p bindings instead. So much so that now using those bindings has become a second nature to me.
PS: There's an emacs-dedicated stackexchange site in case you didn't know.
One idea: Have a game mode that shows two buffers, and the goal is to transform the first into the second buffer with the least amount of keystrokes.

Emacs: git-gutter and flycheck conflict makes most keyboard shorcuts broken

Sometimes Emacs stops to respond to key bindings, for example:
it's impossible to C-x C-s save buffer
it's impossible to C y yank killed text
when mark activated it's invisible
and many other disadvantages.
The only way to return normal behaviour is to relaunch Emacs, though such odd behaviour can occur again very soon. Also, switching buffer to and fro could help a bit, at least it is possible to write buffer.
What is possible reason of this breakage?
Remark: Please review. I've tried to simplify question, but if this still is not good enough, let me know and I'll delete it.
In my particular case the issue was introduced by conflict between git-gutter-fringe plugin and FlyCheck when both of them try to place fringe marks at the same place. To spot this kind of conflicts it is helpful to open * Messages * buffer (by default C-h e), where all kind of errors logged
To resolve problem, I simply rejected git-gutter-fringe plugin.
Hope, this will be helpful for somebody.

Swap keyboard numbers to symbols

I'm a programmer and recently diagnosed with carpal tunnel. I spend a majority of time programming in perl and just the nature of the language has me constantly reaching for my shift-key all day to grab my $, #, % symbols..
Does anyone know of a way to re-map keyboard keys so that the number keys and symbols are inverted? For example, I'd like to press 2 and get an # symbol, press 5 and get %, and have the numbers require pressing shift. Basically the opposite of how these keys normally work.
A windows-based solution is preferred, but willing to go with a linux (Red Hat) solution if that is my only option.
Edit: I know there is a way to do this in Vi, however I typically use Komodo and other GUI-ish IDE's. Thanks
Try to make your own keyboard layout with the Microsoft Keyboard Layout Creator. You can use it like any other Windows keyboard layout. It will work in all applications on Windows.
I know people who use it to have German Umlauts on a US keyboard layout. Changing the number keys should be no problem.
You can download it here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/goglobal/bb964665.aspx
Looking further:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yfdr11LQlvU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Slr-mYDUUsE

Alternative for C-key in Emacs?

Only a full week on emacs in windows now, I can feel the CTRLkey combinations are beginning to hurt. Nobody suffers RSI because of emacs :-) ?
Is there any way to choose another key for a while (the M-key is replaceable by the ESC key I have noticed)
I would like to use, say the tab key, for a change. Any way to do that?
This guide look promising.
Google Ctrl2Cap utility. It allows you to map CAPS lock to additional Ctrl key. Handy not only for emacs, but in general.
Follow the tutorial about Moving the Control Key.
I did suffer a year of RSI after several years of sixteen hours a day of coding in emacs. My solution is to use a Kinesis Countoured keyboard. That means that all of the modifier keys are under my thumbs.
If you think about it, existing keyboards encourage us to use our pinky fingers as if they were opposable thumbs. Thus my customized keyboard layout called I am not a koala. I went a step further than the standard Kinesis layout and moved the shift key under my thumb as well (I swapped Shift_L and DEL).
I admit, for most people moving the control key is enough, but for me my Kinesis and a customized keymap is better.
If you're already comfortable with vi, you might want to try out viper-mode. Using vi keybindings keeps your fingers on the home row more, and puts less of a strain on your pinkies. You still wind up needing to use CTRL some of the time, but significantly less often.

What is the best way to avoid getting "Emacs Pinky"? [closed]

Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Closed 6 years ago.
Locked. This question and its answers are locked because the question is off-topic but has historical significance. It is not currently accepting new answers or interactions.
I just started using GNU Emacs as my text editor and I am concerned about getting afflicted with "Emacs Pinky" by having to constantly press the control key with my pinky finger as is required when using Emacs. How can I avoid potentially getting this type of repetitive strain injury?
Making caps lock another control key is a good place to start. Invest in an ergonomic keyboard. Some emacs users even go as far as to get foot pedal things for control and meta...
Configure so that the space bar works both as space and control; when the space is pressed alone, as a space, and pressed with others, as ctrl. So Space + x is treated as Ctrl + x.
You can do it with AutoHotKey in Windows, and with "at-home-modifier" in Xorg in Linux. (X, but Linux only.) You can use Karabiner (formaly known as keyremap4macbook) in Mac. (In fact, I am the author of at-home-modifier. =)
You can do more, if you have a keyboard with many keys around the space, like Japanese keyboards:Japanese keyboard http://www.owltech.co.jp/products/keyboard/KB86STD/KB86STD_B-320.jpg
My bottom row is basically EscBSSpaceEnterTab, but when used as modifiers, it's AltShiftCtrlShiftAlt. (For example, if you hold down Esc first and then Space, it's Alt+Space, but Space followed by Esc, it's Ctrl+Esc. If you press Space, Esc, and x, then it's ctrl + alt + x.) All can be pressed with the thumbs. You can order a Japanese keyboard from say amazon.com. You don't have to speak Japanese.
This is extremely handy. For firefox (sorry, not emacs) for example, focus a link, and press Ctrl + Enter; then it'll be opened in a new tab. (By also pressing Shift, it'll switch to the new tab, rather than staying on the current.)
(The above picture is the one the author of at-home-modifier uses. The maker doesn't sell this model any more, though.)
alt text http://www.userfriendly.org/cartoons/archives/07sep/uf010710.gif
# Xiong Chiamiov
Get a foot pedal! (I have a kinesis.) After you do, unmap control and capslock so you force yourself to use your feet.
(FYI, remapping capslock will help, but after enough emacsing in one day, will not be a total solution.)
For the love of God - use another text editor! If it's something that requires a foot pedal to work with it normally, then... well... frankly, I'm speechless. There is a multitude of powerful contemporary text editors out there that don't require you to memorize volumes of arcane keystrokes or buy fancy hardware.
You know, I can understand and accept a lot of things, but a foot pedal for a simple text editor is really where I draw the line.
I have always been curious about why such a large community of programmers, writers, geeks, etc. haven't yet found super simple and effective solution to this problem. Simply: 1) take a small piece of paper, make paper ball of it; 2) use scotch to stick it on to your left ctrl key (temporarily removing it from the place); 3) when writing, use side of your left palm to press that key - now this key is higher than others and you can do it easily. That way you don't need to buy uber ergo-keyboards, or remap ctrl key to capslock (which you eventually will push with your pinky anyway)...
So much discussions about such a small problem.
Remap Left-Ctrl and Caps-Lock so they are where they should be:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Keyboard Layout] "Scancode Map"=hex:00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,03,00,00,00,3a,00,1d,00,1d,00,3a,00,00,00,00,00
 
