I want to source a shell script from within Perl and have the environment variables be available in Perl, but I'm not sure if there's an elegant way to do it. Obviously, using system() won't work since it runs in a forked process, and all environment changes will be lost. I think there's a CPAN module that can do it, but I prefer not to use external modules.
I've seen two solutions that would not work in my case:
Have a wrapper that calls the shell script, and then calls the Perl script. I do not know ahead of time which of my shell scripts I need to call.
Manually opening the shell script and scraping for arg=value pairs. This won't work either because the shell script is not a simple list of ARG=VALUE, but rather contain a bunch of conditionals, and variables can have different values depending on certain conditions.
sh -c "source script; env" should output the environment at the end of script as name=value pairs, which you then can parse from your perl script (as Perl is a language made for parsing, this should be easy).
You can do this by installing external module from CPAN which is Shell::Source
$env_path= Shell::Source->new(shell=>"tcsh",file=>"../path/to/file/temp.csh");
$env_path->inherit;
As perl creates its own instance while running on a shell, so we can not set environment path for the main shell as the perl's instance will be like sub shell of the main shell. Child can not set environment paths for parents.
Now till the perl's sub shell will run you'll be able to access all the paths present in temp.csh by using Shell::Source
Related
I am setting env variables using *.csh file to current terminal. When I use system("/bin/tcsh *.csh") in the perl script, the *csh file executing but not setting any env variables to current terminal.
When I use system("/bin/tcsh *.csh") in the perl script, the *csh file executing but not setting any env variables to current terminal.
sub veloce_env_setup_sub {
printf "\n\n\t -veloce_env_setup option enabled\n";
system("/bin/tcsh /proj/I2BZA1/users/ssudi/SCRIPTS/veloce_env/vlab_4p4p0/veloce_setup.csh");
}
Expected: env variables should set to current terminal after sourcing *.csh file.
Actual results: only prints are comming but not setting env variables to current terminal.
perldoc -q environment:
I {changed directory, modified my environment} in a perl script. How come the change disappeared when I exited the script? How do I get my changes to be visible?
Unix
In the strictest sense, it can't be done--the script executes as a different process from the shell it was started from. Changes to a process are not reflected in its parent--only in any children created after the change. There is shell magic that may allow you to fake it by eval()ing the script's output in your shell; check out the comp.unix.questions FAQ for details.
In your code the problem appears twice:
system spawns tcsh, which runs a script that sets environment variables. These environment variables only exist within the tcsh process. When system returns (i.e. when tcsh exits), the environment of the child process is gone.
Even if you managed to modify the environment of the perl script (which you can do by assigning to %ENV), that wouldn't affect the parent shell that perl was started from.
This can now be done with Env::Modify.
use Env::Modify qw(:tcsh source);
sub veloce_env_setup_sub {
printf "\n\n\t -veloce_env_setup option enabled\n";
source("/proj/I2BZA1/users/ssudi/SCRIPTS/veloce_env/vlab_4p4p0/veloce_setup.csh");
}
The environment of a child process doesn't affect the environment of the parent process. That is, a process that you start doesn't change the environment of the thing that started it.
If you want to set up the environment for a Perl script, you have some options. Which one works best for you depends on what you are trying to do.
Set up the options inside Perl. Instead of using a shell program, do it all in Perl by setting values in the %ENV hash. This works well if you just need it for that program. It's likely that whatever you are doing in tcsh you can do it Perl.
Instead of calling the shell script from Perl, call your Perl program from the shell script. Now the shell script is the parent process and the child process (the Perl program) inherits the parent's environment.
#!tcsh
setenv SOME_VALUE foo
perl my_program
In a child process, you could print the environment and read that from the parent process. You'd parse it and convert it appropriately. This is what the Env::Modify module does, but I wouldn't want that as my first option.
You can't access environment variables in a process that have been set by a child process. It's a fundamental property of how processes work.
You can set %ENV{'your_choice'} = 'as you like'; inside Perl.
