I am trying to teach myself Perl and I've looked everywhere for an answer to what probably is a very simple problem. I've defined a subroutine that I call to count the number of letters in a word. If I write it out like this:
$sentence="This is a short sentence.";
#words = split(/\s+/, $sentence);
foreach $element (#words) {
$lngths .= length($element) . "\n";
}
print "$lngths\n";
Then it works like a charm. However, if I wrap it into a subroutine split doesn't split up the input and instead counts the whole sentence as a single input. Here's how I'm defining the subroutine:
sub countWords {
#words = split(/\s+/, #_);
foreach $element(#words) {
$lngths .= length($element) . "\n";
}
return $lngths;
}
From all the pages I've read and texts I've consulted this should work but it doesn't.
Thanks in advance!
The problem is your use of #_. This is an array, but you're accessing it like a scalar.
#_ contains all the parameters to this function. The way it looks, you're passing it a sentence, and you want to split it. Here are some possible ways to do it:
#words = split(/\s+/, $_[0]);
which means "take the first parameter to the function and split it".
Or:
my $sentence = shift;
#words = split(/\s+/, $sentence);
Which is pretty much the same, but uses an intermediate variable for readability.
In fact, what you're doing is:
#words = split(/\s+/, #_);
Which means:
interpret #_ as a scalar, which means the number of elements in #_ (1, in this case)
split the string "1" by whitespace
Which returns the array:
#words = ("1");
You've got the main part of the answer from Nathan; the residual observation is that most people don't count punctuation and digits as letters, but your subroutine does. I'd probably go with:
sub countLetters
{
my($sentence) = #_;
$sentence =~ s/[^[:alpha:]]//gm;
return length($sentence);
}
The key point here is the parentheses around the variable list in the my clause. In general, you have several arguments passed into a sub, and you can assign (copies) of them to variables in your subroutine like this:
my($var1, $var2, $var3) = #_;
The parentheses provide 'list context' and ensure that the first element of #_ is copied to $var1, the second to $var2 and so on. Without the parentheses, you have 'scalar context', and when an array is evaluated in scalar context, the value returned is the number of elements in the array. Thus:
my $var1, $var2, $var3 = #_;
would likely assign 3 to $var1 (because three values were passed to the subroutine), and $var1 and $var2 would both be undef.
The regular expression deletes all non-alphabetic characters from the string; the number of letters is the length of what's left.
When counting characters, perl's transliteration operator often comes in handy.
To count the non-whitespace characters without having to split your string into separate words, you can do:
$lngths = $sentence =~ tr/ \t\f\r\n//c;
Related
I am learning Perl for work and I'm trying to practise with some basic programs.
I want my program to take a string from STDIN and modify it by taking the last character and putting it at the start of the string.
I get an error when I use variable $str in $str = <STDIN>.
Here is my code:
my $str = "\0";
$str = <STDIN>;
sub last_to_first {
chomp($str);
pop($str);
print $str;
}
last_to_first;
Exec :
Matrix :hi
Not an ARRAY reference at matrix.pl line 13, <STDIN> line 1.
Why your approach doesn't work
The pop keyword does not work on strings. Strings in Perl are not automatically cast to character arrays, and those array keywords only work on arrays.
The error message is Not an ARRAY reference because pop sees a scalar variable. References are scalars in Perl (the scalar here is something like a reference to the address of the actual array in memory). The pop built-in takes array references in Perl versions between 5.14 and 5.22. It was experimental, but got removed in the (currently latest) 5.24.
Starting with Perl 5.14, an experimental feature allowed pop to take a scalar expression. This experiment has been deemed unsuccessful, and was removed as of Perl 5.24.
How to make it work
You have to split and join your string first.
my $str = 'foo';
# turn it into an array
my #chars = split //, $str;
# remove the last char and put it at the front
unshift #chars, pop #chars;
# turn it back into a string
$str = join '', #chars;
print $str;
That will give you ofo.
