I want to have on-the-device database for my iphone app. It concerns with the data, which comes from dictionary consisting of 200.000 things and their definitions. It is only related with text-type data as appeared. My questions:
1- Does SQLite hold all of these data?
2- When the client downloaded my app, he/she will also have the db in his/her device. Does app store allow me to update my app's db and upload my new release? (i don't know these issues well by the way)
3- And can any client, who downloaded my app, hack and obtain my database? Is there any prevention methods? Is SQLite resilient enough against these?
1- Does SQLite hold all of these data?
Yes, SQLite can cope with this amount of data.
2- When the client downloaded my app,
he/she will also have the db in
his/her device. Does app store allow
me to update my app's db and upload my
new release? (i don't know these
issues well by the way)
The general approach is to store the SQLite database in your application bundle and then copy the database into the application's document directory on the device when the application is first run. On subsequent updates to your applciation, you should check if the database within the document directory is the same version and update it if necessary. See the existing Run NSBundle from the documents folder question/answer for more information on this.
3- And can any client, who downloaded
my app, hack and obtain my database?
Is there any prevention methods? Is
SQLite resilient enough against these?
It's fairly trivial to open up an app (the deployment package is just a zip file after all), so yes, it will be possible to obtain access to your database data. Unfortunately there's no easy way around this that I'm aware of. (You could I suppose download the data from a server when you first run you app, but it'll still be accessible on a jailbroken device.)
Sometimes, you just have to bite the bullet and accept the fact that your data is going to be ripped off.
1) sqllite can definitely hold that amount of data.
2) You can put up an option of refreshing the database in your app. That can be used to sync the local db with the server copy. Updated db can also be added with the new version of the app.
3) You can encrypt your local db using SQLCipher for protecting your application db against hacks.
Related
I currently have an iOS app that provides a sqlite DB for the data backend to the app. This data is basically a list of information. Within this app I allow the users to mark records as bookmarked (sets a value in the DB). The problem here is when I post updates to the app via the internet (update through software) for data changes, the new downloaded DB wipes out the old one thereby removing the user customizations.
Any ideas on an easy method to search the current sqlite DB for those changes, store them temporarily, then import the new DB and transfer the changes to the new DB? Could I for instance use a Core Data element at the same time as using the sqlite DB backend? Maybe a key/value pair system?
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
-LK
The way I've done it is this:
For your new version, rename your .sqlite file e.g. foo-v2.sqlite. Then, during initialization, check to see if the sqlite file for the old version is there - if so, copy over the necessary info and then delete the old sqlite file.
I am developing an iPhone app which retrieves information via NSUrlRequest and displays through UIWebView.
I want to hold initial data (such as HTML pages, images) as a cache so that users of my app can access to data without network costs at the first time.
Then, if data on my web server are updated, I would download them and update the cache.
For performance issues, I think it is better to store data on file system than on core data.
Yet, I think it's not possible to release a new app writing data on disk.
So, I am about to store initial data(or initial cache) at Core Data, and when users launch my app for the first time, I would copy the data to disk (like /Library folder).
Is it, do you think, a good approach?
Or,...hmm, can I access to Core Data using NSUrlRequest?
One more question,
I might access to file system using NSURL, which is the same as to data on the Web. (right?)
My app would compare version of the cache with version of data on my web server, and if it's old, retrieve new data.
and my app will access only to file system.
All data are actually HTML pages including script, and images. And, I want to cache them.
could you suggest a better design?
Thank you.
Is it, do you think, a good approach? Or,...hmm, can I access to Core Data using NSUrlRequest?
No.
One more question, I might access to file system using NSURL, which is the same as to data on the Web. (right?) My app would compare version of the cache with version of data on my web server, and if it's old, retrieve new data. and my app will access only to file system. All data are actually HTML pages including script, and images. And, I want to cache them.
Yes.
But you could also be more clever. And by "more clever" I mean "Matt Gallagher." Take a look at his very interesting approach in Substituting local data for remote UIWebView requests.
I have an application on app-store which is DB driven, mean all the content is residing in the sqlite DB file. Now, I need to send another update of the app with some content update in the sqlite DB, so, What's the simplest way to make it sure that my DB gets updated during app update. Note that it's static app and there's no online services included to sync DB so I am looking for something simple, without involvement of server side services etc. Awaiting response. Thanks for your consideration.
If you make a copy of your database to somewhere like the Caches folder, you should add an extra table to the database with an entry for the database version. Add something like 2011-11-23 as a string or date to a "db_version" entry. When you update the database, update that field. When your app starts, check the app bundle version of the database against the copied database. If the app bundle version is newer, copy it after deleting the old one.
If the database file is used from the app bundle without being copied, you don't need to do anything. The old version will be deleted when the app is updated.
this is my first question here.
Well, I am developing an iPhone application that will use coredata, but the theres not going to be an option to insert data into the database of the app.
I want to know how to pre-populate it's database.
I thought of creating a plist with all the info and make a function to put it all into the coredata database if the database is not set yet...
but I want to know if it is the right way to do so.
Thanks all.
The easiest way is to create a desktop application with the same model (the exact same model even, just link it in). Then have Interface Builder create you a default UI for it and enter the data. Far easier than doing it on a device.
Once you have the data then include the SQLite file in your bundle and since your app is read only as you claimed; point the NSPersistentStoreCoordinator at the file in your app bundle and Bob's your uncle.
Creating an app on the desktop takes about 5 minutes and will save you far more time on the data entry side.
You can pre-create the database file (sqlite file) using your device and put that in the bundle when you distribute it. When you run the app for the first time you can move that from your applications bundle you can move it to the documents directory where core data will read it.
You can also have a function that runs at the start of your applications first run where it reads from your plist and creates the appropriate objects.
I have a content based, read-only iPhone app. Users can select favorite topics, which I need to track. Some topics I'd like to make available between app updates through the App Store. I'll need to track if users have downloaded these particular topics or not until the App Store update is available. This approach will consist of two tables for user tracking. All other tables contain mainly static content, save any new downloaded entries.
Before I began tracking user content, I'd always deploy the database on app updates. An overwrite - simple. But now I need to track certain user configurations. Rather than trying to keep track of which app version a user has and running through a list of sql scripts in the correct order, so the user is at the right database version, I'm thiking to use two databases. One contains static content and the other user data. The static content database is always overwritten. That keeps things simple. The database currently is 250kb. It will grow very slowly.
I have plans to use SDK 3.0 push notification and peer-to-peer as well, which will store any user config data in the user database.
Any one see problems with this approach?
This sounds alright to me. If you're using SQLite, you may want to look into the ATTACH DATABASE command, which lets you keep two databases open on the same connection.