Sure, it looks like a little bit hartverdrahtet (yt), but it works great again. So the environmental is mental just inner the mind of top instanced script and closed and removed on closing it.
Another way is calling system("set VARIABLE=VALUE");
Here the variable lefts after closing until next reboot.
I need to source configuration file 'eg.conf' to terminal though perl script. I am using system command but its not working.
system('. /etc/eg.conf')
Basically I am writing script in which later point it will use the environment variable (under conf file) for execute other process.
It is not clear what you are trying to achieve, but if you want to make the config available from within Perl AND your config file is valid Perl code you can use do or require (see perldoc for more information).
What you are doing in your code is to spawn a shell with system, include the config inside this shell (which must be in shell syntax) and then exit the shell again which of course throws all the config away on close. I guess this is not what you intend to do, but your real intention is not clear.
What is your goal? Do you need to source eg.conf to set up further calculations from within a perl controlled shell, or are you trying to affect the parent shell that is running the perl script?
Your example call to system('. /etc/eg.conf') creates a new shell subprocess. /etc/eg.conf is sourced into that shell at which point the shell exits. Nothing is changed within the perl script nor in the parent process that spawned the perl script.
One can not modify the environment of a parent process from a child process, without the assistance of the parent process[1]. One generally returns code for the parent shell to source or to eval.
1: ok, one could theoretically affect the parent process by directly poking into its memory space. Don't do that.
I have a series of perl scripts that I want to run one after another on a unix system. What type of file would this be / could I reference it as in documentation? BASH, BATCH, Shell Script File?
Any help would be appreciated.
Simply put the commands you would use to run them manually in a file (say, perlScripts.sh):
#!/bin/sh
perl script1.pl
perl script2.pl
perl script3.pl
Then from the command line:
$ sh perlScripts.sh
Consider using Perl itself to run all of the scripts. If the scripts don't take command line arguments, you can simply use:
do 'script1.pl';
do 'script2.pl';
etc.
do 'file_name' basically copies the file's code into the current script and executes it. It gives each file its own scope, however, so variables won't clash.
This approach is more efficient, because it starts only one instance of the Perl interpreter. It will also avoid repeated loading of modules.
If you do need to pass arguments or capture the output, you can still do it in a Perl file with backquotes or system:
my $output = `script3.pl file1.txt`; #If the output is needed.
system("script3.pl","file1.txt"); #If the output is not needed.
This is similar to using a shell script. However, it is cross-platform compatible. It means your scripts only rely on Perl being present, and no other external programs. And it allows you to easily add functionality to the calling script.
I have a Korn shell script at a location like /opt/apps/abc/folder/properties.env. I can execute it from Unix bash using the dot command:
. /opt/apps/abc/folder/properties.env
This works.
I have a Perl script abc.pl from which I am calling the script properties.env. I tried the following different:
system('/usr/bin/ksh','-c', '. /opt/apps/abc/folder/properties.env');
/usr/bin/ksh -c /opt/apps/abc/folder/properties.env;
system('. /opt/apps/abc/folder/properties.env');
None of the above work. I don't want to use exec because I want to return to the Perl script. What am I doing wrong?
The environment changes will only last as long as the life of the ksh session spawned by the system command. If you want the environment changes to affect the Perl script, then you have to source that file before you launch the Perl program.
If you need those environment variables in your perl code, (not in the environment where you called perl), you can also read and parse that properties.env and set the environment in the %ENV variable.
e.g
$ENV{'ENV_VAR1'}=VALUE_OF_ENV_VAR1
using system() spawn another process, as the other poster said. changing environment in the child does not affect the parent.
How would I determine what script, program, or shell executed my Perl script?
Example: I might want to have human readable output if executed from shell (customized for each type of shell), a different type of output if called as a script from another perl script, and a machine readable format if executed from a program such as a continuous integration server.