Now to use that as a sub, you should pass a parameter. Otherwise you do not need a subroutine.
sub last_to_first {
my $str = shift;
my #chars = split //, $str;
unshift #chars, pop #chars;
$str = join '', #chars;
return $str;
}
You can call that sub with any string argument. You should do the chomp to remove the trailing newline from STDIN outside of the sub, because it is not needed for switching the chars. Always build your subs in the smallest possible unit to make it easy to debug them. One piece of code should do exactly one functionality.
You also do not need to initialize a string with \0. In fact, that doesn't make sense.
Here's a full program.
use strict;
use warnings 'all';
my $str = <STDIN>;
chomp $str;
print last_to_first($str);
sub last_to_first {
my $str = shift;
my #chars = split //, $str;
unshift #chars, pop #chars;
$str = join '', #chars;
return $str;
}
Testing your program
Because you now have one unit in your last_to_first function, you can easily implement a unit test. Perl brings Test::Simple and Test::More (and other tools) for that purpose. Because this is simple, we'll go with Test::Simple.
You load it, tell it how many tests you are going to do, and then use the ok function. Ideally you would put the stuff you want to test into its own module, but for simplicity I'll have it all in the same program.
use strict;
use warnings 'all';
use Test::Simple tests => 3;
ok last_to_first('foo', 'ofo');
ok last_to_first('123', '321');
ok last_to_first('qqqqqq', 'qqqqqq');
sub last_to_first {
my $str = shift;
my #chars = split //, $str;
unshift #chars, pop #chars;
$str = join '', #chars;
return $str;
}
This will output the following:
1..3
ok 1
ok 2
ok 3
Run it with prove instead of perl to get a bit more comprehensive output.
Refactoring it
Now let's change the implementation of last_to_first to use a regular expression substitution with s/// instead of the array approach.
sub last_to_first {
my $str = shift;
$str =~ s/^(.+)(.)$/$2$1/;
return $str;
}
This code uses a pattern match with two groups (). The first one has a lot of chars after the beginning of the string ^, and the second one has exactly one char, after which the string ends $. You can check it out here. Those groups end up in $1 and $2, and all we need to do is switch them around.
If you replace your function in the program with the test, and then run it, the output will be the same. You have just refactored one of the units in your program.
You can also try the substr approach from zdim's answer with this test, and you will see that the tests still pass.
The core function pop takes an array, and removes and returns its last element.
To manipulate characters in a string you can use substr, for example
use warnings;
use strict;
my $str = <STDIN>;
chomp($str);
my $last_char = substr $str, -1, 1, '';
my $new_str = $last_char . $str;
The arguments to substr mean: search the variable $str, at offset -1 (one from the back), for a substring of length 1, and replace that with an empty string '' (thus removing it). The substring that is found, here the last character, is returned. See the documentation page linked above.
In the last line the returned character is concatenated with the remaining string, using the . operator.
You can browse the list of functions broken down by categories at Perl functions by category.
Perl documentation has a lot of goodies, please look around.
Strings are very often manipulated using regular expressions. See the tutorial perlretut, the quick start perlrequick, the quick reference perlreref, and the full reference perlre.
You can also split a string into a character array and work with that. This is shown in detail in the answer by simbabque, which packs a whole lot more of good advice.
This is for substring function used for array variables:
my #arrays = qw(jan feb mar);
last_to_first(#arrays);
sub last_to_first
{
my #lists = #_;
my $last = pop(#lists);
#print $last;
unshift #lists, $last;
print #lists;
}
This is for substring function used for scalar variables:
my $str = "";
$str = <STDIN>;
chomp ($str);
last_to_first($str);
sub last_to_first
{
my $chr = shift;
my $lastchar = substr($chr, -1);
print $lastchar;
}
i am new in Perl and i need to do some regexp.
I read, when array is used like integer value, it gives count of elements inside.
So i am doing for example
if (#result = $pattern =~ /(\d)\.(\d)/) {....}
and i was thinking it should return empty array, when pattern matching fails, but it gives me still array with 2 elements, but with uninitialized values.
So how i can put pattern matching inside if condition, is it possible?