I totally agree with the remap caps-lock solution, that helps quite a bit.
To go even further, I tried and liked the Ergoemacs keybindings. The project is being actively developed, and supported quite well. I personally don't use it because it's not integrated with Mac OS X (some EMACS Keys are integrated in Cocoa), though it seems someone has posted an inputrc file with Ergoemacs keybindings.
Another trick I've been playing with is enabling StickyKeys. It's supported on many platforms and alleviates some of the problems specific to chording (as opposed to just overuse): it is apparently recommended on the emacswiki: http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/StickyModifiers
I use the excellent key-chord mode for common actions. You can give it functions or key sequences to call.
To make sure I do not obstruct normal typing too much, I generated letter statistics to find good key chords. I recorded them along with my default chords.
Additionally to more convenient command-calling, I have chords for inserting stuff like
Best wishes,
Arne
I hate writing emails without that ☺
Also I use control lock mode for things like flyspell, where I need control all the time. That’s modal editing with real emacs shortcuts.
The chords I use the most are
; buffer actions
(key-chord-define-global "vg" 'eval-region)
(key-chord-define-global "vb" 'eval-buffer)
(key-chord-define-global "cy" 'yank-pop)
(key-chord-define-global "cg" "\C-c\C-c")
(key-chord-define-global "äü" 'control-lock-toggle)
; frame actions
(key-chord-define-global "xo" 'other-window);
(key-chord-define-global "x1" 'delete-other-windows)
(key-chord-define-global "x0" 'delete-window)
(defun kill-this-buffer-if-not-modified ()
(interactive)
; taken from menu-bar.el
(if (menu-bar-non-minibuffer-window-p)
(kill-buffer-if-not-modified (current-buffer))
(abort-recursive-edit)))
(key-chord-define-global "xk" 'kill-this-buffer-if-not-modified)
; file actions
(key-chord-define-global "bf" 'ido-switch-buffer)
(key-chord-define-global "cf" 'ido-find-file)
(key-chord-define-global "zs" "\C-x\C-s")
(key-chord-define-global "vc" 'vc-next-action)
First I'd like to point out that suggesting not to use Emacs because the default keybindings may not be for everyone doesn't make any sense. Emacs is the most configurable "text editor" ever made and so, of course, trivial things like keymappings are fully configurable.
Regarding the "Emacs pinky" issue, I noticed that several people have "anti-Emacs-pinky" keybindings in their .emacs, like user "Paul Nathan" (17.5k rep as I type this) here:
What are good custom keybindings in emacs?
Then it is known for a fact that many people prefer the vi way and user Emacs' viper-mode.
I think that the major issue in Emacs is, by default, over-reliance on CTRL and more specifically C-x and C-f / C-b. These three are really terrible because it means, IMHO, painful fingers distortion.
So to me first the problem has to be defined: what is the issue? The issue is an over-reliance by default on CTRL, the fact that CTRL is typically badly located on most keyboards and the fact that most keyboard out there (I'd guesstimate more than 99.9% of all keyboards ever produced) are total pieces of junk.
So what is my solution to this?
I use a good mechanical keyboard and I do touch-type. People really serious about this will probably shell out $$$ for a very good split & matrix keyboard (like the Kinesis Advantage)... Because split and matrix are the only kind of keyboards that makes sense from an ergonomic point of view (this is not even open for debate). I, sadly, have been typing for three decades and cannot adapt to matrix layout, so I'm using an old (flawed) staggered keyboard. If you're going to use a staggered keyboard, at least take one that has a good switch (for example buckling springs like in the IBM Model M or Cherry MX switches or Topres like in the Happy Hacking Keyboard Pro). Be ready to shell out $500 and more if you hope to find a split + "mechanical" staggered, like the Cherry MX-5000 (*) or the IBM M15.
So: in short, if you're really serious about this, go for a Kinesis Advantage (they're using Cherry MX switches and you can even choose your specific switch if I'm not mistaken).
If, like me, you sadly cannot adapt to these wonderful keyboards because they're "too different", then go for a good "mechanical" keyboard. Any keyboard allowing not to "bottom out" while typing will save your fingers' joints. Helps after decades of programming.
If you don't want to go the "mechanical" route and think rubber domes are fine keyboards (I consider them junk but each it's preference), then at least choose a good rubber dome. MS' Ergo 4K would be a good choice (once again: it's rubber dome so to me it's a finger-destroying junk, but it's a matter of taste).
once you're using a good keyboard, remap CAPS-LOCK to CTRL. Can be done on any OS. It's trivial and there are plenty of links on the subject.
Remap Emacs' keys to stop over-relying on CTRL. First CTRL-x is terrible. It really has to be the worst shortcut ever. But you can remap ctl-x-map to what you want. I do this in my remapping minor mode:
(define-key my-keys-minor-mode-map (kbd "C-,") ctl-x-map)
C-, might not suit you: pick something else...
Then there's the issue of cursor movement. I think it's a big one for "text editor". Even if tend to use all the fine Emacs functions to quickly move around the text buffers instead of "moving the cursor", I still do need to move the cursor "manually" quite often.
C-f / C-b have to be the two most stupid shortcuts to move the cursor ever.