Motivation: I have a tool that changes its output based on which shell executes it. I'd normally implement this behavior as an option to the script, but this tool's design doesn't allow for options. Other shells have environment variables that indicate what shell is running. I'm working on a patch to support Powershell, which has no such special variable.
Edit: Many of these answers happen to be linux specific. Unfortuantely, Powershell is for Windows. getppid, the $ENV{SHELL} variable, and shelling out to ps won't help in this case. This script needs to run cross-platform.
You use getppid(). Take this snippet in child.pl:
my $ppid = getppid();
system("ps --no-headers $ppid");
If you run it from the command line, system will show bash or similar (among other things). Execute it with system("perl child.pl"); in another script, e.g. parent.pl, and you will see that perl parent.pl executed it.
To capture just the name of the process with arguments (thanks to ikegami for the correct ps syntax):
my $ppid = getppid();
my $ps = `ps --no-headers -o cmd $ppid`;
chomp $ps;
EDIT: An alternative to this approach, might be to create soft links to your script, make the different contexts use different links to access your script and inspect $0 to build logic around that.
I would suggest a different approach to accomplish your goal. Instead of guessing at the context, make it more explicit. Each use case is wholly separate, so have three different interfaces.
A function which can be called inside a Perl program. This would likely return a Perl data structure. This is far easier, faster and more reliable than parsing script output. It would also serve as the basis for the scripts.
A script which outputs for the current shell. It can look at $ENV{SHELL} to discover what shell is running. For bonus points, provide a switch to explicitly override.
A script which can be called inside a non-Perl program, such as your continuous integration server, and issue machine readable output. XML and/or JSON or whatever.
2 and 3 would be just thin wrappers to format the data coming out of 1.
Each is tailored to fit its specific need. Each will work without heuristics. Each will be far simpler than trying to guess the context and what the user wants.
If you can't separate 2 and 3, have the continuous integration server set an environment variable and look for it.
Depending on your environment, you may be able to pick it up from the environment variables. Consider the following code:
/usr/bin/perl -MData::Dumper -e 'print Dumper(\%ENV);' | grep sh
On my Ubuntu system, it gets me:
'SHELL' => '/bin/bash',
So I guess that says I'm running perl from a bash shell. If you use something else, the SHELL variable may give you a hint.
But let's say you know you're in bash, but perl is run from a subshell. Then try:
/bin/sh -c "/usr/bin/perl -MData::Dumper -e 'print Dumper(\%ENV);'" | grep sh
You will find:
'_' => '/bin/sh',
'SHELL' => '/bin/bash',
So the shell is still bash, but bash has a variable $_ which also show the absolute filename of the shell or script being executed, which may also give a valuable hint. Similarily, for other environments there will most probably be clues left in the perl %ENV hash that should give you valuable hints.
If you're running PowerShell 2.0 or above (most likely), you can infer the shell as a parent process by examining the environment variable %psmodulepath%. By default, it points to the system modules under %windir%\system32\windowspowershell\v1.0\modules; this is what you would see if you examine the variable from cmd.exe.
However, when PowerShell starts up, it prepends the user's default module search path to this environment variable which looks like: %userprofile%\documents\windowspowershell\modules. This is inherited by child processes. So, your logic would be to test if %psmodulepath% starts with %userprofile% to detect powershell 2.0 or higher. This won't work in PowerShell 1.0 because it does not support modules.
This is on Windows XP with PowerShell v2.0, so take it with a grain of salt.
In a cmd.exe shell, I get:
PSModulePath=C:\WINDOWS\system32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\Modules\
whereas in the PowerShell console window, I get:
PSModulePath=E:\Home\user\WindowsPowerShell\Modules;C:\WINDOWS\system32\WindowsP
owerShell\v1.0\Modules\
where E:\Home\user is where my "My Documents" folder is. So, one heuristic may be to check if PSModulePath contains a user dependent path.
In addition, in a console window, I get:
!::=::\
in the environment. From the PowerShell ISE, I get:
!::=::\
!C:=C:\Documents and Settings\user