EDIT:
foreach (keys #ARGV) {
if (my #result = $ARGV[$_] =~ /^--(?:(help|br)|(?:(input|output|format)=(.+)))$/) {
if (defined $params{$result[0]}) {
print STDERR "Cmd option error\n";
}
$params{$result[0]} = (defined $result[1] ? $result[1] : 1);
}
else {
print STDERR "Cmd option error\n";
exit ERROR_CMD;
}
}
It is regexp pattern for command line options, cmd options are in long format with two hyphens preceding and possible with argument, so
--CMD[=ARG]. I want elegant solution, so this is why i want put it to if condition without some prolog etc.
EDIT2:
oh sry, i was thinking groups in #result array are always counted from 0, but accesible are only groups from branch, where the pattern is success. So if in my code command is "input", it should be in $result[0], but actually it is in $result[1]. I thought if $result[0] is uninitialized, than pattern fails and it goes to the if statement.
Consider the following:
use strict;
use warnings;
my $pattern = 42.42;
my #result = $pattern =~ /(\d)\.(\d)/;
print #result, ' elements';
Output:
24 elements
Context tells Perl how to treat #result. There certainly aren't 24 elements! Perl has printed the array's elements which resulted from your regex's captures. However, if we do the following:
print 0 + #result, ' elements';
we get:
2 elements
In this latter case, Perl interprets a scalar context for #result, so adds the number of elements to 0. This can also be achieved through scalar #results.
Edit to accommodate revised posting: Thus, the conditional in your code:
if(my #result = $ARGV[$_] =~ /^--(?:(help|br)|(?:(input|output|format)=(.+)))$/) { ...
evaluates to true if and only if the match was successful.
#results = $pattern =~ /(\d)\.(\d)/ ? ($1,$2) : ();
Try this:
#result = ();
if ($pattern =~ /(\d)\.(\d)/)
{
push #result, $1;
push #result, $2;
}
=~ is not an equal sign. It's doing a regexp comparison.
So my code above is initializing the array to empty, then assigning values only if the regexp matches.
I am trying to count the characters in a string and found an easy solution counting a single character using the tr operator. Now I want to do this with every character from a to z. The following solution doesn't work because tr/// matches every character.
my #chars = ('a' .. 'z');
foreach my $c (#chars)
{
$count{$c} = ($text =~ tr/$c//);
}
How do I correctly use the char variable in tr///?
tr/// doesn't work with variables unless you wrap it in an eval
But there is a nicer way to do this:
$count{$_} = () = $text =~ /$_/g for 'a' .. 'z';
For the TIMTOWTDI:
$count{$_}++ for grep /[a-z]/i, split //, $text;
tr doesn't support variable interpolation (neither in the search list nor in the replacement list). If you want to use variables, you must use eval():
$count{$c} = eval "\$text =~ tr/$c/$c/";
That said, a more efficient (and secure) approach would be to simply iterate over the characters in the string and increment counters for each character, e.g.:
my %count = map { $_ => 0 } 'a' .. 'z';
for my $char (split //, $text) {
$count{$char}++ if defined $count{$char};
}
If you look at the perldoc for tr/SEARCHLIST/REPLACEMENTLIST/cdsr, then you'll see, right at the bottom of the section, the following:
Because the transliteration table is built at compile time, neither the SEARCHLIST nor the REPLACEMENTLIST are subjected to double quote interpolation. That means that if you want to use variables, you must use an eval():
eval "tr/$oldlist/$newlist/";
die $# if $#;
eval "tr/$oldlist/$newlist/, 1" or die $#;
Thus, you would need an eval to generate a new SEARCHLIST.
This is going to be very inefficient... the code might feel neat, but you're processing the complete string 26 times. You're also not counting uppercase characters.
You'd be better off stepping through the string once and just incrementing counters for each character found.
From the perlop documentation:
tr/AAA/XYZ/
will transliterate any A to X.