I use M-{i,j,k,l}. So people prefer {hjkl} instead of {ijkl} but I like {ijkl} because it reproduce the inverted T-arrow. I also like the fact that when, as a touch-typist, you're in your home row, you already have three fingers on {jkl}. No crazy finger motion to reach 'f' or 'b': makes no sense.
Last but not least: when you're not typing, do rest your fingers on your keyboard. For this of course you need a keyboard with a good switch which has enough resistance not to activate when you're simply resting your keys on your keyboard.
The Microsoft Natural Keyboard has been very, very good for me. I use emacs for everything 10+ hrs a day with no problems.
My advice would be to try using your thumbs to press modifier keys (control, alt) when they are within a reach. On keyboards which have shorter space-bar it is possible to press Alt (Meta) even without bending your thumb inwards. You can remap e.g. right Alt to Control and this way be able to conveniently access both Control and Alt.
This is also possible on MS Natural Keyboards.
Consider a Kinesis Contoured keyboard. It took me about a month to get up to speed with mine and I now consider it to be the ideal Emacs keyboard, even without the foot-pedal.
No joke. I ordered my first one with a food-pedal, but found I wasn't actually capable of coordinating the timing of my feet and my hands sufficiently to make much use of it for modifier keys. For a while I used it to toggle the integrated number pad, but I gave that up when I realized I wasn't using it because the number row on the Kinesis is so easy to reach.
One solution not yet mentioned here is to use both hands for key combinations.
For example, suppose you want to press <CTRL-K>. On QWERTY-keyboards, <K> is on the right, so press <CTRL> with your left hand and <K> with your right hand. Once you get used to the system, it works fine.
Per #Alasdair, remap Ctrl to "Caps Locks" or elsewhere: instructions for various platforms.
P.S. I'm a bit surprised this can't be done via an elisp function.
One more approach: if you want to avoid getting "emacs pinky" simply do not use pinky to press control key.
If it is necessary remap keys on your keyboard to go in the following order:
[Ctrl][Alt][ Space ][Alt][Ctrl]
On any standard keyboard (which symmetrically positions modifier keys, e.g. any MS keyboard) now you can press Ctrl key with ring finger and Alt key with middle finger on both hands. These fingers are much stronger than pinky and can endure frequent use.
Great tool for easily remapping keyboard keys on windows is AutoHotKey
On Ubuntu I managed to do it using: Keyboard Preferences / Layouts/ Other options
Try viper-mode, which is a vi emulator in emacs. As someone who has switched back and forth between vi/emacs/vim several times in the last 25 years, I'm now finally trying viper-mode in emacs, and I like it. I find the vi commands to be more comfortable, but I can still keep the advanced features of emacs that I like.
I use emacs and bash all day every day, and I have capslock as an extra left-control key, like VT100 intended. Nobody's mentioned the best way to do that on X11, yet. (actually, this is specific to the X.org/xfree86 X server, which everything uses these days):
setxkbmap -option ctrl:nocaps
Or edit your xorg.conf to have
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "Generic Keyboard"
Driver "kbd"
Option "XkbRules" "xorg"
Option "XkbModel" "pc105"
Option "XkbLayout" "us"
Option "XkbOptions" "ctrl:nocaps"
Option "Autorepeat" "200 40"
EndSection
(The XkbOptions and Autorepeat are what I added to the pre-generated one. Then X will start with the right key mapping every time, and you don't have to find where to put setxkbmap to have it executed every time you log in and start your window manager.)
Although gnome does have a keyboard manager thing, as boskom mentioned.
FYI, emacs was originally written for MIT lisp machines with "space cadet" keyboards. X11 has super, hyper, alt and meta modifier keys. Sometimes the "windows keys" on PC keyboards are mapped to Super. They're handy to bind to window-manager stuff (e.g. switch virtual desktops) because almost no apps normally use them.
Put the modifiers where they were meant to be: on either side of the space-bar, where they can be pressed by the thumb (or other digit of your choice) on the opposite hand from the digit pressing the modified letter (so that C-g is right-thumb on Ctrl and left index on 'g', and C-k is left-thumb on Ctrl and right middle on 'k'). You will note that the correct sequence, from inside out, is Ctrl Meta Super Hyper.
How you do this depends on your OS and your keyboard. For Windows, you might like to start here. In Mac OS X you can look in System Preferences > Keyboard & Mouse > Modifier Keys. For Linux, there are a thousand xmodmap and XKB tutorials.
to Chow,
yesterday i found a solution that we can have system wide ErgoEmacs keybinding on the mac.
The trick is to use mac os x's keybinding system so that you have system wide ErgoEmacs keybinding with the Control key. Then, in OS preference, swap the Control and Cmd key.
So that, you get ErgoEmacs keybinding system wide with the modifier beside the space bar. The draw back is of course that normal mac Cmd+key is now at the corner of keyboard. So, it's a trade off, about whether you use most apps for text editing, or the app's shortcuts.
might give it a shot here:
http://code.google.com/p/ergoemacs/wiki/ErgoEmacs_keys_system_wide
also, few years back i tried the mac's os wide custome keybinding, some cocoa apps still doesn't support it. See bottom here