Because the transliteration table is built at compile time, neither
the SEARCHLIST nor the REPLACEMENTLIST are subjected to double quote
interpolation. That means that if you want to use variables, you must
use an eval()
Alternatively in your case you can use the s/// operator as:
foreach my $c (#chars) {
$count{$c} += ($text =~ s/$c//g);
}
My solution with some modification based from http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=446003
sub lowerLetters {
my $string = shift;
my %table;
#table{split //, $letters_uc} = split //, $letters_lc;
my $table_re = join '|', map { quotemeta } reverse sort keys %table;
$string =~ s/($table_re)/$table{$1}/g;
return if not defined $string;
return $string;
}
You may want to use s instead. Substitution is much more powerful than tr
My solution:
$count{$c} =~ s/\$search/$replace/g;
g at the end means "use it globally".
See:
https://blog.james.rcpt.to/2010/10/25/perl-search-and-replace-using-variables/
https://docstore.mik.ua/orelly/perl3/lperl/ch09_06.htm
I need some help decoding this perl script. $dummy is not initialized with anything throughout anywhere else in the script. What does the following line mean in the script? and why does it mean when the split function doesn't have any parameter?
($dummy, $class) = split;
The program is trying to check whether a statement is truth or lie using some statistical classification method. So lets say it calculates and give the following number to "truth-sity" and "falsity" then it checks whether the lie detector is correct or not.
# some code, some code...
$_ = "truth"
# more some code, some code ...
$Truthsity = 9999
$Falsity = 2134123
if ($Truthsity > $Falsity) {
$newClass = "truth";
} else {
$newClass = "lie";
}
($dummy, $class) = split;
if ($class eq $newClass) {
print "correct";
} elsif ($class eq "true") {
print "false neg";
} else {
print "false pos"
}
($dummy, $class) = split;
Split returns an array of values. The first is put into $dummy, the second into $class, and any further values are ignored. The first arg is likely named dummy because the author plans to ignore that value. A better option is to use undef to
ignore a returned entry: ( undef, $class ) = split;
Perldoc can show you how split functions. When called without arguments, split will operate against $_ and split on whitespace. $_ is the default variable in perl, think of it as an implied "it," as defined by context.
Using an implied $_ can make short code more concise, but it's poor form to use it inside larger blocks. You don't want the reader to get confused about which 'it' you want to work with.
split ; # split it
for (#list) { foo($_) } # look at each element of list, foo it.
#new = map { $_ + 2 } #list ;# look at each element of list,
# add 2 to it, put it in new list
while(<>){ foo($_)} # grab each line of input, foo it.
perldoc -f split
If EXPR is omitted, splits the $_ string. If PATTERN is also omitted, splits on
whitespace (after skipping any leading whitespace). Anything matching PATTERN
is taken to be a delimiter separating the fields. (Note that the delimiter may
be longer than one character.)
I'm a big fan of the ternary operator ? : for setting string values and of pushing logic into blocks and subroutines.
my $Truthsity = 9999
my $Falsity = 2134123
print test_truthsity( $Truthsity, $Falsity, $_ );
sub test_truthsity {
my ($truthsity, $falsity, $line ) = #_;
my $newClass = $truthsity > $falsity ? 'truth' : 'lie';
my (undef, $class) = split /\s+/, $line ;
my $output = $class eq $newClass ? 'correct'
: $class eq 'true' ? 'false neg'
: 'false pos';
return $output;
}
There may be a subtle bug in this version. split with no args is not the exactly the same as split(/\s+/, $_), they behave differently if the line starts with spaces. In fully qualified split, blank leading fields are returned. split with no args drops the leading spaces.
$_ = " ab cd";
my #a = split # #a contains ( 'ab', 'cd' );
my #b = split /\s+/, $_; # #b contains ( '', 'ab', 'cd')
From the documentation for split:
split /PATTERN/,EXPR
If EXPR is omitted, splits the $_ string. If PATTERN is also omitted,
splits on whitespace (after skipping any leading whitespace). Anything
matching PATTERN is taken to be a delimiter separating the fields.
(Note that the delimiter may be longer than one character.)
So since both the pattern and the expression are omitted, we are splitting the default variable $_ on whitespace.
The purpose of the $dummy variable is to capture the first element of the list returned from split and ignore it, because the code is only interested in the second element, which gets put into $class.
You'll have to look at the surrounding code to find out what $_ is in this context; it may be a loop variable or a list item in a map block, or something else.
If you read the documentation, you'll find that:
The default for the first operand is " ".
The default for the second operand is $_.
The default for the third operand is 0.
so
split
is short for
split " ", $_, 0
and it means:
Take $_, split its value on whitespace, ignoring leading and trailing whitespace.
The first resulting field is placed in $dummy, and the second in $class.
Based on its name, I presume you proceed to never use $dummy again, so it's simply acting as a placeholder. You can get rid of it, though.
my ($dummy, $class) = split;
can be written as
my (undef, $class) = split; # Use undef as a placeholder
or
my $class = ( split )[1]; # Use a list slice to get second item
I am trying to do a split on a string with comma delimiter
my $string='ab,12,20100401,xyz(A,B)';
my #array=split(',',$string);
If I do a split as above the array will have values
ab
12
20100401
xyz(A,
B)
I need values as below.
ab
12
20100401
xyz(A,B)
(should not split xyz(A,B) into 2 values)
How do I do that?
use Text::Balanced qw(extract_bracketed);
my $string = "ab,12,20100401,xyz(A,B(a,d))";
my #params = ();
while ($string) {
if ($string =~ /^([^(]*?),/) {
push #params, $1;
$string =~ s/^\Q$1\E\s*,?\s*//;
} else {
my ($ext, $pre);
($ext, $string, $pre) = extract_bracketed($string,'()','[^()]+');
push #params, "$pre$ext";
$string =~ s/^\s*,\s*//;
}
}
This one supports:
nested parentheses;
empty fields;
strings of any length.
Here is one way that should work.
use Regexp::Common;
my $string = 'ab,12,20100401,xyz(A,B)';
my #array = ($string =~ /(?:$RE{balanced}{-parens=>'()'}|[^,])+/g);
Regexp::Common can be installed from CPAN.
There is a bug in this code, coming from the depths of Regexp::Common. Be warned that this will (unfortunately) fail to match the lack of space between ,,.
Well, old question, but I just happened to wrestle with this all night, and the question was never marked answered, so in case anyone arrives here by Google as I did, here's what I finally got. It's a very short answer using only built-in PERL regex features:
my $string='ab,12,20100401,xyz(A,B)';
$string =~ s/((\((?>[^)(]*(?2)?)*\))|[^,()]*)(*SKIP),/$1\n/g;
my #array=split('\n',$string);
Commas that are not inside parentheses are changed to newlines and then the array is split on them. This will ignore commas inside any level of nested parentheses, as long as they're properly balanced with a matching number of open and close parens.
This assumes you won't have newline \n characters in the initial value of $string. If you need to, either temporarily replace them with something else before the substitution line and then use a loop to replace back after the split, or just pick a different delimiter to split the array on.
Limit the number of elements it can be split into:
split(',', $string, 4)
Here's another way:
my $string='ab,12,20100401,xyz(A,B)';
my #array = ($string =~ /(
[^,]*\([^)]*\) # comma inside parens is part of the word
|
[^,]*) # split on comma outside parens
(?:,|$)/gx);
Produces:
ab
12
20100401
xyz(A,B)
Here is my attempt. It should handle depth well and could even be extended to include other bracketed symbols easily (though harder to be sure that they MATCH). This method will not in general work for quotation marks rather than brackets.
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
my $string='ab,12,20100401,xyz(A(2,3),B)';
print "$_\n" for parse($string);
sub parse {
my ($string) = #_;
my #fields;
my #comma_separated = split(/,/, $string);
my #to_be_joined;
my $depth = 0;
foreach my $field (#comma_separated) {
my #brackets = $field =~ /(\(|\))/g;
foreach (#brackets) {
$depth++ if /\(/;
$depth-- if /\)/;
}
if ($depth == 0) {
push #fields, join(",", #to_be_joined, $field);
#to_be_joined = ();
} else {
push #to_be_joined, $field;
}
}
return #fields;
}