• How To Create Keybinding In Mac OS X
but perhaps things are better now.
I have a MS natural keyboard as well and it's awesome. I've managed to train myself to use the side of my left hand (below the pinky) to hit the Ctrl key.
Even after remapping capslock to become control, you still have to use your pinky to press it - at least I do, because my ring finger won't reach it for a command like C-g. Using your pinky at all is not recommended, right?
I'm on a MacBook Pro and I've just remapped the ⌘ on the right side of the keyboard to become control. So that way, for instance, C-g becomes a keystroke I execute with both hands, my right-hand thumb on ⌘ and my left forefinger on g.
We'll see if that helps with my RSI. Anyone else done this?
One of the first things I do on a new machine is remap Caps Lock to a new Control.
Google around, there are plenty of .reg files available that will do this painlessly for you on Windows.
I started using the side\palm of my hands to hit the control key instead of my pinky fingers. My understanding is that on more ergonomic keyboards the control key button is bigger which makes it easier to perform that motion.
I can use the Control key in either the west or south-west positions without any trouble. Many Emacsers swear that the control key belongs in the west position and the west position only, and that anything else will ruin your pinky. The only thing we know for sure causes RSI from typing is too much typing. Try type-break-mode and see if a few regular breaks help.
Buy a Happy Hacking Keyboard which has Ctrl in The Right Place (Caps Lock is moved elsewhere). It has excellent response and is configurable via DIP switches for maximum integration on Mac, Windows, and Linux (for example, you can switch what is Alt and what is the Windows key right from the keyboard, no software required).
It also has a very small footprint, if that suits your fancy.
Since this thread is still kinda going, I'll add my two cents:
With or without emacs, the ctrl key is useful for tons of stuff on linux or windows: copy, cut, paste, find, close, quit... I use this stuff constantly. So as others have suggested, I want that near the spacebar so I can use my thumb. And that's how it is by default on a mac, where all that stuff uses the cmd key:
[ctrl] [alt] [cmd] [spacebar]
So, I use a mac keyboard on my linux box, and set up the cmd key as a second ctrl key (In Ubuntu Lucid: Keyboard Prefs > Layouts > Options > Alt/Win Key Behavior > Control is mapped to Win keys (and the usual Ctrl keys))
[ctrl] [alt] [ctrl] [spacebar]
Other benefits:
* When I need to use a mac sometimes, cut/paste/etc are all in the same place I'm used to.
* ctrl+tab (with the real ctrl key) still moves through tabs for browsers and other apps, on both platforms.
The drawback to this plan is that the alt key has moved to the left, so the alt+tab command (which I use for window switching) no longer matches the mac equivalent cmd+tab. But I can still hit it with my thumb, and it's still, to me, a far lesser evil than destroying my pinky. Yeah, I know I could just make ctrl+tab the window switcher, but then the real ctrl key doesn't work for tab switching. Besides, with apps moving into the browser, the window/tab navigational strategies are gonna be in flux for a while -- but the basics like cut/paste aren't going anywhere, so I want them locked down. Under my thumb.
(Of course, if you wanted to use emacs on a mac, I guess you'd be back at square one...)
I actually did my own hack to avoid using the ctrl key. I use now the SPACEBAR key.
This small program for X changes the behavior of the space bar, so that when it is used in a combination, it adds the control modifier to it. When used alone, it behaves normally on release.
That way you don't have to use your pinky at all! Worked perfectly for me.
I am not a programmer and I also have a hard time explaining ideas. I am on a dell mini laptop. The mouse touchpad is in a spot where my thumbs rest.
My left touchpad button acts as a control key:
With the side of my thumb I press it and edit in emacs as usual.
I was going to map the right touchpad button to alt, but instead I have done the
following:
I press the button and the control key gets pressed (locked).
I press it again and controll gets released.
This not only made my pinky feel better it also made my editing twice as fast. (according
to my org-mode clocks)
It is hard to explain how nice it works.
In order to do this I used the following two aplications:
xbindkeys
xdotool
My xbindkeys config file:
###########################
# xbindkeys configuration #
###########################
# left mouse button ctrl key
"xdotool keydown ctrl"
b:1
"xdotool keyup ctrl"
control + b:1 + Release
# vi wanna be style editing
"xdotool keydown ctrl"
release+b:3
"xdotool keyup ctrl"
release+control+b:3
# -------------------------
Before experimenting with these ideas make sure to read the man pages.
Do not have anything important open. I had to kill my window manager a few times
before getting it correct.
notes:
I use xmodmap to do all the regular stuff i.e. caps ---> control (not a full solution), swapping alt and control. (on a laptop It is ok but my thumbs cramp up)
I use the window manager config file (stumpwm) to create bindings to load the proper key mapping
file. (depending on my mood for the day)
I am sure all this can be implemented in a different environment.
My pink pain is gone, my editing is faster.
Try the God-Mode plugin that is not bad .